Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Sheriff Joe challenges eligibility in Florida
Judge also wants White House to back its definition of natural-born citizen
Art Moore @ WND

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse lead investigator have submitted sworn affidavits in a Florida case challenging President Obama’s eligibility for the election ballot of the crucial swing-state that decided the 2000 presidential election.

Significantly, Judge Terry Lewis in Leon County – known for his rulings in the Bush v. Gore case at the center of the 2000 contested election – has confronted the White House for failing to support its claim that the term “natural born citizen” in the U.S. Constitution means something other than the offspring of two American citizens.

Lewis has scheduled a hearing for Monday at 9 a.m. at the Leon County Courthouse in Tallahassee to hear the Obama team’s motion to dismiss the case and determine whether it should go forward with discovery.

Affidavits from Arpaio, Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo and WND author and senior reporter Jerome Corsi have been filed ahead of the hearing. The briefs support the complaint’s charge that there is evidence Obama is constitutionally ineligible for the White House and, therefore, original documentation is needed to determine whether he should be on the ballot.

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C., watchdogs Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is representing a registered member of the Democratic Party, Michael Voeltz, who has filed the complaint as a Florida voter. Klayman’s work is supported by the non-profit ConstitutionActionFund.org.

Klayman told WND today that unlike other Obama eligibility cases, this case “likely will go the distance” because of the strength of Florida law, which provides voters with the right to challenge a candidate’s eligibility.

CONTINUED HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/sheriff-joe-challenges-eligibility-in-florida

#7 FROM SHERIFF JOE'S AFFIDAVIT: "Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama’s long-form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number." - Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio - June 12th, 2012

SHERIFF JOE'S AFFIDAVIT BELOW AND HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/96895159/Sheriff-Joe-Arpaio-Affidavit-Obama-s-Forged-Identity-Records-Florida-Ballot-Access-Challenge-6-12-2012
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Affidavit - Obama's Forged Identity Records - Florida Ballot Access Challenge - 6/12/2012

WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html 

SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...

71 comments:

  1. Please!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please!!!!!!!!!!!! Please!!!!!!!!!!!
    And Romney better NOT pick Rubio or Jindal!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "It is my belief" and "I believe" ...

    This is worthless.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keep Orly away, and we might have a chance! I still haven't figured out which side she is on. Either she is the worlds worst attorney, or she is working for Obama.

    The FL law, and the judge give this case a shot, as long as it doesn't become a circus.

    ReplyDelete
  4. reelect Obama in 2012,Hoax and Chains

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow... that says nothing. Im shocked. Not really. This is what you all have been waiting for. A sworn we got nothing, but if you will wait...
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  6. Now we are talking !!!!!! Ra , Ra, ya, team Arpaio... We are finally scoring one for the home team... This is huge, biggest point team Birther has scored... We be rocking, we be rolling, we be dancing in the streets....

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is significant and cannot be ignored. Sheriff Arpaio has been repeatedly subpoenaed by Taitz to appear and testify to the veracity of the Cold Case Posse's findings that he revealed in the 3/1/12 presser, and he has ignored all of them. The fact that he has enjoined Klayman's case speaks volumes as to the strength of the case and the possibility of a favorable ruling in the plaintiff's favor. Arpaio is no fool. This is significant.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The good sheriff ALSO named obama's SS # as questionable. He has not mentioned much about the SS# until now. Next Press Conference can not come soon enough...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Arpaio , Zullo and Corsi affidavits are all POS because.....wait for it.....

    HEARSAY IS NOT ADMISSIBLE.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Grandmas Mad

    If Romney picks Rubio or Jindal, I think it obvious either 2 things:

    1) The GOP Establishment under estimates the whole birther issue to its election loss demise

    or,

    2) The GOP with Romney being their patsy, is deliberately taking a dive

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Anonymous

    Oh, you dumb OBots slay me. Tic toc tic toc... It is called evidence that backs up Arpaio's affidavit.

    And wait for the next shoes to drop you Dumb OBots...

    So what has the dumb OBot lawyers presented as evidence in court? Yeah that's right you Fog Dumbs - nothing. Obama has not put his bogus birf certificate in court or has he cited Supreme Court holdings that he is a natural born citizen unlike what Klayman has done. If this judge is serious, Obama is going down.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Arpaio's affidavit is not hearsay. It is information garnered from a police investigation.

