Friday, October 5, 2012


Ohio Prosecutor David Joyce Responds To Obama's Connecticut 
Social Security Number: Private Investigator Susan Daniels Fires Back

Ohio Prosecutor David Joyce Responds To P.I. Susan Daniels About Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number
- PROSECUTOR JOYCE'S RESPONSE EMBEDDED BELOW AND HERE.

Private Investigator Susan Daniels fires back: We are in serious trouble when a Republican prosecutor, David Joyce, who is now running for congress, does not care enough to look into a felony being committed by Barack Obama. The information in the letter from the SSA was added after I discovered that Obama is using a fraudulent social security number. The residence had to be in the state where the number was issued. They are lying. The issue could be cleared up by the prosecutor sending a letter to the SSA asking for a copy of the original application that goes with 042-68-4425. Apparently, that was too much trouble.

From the David Joyce Wikipedia page: Joyce was nominated by Senators Mike DeWine and George Voinovich to serve as U.S. Attorney. However, serious questions arose during his FBI background investigation and President Bush did not move forward with the nomination.

Serious questions should now be asked about why he is the Republican congressional nominee. - Susan Daniels

See Susan Daniels Original Affidavit About Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number here.

See Private Investigator Susan Daniels response to Snopes and the Obots here and here.



2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 


SHOCK CLAIM: Breitbart Reporter Charles Johnson Has Documented Proof Obama is Indonesian Citizen - AUDIO HERE. 

WATCH SHERIFF JOE'S 2ND OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.

WATCH SHERIFF JOE'S 1ST PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html 

SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...

64 comments:

  1. Very interesting comment linked from the image at the top of this article!

    "Why isn't the P.D. pounding harder on David Joyce to reveal the results of the background check that cost him the U.S. Attorney job? People in the county party are saying that it's career ending and that could turn the seat over to the democrats. The public deserves to know before we vote!"

    http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/08/david_joyce_has_friends_on_bot.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ohhhhhh I see, Barack Obama just had a CT mailing address, he didn't live there, uh huh, uh huh...he was a teenager in Hawaii and he mailed in an application for a social security number and he listed a CT address as his mailing address, sure thing, that makes a lot of sense. Oh and he must have had someone who was at this mailing address gather the mail from social security and forward it to him out in Hawaii, sure, that's what happened. Nothing to see here folks, move along now. GRRRRRRRRRRR

    ReplyDelete
  3. @dotdotcom
    Yeah, a 15 year old just happened to use a CT SSN. It is so obvious that these guys are covering for Oscama. Also, if identity theft is done from within the SS admin by scrubbing names then I guess our gov't has to overlook both crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Which felony statute is Susan Daniels referring to? Please provide the United States Code section number.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, birthers, you are simply going to have to buckle down on your investigation efforts and find out who that SSN was originally assigned to.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Susan Daniels says,

    "The issue could be cleared up by the prosecutor sending a letter to the SSA asking for a copy of the original application that goes with 042-68-4425."

    Perhaps Ms. Daniels would be kind enough to cite the provision of FOIA that exempts a prosecutor's request from the usual provision that personal information shall not be released if it pertains to an individual who is living.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ A Real Lawyer . . Did you get your law degree at Monkey U ?

      Delete
  7. @A Real Lawyer

    Susan Daniels says,

    "The issue could be cleared up by the prosecutor sending a letter to the SSA asking for a copy of the original application that goes with 042-68-4425."

    Perhaps Ms. Daniels would be kind enough to cite the provision of FOIA that exempts a prosecutor's request from the usual provision that personal information shall not be released if it pertains to an individual who is living.


    And then we can move on to the Ohio Social Security number.

    Thanks. You're a real problem solver, in your day job.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Anonymous

    "Well, birthers, you are simply going to have to buckle down on your investigation efforts and find out who that SSN was originally assigned to."

    That's going to be a problem since Daniels has proof that the person was either born in 1890 or 1990.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, she not only has no proof of either date, she doesn't even have competent evidence of such... In fact she has no evidence, competent or not.

      Delete
  9. @A Real Lawyer

    Just curious Real Lawyer,
    Two questions for you...

    1) Would you buy a car from a salesman that repeatedly refused to show you the "CarFax" and then finally decides to show you what you believe to be a fake/"CarFox"?
    2) What deserves greater due dilligence and vetting, the purchase of a car or the presidency of the USA?

    Loopholes don't change whether or not someone is scamming. Would you have us believe that just because the rules are either being overlooked or skewed in the favor of the scammers that we should just say "uh okay" and just accept it, defying what our common sense tells us about any other similar situations in our lives of lesser importance?

    Oscama is working for us. He claims he works for all Americans and that people deserve the truth. So he should pony up his records and prove us all wrong.

