Thursday, January 26, 2012


Update: Obama's Georgia Ballot Hearing: Judge Wanted To 
Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against Obama
Dean Haskins on the Scene at Hearing

As we are trying to get a quick lunch, and then do some interviews, this is just a very brief synopsis of what happened today. Before the hearing started, the judge called the attorneys into his chambers and explained that he was going to enter a default judgment in their favor. Attorneys Hatfield and Irion requested to be able to present abbreviated versions of their arguments so that they would be on the record. At that point, Irion estimated he would need 20 minutes, Hatfield estimated he would need 30 minutes, and Taitz estimated she would need 2 hours.

Van Irion and Mark Hatfield made their arguments, and left. Taitz then presented her argument, calling several witnesses, until the judge asked her to make her closing statement. As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify. The judge finally asked her just to make her closing statement, which she did.

We believe that the default judgment automatically translates into the judge's recommendation to the Sec. Of State being that Obama should not appear on the ballot in Georgia.

Back to work . . . more to come!

UPDATE: From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,

The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.

Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl

You can also find a blow by blow account of today's hearing in Georgia here: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138

Article II Super PAC reports they will post an archive of today's hearing soon as it is available: http://www.art2superpac.com

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC

179 comments:

  1. Too good to be true!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So when does it become official? I can't wait to gloat!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't really want to gloat. Well, maybe a little. I just want to get the corrupt usurper out of town and out of the country.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hope Jablonski gets dis-barred and that "everyone" who was subpoenaed and did not show up gets slapped with a heavy fine including the Ignoramus-in-Chief.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Don't worry guys, "A Real Lawyer" will post soon that this is what Team Obama really wanted, and that us "birthers" are pathetic and he can't wait until the judge makes us all look silly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. California birther/dualer/doubterJanuary 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM

    Is that a resounding "GULP!" I hear emanating from the direction of the White House? Take that, Obots! I fully expect the Georgia secretary of state to remove the illegal president from the ballot and let the crybabies stew in their own juices.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why is there not a warrant out for this fake? How does he get away with this. Isn't anyone (any honest people left) going to do something or is he simply allowed to carry on as he does. This is appalling. Charge him with contempt. It's embarrassing to the judicial system of the USA. He's nobody important if he's not eligible.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA. The term "natural born citizen" has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
    1) Obama must be born in the USA.
    The forged document provided by the White House web site of Obama's supposedly long form birth certificate is simply that, a bad forgery!
    Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii and to check directly the original long form birth certificate and in particular to assess if even this original is genuine that is if it is not also a forgery!!
    2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
    We know that Obama's father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
    Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!

    More, Obama is a former lawyer. Therefore, he knew perfectly well that he was not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA but he nevertheless did it DISHONESTLY, FRAUDULENTLY, deceiving purposefully the entire American people.

    Furthermore, Obama was confronted with the definition of what a "natural born citizen" is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain's eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
    Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.

    First Conclusion:
    ---Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
    ---Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
    ---THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
    1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
    2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
    3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
    ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!

    If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a "natural born citizen" truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo's web site "Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
    In particular, read:
    ---"The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. As I stated yesterday, the reason that the place of this hearing has been changed so many times is that it was hard to find a courtroom in Georgia that would allow the hearing to take place. Up until yesterday it was scheduled to take place in Fulton Superior Court but they would not allow it. Fulton Superior Court has the last word in the State of Georgia as to whether Obama appears on the ballot and it does not appear that they are going to allow Obama to be removed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I seem to recall a "Birther Summit Editorial" penned Dean Haskins 6 days ago, stating that the hearing this morning would NOT happen.

    And while I am grateful for his "On the Scene at Hearing" report,I have yet to see an admission that he was wrong and the guaranteed, promised, full apology.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Kick Butt!
    I can't wait until the MSM puts this out; walls will crumble.

    ReplyDelete
  12. We have this on what? Dean Haskins' say-so?