    ReplyDelete
  13. you are all right keep orly out

    ReplyDelete
  14. Looks awesome. Might have to go for a spin in the Benz down Route 10 East to hear the case. Hopefully the Dentist, who had a roof rat bite one of her spark plug wires, and then blamed it on some grand conspiracy out to get her, won't be there. I guess she won't be able to cast any aspersions any more now that the Sheriff has stepped up. Maybe she'll run and report the good news to Pravda, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Anonymous

    LOL All Obummer has is HEARSAY. We are supposed to believe the forger when he says he's telling the truth? You guys crack me up. ROFLMAO

    ReplyDelete
  16. Affidavits are useless unless the one making the statement can be cross-examined in court. Otherwise, they won't be admitted.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just another try by Klayman to get some money from you birthers. He has to pay a lot of bills....

    You all know very well that an affidavit which states "IT IS MY BELIEF THAT ....." can prove nothing. You are allowed to believe in everything, even in the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So Florida will make history again! **== **== Screw obum the kenyan! Life in jail for barry soetoro and everyone who knew or was involved... piglosi, reid, the heads of the dnc and the clintons... send all their worthless lying asses to jail for life.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just a little time and Obama is toast. Hey, he could always go back to Kenya and fulfill the dream of his father for him to rule the country with an iron fist until the Muslims there get wind of him having had gay sex and smoking crack. That will be when the chickens come home to roost.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Anonymous
    Actually, it is hearsay until and unless the good Sheriff comes to Florida to give testimony under oath and through cross examination.

    Until that point, it isn't evidence at all.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments"

    Well, Obama is President.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @TheEuropean

    You atheists and your flying spaghetti monster is so passe. No one says that any more. Didn't you get the memo?

    ReplyDelete
  23. I Tell it Like it isJune 13, 2012 at 2:11 AM

    The problem is not Orlu. The problem is the corrupt political environment we have in this vountry. How can a defendent win a case if they refuse to show up in court and three attorneys present evidense against? Corruption. That's how.

    This case is going nowhere. Just look at the lsst dissmissal this attorney got. Sure the corrupt judge didn't use legal reasoning. They don't nreed to. They are the judge.

    I am afraid that the only solution to this coup is violent revolution.

    "Those that make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." JFK

    ReplyDelete
  24. Well ... when Judge Lewis rules against you (which he will: I know it; You know it, too) what will you say? He was bought? He was terrified? He is part of the Conspiracy? Has to be one of the three, or do you folks forget how very keen you were on the Georgia Judge before he ruled against you?

    Anyway Good Luck with it all.

    ReplyDelete
  25. why did Arpaio decide on Florida? Are the 49 other states with no participation from him, exempt?

    at least use the affidavit in the 27 states that sued obama over health care & ASK them JOIN THE LAWSUIT!
    OBAMACARE
    State Lawsuit Joined Date Joined

    Virginia Virginia March 23, 2010
    Florida Florida March 23, 2010
    South Carolina Florida March 23, 2010
    Nebraska Florida March 23, 2010
    Texas Florida March 23, 2010
    Utah Florida March 23, 2010
    Louisiana Florida March 23, 2010
    Alabama Florida March 23, 2010
    Michigan Florida March 23, 2010
    Colorado Florida March 23, 2010
    Pennsylvania Florida March 23, 2010
    Washington Florida March 23, 2010
    Idaho Florida March 23, 2010
    South Dakota Florida March 23, 2010
    North Dakota Florida April 5, 2010
    Arizona Florida April 6, 2010
    Georgia Florida April 13, 2010
    Alaska Florida April 20, 2010
    Nevada Florida May 14, 2010
    Indiana Florida May 14, 2010
    Mississippi Florida May 14, 2010
    Wisconsin Florida January 3,2011
    Oklahoma Oklahoma January 7, 2011
    Wyoming Florida January 7, 2011
    Ohio Florida January 11, 2011
    Kansas Florida January 12, 2011
    Maine Florida January 12, 2011

    arpaio is moving at a snail's pace.

    october surprise? ONLY then will he redeem his soul.

    the longer the drip drip drip, the more personal security he'll need.