    One last thing, if you felt this car saleman was scamming you and someone else came up and actually made excuses for him, what would you think of that person? I know what I would think... I would think that the other guy is in on the scam too.





    ReplyDelete
  10. Susan Daniels said,

    "The information in the letter from the SSA was added after I discovered that Obama is using a fraudulent social security number."

    This is not true. The SSA website has said this since at least 2004. The wayback machine website shows this same statement in 2004.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Get out of here u stupid obama ass protector..People like u make normal people sick...What an arrogant sack of shit u are!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. 4:25, You do it. Birthers need to begin the process of arresting all congressional members now.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Good story about Obummers drug addictions and why he lost the debate to Romney at KevinDujan@Hillbuzz,org

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I knew it. . Oboob didn't get a chance to hit his crack pipe before he went on stage.

      Delete
  14. Hey you ignorant OBOTS how many people do you know with SSNs from a state where THEY NEVER LIVED???? Obviously common sense is something you can't learn or you would know how stupid your statements are! I guess you love this lying Usurping bast*rd more than you love your country or you wouldn't be supporting his criminal ass. I hope you all rot in hell someday for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My husband was a high school student in his hometown in Iowa in the mid-'60's when the SSA gave him a Minnesota SSN. My mother lived in the upper Midwest, but certainly not Iowa, when the SSA gave her an Iowa SSN in the late '30's. Ask around! You'll find out that assigning an "incorrect" state code is not that uncommon!

      Delete
  15. Having read Susan Daniel's affidavit I don't see that Joyce really had any other recourse. She makes the claim that Obama is using the SS# of another person, but in her own affidavit she never names that person. She merely claims that he "must be" using another person's SS#. Exactly what should the prosecutor pursue if she is unable to provide that name?

    Also, her claim that the only way that he could receive his SS# is through a Conneticut residence, but when the very agency that would be responsible for the issuing of these numbers states that this is just not the case, then once again the prosecutor has nothing to pursue. There is simply no case. The number isssued returns to Obama, and no one else. Susan Daniels has a very very long way to go to prove a fake or stolen SS number is being used by the President.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bet A real Lawyer got his degree at Vanderbuilt in Nashville. The black and gold of Vandy. He fit right in with his gold teeth and his greasy black head. I bet he wore a rubber over his head so the grease wouldn't drip all over every thing. Haha

      Delete
  16. "Hey you ignorant OBOTS how many people do you know with SSNs from a state where THEY NEVER LIVED????"

    And if someone told you that they did in fact know someone who had a SS# from a state they never lived in, would you believe them? If your answer is, "no," then why should anyone waste their time trying to prove to you otherwise? There are over threehundred million people in this country. I gaurantee you that there are plenty of examples of people who have obtained social security numbers that would not normally be issued to the state that they reside, and this would occur for a number of reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  17. CanTone, take your Obottish race-baiting elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Susan Daniels says,

    "The issue could be cleared up by the prosecutor sending a letter to the SSA asking for a copy of the original application that goes with 042-68-4425.""

    There isn't any issue to clear up. At least, not for real Americans. Birfers have their own issues. Real Americans needn't bother taking notice.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @AR925 - "Hey you ignorant OBOTS how many people do you know with SSNs from a state where THEY NEVER LIVED????"

    A Social Security number is a TAX construct for retirement planning. If the IRS isn't complaining (and they DO complain, believe me), Obama's social security number isn't anyone else's business. How and where he got it is an IRS concern.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Anonymous @ 4:39

    "That's going to be a problem since Daniels has proof that the person was either born in 1890 or 1990."

    What Daniels has is a credit report with a stray "1890" date on it. That is not "proof" of anything.

    The courts and prosecutors want Daniels to identify the person to whom this alleged SSN belongs. In four years Daniels has never been able to answer that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anonymous @ 5:23

    "Get out of here u stupid obama ass protector..People like u make normal people sick...What an arrogant sack of shit you are!!!!"

    Barf away, or stop reading this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So the gullibl on this site still believe voting for Mitt will solve all ills including this one.
    The GOP is up to its neck and Romney totally complicit.
    Try this
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=39xn1VkrHVQ
    Russia Today.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @rikker
    So if someone is beat up because he's gay and the cops decide not to investigate because they don't like gays, I guess its okay since its the cops concern.
    It is our business since he has and wants to continue to work for us.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A Social Security number is a TAX construct for retirement planning. If the IRS isn't complaining (and they DO complain, believe me), Obama's social security number isn't anyone else's business. How and where he got it is an IRS concern.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    My my....now we suddenly have co-opted lovers of the IRS. Obots/libs really do have a hatred of the working man and his right to keep more of his hard earned money. Obots can't help but turn against honest working brothers and sisters all due to their lemming worship of their people hating loser idol.