    If this is true, why didn't the ALJ make a record? That is how it is done in courts. The judge says, "Let the reflect the following order of this court: ... XYZ" and then states that a judgment of default is hereby entered against the ABC party. This is done at the BEGINNING of the hearing.

    I listened to the entire proceeding and did not hear one word from the judgment that sounded remotely like default. Instead, he proceeded to hold a hearing as if he has a determination to make.

    I would not trust a nonlawyer to interpret the remarks of a judge, especially when Dean was not actually present in chambers. I think one of the parties -- Carl Swensson -- interpreted something said in chambers as meaning that a default judgment was entered.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jablonski made a wise decision to boycott this freak show.

    The Georgia delegation will attend the convention and cast their votes for Obama. The President will be on the general election ballot, running for re-election. If not this administrative court, then a higher court will see to it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So, who ACTUALLY said the judge was going to entrer a "default judgement", specifically which of the lawyers that went into chambers as they and the jusge are the onl;y ones who would have heard that.

    If it was Orly who passed this inmformation then, well we know just how interesting her interpetation are.

    For example, this was an administrative hearing in front of an ALJ. He can't enter any type of judgement never mind a "default" judegement.

    All he can do is make a recommendation to the SoS, that's it.

    So, who told everyone there was a "default' on the table..?

    ReplyDelete
  15. What is Dean's source for this default judgment?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think it's fair to say that Obama is now in deep doo-doo...all the way to and through the U.S. Supreme Court.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The government is showing that they are weak and don't have any power its dictatorship. But the US is trying to remove dictators from other countries...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Not sure where you get that Dean said the hearings would not take place. He never stated that and if you go back and read his articles you would see that. He did say the subpoenas that were issued to people outside the state of Georgia were not legally valid. He was 100% correct about that.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @AM

    You are correct -- it is part of a strategy. Ignore the Star Chamber and go straight to federal court if the SOS makes the wrong decision. Mr. Kemp, who is in possession of the COLB -- all the evidence he needs -- knows that his a** is toast in a court of law if he makes the wrong decision.

    You noticed the U.S. Attorneys sitting there, right? Why, do you suppose, they were there? Taking notes? Clue: think Civil Rights Act violations. Think, "I hope Linda Jordan, who incriminated herself in a criminal act, can get off with probation."

    This Ringling Bros. affair relates only to the primary ballot. Obama WILL be on the Georgia ballot in November.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The judge should bring forth sanctions against the OBot lawyer and Obama. One of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, I think Hatfield did, recommended or suggested that the court should do so.

    And he should also sanction the Foggy-OBots and Dr. CON blocking the camera view of the court proceedings! (only mildly sarcastic)

    ReplyDelete
  21. They're on the run guys! They FAILED TO APPEAR and the judge is pissed. Nothing more strongly supports our case than they're "FAILURE TO APPEAR"...

    No one knows what tomorrow might bring but make no mistake, THE DAY BELONGS TO THE BIRTHERS..!

    ReplyDelete
  22. @AM

    Don't worry guys, "A Real Lawyer"

    Another village clown. LoL.

    So Foggy OBots....Whaaaat Happppeeened? Did yoooou Lose?

    Sooo Foggy OBots, Where was that famous Crayola Crayon abstract, birf certificate that was going to be presented to save the day for yooou OBums? LoL. Epic Fail!

    Sooo OBots again, whaaaat Happppeeened? I thought Jabber Jabber Jablonski saved the day by sending that note to the GA SoS to end the "Insanity" and "Birther Circus"??

    Just Damn OBots - Epic Failure!

    LoL!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Commykiller said...

    They're on the run guys! They FAILED TO APPEAR and the judge is pissed. Nothing more strongly supports our case than they're "FAILURE TO APPEAR"...

    No one knows what tomorrow might bring but make no mistake, THE DAY BELONGS TO THE BIRTHERS..!