    ReplyDelete
  26. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    Arpaio's affidavit is not hearsay. It is information garnered from a police investigation.
    June 12, 2012 8:56 PM "

    Unless and until he testifies in court, subject to cross-examination, it is inadmissible. "Beliefs" are not admissible. And since that's all his affidavit speaks to, it is useless, except as a money-raising tool, and that's exactly what it's being used for.

    If his "beliefs" are so strong he thinks they will meet the requirements of a prosecution investigation, that's what he needs to do with them. There's a really good reason he doesn't... because he knows they won't.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous @ 8:56

    "Arpaio's affidavit is not hearsay. It is information garnered from a police investigation."



    Hahahahahahahahaha! You clearly are ignorant about the definition of "hearsay." Hearsay is ANY out-of-court statement offered as proof of the matter asserted. An affidavit, by definition, is hearsay and it may (as Joe's does) contain hearsay within hearsay.

    How about you point to the Florida evidence rule that allows this to be admissible? You cannot.

    Stop practicing law. You are terrible at it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. dustbin, fla....I believe you meant to say your chevy VOLT on route 10, we'll be watchin' fer ya!! bwahahahhaha!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Andy and TheEuropean, Thanks for the laugh. Not because you're wrong, you're probably right. (I have never trusted the sheriff and co., from day one.) Why I am laughing, though, is- both of you know, and, are well aware, of an illegal alien, fraud, communist/marxist bastard illegally occupying the WH. It is obviously not funny, but, I can't stop laughing at you guys eating it up, and, possibly, getting a little nervous.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Klayman has a good track record and so does Obama, it depends if obama can get to the judge like he did with Judge Land and that Iranian sharia law judge in GA.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It's easy:

    Tell Bari Barry Barak Barack Hussein Malik Soetoro Soebakrah Shabazz Obama II to

    GET OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. It doesn't matter how much evidence is presented. The fix is in. I was confident before but less and less so as time goes on. We just have to hope Obama loses fair and square in November, but despite how promising that might look I have doubts about it working out that way.

    Even if he does lose what do the last four years say about our nation, when there are so many VALID QUESTIONS that not only politicians, but the courts and the people just dismiss without demanding the explanation that is OWED to us!

    What a sad and pathetic nation we've become.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I read Sheriff Joe's affidavit and it seems pretty weak. At this point, I doubt that Nobama will be removed from office prior to the election; however, with the economy in the tank, I think Romney has a good chance of replacing the usurper. Couple this with the strong possibility that the Supreme Court will rule Obama care unconstitutional, and I'm feeling pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @the european trash

    lol, eurotrash that believes in global warming, gov benefits for life, etc etc, mocking others beliefs. so funny

    when euro countries crash and burn in a matter of months, we'll be thinking about you... and having a good laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  35. > So Florida will make history again

    I wouldn't hold my breath. Klayman's record of losses is only surpassed by Orly's.

    ReplyDelete
  36. > Arpaio's affidavit is not hearsay. It is information garnered from a police investigation.

    Then why doesn't it say "our investigations prove" but instead "we believe"?

    Arpaio is just another crook who's in it for the money, that should be obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I Pray,God please watch over us .. if Arpaio Fails..

    Lock n Load

    ReplyDelete
  38. i hope they get somewhere in florida

    ReplyDelete
  39. I believe this judge is an honest and fair man. If so Obama is finally being prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I also believe that good conquers evil.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Anonymous
    "It is my belief" and "I believe" ...

    This is worthless.
    ==================

    A digital image of Obozzo's alleged bc on the internet is worthless.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Andy

    Hey Obama dim bulb. Ummmmmmmm...

    What makes you think that Klayman will not put Arpaio or his Posse on the witness stand? This judge looks like he will take this issue seriously. You Obutt clowns better pray to God [a liberal oxymoron] that this judge does the same as the rest of the jellyfish judges have done in the past by evasion because that is the only way you village Obots[idiots] "can win." You will lose if the court honestly looks at the facts.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @(CAPT-DAX)

    I Pray,God please watch over us .. if Arpaio Fails..

