Monday, October 1, 2012

New Book Proves President Obama Not a Natural-Born US Citizen
PR-Web @ Yahoo News

According to the book, new research proves beyond any doubt what is meant by the term "natural born citizen" as it appears in the presidential eligibility clause in Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution.

San Carlos, CA (PRWEB) October 01, 2012
Just in time for the 2012 presidential elections, author Bob Gard has released an eBook that sheds light on a controversy that, over the last few years, has become a grim contest of political wills. The book offers a historically verified definition of the term "natural born citizen" as it appears in the presidential eligibility clause in Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution.

With the ponderous but eminently searchable title of "On Gard, Obama, You Are An Unconstitutional President Because You Are Not A Natural-Born Citizen, Which I Shall Prove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt," this 1,722-page volume lays out conclusive, verbatim evidence that the reader can analyze independently of the writer's own opinions. Available at Amazon.com, the eBook can be downloaded on PCs in the Microsoft Word™ 2010 “docx” file format. The 175-megabyte file requires a longer-than-average downloading time, and some readers may experience intermittent warnings of “not responding.” Author Bob Gard says, "The wait will be worth it for those who wish to follow a path back to constitutionality."

Bob Gard is the first person who pieces together this comprehensive definition of natural-born citizenship using both correlative and corroborative evidence. For more than 220 years, much of this evidence has been readily available within the public domain, but no one has yet brought the parts together into a conclusive whole. In order to define natural-born citizenship, this book traces how the law of nature, the law of nations, the British legal system and the American legal system have evolved through the course of history. "The evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama's claim to presidential office is unconstitutional due to his violation of the Constitution’s presidential eligibility clause," Gard says.

CONTINUED HERE: http://news.yahoo.com/book-proves-president-obama-not-natural-born-us-150108550.html
 


2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 


SHOCK CLAIM: Breitbart Reporter Charles Johnson Has Documented Proof Obama is Indonesian Citizen - AUDIO HERE. 

WATCH SHERIFF JOE'S 2ND OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.

WATCH SHERIFF JOE'S 1ST PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html 

SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...

37 comments:

  1. Can someone, anyone, explain how place of birth and citizenship of parents has any bearing on the loyalty of a person to their country? Any sceintific evidence at all? Any study that was done that shows that a person born of citizen parents on home soil somehow inspires more loyalty and patriotism to a country than a person born elsewhere to non-citizen parents?

    I mean, isn't this really a bunch of superstitious nonsense, that really has no proof whatsoever? It is almost as ridiculous as the notion that a father passes on citizenship and not a mother. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and sounds more like what a colonialist power would claim and not a rational and free thinking people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. The ANSWER to your question can be so patently OBVIOUS by Obama's "actions" and WHAT HE IS DOING TO AMERICA.

      I mean I agree with you basic premise that some immigrants can indeed developed a "love" for this country and be trusted to do the best for America.

      BUT Obama is PROOF we should not take that chance with the President (Commander in Chief).

      Delete

    2. Also remember that "Natural Born Citizen" becomes irrelevant when he is NOT EVEN A "CITIZEN" !!!

      Is your point that it is OK to have an ILLEGAL ALIEN as president and Commander in Chief ???

      Delete
  2. Indisputable to O-Holes - Obama's father was not, nor ever, a US Citizen. Own it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. And neither is Obama a "citizen".

      There is not one shred of evidence President Obama is a "citizen".

      Even his attorney ADMITTED the April 27,'11 released LFBC is "NOT LEGAL" (and that his ONLY "LEGAL" birth-certificate was the 2008 short-form that does NOT prove Hawaii birth, (as per Hawaii DOH 338 - 17.8).

      (But WOULD have produced the birth-announcements.,)


      Delete
  3. @Anonymous

    hahaha, is your way of trying to justify it now?

    it went from being a "conspiracy theory for right wing nut jobs" to you now trying to justify it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "it went from being a "conspiracy theory for right wing nut jobs" to you now trying to justify it?"

    No... and could care less about the legitimacy of Obama or not. I have no intention of voting for him in the next election. The guy is a disaster.

    But, I am interested in this idea that coil and blood have some bearing on a person's loyalty and patriotism towards their country. I really don't get it. It sounds more like tradition based on superstition and not actual or factual evidence. It seems like it limits us. It disqualifies people who might otherwise be a great President. And it seems that will limit ourselves based on a superstition that blood and soil have some bearing on the loyalty of a person.

    Let's face it... Bill Ayers is a natural born citizen and not one person here would ever want to see that man as our President nor would they argue that he has any loyalty at all for this country. He is proof that the soil and blood argument is completely a bogus one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Death Angel

    Now, if only the Constitution mentioned parents, even once. Or any source. Golly gee. That would just make your case...

    To bad you have no citation for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Obama is the most Anti-American president ever and he isn't a natural born citizen.....sounds like reasonable empirical evidence the founders knew what they were doing.

    Of course it's no guarantee, but it increases the odds of complete allegiance to one's country........and since we have at least a couple of hundred million natural born citizens to choose from of all races, there is no reason to ignore the Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Anonymous

    I mean, isn't this really a bunch of superstitious nonsense, that really has no proof whatsoever? It is almost as ridiculous as the notion that a father passes on citizenship and not a mother. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and sounds more like what a colonialist power would claim and not a rational and free thinking people.