    If got a dollar for every prediction you have been proved WRONG...I would afford a cruise vacation.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A "Real Lawyer" would have had the stones to show up for the hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Time to move the goal posts OBots.

    As a plaintiff, OBama will have dooooo something to prove his eligibility to get on the GA ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The reason that Obama did not show up and that the media is not reporting this is that the theory of the day is that if Birthers want to make fools of themselves get out of the way and let them do it.

    Everyone knows that US Courts will not allow Administrative Judge Malihi or Secretary of State Kemp to keep Obama off of the Georgia Ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "Error Establishing Database" is what I keep receiving trying to connect to Post&Email. Anyone else?

    ReplyDelete
  28. This is actually HORRIBLE people!

    Because the judge is entering a default judgement, it means that he will not be ruling on any of the evidence presented in the hearings. He WILL NOT be ruling that Minor v Happersett is established precedent on the definiton of NBC!!!!

    The SOS may, or may not be placed on the ballot. But the media DEFINATELY will not be reporting on Minor, and it's definition of NBC!

    There is nothing that is going to come out of this ruling that will be benificial in other state challenges.

    The news will just keep continue reporting on the crazy birthers who think Obama's not a US citizen!

    The judge, and the SOS are punting on this whole issue!

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Anonymous

    I think in this context a default judgement simply means that the Judge will rule in favor of not allowing Obama to be on the ballot, based solely on the fact that he FAILED TO APPEAR.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This is HORRIBLE news!

    A default judgement means that the judge does not need to rule on any of the evidence presented at the hearings! So we still will not have a judge ruling on the merits of Minor v Happersett being precedent on the definiton of NBC.

    The SOS may or may not place Obama on the Georgia ballot, but one thing is for certain, nothing benificial for any other state challenges will be coming from this default ruling!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Folks don't hold your breath !! How many other "delayed judgements" that looked they were gonna finally make the imposter show HE'S AN IMPOSTER/ILLEGAL ? And unbeknowing to us, the judge probably get's a M-16 stuck in his mouth at 3 am at home right before the day of judgement. How do you think he'll rule ?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @RS
    Ready to bet yet computer coward?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Time to kick ass and take names!

    ReplyDelete
  34. This is awesome..If the Sec of State overrules this decision then Taitz can take this all the way up the chain with STANDING! Remarkable victory for her today no mater the outcome!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Time to break out a can of whoop ass!

    ReplyDelete
  36. You guys are funny. Neither the ALJ nor the SOS has the final say. As someone pointed out earlier, the real court has the final say. However, if the U.S. Attorneys office was present, the decision will be in Obamas favor. You will lose again. If it is so slam dunk, why didn't Mahlihi make the decision today. Hint:He did not want to upset you cry babies.

    ReplyDelete
  37. ""Error Establishing Database" is what I keep receiving trying to connect to Post&Email. Anyone else?"

    Yep, I get the same message...most all of today.

    ReplyDelete
  38. How does a judge rule in favor of defendants who don't show up? When you are a juror they tell you the case has to be decided by the evidence issued in Court only. I would assume that holds true for a judge who has to make a ruling on a case and he has the make a ruling based on the evidence submitted in the Court. Seems the ruling has to go against the Obama Administration in this case or why should anyone have to show up in Court at all?

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Mashman

    Aaaannnddd...WE HAVE A WINNER!

    Step forward Mashman, and collect your prize!

    For you other birthers, you see how it's done?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Obama thru his attorney under the bus!!! LMAO

    ReplyDelete
  41. This is actually HORRIBLE people!

    Because the judge is entering a default judgement, it means that he will not be ruling on any of the evidence presented in the hearings. He WILL NOT be ruling that Minor v Happersett is established precedent on the definiton of NBC!!!!

    Not really horrible. The objective here is to keep Obama off the GA ballot. A victory. You should not fall prey to media spin and other BS.