    Lock n Load


    LOL!

    Already locked and already loaded Cap'n Crunch. Bring it.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @RS

    Even then, their "belief" that something "may" have happened isn't really admissible. More importantly, none of them are qualified as "experts." Their testimony is irrelevant to anything in the Florida Challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Win or lose in Florida, Oscama's approval is dropping. Look at NC with blacks. Funny, you want to see some people turn real fast. Wait until they get even more pissed. If they ever start to feel duped they will turn on Obama in a heartbeat, afterall he is only half black if that. The let down for them is even bigger since Obama was to be their savior. Just like Moochelle is an angry black woman ( from Oscamas words) there will be many more and they will turn against Oscama hard.
    The ones that want jobs will be pissed and the ones that want more free stuff will be pissed. Oscama is in a lose lose situation.
    Either way every little bit helps. I can't wait to see Oscama cry like a baby and blame everyone but himself.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @RacerJim

    "A digital image of Obozzo's alleged bc on the internet is worthless."

    But a certified verification from the Hawaii Registrar is priceless.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Poor old RacerJim doesn't grasp basic facts

    Due to the grotesque stupidity of Mad Old Orly, she ensured that opposing council in IN got a full, legal and binding statement from the HDoH and the Custodian of Records that the content of the image on display IS EXACTLY AND FULLY IDENTICAL TO THE BC RECORD ON FILE.

    So, alas, the image is now verified as the real deal and you, you're SOOL.

    ReplyDelete
  47. In the end, the Truth wins, it has a life all its own. There are too many detail devils that a lie can never cover. Inasmuch as clambreath jane and fagboy and the 2 other basementdweller batshit crazy paid-with-pepperoni-pizza dumbots have tried to cover it all up, the truth knows no bounds, the truth breaks through, the truth always resurfaces, the truth has complete ownership of logic and free thought.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Anonymous

    > Arpaio's affidavit is not hearsay. It is information garnered from a police investigation.

    Then why doesn't it say "our investigations prove" but instead "we believe"?

    Arpaio is just another crook who's in it for the money, that should be obvious.

    June 13, 2012 7:49 AM
    ___________________________

    Because, numnut, it isn't up to law enforcement to be the ones who decide proof or not....it's the courts who will hear the evidence presented from law enforcement. Hopefully we never mix up the different forces of law as you so ignorantly don't appear to have a grasp of....like most confused and manipulating, controlling obots.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Due to the grotesque stupidity of Mad Old Orly, she ensured that opposing council in IN got a full, legal and binding statement from the HDoH and the Custodian of Records that the content of the
    image on display IS EXACTLY AND FULLY IDENTICAL TO THE BC RECORD ON FILE.
    _______________________________
    You're wrong....never said that.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Andy said...
    @RS

    Even then, their "belief" that something "may" have happened isn't really admissible. More importantly, none of them are qualified as "experts." Their testimony is irrelevant to anything in the Florida Challenge.
    ___________________________________
    In your dreams!! The evidence is backed by qualified experts who easily can be called to testify.

    ReplyDelete
  51. An affidavit IS a form for "belief":

    An affidavit is based upon either the personal knowledge of the affiant or his or her information and belief. Personal knowledge is the recognition of particular facts by either direct observation or experience. Information and belief is what the affiant feels he or she can state as true, although not based on firsthand knowledge.

    It is then up to the court to look at the info of foundation and of course the reliability of such a one of law enforcement with all of the experience there also contained in such a "belief".

    ReplyDelete
  52. BETWEEN THE LINES


    "MEET THE ORIGINAL 'BIRTHER'"


    EXCLUSIVE: JOSEPH FARAH OFFERS JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF 'DUPLICITY AND DECEIT BY OBAMA'"


    By Joseph Farah
    June 12, 2012


    "If you tell one story for 16 years and then tell another story for five years, what does that make you?

    For certain, it makes you a liar.

    There are only three possibilities:

    •Obama was lying for 16 years when he said he was born in Kenya;

    •He’s lying now;

    •Or he was lying for 16 years and is still lying today about his past.

    There is no other explanation of this phenomenon than Obama lies.

    Why does he lie?