    ReplyDelete
  25. There isn't any issue to clear up. At least, not for real Americans. Birfers have their own issues. Real Americans needn't bother taking notice.
    ================================
    Then you must be a birther as well since you are taking a LOT of notice. Obots always hang themselves by their own ropes!!! ROFL

    ReplyDelete
  26. And if someone told you that they did in fact know someone who had a SS# from a state they never lived in, would you believe them?
    --------------------------------
    As typical for Obots they like to leave out the years they are so loudly proclaiming their ignorance by and using in their non-argument. Obots never have their facts....like their stooopeed lazy idol demonstrated in a debate against his first ever challenger who did. Zero, as are his lemmings, was definitely equal to an empty chair.....or....a naked emperor! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  27. This is not true. The SSA website has said this since at least 2004. The wayback machine website shows this same statement in 2004.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    You should use a more reliable and less Obot convenient data base. In fact, now the data bases have been so scrubbed that that particular SSN used by Zero DOES NOT EXIST. Even worse! Susan is right. And SSA also better coordinate itself with its gov's verify system since both came up with the same info in the past which is now conveniently scrubbed...."no match for # with Obama owner"! Since it is giving various forms of info when asked then it must explain the discrepancies or be considered fraudulent as well. It's otherwise good for nothing within a good for nothing regime!!! While they too are laughing with Obots all the way to the bank that honest citizens pay for. Sick, sick Obots!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Perhaps Ms. Daniels would be kind enough to cite the provision of FOIA that exempts a prosecutor's request from the usual provision that personal information shall not be released if it pertains to an individual who is living.
    ===============================
    Perhaps you should instead!

    ReplyDelete
  29. hussein soetoro and boyfriend holding hands photo!!...
    http://citizenwells.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/obamaandpakistanibuddy.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  30. Obama is violating ORC 2913.49 "Identity Fraud" and there is no need for a FOIA request if a criminal investigation is being conducted. And, yes, they added new language when last year they started issuing social security numbers randomly. It not not attempts to fool people about Obama's number but it will be a help to illegals. It will also be a nightmare for law enforcement.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous said...[Reply]
    "Hey you ignorant OBOTS how many people do you know with SSNs from a state where THEY NEVER LIVED????"

    And if someone told you that they did in fact know someone who had a SS# from a state they never lived in, would you believe them? If your answer is, "no," then why should anyone waste their time trying to prove to you otherwise? There are over threehundred million people in this country. I gaurantee you that there are plenty of examples of people who have obtained social security numbers that would not normally be issued to the state that they reside, and this would occur for a number of reasons.
    October 5, 2012 8:39 PM

    "I gaurantee you that there are plenty of examples of people who have obtained social security numbers that would not normally be issued to the state that they reside,"

    How many of those "plenty of examples" are running for Prsident?

    How many people have SSN's that do not pass the e-verify system??

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Susan Daniels

    Here is what it says today:

    The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

    Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

    Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

    http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html


    ReplyDelete
  33. @Susan Daniels

    "they added new language when last year they started issuing social security numbers randomly."

    Here it what it said in 2001:

    The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

    Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

    Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20010302160247/http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html

    So what was changed?

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Susan Daniels

    The randomization process was outlined in 2007.

    "On July 3, 2007, the SSA published its intent to randomize the nine-digit SSN in the Federal Register Notice, Protecting the Integrity of Social Security Numbers [Docket No. SSA 2007-0046]."

    http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/randomization.html


    ReplyDelete
  35. @4:05 - "It is our business since he has and wants to continue to work for us."

    Then don't vote for him. That's your only recourse.

    Americans are NOT required to have Social Security numbers. It is not an indication of citizenship. Jus soli is THE indication of Natural Born citizenship in America.

    ReplyDelete
  36. For the record, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is Michael J. Astrue, appointed by President George W. Bush to a six year term in 2007.

    ReplyDelete
  37. It is not an indication of citizenship.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    In this case it's an "indication" of felony....nice try to change subject.

    ReplyDelete
  38. October 6, 2012 11:33 AM
    ++++++++++++++++++++++
    Whatever point you were trying to make had nothing to do with the particular facts of the SSN/s used by Obama. In fact, now, the previous data bases used to reflect the crazy associations between the Obama name and that particular SSN in question have been scrubbed that the # itself does not in fact now even exist. That isn't any solution....in fact it simply means SSN fraud...use of # that does not exist....use of non-existing SSN # means you dummied one up....not "a good thing"!

    ReplyDelete
  39. "I gaurantee you that there are plenty of examples of people who have obtained social security numbers that would not normally be issued to the state that they reside,"
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Then name those examples...and I'll guarantee none have any likeness to the situation of Obama and the # he's been using. And now that the knowledge is out there he's simply not using the number any longer....uh oh!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Sure thing Obot! Provide some proof of your claim. Everybody that I've spoken to and discussed this with all have social security numbers with a prefix that coincides with the state they registered in.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Anonymous: "It is not an indication of citizenship.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    In this case it's an "indication" of felony....nice try to change subject."


