Tuesday, April 10, 2012


New Jersey Obama Ballot Challenge Not Decided Yet; Written Ruling To Be Issued in Next 24 Hours.

This post will be updated shortly when first-hand accounts from the New Jersey ballot challenge are available.....

UPDATE FROM CDR KERCHNER: I just returned from the hearing. It was a two hour drive each way and I’m tired. The hearing got off to a late start circa 9:30 a.m. and lasted about 3 1/2 hours. The judge asked a lot of questions on the natural born Citizen issue repeatedly interrupting the presentation by Attorney Mario Apuzzo. On the issues of the forged Obama documents, the judge did not wish to hear anything about that matter and refused to allow any evidence to be entered on those forgery issues since Obama had not presented his birth certificate or draft registration documents in any form to NJ. Thus he said those issues of alleged forgery are not before his court. His reasoning was that the only legal matters before him is whether Obama has to provide any documentation such as a certified copy of his birth certificate with a raised seal on it to the state of New Jersey to try to prove his qualifications as to place of birth in the USA and also as to whether Obama’s father being a foreign national and non-U.S. Citizen impacts where Obama is a natural born Citizen or not. He seems to place a lot of wait on prior cases that the Obama for America campaign defense counsel brought up such as the Ankeny case and Wong King Ark. But the judge did listen very attentively to Mario’s arguments as how those cases are being misinterpreted and misstated as to what they determined.

The judge ended the hearing saying he would issue an oral YES on NO decision later today to the Secretary of State of NJ and the two counsels as to whether he recommends to the Secretary of State of NJ Obama being allowed on the ballot in NJ. The written decision will be issued tomorrow at 10 a.m.

More later. http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/nj-ballot-access-challenge-hearing-update

UPDATE FROM ATTORNEY APUZZO: Today, April 10, 2012, Nicholas E. Purpura and Theodore T. Moran had their Barack Obama primary ballot objection heard by Deputy Director and Administrative Law Judge, Jeff S. Masin, at the Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge Plaza, Mercerville (Hamilton Twp.), New Jersey 08619. The case started about 9:30 a.m. and lasted to about 1:00 p.m. I represented the Objectors. Mr. Obama was represented by Alexandra Hill of the firm of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi of Newark, New Jersey.

We argued that Mr. Obama has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that he has not presented any evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State showing who he is and that he was born in the United States. We also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

Obama’s attorney made a motion to dismiss the Objection in its entirety. She argued that it was not relevant to being placed on the ballot whether Mr. Obama is a “natural born Citizen,” where he was born, and whether he was born to U.S. citizen parents. She said that no law in New Jersey obligated him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot. We argued that Mr. Obama under the Constitution has to be a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that under New Jersey law (the state constitution, statutes, and case law), Mr. Obama must show that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. We argued that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot. Judge Masin denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

After calling to the witness stand Mr. Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony as to why they brought the ballot challenge, and introducing documents showing there is a question as to Mr. Obama’s identity, I called Brian Wilcox to testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama’s lawyer objected to my proffered testimony. I then offered that I would not need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided that Obama stipulated that the internet image of his birth certificate could not be used as evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey Secretary of States and that he presented to the court or the Secretary of State no other evidence of his identity or place of birth. Judge Masin also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth. She also argued that Obama has no legal obligation to produce any such evidence to get on the primary ballot. Judge Masin then took the issue under advisement. Having produced absolutely no evidence of his eligibility for the Office of President, Judge Masin will decide whether as a matter of law Obama has a legal duty to produce such evidence before he may be placed on the New Jersey ballot in light of the pending objection filed against him. If he decides that he does, then the Objection will be successful. If he decides that Obama has no such legal obligation, the Objection would fail on the first issue.

