Tuesday, January 3, 2012


Judge Malihi Denied Obama's Motion to Dismiss in Georgia Ballot Access Challenge: Granted Powell's and Swensson's Motion for Separate Hearings

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Motion to Dismiss by Obama is Denied, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge

Excerpts from Judge Michael Malihi in the Order for Obama's Motion to Dismiss:

"Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this Court finds that the cases cited by Defendant are not controlling."

"Code Section 21-2-5(a) states that "every candidate for federal and state office" must meet the qualifications for holding that particular office, and this Court has seen no case law limiting this provision, nor found any language that contains an exception for the office of president or stating that the provision does not apply to the presidential preference primary."

"Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought."

Other Orders from Judge Michael Malihi are as follows;

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Motion to Take Depositions Denied, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Motion to Sever Granted, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge

Please visit Article II Super PAC for the complete Orders here: http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit the site at www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation.

Disclaimer: Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund are two separate legal entities with separate missions, separate banking accounts and separate mailing addresses. Neither entity assumes any legal liability for any litigation or consequences thereof, as we are not a Party to such actions.

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html 

MAKE A PAC CONTRIBUTION HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/donate.html
19 Dec 2011: Wash Times Ad - Obama SSN Fails E-Verify System - Support New Article II Super PAC Org


116 comments:

  1. So...what does this all mean to a non-lawyer. Is it good or bad?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It means the judge just gave Obama and his lawyer a big middle finger!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It means as far as I understand it and as far as this judge is concerned barry has to prove he is eligible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It means Georgia election laws apply to presidential candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  5. HalfWhiteHalfKenyanJanuary 3, 2012 at 10:22 AM

    ORYR why didn't you post a blog about obama signing the ndaa bill saturday taking away all of our constitutional rights. Why didn't you post a blog yesterday on anything about obama's usurpation of the presidents office of the united states of america for the past 3 years. What the fuck is going on with you???? Are you having second thoughts????

    ReplyDelete
  6. Deposition was requested in the Plaintiff's response to Motion to Dismiss by Defendant.

    Court denied Defendant Obama et al. Motion to Dismiss, so the response which included the Deposition was no longer relevant to the Judge (since he earlier denied the Motion to Dismiss.)

    Plaintiff could file a separate motion for a deposition as the case progresses.

    The pendulum is moving now!

    Happy New Year, Harrison J. Bounel et al.!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    It means Georgia election laws apply to presidential candidates."

    At this juncture, if you include the word "primary" that would be correct.

    All the ruling states is that the judge disagreed with Mr. Jablonski's statements in his Motion to Dismiss that according the GA law there could be no challenge at the primary level as no "candidate" was being "elected" nor in fact anyone even nominated.

    The judge disagreed and stated that yes, at the PPP level, one still has to abide by the law and prove he's eligible for the office sought, as the statute states in plain language a person the primary ballot is indeed a "candidate" as defined by GA law.

    The ruling does not state that Obama has not proven his eligibility, merely that the challenges will not be dismissed based on the grounds of the motion to dismiss of the defendant.

    ReplyDelete
  8. California birther/dualer/doubterJanuary 3, 2012 at 10:46 AM

    It means the judge has slapped down the White House squatter and told him that he is not above the laws, to quit playing games and to fork over the conclusive evidence that he is constitutionally eligible to run for president. Otherwise he needs to take his un-American shit back to Kenya or Indonesia, or better yet we the people should throw him into Gitmo under the new defense bill that he illegally signed.

    Great to see the judge also grant the motion to divide the lawsuits so the SOB can be hammered on both his funny papers as well as the natural-born citizen issue.

    May this be the beginning of the end of this damned constitutional crisis.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is the best news I have seen in months. Compared to New Hampshire, Georgia is a beacon of liberty through its respect for the rule of law. If judge Malihi is to be believed based upon his strict reading of the laws of the state, BHO & Company will have no choice but to assume the burden of proving the validity of his asserted credentials. However, we have seen this movie before-- Judge Carter also showed early intent to ensure that any eligibility case would be examined on the merits, and he was corrupted by Perkins Coie. We shall wait and see...

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Anonymous
    What Obums! Malihi failed to dismiss the caseI?I? LoL.

    So...what does this all mean to a non-lawyer. Is it good or bad?

    It means those village Foggy-OBots should eat some of their idiotic pooh-pooh that they dish. LoL.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Orly believes a denial of a Motion to Dismiss opens the legal door for anything and everything under the sun.....someones in for a big let down.

    Obama's lawyer will file a motion for summary judgment based on the BC and the Motion will be granted.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Anonymous" makes some good points.

    Here are some further points to consider:

    - Since GA will participate in the "Super Tuesday" primary slate of States, the question is then whether or not candidate eligibility can be challenged by then and under what conditions. The point here is to remember that Obama is not officially the nominee at this point, merely a candidate for the DNC to choose

    - Once Obama likely becomes the nominee for the DNC, it is then the DNC's responsibility to submit to, say, the GA SoS' office a statement of eligibility. This was part of the snag during 2008 when folks were challenging Obama at that point. The question then becomes, how does one get, for example, the GA SoS to validate Obama's eligibility when his own party has officially gone on the record, presumably at that point, stating that he is qualified? In other words, what controlling legal authority is there for the GA SoS to essentially go beyond the self-ascribing statement of eligibility to ask for additional paperwork?

    Therefore, that would be the rub at this point. While the judge is stating that constitutional qualifications matter for a candidate for a federal office, either the law must subsequently direct another officeholder (e.g.: SoS) to check on these qualifications and/or the law must subsequently allow for a class of individuals to directly challenge such evidence.

    This would basically bring us back to 2008 all over again, unless another variable changes.