    The answer is obvious.

    He lies for self-advantage."


    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/meet-the-original-birther/

    ReplyDelete
  53. BETWEEN THE LINES


    "MEET THE ORIGINAL 'BIRTHER'"


    EXCLUSIVE: JOSEPH FARAH OFFERS JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF 'DUPLICITY AND DECEIT BY OBAMA'"


    By Joseph Farah
    June 12, 2012


    "If you tell one story for 16 years and then tell another story for five years, what does that make you?

    For certain, it makes you a liar.

    There are only three possibilities:

    •Obama was lying for 16 years when he said he was born in Kenya;

    •He’s lying now;

    •Or he was lying for 16 years and is still lying today about his past.

    There is no other explanation of this phenomenon than Obama lies.

    Why does he lie?

    The answer is obvious.

    He lies for self-advantage."


    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/meet-the-original-birther/

    ReplyDelete
  54. The verification of certification doesn't mean shit. For all we know, what was verified was a COLB that Hawaii gave out to those who wanted the foreign births of their babies registered in Hawaii. And how do we know that the scumbags in Hawaii aren't covering up for the SOB squatting in the White House? Only an unbiased forensic examination of the long-form birth certificate, which Hawaii had claimed didn't exist for Obama, of the real McCoy will finally put this matter to rest.

    For now, Obama is fucked, now that he will have to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii. Even then, he and his asshole lawyers will have to prove that natural-born citizenship means something other than being born on U.S. soil of American citizen parents.

    ReplyDelete
  55. ~ WND EXCLUSIVE ~


    "MEDIA SCORCHED FOR PATHETIC OBAMA COVERAGE"


    "'MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT: DEMOCRATS ARE PANICKING"


    "Radio giant Rush Limbaugh is scorching the national media for their lack of coverage of problems in America directly tied to Barack Obama and his administration.

    “The media doesn’t report this stuff and they think as a result nobody knows about it,” Limbaugh said today on his top-rated program.

    “They continue to live in a state of denial, that there is an alternative media that is just as penetrating. They can pretend that by not covering a story, the story doesn’t happen. They can pretend by not covering a story, or not condemning an action, that nobody hears about it.”

    Limbaugh said President Richard Nixon was hounded out of office 40 years ago “for a second-rate burglary that even to this day nobody can figure out.”

    “We have got Watergate-type scandals in three different spots in this administration, and what’s the media writing about? Forty-year-old Watergate,” he said.

    “For crying out loud, we have a regime which ignores federal judges on drilling moratoriums. We have a regime that is running an open money-laundering operation with union dues. We have an administration that is knowingly bankrolling losing industries, crony capitalism out the wazoo. Whatever Nixon did, it pales in comparison.”

    He also noted the Justice Department declining to prosecute the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia “as was said because we’re not going after black defendants,” the president’s lawsuit against Arizona to stop the state from enforcing laws that protect their citizens, and the Fast and Furious gunrunning operation.

    “For crying out loud, nobody died in Watergate! A federal agent died in Fast and Furious,” Limbaugh said. “We had [Attorney General Eric] Holder taunting members of the Senate yesterday: ‘I’m gonna stick to my guns.’”

    Limbaugh says there have been several recent reports by journalists who say Democrats are coming to the sudden realization Obama’s re-election in November is not a lock.

    “Make no mistake about it: Democrats are panicking,” Limbaugh said. “They’re all writing stories now that Democrats are waking up in the morning now and for the first time confronting the real possibility – in fact, some are even calling it a likelihood – that Obama could lose. And they’re contemplating this for the first time.”

    While some headlines have said that Obama has experienced a “bad week,” Limbaugh preferred to look at events through a different prism."

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/media-scorched-for-pathetic-obama-coverage/

    ReplyDelete
  56. @Anonymous
    Except for the "qualified experts" part, maybe.

    A qualified expert wouldn't say that something is a forgery by looking at an internet picture of it.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Anonymous

    Even then, their "belief" that something "may" have happened isn't really admissible. More importantly, none of them are qualified as "experts." Their testimony is irrelevant to anything in the Florida Challenge.


    Earth to delusional OBOt. Come in OBot... It's useless.