The second issue that Judge Masin addressed was whether the definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” includes the requirement that the child be born to two U.S. citizen parents. Judge Masin relied heavily upon the fact that no court in the nation has yet ruled that Mr. Obama had to have two U.S. citizen parents at the time of his birth. I explained that most cases regarding Mr. Obama have been ruled in his favor on procedural grounds rather than on the merits of the definition of a “natural born Citizen.” He relied heavily upon U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and its use of the English common law to define U.S. citizenship. We also discussed the Indiana Ankeny decision and the Georgia ballot access cases. I explained how Wong did not hold that Wong was a “natural born Citizen,” but only a “citizen of the United States” under the Fourteenth Amendment which does not define an Article II “natural born Citizen.” I explained that Wong distinguished between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen,” explaining how Justice Gray used Horace Binney’s distinction between both classes of citizens. I argued that it is error to rely upon Wong as though it held Wong to be a “natural born Citizen.”

I argued that the Founders and Framers did not adopt the English common law to define the term, but rather natural law and the law of nations which under Article III became part of the “Laws of the United States.” I explained that the definition of a “natural born Citizen” comes from natural law and the law of nations as commented upon by Emer de Vattel in Section 212 of The Law of Nations (1758), which definition was recognized as American “common-law” in Minor v. Happersett (1875). I also explained that Wong Kim Ark confirmed Minor’s definition (a child born in a country to citizen parents) and did not change it.

I explained that Congress through the Naturalization Acts of 1790, 1795, 1802, and 1855 abrogated the English common law as the law to define U.S. citizenship and that through those acts it told us that a child born in the United States to alien parents was an alien and not a “citizen of the United States.” I went through the historical evidence, including but not limited to Emer de Vattel and St. George Tucker, which shows that the Founders and Framers defined a “natural born Citizen” as a child born in the country to citizen parents and not as the English common law defined a “natural born subject.” I explained how Madison wrote to Washington that at the constitutional convention, the delegates did not adopt the English common law for the new republic. I explained that the English common law continued to have effect in the states, even being included in their constitutions and statutes, but not on the federal level where both the Constitution and Acts of Congress did not do the same as the states did. I explained that there is a constitutional distinction between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen,” and that the two terms cannot be conflated and confounded as per Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 and Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, who told us that each clause of the Constitution must be given its own meaning. Judge Masin also reserved decision on the question of whether a “natural born Citizen” must be born to two U.S. citizen parents.

Judge Masin will be contacting counsel today or tomorrow morning either by telephone or email as to his decision, stating “yes” or “no” on both issues. He will then provide his written decision to the Secretary of State no later than Wednesday, April 11, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel will be able to object to Judge Masin’s initial decision. The Secretary of State will make the final decision. After her decision, the parties can then appeal to the New Jersey Appellate Division and then to the New Jersey Supreme Court. After that, the parties can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 10, 2012
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
#### 

UPDATE: Full Video of New Jersey Obama Ballot Challenge Hearing: Interview with CDR Kerchner - VIDEO HERE

UPDATE: Terry Hurlbut reports: Obama eligibility: NJ ALJ ducks issues: In the latest Obama eligibility challenge, an Administrative Law Judge cleared Obama for the New Jersey Democratic Primary today. The two men who objected to Obama’s nominating petition vowed to appeal. http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/nj-judge-admits-obama-hasnt-provided.html 

Read the objection filed in New Jersey here: http://www.art2superpac.com/njballot.html

You can make a secure online donation here: https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund/NJ

HD VIDEO FROM 3/31 TEA PARTY EVENT WITH SHERIFF JOE POSTED HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html

-WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html -

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...

57 comments:

  1. Can we say "denied?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marshman says 24 hours is plenty of time for Obama to send his handlers up there to pursuade some people not to deny him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Did someone record it??