    Just some things to think about.

    Best,

    -Phil

    phil@therightsideoflife.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. @RS

    RS

    You should post these other orders at Free Republic!

    ReplyDelete
  14. The denial of the motion says nothing about the requirements for NBC or anything else. It simply denied a motion to dismiss because the Court was not persuaded by the case law. Obama will not file an answer and either a motion for judgment on the pleadings or a motion for summary judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  15. SUCK ON IT OBOT TERRI

    "Accordingly, this Court finds that Defendant is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party, and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought."

    ReplyDelete
  16. http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-PowellvObama-OrderonMotiontoSever-GeorgiaBallotAccessChallenge.pdf

    There are no trials, there are going to be a series of hearings. As the Judge is scheduling all the hearings on the same day, he expects them to be short.
    http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-PowellvObama-OrderonMotiontoSever-
    www.art2superpac.com
    http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-PowellvObama-OrderonMotiontoSever-
    www.art2superpac.com

    So I guess Orly can't depose the prez.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Terri

    Obama's lawyer will file a motion for summary judgment based on the BC and the Motion will be granted.

    Uuummmmmm OBot Terri...

    Mahili - "Statutory provisions must be read as they are written, and this Court finds that the cases cited by Defendant are not controlling."

    As I recall, OBama cited tons of cases in his MOD and I'm sure many of those cases cited (lies) words and stupid pictures in the Lame Stream Media and on the Internet of Obama's so called BC.

    Mahili looks to call your OBot BS on the carpet. It is way past time to show the 'OBot evidence' in court.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous said
    SUCK ON IT OBOT TERRI


    Lol...someone is in for a BIG let down.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Jablonski will now submit the COLB and then it's case closed

    ReplyDelete
  20. Terri, there is no BC, zerO's own lawyers would not allow him to be videoed or taped holding the paper you call the BC. Internet cyberspace pdf's, and computer screens are not hard copy certified documents- these are some very stubborn facts

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Terri

    "It simply denied a motion to dismiss because the Court was not persuaded by the case law."

    Didn't Judge Carter deny President Obama's Motion to Dismiss in Barnett v. Obama, only to grant the Motion for a Summary Judgement some months later.

    It appears that the judge wants at least some evidence (COLB?) that the President was born in the US.

    ReplyDelete
  22. They dismissed a rather shaky argument that the Georgia election law does not apply to primaries.

    That's all.

    This has no impact on anything birth certificate related alas.

    Orly does not understand that because she is very bad at being an attorney.

    ReplyDelete
  23. ANONYMOUS...That was a good response about the high sign. I would like to caution the Judge though. He/she needs to be careful when producing stiff things in front of OJUDAS. He has this "thing" about stiff things ! Ask Larry Sinclair about that or maybe Reggie Love could enlighten you.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Just so no one is confused here, the case is NOT about a BC, SS#, College records or Indonesian Citizenship. It's simply and succinctly about wether or not BHO is Constitutionally eligible to be on the GA ballot. At least two of the cases are about that. Either he is and Minor V Happersett, Vatell, the Law of Nations and any number of other cases relating to NBC are irrelevant or He is in a bit of a pickle and will have to conclusively prove his eligibility. Let reason and logic rule the day and let that one question be answered and laid to rest, once and for all. Don't know about you but that's all I've ever asked. Seems this Judge may just share that opinion. IMHO

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Anonymous

    You should post these other orders at Free Republic!

    Some are done. ;-)

    link here -

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2828181/posts?page=9#9

    ReplyDelete
  26. "Didn't Judge Carter deny President Obama's Motion to Dismiss in Barnett v. Obama, only to grant the Motion for a Summary Judgement some months later."

    No. Judge Carter granted the Motion to Dismiss.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sorry Carl.... But it will not happen....The most that will is Jablonski will submit the COLB and then it's case closed

    ReplyDelete
  28. And to all the others making fun of me, come back after the hearings and let me know who was right ....

    ReplyDelete
  29. "California birther/dualer/doubter said...[Reply]

    It means the judge has slapped down the White House squatter and told him that he is not above the laws, to quit playing games and to fork over the conclusive evidence that he is constitutionally eligible to run for president. Otherwise he needs to take his un-American shit back to Kenya or Indonesia, or better yet we the people should throw him into Gitmo under the new defense bill that he illegally signed.
    "

    No, what it means is Obama has to abide by the GA statutes as to how a candidate is placed on the PPP. The same rule(s) apply to all candidates, Republican and Democrat.

    He is being held to the same standard as all others PPP will be held... nothing more, nothing less.

    ReplyDelete
  30. You Obots make me sick. There is a near 100% chance that Obama is not eligible to be president and/or has committed many identity crimes in his past, but you come on here and gloat because he wins in court due to legal technicalities. Go to hell.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Terri

    Which COLB will Jablonski submit? The DailyKos COLB, one of the two Fackcheck COLBS, the Snopes COLB or one of the two WhiteHouse.gov COLBs? No two are the same so that means only one could possibly be authentic, and that's only a possibility. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Terri

    Sorry Carl.... But it will not happen....The most that will is Jablonski will submit the COLB and then it's case closed

    Ummmm Village OBot, not if Judge Mahili demands to see the original Obama birf certificate where a silly COLB abstract picture will not do.

    Recently, in the Hawaiian court, the OBot lawyer was using weasel words to describe that the data reflected what they had on record. "The data" OBot?? Have you heard of GIGO? That's computer lingo - 'GIGO' = Garbage In Garbage Out. , "The Obama data" is garbage on the Internet so lets see the genuine doctor signed and hospital issued birf certificate in court OBot.