    Obot, you wouldn't know an expert if it bit you in the ass. Obot, if this goes to a real trial, they will be called to testify before the court.

    Arpaio's true belief is backed up by computer analysis and document experts who have analyzed the Obama birf document(s) and his SS document, and they have concluded that they are fabricated forgeries. Do we understand these simple facts dumb OBots? LOL.

    So idiotic OBots when is Obama going to show his real birf certificate in court where he can be held legally accountable?

    We all know that he won't show it because he doesn't have a genuine birf certificate. Maybe Obama can show his Kenyan birf certificate to the court. Heh.


    In your dreams!!

    No, in your dreams you delusional Fogger OBot.

    The evidence is backed by qualified experts who easily can be called to testify.

    Who do you mean is the expert(s) that says Obama's White House birf certificate is wreeall? Hahaaaha....

    Nathan Goulding Perhaps? His analysis has been debunked a trillion times as it was completely idiotic. You know, idiotic like the grape flavored kool-aid drinking Obama supporters.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Anonymous @ 1:45

    "An affidavit IS a form for "belief":

    An affidavit is based upon either the personal knowledge of the affiant or his or her information and belief. Personal knowledge is the recognition of particular facts by either direct observation or experience. Information and belief is what the affiant feels he or she can state as true, although not based on firsthand knowledge.

    It is then up to the court to look at the info of foundation and of course the reliability of such a one of law enforcement with all of the experience there also contained in such a "belief".

    ___________

    What part of OUT OF COURT STATEMENT are you failing to grasp? An affidavit is an OUT OF COURT STATEMENT, so it is hearsay.

    Sure, an affidavit can state the affiant's "belief" but that does not make the "belief" admissible under the rules of evidence.

    These daffydavits are publicity stunts only. Klayman knows they are inadmissible.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Let me provide a little truth here for all of the factually challenged people:

    1) Arpaio is NOT a crook in it for the money. Why? Because he isn't making any money off of this...lol. The most you could even claim is that he is in it for the publicity, but then you would have to know his heart...which you don't.
    2) If Klayman wants Arpaio, Zullo and Corsi to testify...they will. Klayman is representing WND in their suit against Esquire, so I'm sure they have discussed this and are willing to back up their affidavits.
    3) While Arpaio, Zullo and Corsi are not experts...their beliefs are based on the analysis of experts from whom they have signed affidavits supported by lengthy written analysis. Trust me...the public has only seen a portion of the research and analysis that the CCP has.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I am going to take a wait and see attitude this time.

    At least I won't have to wait too long before I see.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Andy

    A qualified expert wouldn't say that something is a forgery by looking at an internet picture of it.

    You know you OBots are ignoramuses and very stupid.

    The experts would testify that the online WH birf certificate document has been manipulated as a cut and paste piece of crap.

    So dumbBot OBot, when is Obama going to show a court his White House birf certificate where he would be legally accountable? Hmmmmmmm OBot? It looks like this judge is not going to take OBot BS letting OBots point to a stupid online picture and say it is wreaaal!

    We've heard a 3rd or 4th forgery is on the way to save the OBot day! Or is that the 5th forgery?? So easy to lose track of all these Obama forgeries flying around.

    ReplyDelete
  62. @Anonymous

    Sounds like one of the Dentist's little cult followers. I'll bet you have knots on your head also from diving into shallow rivers with her. At least she hit the water. It appears you must have hit a rock based on your very mature post.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I see it's going to be much crying come Monday in birther land.

    ReplyDelete
  64. "why did Arpaio decide on Florida? Are the 49 other states with no participation from him, exempt?"

    Because Klayman is specifically a World Net Daily lawyer who is currently representing them in a Jerome Corsi lawsuit against Esquire.

    He is doing it because WND, Farah, and Corsi told him to.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Anonymous June 13, 2012 12:58 PM
    "But a certified verification from the Hawaii Registrar is priceless."

    Priceless in that the online (i.e. scanned) image of it clearly shows what a document certified by the HDOH (via embossment with the official HDOH seal) looks like -- a stark contradiction to the online (i.e. scanned) images on whitehouse.gov alleged to be of Obama's similarly certified (via embossment with the official HDOH seal) long-form and short-form birth certificates which show no even remotely similar embossment. Note that the same HDOH official using one/more identical HDOH embossing seals embossed the verification less than a year after he allegedly embossed the LFBC his verification applies to.