    I mean OBot...you are an ignorant clown for not knowing history or just another common liar.

    ReplyDelete
  8. All we have to do is look at the decisions made by obama to realize that he has no loyalty to the US and it's citizens .. everything else is moot... what's missing is any real opposition ... we were manipulated into tea parties, birthers to absorb the discontent ... both political parties won and we lost .. a national leader never emerged although some think it's Donald Trump

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Anonymous

    Anon wrote: "Can someone, anyone, explain how place of birth and citizenship of parents has any bearing on the loyalty of a person to their country?"

    Anon, in effect, and in a word, you are asking others to do your homework for you.

    This site has numerous easily accessed archived scholarly articles/features which discuss in-depth the natural born citizenship issue. There are also numerous other websites, such as AER2SUPERPAC.com (which is linked in a side-box above) that offer a wealth of information on the topic. In addition, as ORYR posted today, a new e-book of some 1,700 pages on Article II is now available for download.

    You are entitled to your opinion, but you should perform due civic diligence to ensure that it is an informed one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Yankee Sojourner

    An informed citizen cannot be a birther, and the reverse is also precluded.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Woo Hoo! Constitutionalists had a major victory today! You betcha, MAJOR!!!

    SCOTUS denied Weldon v 0.

    This means M v H stands people. The debate is over! SCOTUS has said so in umpteen hundreds of ways. This denial is a VICTORY!

    Like someone said up thread, own it obots, own it!!! SCOTUS is accepting M v H as precedent.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How is it that Obama is leading Romney in every swing state? Is it possible that he could get elected again? Because I fear he will author an executive order that guts the 22nd Amendment and run again in 2016. He might even cancel the 2012 election.

    If he does that, why, I'll start blogging at several different places, not just here.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous

    By the Supreme Court ruling that Weldon was wrong, it somehow upholds a law that doesn't even factor into the lower court's ruling?

    Methinks you missed a train of thought somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  14. CORRECTING GROSS ERROR ABOVE-

    An informed citizen CAN ONLY BE A BIRTHER (aka a Constitutionalist; one who knows the Constitution is still the supreme law of the land no matter what any traitor might say to the contrary).

    In addition, people who are not birthers are either:
    1) ignorant,

    2) scared of the truth (and believe they can not make a difference),

    3) plain out-and-out lovers of evil and treason, or

    4) any combination of the above


    So which are you?

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Anonymous

    I'm none of your choices. I'm an informed voter. But I can't be a birther because of being informed. Understanding the law means I could never side with you since it doesn't.

    So being a birther makes one:

    1) a racist
    2) an idiot
    3) an idiot racist
    4) a racist idiot

    Which one are you?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Who is Bob Gard?

    ReplyDelete
  17. How is it that Obama is leading Romney in every swing state?

    Is it possible that he could get elected again?

    *******************

    Yes it is very possible, and easy to explain.

    Elections are always inherently "close" due to exactly what Romney correctly stated, 47%-49% do NOT pay income-tax and therefore are LIBERALS that simply want the government to "do-more" for them. (and yes I know that number is not exactly correct as it also includes retired seniors and disabled, etc. that should not be demeaned)

    BUT ... in this case ... we CANNOT IGNORE THE RACIAL COMPONENT. 11-12% of the nation is black, and they ALL (96%) support him as they did in the last election. So about 11% of the current 47% that support Obama is indeed BLACK.

    Now it is also true that 60% of blacks normally vote "democrat" anyway, so I cannot honestly state he would be 11% lower if Obama was simply a "white" democrat, BUT at least 5% lower --- which is about WHAT WOULD BE EXPECTED in a normal Liberal vs Conservative race.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Now, if only the Constitution mentioned parents, even once. Or any source. Golly gee. That would just make your case...

    To bad you have no citation for it.

    *************************

    Minor vs Happersett and 5 subsequest Supreme Court decisions, and as recent as Senate Resolution 511.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Obama is the most Anti-American president ever and he isn't a natural born citizen.....sounds like reasonable empirical evidence the founders knew what they were doing.

    *********************

    WHY are we still talking "Natural Born" citizen when there is NO EVIDENCE what-so-ever that PROVES he is even a CITIZEN ???

    ILLEGAL ALIEN "Trumps" Natural Born --- (pun intended)

    ReplyDelete

  20. WHY do we need 1,722-pages to explain he is not a "Natural Born Citizen".

    Obama has "NO"-PAGES to document he is even a CITIZEN since his ATTORNEY ADMITTED that his LFBC released on April 27,'11 was NOT a "legal" birth-certificate and ONLY his 2008 short-form was "LEGAL".

    AND as per Hawaii DOH rule 338 - 17.8 does NOT "prove" he was Hawaii born since BC were indeed issued to OUT-OF-STATE/country residents.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So, what are you saying?

    ReplyDelete
  22. So, what are you saying?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Andy,

    Anyone who is for Obama is the antithesis of "being informed".

