Truth or Consequences
In Part 1, Emer de Vattel’s treatise The Law of Nations can be found in the Laws and Regulations of the College of William and Mary circa. 1837 as the textbook for Natural and National Law. Here, I follow-up with the 1830 edition, and the conviction for Vattel’s inerrancy is evident as the course curriculum mandated: “..shall be Vattel”
Comparing the acceptance of the Law of Nations over time we see Vattel’s masterpiece garnered immediate recognition among his contemporaries as well as in the annals of history.
In Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics, “The work quickly established Vattel as a major authority on natural jurisprudence. It also changed his personal situation. In 1759 the elector of Saxony finally recalled Vattel to Dresden, appointed him to the Privy Council, and made him chief adviser to the government of Saxony on foreign affairs.”
Having stood the test of time, Vattel’s works are also referenced in the Encyclopædia Britannica as both influential and authoritative in the United States.
In The Authority of Vattel by Charles G. Fenwick, Vattel's treatise on the Law of Nations “was quoted by judicial tribunals, in speeches before legislative assemblies, and in the decrees and correspondence of executive officials. It was the manual of the student, the reference work of the statesman, and the text from which the political philosopher drew inspiration.”
“In testimony of the authority exercised by Vattel's treatise, one has only to turn to the decisions of the British and American courts on questions involving the rules of international law, and time and again the court will be found citing a paragraph from Vattel in support of its position.”
Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States. Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.
If Barack Obama was eligible, why would he have proffered several forged and fraudulent identity documents?
Defender of the Truth