    ReplyDelete
  4. Somehow, building any suspense over what the decision will be is veeeerry difficult.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In 24 hours? That's not good.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Anonymous

    Can we say "corruption"?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Even though we are taught to stand behind the leader of our country no matter what, this is very disturbing. The evidence that Soros and his cronies have funded such a clear violation of our Constituion is appaling. I therefor agree that the evidence has been presented and Obambi is NOT my president, nor deserves the respect of such.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Keep your panties dry. Just as in Georgia, it won't be a final ruling, it will be a recommendation to the Secretary of State. Then it's either accepted, rejected or modified. The SOS decision can be appealed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. How many nuclear-reactors can be promised in 24the hours ???

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just more of the same...we've been had and are now nothing more than a banana republic.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "How many nuclear-reactors can be promised in 24the hours ???"

    Where does Christie fit into this?...They could offer him a lifetime supply of jelly filled donuts.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Treasongate continues. The fraud-in-chief and handlers will pounce on this judge. Oh to find a judge with integrity like Arpaio. The list of barry-ites is so large. Do you realize that over 1,000 accomplices are guilty of treason. This is huge. All staff of barry, Gibbs, Axelhead,Jarrett, Bauer, Carneyville,Michelle, FBI director, Cia director, military generals,commanders, all CONgress members, Hawaii health dept.,entire DNC, former and present election committee commissioners, and more committing TREASON everyday they stay silent.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous
    Didn't New Jersey always wanted the Statue of Liberty?

    ReplyDelete
  14. "whether Obama has to provide any documentation such as a certified copy of his birth certificate with a raised seal on it to the state of New Jersey to try to prove his qualifications as to place of birth in the USA"

    That is a pitiful thing when one even has to think about the answer to that question. I had to give ID to get cough syrup and show my son's BC for little league. But for the most powerful office in the world? Nope, no background check- no original BC. The certificate of live birth would have been OK but HI has given them out to anyone foreign born or otherwise who asked - compromising its purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Orly proved today that, not only does she know nothing about the law and/or legal procedure, she doesn't even know how to read the results of a newspaper poll. Either that, or she's simply lying again. #batting1000.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "I will support and defend the Constitution of the U.S. against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Anoymous 1:34 We dont have time for an appeal. The election is in 6 months. This is not 2010 and 2011 anymore when we had time for appeals. The appeal days are over. Time is running out. Obama must be removed from office before the election. We only have 6 months to get it done or we can kiss america goodbye.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "he certificate of live birth would have been OK but HI has given them out to anyone foreign born or otherwise who asked - compromising its purpose."

    I have not seen a single shred of evidence that Hawaii ever gave out a COLB stating they were born in Hawaii to anyone born outside of Hawaii. Can you find one?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mao..."Power flows from the barrel of a gun." Donald Young knows all about it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. anon, 2:59. Sun Yet San got one and its posted all over the internet,
    you are new here, eh.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yep, this playing with corrupt judges and endless court appearances is just playing into the hands of the enemy. Time is running out.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Dean Haskins

    Who gave you permission to come out of your mother's basement?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Just the fact that Obama's attorney was arguing their position today is compelling evidence he is a usurper. They could have easily come to this hearing with a certified copy of his LFBC and the matter would have been dismissed and all other state challenges would come grinding to a halt....but they can't do that because the documentation does not exist. Can anyone supporting Obama hoenstly explain to me why they don't simply provide hard copies of his birth records? And don't say "because they don't have to"....that is a flippant answer - why spend millions on attorney's fee when a $15 certified copy would make this all go away?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Obama paid a Visit to FAU IN "BOCA" today. He said a student came up to him & said, "I want your job!"
    Obama responded, " I told him, 'the CONSTITUTION says, you have to be 35 years of age.. so I'll keep it warm for you for a few more years. '"

    THE CONSTITUTIONAL " scholar" LIES BY OMISSION.

    The kids were wooning to their idol.

    THEY HAVE NO CLUE!

    He stopped there as a cover to get his expenses paid for by TAXPAYERS, so he could raise $$$ at 3 fundraisers without reimbursing US!!

    He is a lowlife, a thief & a fraud. When you add up how many felonies he MUST BE CHARGED WITH, he would be in the pen long enough to be diagnosed with terminal lung cancer!