    Yup, 1) ignorant and 4) above are strong suits for "informed" Obama followers.

    Talk about sheep to the slaughter...

    ReplyDelete
  24. OK genius: What's the difference between a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN and a plain vanilla CITIZEN?

    Presidential candidates are SUPPOSE to be NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.

    But, Congressional candidates only need to be a CITIZEN.

    ReplyDelete
  25. If you're not a birther, you must be an afterbirther.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Anonymous

    It's the law!!! WHAT PART OF THAT NEEDS AN EXPLANATION?

    Don't need to read into 'why' it's the law, it just is.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @AndyNatural Born requires both parents be citizens. Shame you flunked logic.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Anonymous
    THE IMPORTANT ISSUE HERE IS THAT OUR CONSTITUTION REQUIRES A CANDIDATE FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT TO BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF AMERICA .
    THE FRAUDULENT COMMUNIST IMPOSTER WHO ILLEGALLY "OCCUPIES " OUR OVAL OFFICE AND WHITEHOUSE IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF AMERICA BECAUSE # 1 .HIS FATHER WAS NEVER A CITIZEN OF AMERICA. # 2. HE RECEIVED MONETARY AID AS A FOREIGN STUDENT FROM INDONESIA TO ATTEND OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE .

    ReplyDelete
  29. The only idiots still trying to get people to believe that a natural born citizen is the equivalent of a 14th amendment citizen are Barry's supporters, who don't give a crap if he's eligible or not anyway. Anybody who sincerely wanted the true definition could research for a night and find out really quickly what the framers were referring to.

    I wish Obots would just cut the crap and quit pretending like they believe the guy is eligible and hasn't committed multiple felony ID crimes. Nobody's buying it anymore, you look like complete fools now.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @Anonymous 1:59pm "Can someone, anyone, explain how place of birth and citizenship of parents has any bearing on the loyalty of a person to their country?"

    You can't be serious, have you been in a coma for the last 4 years?

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Anonymous

    This post of yours is now, definitely, vying for one of the most imbecilic on record, here on this site
    ABSOLUTELY, STUNNING , IN ITS LUDICROUSNESS

    WHO'S TO SAY THAT A BEING BORN IN ANOTHER GALAXY OF ANOTHER RACE MIGHT NOT CHOOSE TO BE LOYAL TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HERE ON EARTH

    SEE HOW STUPID YOU APPEAR

    ARTICLE II S1 CL 5 IS A RATIONAL ,,DOWN TO EARTH, ALBEIT NOT ALWAYS FAIR, NATIONAL SECURITY MEASURE TO PROTECT OUR SOVEREIGNTY NATIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL

    GET IT?
    PROBABLY NOT

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Andy
    only deluded morons , such as yourself, don't recognize "the blood" as the essence of NATURAL

    ReplyDelete
  33. For example in soccer You can see the true allegiance of immigrant children.
    In Europe for example are many Turks who have been born in the countries their parents immigrated to.
    When there is a soccer match between Turkey and the country they were born in, who do You think they root for?
    Right! For Turkey.
    Because it is the country of their parents.

    Therefore the allegiance is only guaranteed when a person is born in a country to citizen parents.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Anonymous 1:59pm "Can someone, anyone, explain how place of birth and citizenship of parents has any bearing on the loyalty of a person to their country?"


    There are many reasons for the POTUS (CIC) to be a NBC but the main reason is when a CIC sends any citizen into a war zone and people die, you shouldn't want someone who is not a citizen to kill your own country's sons and daughters or another hitler, who was not a natural born citizen of Germany. This bozo has sent lots of American soldiers to die and how do you think their parents (means both mom and pop,not adam and steve, because the s makes parent plural) and family members feel about that or how loyal Americans feel about a hitler sending many sons and daughters to die and could care less. It is so obvious that this bozo is jihading America in his own way. Try to put yourself in the place of all those families of German soldiers who sons, daughters and citizens died for a CIC who was not natural born citizen. Our whole country takes on the responsibility of every aspect of war , along with a legitimate CIC and the whole country should honor the ones who saved her and paid the ultimate price for God and country. America is rapidly losing this kind of patriotic thinking and soon many will not care about her because their loyalties lie elsewhere, so who will care about the unknown soldier anymore, (Answer, NOT MANY). lol, Surely not the illegals and the muslims. The Constitution defines NBC, as a citizen with both parents being American citizens but I think it should define a NBC as someone WHOSE GRANDPARENTS were citizen's AND loyal to the USA in every way. ayers premise is rhetoric, he is a traitor to the USA and never a good candidate for POTUS. A country MUST teach it's citizens loyality and honor for God and country from day one and anyone who wants to come here MUST have that kind of loyality or stay out. As we can all see now folks this is not a game. Evil has crept in while we were sleeping and taken control. Most citizens should be of the same mindset but as you read some of these comments there are commie want-a-be's everywhere. America could have been better than what she was at her peek moments, BUT now you see the "rest of the story." SHAME, DESTRUCTION, NWO, CHAOS AND CONFUSION is the order of the day.

    Jesus Saves, we are in the last days, ask Jesus to save you!

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.