Thursday, December 27, 2012

Team Obama (U.S. Atty.) Seeks More Time To Quash California Subpoenas; Files Opposition For Temporary Restraining Order To Halt Electoral College

As reported here Dr. Orly Taitz subpoenaed numerous individuals involved in the Grinols v. Electoral College including Barack Obama. The U.S. Attorney just filed a motion to extend time for responding to the subpoenas and filed the opposition to the motion for a temporary restraining order to halt the electoral count. Last week a hearing was set for January 3rd, 2013. EXCERPTS:

DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENAS

First, you have not delivered a copy of each subpoena to the persons named in the subpoenas, as required by of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(1). Instead, you have simply mailed by Federal Express copies of your subpoenas to either the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Hawaii (in the case of your subpoena to the President) or to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia (in the case of your subpoenas to the Commissioner of Social Security, the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, and the Director of Selective Service). In the case of your subpoena to Darrell Issa, your subpoena does not reflect any service whatsoever.

Second, with the exception of the President (who is a named party), the subpoenas require the named individuals to travel more than 100 miles to the place specified for production of documents. Such a requirement in a subpoena to a non-party is prohibited absent court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(2)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c (3)(A)(ii). [...]

Federal Defendants intend to file a formally noticed motion to quash the subpoenas forthwith and hereby ask the Court to extend the deadline for responding to the subpoenas until after the Court disposes of the motion to quash the subpoenas. [...]

MOTION CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118079864

DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

The Petition lists Barack Obama in his capacity as “Candidate for the U.S. President in 2012,” the Electoral College, the Congress, the Vice President of the United States in his capacity as President of the Senate, the Governor of California, and the California Secretary of State, as defendants.

However, none of the defendants has been properly served under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Plaintiffs have provided only the U.S. Attorney’s Office with their Petition and Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, not any of the named federal defendants. [...]

Whether or not the President is in possession of a valid social security card, selective service registration or any particular type of birth certificate is simply irrelevant to his eligibility for the Presidency under Article II, section 1 of the Constitution. [...]

Furthermore, where plaintiffs plead nothing other than a wholly attenuated claim to injury, no public interest is served by granting the relief plaintiffs seek. To the contrary, unsettling the results of the election and disrupting the operation of Congress on the basis of plaintiffs' conclusory allegations works an immeasurable harm to the public. In such circumstances, plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied. [...] - Court filings via Dr. CONspiracy.

OPPOSITION CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118079957

CASE DETAILS: California Judge Sets Hearing For TRO Enjoining Congress From Certifying Obama’s Votes - CLICK HERE.

Grinols et al v Electoral College et al - Motion To Extend Time For Responding To Subpoenas - California El...

Grinols et al v Electoral College et al - Opposition To Temporary Restraining Order - California Electoral...

WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...