    This is an outlaw in every sense: where is the real Matt dillon?

    It sure ain't Arpaio

    If Beau Biden, AG OF OF DELAWARE gets his way, NO SHERIFF IN AMERICA WILL HAVE POWER TO MAKE AN ARREST.

    On WRKO Boston today HOWIE CARR spent the show ranting about 400 Agents from. IRS hired to enroll the poor in ObamaCare.

    When a caller asked if ARPAIO would lose his power to arrest, Carrr stopped the conversation. hung up & told the listeners that Arizona was on the other side of the country from Delaware.....

    ANOTHER CHICKEN ON THE RADIO.

    ReplyDelete
  25. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=34389

    Absolute lying dolt.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Apuzzo left the judge & Obama's team stricken.

    The only advantage for Obama is his strategists get to learn more & more about their imposter employer.
    They are running out of excuses now.

    Only bribes work.

    SOME MUST BE FED UP ESPECIALLY IF THEY KNOW WHERE THE PAYOFFS ARE COMING FROM.

    Let's hope an October Surprise brings a witness forward.

    Whose money is paying for attorneys in 50 states?

    Warren buffet, George Soros, or US??

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous April 10, 2012 4:47 PM

    Compelling indeed. Why not just cough it up? In Georgia they complained about cost... just cough it up already then.

    The jig is up and they know it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. anon 5:18:

    The Democratic National Party is paying for the Obama lawyers as a ''campaign expense''. They have paid out over two million dollars to lawyers. Approx. $150,000 per court appearance and $50,000 per letter or simple brief. They have many millions in that account and can easily pay for hundreds and hundreds of court appearances.....

    The amount of money paid to keep Obama's records secret could top half a billion dollars eventually. That's how terrified he is of the public finding out his true identity.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I've always been amazed by those who claim "natural born citizen" is a mystery. The meaning is self-evident.

    "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President..." U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl 5.


    The noun "citizen" in the first clause is qualified by the adjective "natural born". This rule is ordinary English, the noun is modified by the specific characteristic "natural born".

    "Natural born citizen" is more specific than "citizen".

    The Founding of the United States is the Declaration of Independence, whereby the Colonists became citizens of their state and the United States.

    The first plan of government, The Articles of Confederation, left the power of naturalization to each state.

    The Citizens increased by both birth and naturalization by the several states.

    The second plan of government, The Constitution, prohibited to the states the power of naturalization and delegated it to the United States.

    The Citizens increased by both birth and naturalization by the United States.

    The United States adopted a uniform rule of naturalization that specified that aliens who naturalize, and the children of naturalized aliens "shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States".

    Since "natural born citizen" is more specific than "citizen" it must therefor exclude naturalized aliens and their children.

    Which leaves only the children of citizens.

    Therefore "natural born citizen" means citizens born from citizen parents.

    The definition of "natural born citizen" was not modified by the 14th Amendment.

    The 14th Amendment defined "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

    The set of people termed "natural born citizen" is the same after the 14th Amendment as it was before the 14th Amendment.

    The set of people termed "natural born citizen" is not expanded or contracted by the 14th Amendment, it is not modified in any way.

    Article II was not specifically modified by the 14th Amendment.

    A natural born citizen is a citizen born to citizen parents in country.

    It is obvious and self-evident.

    By Obama's own narrative he does not qualify.

    ReplyDelete
  30. keep picking at Obama, the stress is showing on his face and the jokes he tries to crack. it is getting to him. he does not sleep sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Dean Haskins

    What eligibility cases are your legal experts currently prosecuting?

    ReplyDelete
  32. We are currently working on some initiatives--when they are lodged, you'll know it. The answer to that question, if you asked Oily, would be "zero," as she has "prosecuted" nothing. She has done nothing but embarrass herself and our movement. Hauling manure from one place to another is still nothing but slinging crap. She's not done a single beneficial thing for us.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Anonymous

    ANOTHER NEOCON IN HOWIE CARR WHO WORKS FOR A MEGA CORPORATION IN ENTERCOM RADIO!