    In this case it's a moving of the goalposts. You've gone from being a birfer to a whiny little Barney Fife hollering "Citizen's Arrayest!!"

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Anonymous @ 6:35

    "Perhaps Ms. Daniels would be kind enough to cite the provision of FOIA that exempts a prosecutor's request from the usual provision that personal information shall not be released if it pertains to an individual who is living.
    ===============================
    Perhaps you should instead!"

    ****************

    Okay, I will. Here it is:













    You see, there is no exemption. A prosecutor cannot obtain that info from the SSA.

    Live with it.

    ReplyDelete
  43. It is sickening to know that Americans who are protecting Obama, an ineligible, would rather make a mockery out of dedicated and prove Americans like Apario and Susan Daniels and Orley Taitz. These people are aiding and abetting Obama in his lawlessness.

    ReplyDelete
  44. In 2011 Obama started working to get the SS# selected randomly. Up until then it was done by the numbers indicating what state and/or district. I do not know if this has been changed for sure by now. Sounds like he is wanting all this to go away, so he is changing the laws to conform to his felonies.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous

    Not true, they were discussing it in 2007.

    See the link above posted on October 6, 2012 11:47 AM by Anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  46. So,

    How many example do the muppets like Death Kitty want of folks with "irregular" SSN's before they agree they are just full of it?

    Take mine, NJ resident, applied for my SSN from NJ, got a 240 prefix number which is N Carolina, never been resident in NC in my life.

    All I can assume is that when entering my zip code, they fat fingered the keyboard entry and entered 27xxx instead of 07xxx.

    Guess what Unle Sam desn't care less and has been taking my FICA on that "irregular" nuber ever since, my time in uniform and a TS/SCI rating never had an issue either.

    So how many more do you need before you stop beating the dead meat?

    ReplyDelete
  47. I think people ("birthers") are missing the obvious.

    They assume that "Obama" is using somebody else's SSN (let's say, from a guy named John Doe).

    However, what if the guy who calls himself "Obama" is actually somebody else and is using the SSN of the real Barack Obama (and possibly his BC also)?

    I wonder why among all the zillion theories we have heard so far, this has never been thoroughly discussed.

    I mean, people jump on every stupid unsourced claim ("he was a drug mule in Afghanistan", "his parents worked for the CIA", "he frequented gay bars in Chicago" etc.), but no-one ever considers that possibility that actually would explain a helluva lot of open questions. Why?

    ReplyDelete
  48. > Americans are NOT required to have Social Security numbers. It is not an indication of citizenship.

    I think the point is that IF his SSN can be proven to be somebody else's, it is at least a strong indication that there is something very wrong with "Obama"'s background.

    I agree that by itself it doesn't prove he was born somewhere else, or is ineligible for some other reason. But it would be a red flag that would make every sane prosecutor look further into evidence regarding "Obama"'s documentation.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @3:12 "However, what if the guy who calls himself "Obama" is actually somebody else and is using the SSN of the real Barack Obama (and possibly his BC also)?"

    Obama is the scion of the rampaging Kenyan hordes who conquered Hawaii in 1952 and laid waste to the country for 16 years until candidate Nixon led a militia of Oregonians to free that state from Kenyan bondage.

    Until the birthers recognize this historical factoid, they will never gain traction in the realm of national politics.

    ReplyDelete
  50. GALLUP: 5-POINT ROMNEY BOUNCE...

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/157907/romney-narrows-vote-gap-historic-debate-win.aspx

    POLL: Romney leads among independents 51-35...

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/08/Battleground-Romney-Crushing-Obama-Indies

    'Enthusiasm' gap 13-point spread for Republican...

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82122.html

    ReplyDelete
  51. GALLUP: 5-POINT ROMNEY BOUNCE...

    LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!

    Last week Gallup's numbers were "SKEWED" by Democratic bias!! This week they are right on the money!!!

    ReplyDelete
  52. The emperor has no clothes!

    Military Times Poll: Romney 66% Obama 26%

    http://militarytimes.com/news/2012/10/military-times-poll-romney-bests-obama-2-1-100712

    OUCH!

    ReplyDelete
  53. I guess Obama's Harvard Law Review bio stating him as being 'born in Kenya' must have been merely a typo then. Yeah, that happens all the time...

    ReplyDelete
  54. > Obama's Harvard Law Review bio stating him as being 'born in Kenya'

    I think you're mixing that up with the promotional flyer for his planned bio. There is no indication any actual biography ever stated "born in Kenya".

    Please stop confounding the issue, that's another Obot/Alinsky tactic.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.