    And NOT what Granny Dunham told the state of Hawaii or from some other OBot witness(es) who claimed Obama was born in Hawaii.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It is an Alinsky tactic to disguise oneself [in this case for example] as a Birther-supporter, and then use the position to rail against others, calling them names, saying 'go to hell', 'suck on it' and other expressions.

    I am suspicious of such comments and their contributions, since such invectives only seek to disrupt, cause chaos, and present a crude face of the Birther movement to the general public.

    I would like to warn the readers of this blog that not all comments made here-- presumably from Birthers are from actual Birthers.

    There is an organized 5th column of Occupy Obots that have been assigned to disrupt all public forums with respect to the issue of Obama's eligibility. I have experienced first hand dealing with these people when I had success bringing the issue to a national forum when I wrote for SanDiego.com.

    So how do you discern who is legit and who is not? Look toward the language. If it is abusive, littered with obscenities, dotted with personal attacks and hatred-- odds are they are not legit. They are part of a rabble that urges that 'buildings be burned down to save the constitution'-- and other nonsense.

    Please read these blogs circumspectly.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I am legit. I have been posting here since before the fake BC was released in April. I am beyond frustrated with Obama getting away with all of this. I wrote "go to hell" because I am tired of the gloating from the Obots when they ignore the facts and just focus on legal technicalities.

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Terri

    A copy of a vital document isn't acceptable to a court.

    (much less a copy of a vital document that contains layers and has been deemed a forgery by every expert who's seen it.)

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Terri

    In a case where fraud is being considered there's no way any judge is going to accpet a computer generated document that non-citizens can get.

    ReplyDelete
  37. California Birther/Dualer/DoubterJanuary 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    Ditto for me. Who wouldn't be pissed as hell over this bizarre chapter of our nation's history?

    @ Anon at 11:56 a.m.: In that case one of the lawsuits takes aim at the Georgia SOS for failing to respond to a FOIA request to submit evidence that the candidates were properly vetted in 2008. Failing that, you can be sure this shenanigan won't happen again.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @AM
    I understand your frustrations, but you have to remember [always] that the outcome of the movement may well depend on how your contributions are perceived by the general public-- And how your interactive remarks may be used by our enemies.

    That's all I am saying.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Rs

    Since you have posting privileges over at Free Republic could you correct poster JDIRTS false assertion that reads,

    "Article II SUPER PAC DOES NOT FUND THE LAWSUIT, IT IS JUST FOR EDUCATION. PLEASE SEND DONATIONS TO THE ATTORNEYS: HATFIELD, IRION AND TAITZ" http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2828181/posts?page=33#33

    The PAC set up a separate legal entity called the Article II Legal Defense Fund to cover legal expenses for Swensson and Powell's ballot challenge and other ballot and legal challenges in the future regarding article 2.

    Posted at the PAC Georgia news page.

    Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

    Please visit the site at www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation.

    Disclaimer: Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund are two separate legal entities with separate missions, separate banking accounts and separate mailing addresses. Neither entity assumes any legal liability for any litigation or consequences thereof, as we are not a Party to such actions.

    http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

    ReplyDelete
  40. L - O - L!!!!!!!!!! UP YOURS BARi !!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Georgia Citizen

    I'll give jdirt a link to your post here.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Terri

    The BC proves our point. He's not natural born.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Terri

    Hello!!! They are not asking for the LFBC. They are making the case of him being ineligible due to his father not being a US citizen.

    The birth certificate has nothing to do with it. If the only defense BO's lawyers have is to hand the judge a COLB...BO may FINALLY be going down.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Terri

    "Orly believes a denial of a Motion to Dismiss opens the legal door for anything and everything under the sun.....someones in for a big let down.

    Obama's lawyer will file a motion for summary judgment based on the BC and the Motion will be granted."

    The problem with your theory is that in order for what you say to occur, the court would need to make a holding on the legal definition of the term "natural born Citizen". That is exactly what the plaintiffs want!

    The court CAN'T do what you says it will, because it would need to find legal precedent that says that being born in the US makes one an NBC. There is no such legal precedent. Therefore the plaintiffs will be afforded the oppurtunity to argue that their case the Minor is legal SCOTUS precedent that NBC requires both parents be US citizens.

    Any way you look at it, it looks like a US court is going to make a legal ruling on what exactly the term-of-art 'natural born Citizen' actually means.

    ReplyDelete
  45. can we get this decision by judge malihi posted on drudge : we need to make it go viral every where possible . however , remember how judge carter wimped out in ca. a couple years ago .

    ReplyDelete
  46. Does Columbia have a fraud major?In the 1950's Columbia grad and instructor,Charles Van Doren,was able to pull off a national deception during the TV game show Golden Age for about a three year period until his Congressional confession.I'm not expecting what's his name to come forth in a similar fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  47. @Terri

    Terri said: "Jablonski will now submit the COLB and then it's case closed"

    There is nothing on the COLB that is being disputed - so why would it need to be entered into evidence?

    The argument is if the legal definition of the term 'natural born Citizen' includes citizens who were not born of 2 US citizen parents.

    Since the fact that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that his father was never a US citizen is not in dispute, the COLB has no relevance.

    The only thing that is relevant is what the legal definition of NBC is. The easiest way for Judge Malihi to punt this out of his court, would have been to find a way to grant the defendants Motion to Dismiss. Since he denied the Motion to Dismiss, there really doesn't appear to be a way for this case to end that does not result in a legal definition of what exactly a NBC is.

    The plaintiffs really are in a good position to argue that NBC does not include native born children of alien parents.