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Anonymous

    Pen Johannson, in “50 reasons America should re-examine Obama’s past”:

    “Historical archives dating between 1890 and 1941 reveal that the hawaiian islands served as an unofficial, but widely-pursued sanctuary for thousands of foreign expatriates seeking protection from political persecution in China, Japan, south-east asiatic nations, the middle east and, later, the United States. … One example of this surrogate nativity was granted to a Mr. Sun Yat Sen, a chinese expatriate who received an official certificate of hawaiian birth in 1904 stating that his birth had taken place in Hawaii in November, 1870. However, later evidence revealed that Mr. Sun’s birth had actually occurred in China in 1866.”

    Archives reveal that the state of Hawaii has provided similar documentation to thousands of immigrants over the years without ever confirming their age, the birth place or their actual identity.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I wonder if the Judge could help but notice, that the Obama attorney never argued in any respect that Obama was legitimate? She only argued that no law obligated him to produce legitimacy and no law prevented him from being on the ballot without proof of legitimacy. How come he couldn't just provide proof and documentary evidence and save the court and people from any more debate? Occum's razor your honor... he's just not legit. If the proof glove don't fit: He ain't legit. What moron can't see this? What moral, ethical, legal, character, patriotic, constitutional and so on, point is so worthy to prove, requires this type of evasion and the people's and courts time? When an authentic document, a brief authentic history and the Supreme Court definition of Natural Born Citizen in regards to Article II Section 1 could resolve in about 2 seconds'? Anything else is pure obfuscation and therefore evidence that he is not eligible.
    I'm not anonymous I'm Bob M. from Ohio

    ReplyDelete
  36. The Mercerville Miracle?

    ReplyDelete
  37. The Judge is waiting for the "check" to clear.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Obama spends millions of dollars defending his position that he doesn't have to produce a real Birth Certificate. Even if he did, it will say that his Father was from Kenya, which means he was born a British Citizen or dual citizen at the least. Then he went to school in Indonesia where his step Dad adopted him so he could get in school. He then became an Indonesian Citizen since Indonesia does not recognize dual citizenship. Either way for $15 bucks he could have shut down todays hearing and the whole thing would have gone away. I.E getting a Certified copy of his Birth Certificate from Hawaii. Did he do that? I will let you answer that question.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Anonymous
    "I wonder if the Judge could help but notice, that the Obama attorney never argued in any respect that Obama was legitimate?"
    ----
    That is because under the American system of jurisprudence, the defendant does not have to prove anything. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff.

    ReplyDelete
  40. For any candidate for pubic office to defiantly tell voters that they have no right to know who he is and that he does not need to prove to them his identity and his constitutional eligibility for the office to which he hopes they will elect him is the height of arrogance! If Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Obama/Harrison J. Bounel or whoever he is had valid, verifiable proof of his true, legal identity and his constitutional eligibility to be POTUS, he would have presented it a long time ago instead of spending two million dollars to hire an army of lawyers to hide, modify or destroy the very records that would supposedly prove his eligibility. The charades in our courts regarding this issue and the refusal of our judges to consider evidence of fraud illustrate why people despise lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Dean Haskins

    So, if you have NONE, why are you criticising others who are at least doing something?

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Anonymous

    New Jersey law specifically says that for a ballot challenge the burden of proof is on the challenger.

    ReplyDelete
  43. First, you obviously didn't read what I wrote. And, second, she is not doing anything that will ever amount to anything. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just not very intelligent. She has done nothing but poison every court she has been in.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Dean Haskins

    You are worse than the trolls that defend Obozo on other sites.

    You have never posted anything positive about anyone, except that genius Van Irion, the one that presented documents in the Georgia case, entering into evidence that he believed Obozo was be born in Hawaii and that he was an American Citizen.