    ReplyDelete
  66. @Anonymous June 13, 2012 !:06 PM
    "Poor old RacerJim doesn't grasp basic facts

    Due to the grotesque stupidity of Mad Old Orly, she ensured that opposing council in IN got a full, legal and binding statement from the HDoH and the Custodian of Records that the content of the image on display IS EXACTLY AND FULLY IDENTICAL TO THE BC RECORD ON FILE.

    So, alas, the image is now verified as the real deal and you, you're SOOL."

    Kool-Aid impaired Anon/Obot can't handle the truth.

    Due to the grotesque Hawaii law in effect when Obama was allegedly born in Hawaii, FOREIGN BORN children could be issued a Hawaii birth certificate and no information on such a birth certificate would indicate that the child was not born in Hawaii.

    So, alas, that legal and binding statement from the HDoH and the Custodian of Records is a red-herring and, you're DEBUNKED.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Analysis: What does this mean?
    Recall that Judge Lewis was appointed by a much earlier FL Democrat Gov (Lawton Chiles) back when Dems in the south were much more conservative but no less partisan. Also that Lewis ruled in favor of Bush(41) back in 2000 just before the case hit the (then) very liberal FL Supreme Court which ruled for Gore and then the SCOTUS ruled for Bush. The case was simple. Gore wanted to recount a handful of heavily democrat counties where the math favored most errors falling to Gore. Lewis simply looked at the Florida Law and ruled that the SecOfState certified the election results IAW the law. The FL Supreme Court wanted to ignore the law and elect Gore and their ruling was spaghetti logic. Of course if a recount in the state was truly warranted it would have to have been for the entire state. Gore did not want to recount the entire state as that left him with pretty much 50/50 odds. Counting only the select counties was a sure thing, incredibly unfair and outside FL election law. In the end both Lewis and the SCOTUS got it right. Some more history. Gov Chiles served the 8 years before 2000 and had appointed most of the 7 justices on the FL Supreme Court (these justices have staggered 6 year terms).

    That was 2000, on to 2012. The current FL Supreme Court is split fairly even and I don't presume to predict an outcome.

    Now Judge Lewis has another epic case and thus far it looks like he is giving it the serious consideration that most of us here believe it should have.

    I speculate that if Lewis rules against Citizen Voeltz, all appeals will follow similarly. But if he rules for Voeltz then the Florida Supreme Court might affirm the ruling as we've had 3 Republican governors since Chiles and the Florida Supreme Court is not as far left as it was in 2000. If that happens the SCOTUS may yet refuse the expected appeal thus forcing the media to do its job. I think this would be highly interesting and an incredible payback to the media for abdicating its role to vet candidates. Though it is more likely in my view that the SCOTUS would finally take the case having been forced into it and rule on the NBC issue upholding the Happersett ruling as the law of the land. We can hope!
    Born912

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Terri

    I see it's going to be much crying come Monday in birther land.

    Sure thing OBot. LoL. No, it's going to be a bad year for OBots.

    So how is Valerie Jarrett these days?

    ReplyDelete
  69. @Andy June 13, 2012 3:41 PM
    "A qualified expert wouldn't say that something is a forgery by looking at an internet picture of it."

    An honorable Judge wouldn't say that something is authentice by looking at an internet picture of it, or a hard-copy printout of that internet picture.

    ReplyDelete
  70. The case before Judge Lewis did not have Bush or Gore as a party. So to say that he ruled "for" Bush is disingeuous. He ruled that the recount had to be completed and certified by the statutory deadline, when the county asked for additional time that the statute did not allow.

    Say, ORYR, how about posting a copy of the Order or minute entry where the judge ordered the SOS to file a brief defending its definition of NBC. Klayman should be able to produce a copy for you. Every order of a court is memorialized in writing, you know.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Obama Eligibility Attorney Gary Kreep Leading San Diego Superior Court Judgeship Race: A Win?

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/06/obama-eligibility-attorney-gary-kreep.html

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.