    One of the reasons why a court might be willing to take this issue on, and punt the other "arrest Obama for treason" cases, is that this argument does not only effect Obama, or Democrats, there are nationally prominent Republicans (Rubio and Jindal) who would suffer from the same ruling. That may give the court a way to deflect the impartiality rhetoric.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Anonymous January 3, 2012 2:29

    Judge Carter wimped out two days after a law clerk from the law firm of Obama's then current personal attorney was assigned to him. Coincedence or conspiracy...one or the other.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @Anonymous

    So what....he's still gotta put up or shut up with his info. It's a mechanism to get him legitimately tested....before the public....and with the ability to be challenged with whatever is presented.

    ReplyDelete
  50. @Anonymous

    "The plaintiffs really are in a good position to argue that NBC does not include native born children of alien parents."

    Not so much, if the judge requires actual proof that NBC requires two citizen parents, they may have difficulty coming up with something.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @RacerJim

    Jablonski will offer the COLB issued by the State of Hawaii. The one with Onaka's signature and the seal. Whether it will be the long form or short is his choice. Both are sufficient under the Georgia rules of evidence and the Full Faith and Credit Clause.

    Orly will get a photocopy. The certified copy will go to the ALJ. No forensics will be necessary -- or permitted.

    Then Judge Malihi will find, as a fact, that Obama meets the requirements to be on the Georgia PPP ballot.

    This will be res judicata as to the general election ballot.

    Orly should begin writing her appeal.

    ReplyDelete
  52. @RS

    The ALJ will accept a certified copy. Maybe the short form, maybe the photostat long form. The judge will not request to view the original archived vital record.

    ReplyDelete
  53. @Anonymous

    A copy may not be acceptable but a certified copy will be. Rules of evidence, my dear. Rules of evidence. By law they apply to this administrative hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I dare Mr. Obama's unlawful lawyers to submit either one of his birth documents to the court to be analyzed by the plaintiffs professional digital forensic experts. All the Hawaiian BOH employees will be called to take the stand.

    Obama will step down before it gets to that point and the felonies will pursue him and all those who are connected and are part of these grave acts against The United Satates citizens and The United States Constitution.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Anonymous

    Judges only rule on what is in the Motion. Here, the Motion to Dismiss did not raise any issue concerning the definition of NBC, therefore the judge would never make a ruling such as you suggest. The judge decided only the basis for the motion: Whether the Georgia statutory scheme for bringing a challenge against a candidate applies to the presidential preference primary candidate designated by the state party. He answered that affirmatively. Nothing more than that was decided.

    ReplyDelete
  56. This development is only the beginning. When one person of integrity stands many others join. There will be modern heroes when the truth is finally front and center where it belongs.

    The best strategy is the yet to be disclosed investigations that were never made public on the internet.With patience and persistent confirmation of facts being compiled without announcing on blogs and web media, the bombshells of high level conspiracy within our government leadership is nearing the full exposure stage. Bari, barry soetero, alleged Barack H. Obama will be arrested with many others. Crafting crimes always leaves trails.

    ReplyDelete
  57. For some reason, probably because I have often written on the matter, including on www.antimumullah.com I have been designated/tagged/targetted by a lady researcher/author Obamabot? as the "father of birtherism"!

    A Google search by a friend brought this out with links to actual articles posted on the Internet.

    I don't know what he put into his "search" box but here are a couple of them.

    As to the Malihi decision, I seem to remember that there is NO legal requirement or law, State or Federal to certify/vet a Presidential candidate, thus avoiding an obligation by the Democrat Party or anyone else to do so.

    Anyway, here are a couple of less than complimentary/ positive "researches" about me and if I remember correctly about this site here.

    http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2011/06/secret-origin-of-birthers.html

    http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2011/08/jim-racebannon-bancroft-birtherisms.html

    As a sidebar issue, you might want to check out a long but great list of links to audios and videos, which have been edited with an editorial/foreword by me on www.antimullah.com which show up Obama's flaws over the past years - visually in his own words from his own mouth.

    Worth sharing with your mailing lists to share and educate others about the person currently in the Wite House.

    BTW not my best, most accurate photo (smile)!

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Anonymous


    "Not so much, if the judge requires actual proof that NBC requires two citizen parents, they may have difficulty coming up with something."




    How about US Supreme Court precedent?




    From Minor v. Happersett opinion - "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens".




    There are many attempts out there to say that this is dicta, and not precedent, but it's been cited as precedent in dozens of cases. The whole 'Justiagate' issue, was an apparent attempt to obfuscate these cases.




    Obots can give it up now, because public opinion no longer matters. A case has finally been braught that will force a judge to make a legal decision on the definition of 'natural born Citizen'. And I don't really see forum posts as a good way of swaying a judges opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  59. According to Georgia law (Code Section 21-2-5(a)) every candidate to state or federal office, must be eligible to that office. And it provides the procedures for any voter in Georgia to challenge a candidates eligibility.




    Obama's lawyer argued that for various reasons the office of president was an exception. The judge denied this. That means that Obama must comply with the law, and prove that he is eligible for the office.




    The case was severed into 3 separate cases. I only care about the first two, those represented by Irion, and Hatfield.




    These cases simply argue that Obama is not eligible for the office of Potus because his father was never a US citizen. And that's it. They require no conspiracy by the state of Hawaii. No forged documents. There only concern is the legal definition of the term 'natural born Citizen'. These cases actually stipulate that they believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. And, that the COLB, and LFBC released by Obama are legit.




    Since the Motion to Dismiss was denied. It appears that the court will need to determine 3 things. 1) Obama is over the age of 35. 2) Obama has lived in the US for more than 14 years. And, 3) Obama is a 'natural born Citizen'. There is no way around the fact that a US court WILL determine the legal meaning of the term 'natural born Citizen'.




    Obama will not have to provide his COLB, or LFBC, because the paintiffs have already stated that they accept what has been released. What is going to be argued is whether or not Minor V. Happersett is standing legal precedent. And there are many VERY good arguments that it is.