    Without your "Competent Lawyer" help, Malihi would not have been able to rule as he did.

    You pathetic, immature asshole: You stay out of our movement!

    Since you have this obsession about feeling unappreciated, I suggest that you join the Huffington Post. You'll find plenty of other misfits like you with whom you can complain about how badly the world treats you.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous

    "I wonder if the judge could help but notice, that the Obama attorney never argued in any respect that Obama was legitimate?"

    That is because under the american system of jurisprudence, the defendant does not have to prove anything. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff.

    Not so. State election laws require candidates to prove their eligibility for the office they seek and give voters the right to challenge that eligibility.

    ReplyDelete
  46. For you Obots who analyze word structure and spelling, or points of law when examining opinion or the influence of the thought process, who could care less about the truth as long as you get your check for sitting oh so sassy on your couches. I've created a pledge for you Obot, man worshiping traitors.

    It’s The Stupid Truth Pledge for Obots



    I Mindless Obot______
    Do solemnly swear without reverence nor honor: to suspend, ignore, betray and deny the constitution of the former evil capitalistic United States while in conspiracy with all enemies both foreign and domestic including the stupid complicit elected republicans as long as they allow me to insult them like the traitorous dogs they are. Constitution? What constitution? I affirm that as long as Obama is for the working union man or says he is, and I get my: check, or health care, or food stamps, or unemployment, or employee pension, or Pell grant, or house loan, or abortions, or birth control pills, or clean air and environment, or redistribution, or higher gas prices, or solar panels, or electric cars, or windmills, or kitchen, or unemployed coal workers and pipeline workers, or fetal stem cells, or my whole tax deductions back with a bunch of child credits paid by the rich, or higher taxes for the rich, or some combination of all of the above for free, from Obama, while I can remain needful and do nothing meaningful, that I will vote for him as many times as possible in each election whether I am a citizen or not and he can be Messiah forever. I could care less about any crimes unless its those of decent white people who are all guilty or Judeo Christians unless their really pissed off’ed black Christians like Al Sharpton or Rev. Wright and self deprecating anti-Israel Jews, etc. I swear to blame George W. Bush for everything that Dick Cheney didn’t do with Halliburton while I will always buy all things G.E. I am against the death penalty unless it’s for the unborn, Christians, Jews, one percenters, the Tea Party, conservatives and birthers. I am against all but government and criminals owning guns. I believe that people don’t kill people, but lower taxes, SUV’s and guns kill people. I will always vote like the stupidest Hollywood type like Joy Bahar or Oprah Winfrey. I will follow George Soros and Media Matters orders to ‘Occupy’ public and private places and to use them as toilets. I promise to notify the Democratic National Committee of my monetary pledge in any amount in any name for any candidate they desire and to encourage that my congress vote for bills before we know what’s in them. I will be a good student of Marx and Mao and Alinsky or pretend they don’t exist. I will lie, cheat or betray at will for the ‘Better Good’ as long as it’s the socialist better good. All crime for socialism is good crime. I will align myself in unison with any other piece of garbage advocate as long as he gets his and I get mine. I believe in the communist party, the New Black Panthers, that the only good Muslim is a radical jihadist and or living in the White House, a One World Government, the U.N., the World Court, that big government is good government, that government knows best, the benefits of deficit spending and I promise to wear a hoodie, follow blindly, stand in line mooing my worship for the man god Obama and report on my neighbor for non compliance and their excessive carbon footprint. May Obama’s spike heeled carbon footprint massage my back. May Michelle eat 2 whole lobsters twice a day and fart in my general direction. So help me Soebarakah, Heil! It’s The Stupid Truth.

    I’m not anonymous, I’m mad at republicans too! Bob M. from Ohio

    ReplyDelete
  47. The judge at the New Jersey hearing said the burden of proof to prove Obama is eligible is on OBAMA!!