    Personally, I think that has always been the issue. I believe that Obama was born in Hawaii. I believe that he's got a LFBC on file just like everyone else. I also believe that the COLB, and LFBC that he released was fraudulent. He has done everything possible to stir up 'birthers'. Every time the issue starts to settle down, bam, something stirs it back up again. Things settle down, and bam, Ambercrombie, one of Obama's biggest supports comments that Hawaii doesn't have a certificate on file. Bam, Trump stirs things up, and then gets some permits in Chicago.




    I belive that Obama has done everything he could to create enough evidence that even reasonable people would question whether or nothe was born in Hawaii. And he's done this to obfuscate the one fact he can't hide (because he wrote an entire book about it!), that he's not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of POTUS, because his father was never a US citizen!

    ReplyDelete
  60. Quil said...[Reply]
    I dare Mr. Obama's unlawful lawyers to submit either one of his birth documents to the court to be analyzed by the plaintiffs professional digital forensic experts. All the Hawaiian BOH employees will be called to take the stand.

    Obama will step down before it gets to that point and the felonies will pursue him and all those who are connected and are part of these grave acts against The United Satates citizens and The United States Constitution.


    No need , all Obama's lawyers has to do is have HI say they have Obama's BC on file and that's that..

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Anonymous

    The ALJ will accept a certified copy. Maybe the short form, maybe the photostat long form. The judge will not request to view the original archived vital record.

    We'll see OBot. One step of the time. Obama will eventually get his due comeuppance in history as well as his OBots.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous 4:23
    Well the part where he has to prove that he's over the age of 35 would take a vault birth certificate!

    ReplyDelete
  63. Yah, just argue that Obama is 2 years old, he sure acts like it.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Barry admitted in 1971 when he visited Decatur, IL that he wasn't born in this country, but wanted to run for the presideny someday.
    Tim Geithner and his sister, Audie Geithner, talked about Barry in 1970 when they visited Decatur, IL. Barry attended the same school in Jakarta, Indonesia as Audie Geithner. He had taken up Muslim religious studies in Muslim garb. Tim recited Barry's many, many names. Then, Mrs. Geithner stormed out of her relatives' home and forced her children inside the house all the time accusing them of violating an oath of silence about certain people and subjects. It seems the children's father had forbidden them to speak about certain people and things as a pre-condition for their visit to the U.S. mainland.
    This is the truth, and no one can change the truth. I was threatened by Barry's handler, a known drug dealer, in 1971 when I cited the Constitution. Barry claimed to have NO birth certificate and needed a SS#;someone in the SDS/hippie/druggie network offered a CT mailing address.
    The FBI can ignore me, just like they ignored information that Middle Eastern men were trying to take flight lessons at Flying Cloud Airport near Round Lake, MN in 1989. The young flight instructor was told by the men that they only wanted to learn how to take off and fly the plane; they refused to learn how to land the plane. I know the people from Burnsville, MN who reported this to the FBI were threatened by the FBI agents when they tried to provide further information.
    Geithner worked for Henry Kissinger at Kissinger & Associates,IMF,Federal Reserve, and now as head of Treasury. Kissinger initiated free trade with the Chicoms under the Nixon administration. Former President George Bush, Sr. was trade ambassador to China. The labor unions in this country were allegedly infiltrated by Communist, and this was initially given as a justification for outsourcing our manufacturing sector. How is enriching the CommunistPeoples' Republic of China a deterrent to the viability of a Communist regime?
    Google Club of Rome, Committee of 300, and Dr. John Coleman's video series about the Committee of 300. The destruction of the American middle class by the removal of her stable manufacturing sector curiously echoes what is being done to this country in the name of free trade.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Hey OBots. Sheriff Arpaio's Posse preliminary report is due out next month. We hear Michelle O. is "in a panic." Panicking? Why, she got nothing to worry about right OBots? LoL. It's a good possibility that the plaintiffs would use that derogatory Obama report in this Georgia Administrative Court.


    So much for the FoggyOBots and Micheeeellle to worry about these days. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  66. Terri @ 4:28 p.m.

    His loophole is that the corruptocrats in HI who now call a Certification of Live Birth a Certificate of Live Birth are relying on the Full Faith and Credit Act of the United States which require states to honor other states'legal documents.
    He knows he stated in 1971 in Decatur, IL that he was not born here, but wanted to run for the presidency someday. He knows the name of his handler for that visit in 1971.
    He is relying on others not having the truth at their disposal. I was sixteen years old when his handler threatened me. Your hero and his followers ought to be ashamed for threatening minors. Your hero is a liar and he ass-o-cia-tes with people who threaten high school girls.
    The secrets kept, the evil secrets kept by those in power to continue to wield power are an anathema to freedom and democracy.
    Barry and Tim serve Kissinger, Rockefeller, Soros, and the Committee of 300, the Black Guelphs (Niw4ros/irs4Nwo/Windsor/King George/Nazis).

    ReplyDelete
  67. @Anonymous

    "And there are many VERY good arguments that it is."

    And there are just as many very good arguments that it isn't. Include several legal cases that say it isn't.

    Even Orly says Minor v. Happersett is dicta. And doesn't she go first in Georgia?

    ReplyDelete
  68. "I dare Mr. Obama's unlawful lawyers to submit either one of his birth documents to the court to be analyzed by the plaintiffs professional digital forensic experts. All the Hawaiian BOH employees will be called to take the stand. "

    What makes you think any digital image would be presented, number 1, and number 2, none of her experts are experts that would qualify to testify in a court of law on forensic document examination, digital or otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Google Echelon and Carnivore. The British government, probably MI6, monitors internet communications in the United States, and the U.S. intel monitors British internet activity by agreement.
    That' right, the Black Guelph/Nazi/Windsor/Niw4ros/Princess Diana-murdering monarchy is monitoring our communications.

    ReplyDelete
  70. "Obama's lawyer argued that for various reasons the office of president was an exception. The judge denied this. That means that Obama must comply with the law, and prove that he is eligible for the office."

    Not "exactly." Mr. Jablonski did not argue that the office of the president was an exception, he argued that a PPP in GA was not an "election" as defined by GA election code as no one is "elected" nor even "nominated" in the PPP and therefore there was no "candidate."

    Judge Malihi disagreed with Jablonski's interpretation of the GA Election Code and denied the motion.

    ReplyDelete
  71. I'm starting to think "Terri" might actually be Valerie Jarrett, AKA, "Barry's brain".

    Barry lost his Reggie Love but as far as I know still has his brain....or, considering the big scar on his head, someones brain.

    The Obots may be even more sleazy than Barry himself.......and that's a real challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  72. And doesn't she go first in Georgia?
    -

    Nope genius Obot she goes last.

    ReplyDelete
  73. @Anonymous

    "hey dismissed a rather shaky argument that the Georgia election law does not apply to primaries."

    It does apply to primates, though. Ol' barry big-ears is one shot duck.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I hope and pray this Judge continues to have a spine.

    ReplyDelete
  75. In 1993, someone who is a descendant of Carl-Eduard, talked about “King Arthur” and “Round Tables” When I stated I did not undestand the significance of those terms, he mentiond the Committee of 300. I had never heard of the Committee of 300. Nor, did I know the significance of the name of Carl-Eduard.
    This descendant of Carl-Eduard bragged about his forbear being in charge of the German Red Cross in the past and a very powerful individual connected to royalty, specifically the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha aka House of Windsor.This person's imperious manner and inflated sense of superiority was quite evident and off-putting, and I thought his allusions quite grandiose.
    Later,I would learn that he was speaking of this individual:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl-Eduard_Herzog_von_Sachsen-Coburg_und_Gotha
    Carl--Eduard was a grandson of Victoria and Albert, and the forbear of King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden. He collaborated with the Nazis during WWII and was made head of the German Red Cross.
    Dr. John Coleman wrote “Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 in 1992 and included flow charts connecting the Committee of 300 to various United States institutions, government, military, academia, etc. through round tables whereby the Committee of 300 directs input to the various round tables and gathers information to formulate plans on how to accomplish the goals of the Committee of 300. Would you be surprised to learn that Henry Kissinger and George Soros are members?
    I would encourage you to view Dr. Coleman's series on the Committee of 300 on youtube wherein he mentions that the Club of Rome's goal is to destroy the middle class in America.
    A descendant of Carl-Eduard, head of the German Red Cross for the Nazis believes the Committee of 300 runs the world.

    ReplyDelete
  76. @RacerJim

    "Judge Carter wimped out two days after a law clerk from the law firm of Obama's then current personal attorney was assigned to him. Coincedence or conspiracy...one or the other."

    I'll take "Conspiracy" for $2,000 Alex.....

    ReplyDelete
  77. Yep 2012 is promising to be a VERY good year! Let us pray it is so! :) By the way Obots, Happy New Year!!! lol

    ReplyDelete
  78. "ORYR why didn't you post a blog about obama signing the ndaa bill saturday taking away all of our constitutional rights. Why didn't you post a blog yesterday on anything about obama's usurpation of the presidents office of the united states of america for the past 3 years. What the fuck is going on with you???? Are you having second thoughts????"

    I second this HalfWhiteKenyan, I've like this site, but all the goings on with this guy, and now this law where we could all just disappear at the whim of the president, like what has happened in EVERY OTHER COMMUNIST COUNTRY THROUGHOUT HISTORY - and you say nothing? I've long suspected Orly Taitz as the attorney who gets fielded to handle all these cases - only to botch. Its called the controlled opposition. Do we have to suspect you too? I note this site advertises on her site.

    ReplyDelete
  79. if zerO's attys profer one of the fake docs, has a Felony occurred. At least an investigation should be started as to the origins of the fake docs.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Quote from bn:

    "I've long suspected Orly Taitz as the attorney who gets fielded to handle all these cases - only to botch. Its called the controlled opposition. Do we have to suspect you too? I note this site advertises on her site."

    Fox News is "controlled opposition" but I don't believe we can conclude that this site or Orly's are even remotely close to being anything but all out efforts to expose the truth about the usurper.

    ReplyDelete
  81. "Why didn't you post a blog yesterday" | Myself like others that help out here have families and with the long holiday weekend what do you expect? Nobody is getting a paycheck to keep the eligibility news flowing. This site puts out 1-3 posts a day in a typical week and you're complaining about one day without a post?

    =======

    "and you say nothing?" | This site is strictly about eligibility news. Of course what he signed was a travesty and unconstitutional but so was his 2008 coup.

    What do you expect from a two-bit Marxist revolutionary?

    ========

    "Do we have to suspect you too?" | None of the information put out at this site helps Obama in any way. You can suspect what you want.

    =======

    "I note this site advertises on her site" | No she pulled down the linked banner to this site several weeks ago and it wasn't ever paid advertising.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Typo by me in my last post, the site is www.antimullah.com not antimumullah. Called "fat finger" typing.

    ReplyDelete
  83. This is great news for America. Hopefully, the fraud will eventually be prosecuted & his buddy
    Holder.

    Why isn't this big news on Conservative sites?
    The Drudge Report for example?

    America, let's roll!