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/04/video-from-nj-ballot-hearing-obama.html

    ReplyDelete
  48. anon 5:18:

    The Democratic National Party is paying for the Obama lawyers as a ''campaign expense''. They have paid out over two million dollars to lawyers. Approx. $150,000 per court appearance and $50,000 per letter or simple brief. They have many millions in that account and can easily pay for hundreds and hundreds of court appearances.....

    No lawyer in America charges $50,000 per letter. These numbers are so ridiculous I have to assume it's a joke or he thinks anyone who questions Obama is stupid enough to believe anything.

    ReplyDelete
  49. i worry that this judge will turn 180 like all the others, remember the former marine Judge that was going to give Orly discovery. Malahi loo ked like he was possibly siding with the people. Things look possibly OK, but then judges get phone calls on their private numbers that cant be traced or recorded, but turn them on a dime. When the caller says your family will die in a car accident, fire or of natural causes next week, you listen.

    ReplyDelete
  50. @Anonymous
    Under Campaign finance laws, a campaign's legal expenses don't have to be accounted for in finanacial disclosure forms. Obama can launder illegal campaign donations through the legal expenses. That's why he loves these ballot challenges in each state. It allows him to raise millions that don't have to be itemized.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @Anonymous
    I'll take that pledge! Renember that "all's fair in love, war, and politics." And that winning isn't a thing, it's the ONLY thing.
    On to kicking RINO Romney's butt!

    ReplyDelete
  52. "Not so. State election laws require candidates to prove their eligibility for the office they seek and give voters the right to challenge that eligibility."

    Not in New Jersey, and most states, for that matter.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Torchie--"Your movement"? What a pathetic joke. What have you ever done? Except, of course, show your complete ignorance for defending the biggest evil joke of them all--Oily.

    We have things going on behind the scenes--and will always make sure that the idiot dentist never comes close to them. Hopefully, the Obots will permanently put her out of business in MS (which, it's looking like she's taken their bait for them to do so). Enjoy the ride down on your blond burning ship.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Georgia Supreme Court
    Farrar v. Obama et al.

    Disposition Date: April 11, 2012
    Application denied
    All the Justices concur.

    http://www.gasupreme.us/docket_search/results_one_record.php?caseNumber=S12D1180

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Anonymous
    "Pen Johannson, in '50 reasons America should re-examine Obama’s past':

    'Historical archives dating between 1890 and 1941 reveal that the hawaiian islands served as an unofficial, but widely-pursued sanctuary for thousands of foreign expatriates seeking protection from political persecution in China, Japan, south-east asiatic nations, the middle east and, later, the United States. … One example of this surrogate nativity was granted to a Mr. Sun Yat Sen, a chinese expatriate who received an official certificate of hawaiian birth in 1904 stating that his birth had taken place in Hawaii in November, 1870. However, later evidence revealed that Mr. Sun’s birth had actually occurred in China in 1866.'

    Archives reveal that the state of Hawaii has provided similar documentation to thousands of immigrants over the years without ever confirming their age, the birth place or their actual identity."

    This is why Hawaii Dept of Health officials, along with other elected and appointed officials of Hawaii, including the former Republican governor of Hawaii, Lingle, cover for Barky. It's not about or for Barky that they do it; they do it for themselves. The last damned thing they want is an audit/investigation of Hawaii Dept of Health records, particularly birth records, going back the decades since Hawaii became one of the United States. All of the certifications of live birth issued to all of those babies born at home with no witnessing doctors or other registered health care workers and all of the monies the Federal govt gave to the state of Hawaii because of those registered home births in the state...It's a can of worms Fukino and the rest absolutely can not allow to be opened, even if keeping that can shut means aiding and abetting the usurpation of the office of the President of the United States of America.

    The registrar who worked for the Hawaii Dept of Health in the summer of 1961 had no idea what troubles s/he was helping to cause both the Hawaii Dept of Health officials and so many others across this nation and even across the globe 50 years or so after that summer.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.