    ReplyDelete
  84. The people demand and deserve answers to reasonable questions about their president. Media and the established political elite are evading the truth and this is BS

    ReplyDelete
  85. Even if O DOES file for a summary judgement, according to that judge, he will not qualify because his father was a British citizen. Very plain and simple. Unless O can somehow change his father for another one ( :D )he will not qualify according to law.

    ReplyDelete
  86. We are all in for a big one coming soon. Obama will not make it through to the election due to higher accountability that is beyond anyone's control. However, prepare for things to get very ugly due to this new NDAA. We will ALL be stunned and surprised about what is about to occurr in America.

    ReplyDelete
  87. John Doe at 8:55 PM: Does Orly still have that picture of a Snow Owl at the top of her blogsite? Well, what is the significance of a Snow Owl? A predator whose exterior camoflauge makes it invisible to smaller prey and has the distinct advantage of viewing prey from above. The all-knowing and all-seeing owl is a symbol for secret societies and occult religion.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Does anyone know what the calender looks like for this proceding?

    ReplyDelete
  89. John Doe Sr. said...[Reply]
    I'm starting to think "Terri" might actually be Valerie Jarrett, AKA, "Barry's brain".

    Lol....The stupidity...it burns!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  90. @bn People have lives away from the internet. Get over it. This is a FREE country (for now), therefore the owner has the right to publish whatever he or she wants to. NOTE: This blog is about Obozo's non-eligibility, not whatever you want it to be. Now, have a nice day.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Several issues: (1) Obama's father WAS NOT a US citizen. This means that Obama could have been born at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial and he STILL WOULD NOT BE a "natural born citizen.
    (2) Obama is using an illegal Social Security number and this violation needs to be investigated by criminal law enforcement agencies and prosecuted in the courts.
    (3) He will be FORCED to have his alleged vault-maintained original Hawaiian Birth Certificate surrendered by the Hawaiian Health Department and FORENSICALLY examined by document experts for indications of fraud.
    (4) Down the line if this birth certificate is found to be a fraud, and because Obama has gone on record in claiming it to be legitimate, he can be found guilty of perpetrating a fraud. He will be prevented from running again for the US presidency and, in having run for and accepting the office of president in the first place under wholly false pretenses, who knows the limit of criminal violations he can be held guilty of committing. If he's found guilty, I say throw the book at him, force him to repay the salary and perks he and his family and associates received while in office, start procedures to undo ALL the governmental actions he's been responsible for, and start inquiries into all of actions of and benefits received by the official office holders who KNOWINGLY AIDED AND ABETTED HIS SUBTERFUGE of getting in office and staying in office. Every person reasonably suspected of knowingly aiding and abetting his USURPATION should be put on trial and prosecuted to the full extent of the law! ALL members of the US Congress who have violated the Constitution-Upholding provisions they had to swear to uphold in assuming their positions should, as well, be investigated, challenged, and, if not formally brought to trial, run out of the country with cans of shame and disgrace rattling behind their two-faced, self-serving tails!

    ReplyDelete
  92. Several issues: (1) Obama's father WAS NOT a US citizen. This means that Obama could have been born at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial and he STILL WOULD NOT BE a "natural born citizen.
    (2) Obama is using an illegal Social Security number and this violation needs to be investigated by criminal law enforcement agencies and prosecuted in the courts.
    (3) He will be FORCED to have his alleged vault-maintained original Hawaiian Birth Certificate surrendered by the Hawaiian Health Department and FORENSICALLY examined by document experts for indications of fraud.
    (4) Down the line if this birth certificate is found to be a fraud, and because Obama has gone on record in claiming it to be legitimate, he can be found guilty of perpetrating a fraud. He will be prevented from running again for the US presidency and, in having run for and accepting the office of president in the first place under wholly false pretenses, who knows the limit of criminal violations he can be held guilty of committing. If he's found guilty, I say throw the book at him, force him to repay the salary and perks he and his family and associates received while in office, start procedures to undo ALL the governmental actions he's been responsible for, and start inquiries into all of actions of and benefits received by the official office holders who KNOWINGLY AIDED AND ABETTED HIS SUBTERFUGE of getting in office and staying in office. Every person reasonably suspected of knowingly aiding and abetting his USURPATION should be put on trial and prosecuted to the full extent of the law! ALL members of the US Congress who have violated the Constitution-Upholding provisions they had to swear to uphold in assuming their positions should, as well, be investigated, challenged, and, if not formally brought to trial, run out of the country with cans of shame and disgrace rattling behind their two-faced, self-serving tails!

    ReplyDelete
  93. Infowars has reported on this...

    http://www.infowars.com/birthers-hail-judges-decision-that-could-depose-obama/

    ReplyDelete
  94. Hey Valerie....uh, Terri,

    Put something on your burn and enjoy that laugh.

    Your job of defending Barry isn't going to be fun anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  95. The population of the USA nears 400 million...50 sovereign independent nation states...
    and some teensy number of pipsqueaks in DC are trying to paddle-steer an aircraft carrier into the direction of socialism...they will
    FAIL
    they'd best jump ship now

    ReplyDelete
  96. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    Even if O DOES file for a summary judgement, according to that judge, he will not qualify because his father was a British citizen."

    The judge has not stated any such thing.

    ReplyDelete
  97. @Terri don't you have better things to do, terri? than stalk this site and try to cast your dispersions. You are pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  98. @ZTR
    Sadly, Oscama will just claim he thought he was natural born, thus committing no crime. We all know its a big scam and I am sure they have a contingency plan.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Don't get too excited. Judge Malihi disagreed with Jablonski that this was not an "election" with a "candidate." Jablonski had argued this was a "preference" vote. The language of the statute appears to be ambiguous, but in the end other provisions in the statute seem to indicate that "candidate" can be in a future election.

    So, the issue now is whether President Obama is over 35, born in the USA and has lived here for 14 years. The first two can be proven with a copy of the short form certificate of live birth, and the latter with either "administrative notice" or a declaration/affidavit from Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Anonymous said...
    @Anonymous

    A copy may not be acceptable but a certified copy will be. Rules of evidence, my dear. Rules of evidence. By law they apply to this administrative hearing.

    January 3, 2012 3:35 PM

    Rules of evidence does not allow just ANY item be placed into evidence. It first must pass Fed. Rules of Evidence Article IV Rule 401.
    The validity of this BC is in question. This, in itself, is the question. Is this a valid BC for Obama?
    Plantifs are not forced to accept it at face value. It has been shown time and time again to be a forgery. Would the Obama clan open the door to a forensic analysis of this document? No.
    In admitting it into evidence, they must then prove it to be a valid copy of the original. There is only one way to do that.
    I doubt they are dumb enough to open that Pandora's box.

    ReplyDelete
  101. "So, the issue now is whether President Obama is over 35, born in the USA and has lived here for 14 years."
    -

    Please cite in Article II, or anywhere else in the Constitution, where it says only being "born in the USA" alone makes one a natural born Citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  102. @Georgia Citizen

    "Please cite in Article II, or anywhere else in the Constitution, where it says only being "born in the USA" alone makes one a natural born Citizen."

    please cite where it says anything else is required.

    ReplyDelete
  103. @Georgia Citizen - U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Please cite where it says anything in the Constitution that "born in the USA" alone makes one a natural born Citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Newt Gingrich's Chastisement of the Judiciary the other night, on the Internationally Televised Republican Primary Debates, obviously struck a nerve....
    A simple reminder to the Judiciary that they only interpret Law, they do not make Law.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Well, since Article I defines the requirement for Congress/Senate as being a "Citizen"

    and since Article II defines the requirement for President as being a "Natural Born Citizen" and 14 years a Resident...

    this means that a "Citizen" is not always a "Natural Born Citizen"

    Indeed that is why the requirement goes on to say "14 years a resident", since though every natural born citizen is a Citizen (it's a subcategory), not every Citizen is a natural born citizen.

    So being born in-country alone does not make one a Natural Born Citizen, since the Constitution says that a Natural Born Citizen is different than the generic term Citizen, and you can be a Citizen by being born in the US or elsewhere too, so that is not the clarifying and defining factor.

    See unfortunately for limited IQ Obots, there's only finite permutations of parentage and birthplace, and the one thing that separates a NBC from a statutory naturalized citizen is being born of 2 US Citizen parents on US soil. McCain is a statutory citizen, not a natural born citizen and he is born of 2 US Citizens on foreign soil, in Panama (not on a military base). A Citizen is the umbrella category which includes Natural Born Citizens.

    That is why Article I is just "Citizen" and Article II is just "natural born citizen".

    Pure mathematical logic.

    ReplyDelete
  107. To force the hand of the jus-soli only b.s.ing obots, just ask them to DIFFERENTIATE between a Citizen and a Natural Born Citizen

    When they try to say NBCs are just born in-country, well so are Citizens often-times, so that aint it.

    The difference is that NBCs require both parents and to be born in-country, since 2 US citizen parents born abroad AND 1 US citizen parent born anywhere are just naturalized statutory Citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Remember "Citizen" is umbrella category which INCLUDES "Natural Born Citizen"

    So every NBC is a Citizen, while not every Citizen is a NBC

    A Citizen is so by naturalization (which means they are citizens by statute).

    A Natural Born Citizen is so by nature.

    In fact the laws reflect this, if you have 0 or 1 US Citizen parent born anywhere, or even 2 US Citizen parent born abroad, you can be a Naturalized (statutory) US Citizen.

    The one omitted permutation under US Citizen statutes is that for NBCs which is 2 US Citizen parents born on US soil.

    ReplyDelete
  109. New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html

    ReplyDelete
  110. Rules of evidence does not allow just ANY item be placed into evidence. It first must pass Fed. Rules of Evidence Article IV Rule 401.

    This challenge is being heard in by a state agency, not a federal court. So the federal rules of evidence don't apply; the State of Georgia's rules apply.

    FRE 401 is about relevance, and Georgia has a similar rule about relevance. Surely a birth certificate is relevant to the issue of natural-born citizenship -- unless the parties stipulate that Obama was born in the United States and is over 35, but it is doubtful all parties will stipulate to that.

    Georgia does have evidentiary rules about the proving the authenticity of out-of-state documents. It would be no problem for Obama to comply with those.

    ReplyDelete
  111. NBC's WXIA-TV: Georgia Judge Denied Obama's Motion to Dismiss Ballot Access Challenge


    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/nbcs-wxia-tv-georgia-judge-denied.html

    ReplyDelete
  112. The best that can happen is that he is NOT re-elected, and goes on to teach an adult ed course in NY on "How to use Charm, Lies and Impression Management to run a country (into the ground)". Wednesday evenings 7:00-8:30 Fee $40.00/$20.00 for seniors. Registration limited..so sign up now!

    ReplyDelete
  113. The illegal alien DOES have some support--that is correct. They DO have a right to speak out, but frankly, do you expect any of their fawning over the chief liar in Washington to change OUR minds? I don't think so. Actually, the "illegal" will never make 20 Jun 12; he will be tried for treason and put at Guantanamo Bay for the rest of his life. Watch.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Judge Malihi be carefull its just a matter of time before they recall you out of office, the truth is out every singel JUDGE is the United States is bought by money,let's expose Malihi I bet he is as corrupt as every single Congress man in the U.S Senate.. I assure you he will soon dismiss this case when he is exposed and he has nothing to fall back into... WIKI leak if you are reading this expose this clown...

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.