    The real reason that would surface if Obama fails to get on the GA ballot is because he cannot prove he is a natural born citizen. One step at a time. We all know it and so do the lying OBots who have sold their souls.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I wish that Dean Haskins would give us a good report on what all happened in the court today.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Mashman

    It still a good start. If Obama does not want to face the music in GA he won't want to face it anywhere else either.

    Let's keep the SOB on the run.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @A Real Lawyer

    Who said Brian Kemp had Obama's birth certificate? A birth certificate isn't required, only that the party (in this case, DNC- WHO REMOVED THE WORDING OF "Candidate is constitutionally eligible") certifies that they ARE constitutionally eligible.

    What is your source that Kemp has the birth certificate? And not one downloaded from the internet. If I lose my Drivers License, could I just walk in the DMV and give them a URL for a scanned in copy of it? Uhhh, no.

    ReplyDelete
  45. So Obama lost by binding default judgment of the historically critical first eligibility case ever adjudicated in the history of the United States citing Minor v. Happersett as precedent holding defining a natural born citizen as born in-country of citizen parents.
    This establishes Minor as the precedent ruling used for the precedent judgment of Obama's ineligibility, and can be used again.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Dean Haskins on the Scene at Hearing

    As we are trying to get a quick lunch, and then do some interviews, this is just a very brief synopsis of what happened today. Before the hearing started, the judge called the attorneys into his chambers and explained that he was going to enter a default judgment in their favor. Attorneys Hatfield and Irion requested to be able to present abbreviated versions of their arguments so that they would be on the record. At that point, Irion estimated he would need 20 minutes, Hatfield estimated he would need 30 minutes, and Taitz estimated she would need 2 hours.

    Van Irion and Mark Hatfield made their arguments, and left. Taitz then presented her argument, calling several witnesses, until the judge asked her to make her closing statement. As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify. The judge finally asked her just to make her closing statement, which she did.

    We believe that the default judgment automatically translates into the judge's recommendation to the Sec. Of State being that Obama should not appear on the ballot in Georgia.

    Back to work . . . more to come!

    ReplyDelete
  47. @RS

    One of the reason I'm dishearted about this default judgement - is because I predicted it.

    This is part of a post on a forum that was talking about the Jablonski letter to SOS Kemp, and it's meaning.


    I think there are two possabilities of why Jablonski has decided on this action.
    1) The statute requires that the candidate show that they are eligible for the office they are running for. Since the candidate is not participating, the judge might cancel the hearings, telling the plaintiffs that he does not need to hear their arguments, because they have won, and his referal to the SOS will be that the candidate be removed because they did not show up at the hearings to prove eligibility.


    The only thing I was wrong about, is that judge Malihi begrudgingly allowed evidence to be presented.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Van Irion describes citizenship types

    And introduces the Supreme Court case, Minor v. Happersett, as precedent.

    "'At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents [plural] who were its citizens [plural], became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.' Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168."

    Van Irion made his point that Obama’s father was never a citizen of the United states so Obama can not be a natural born citizen. He presented numerous INS documents showing that Obama Sr WAS NEVER a US citizen!

    ReplyDelete
  49. My comment and reaction to today’s legal proceedings in GA:

    Today I give thanks to God and the great state of Georgia which demonstrated that we are in some parts of our nation still a nation of laws and not men. Obama and his attorney thumbed their noses at the Georgia court and the entire judicial system and decided not to even show up at the court hearing in Atlanta GA today to present evidence and the real 3-dimensional identity documents requested and subpoenaed, not merely digital images on the internet. Obama thinks he is a King and thus not subject to the election laws of Georgia and the United States Constitution. He will soon learn otherwise. As the Georgia Secretary of State said in warning Obama and his attorney if they did not show up for the court hearing today … if they do that, they will do so at their own peril.

    They are taking the risk and defaulted the case today because they know if and when they do show the extent of the ID theft and election fraud engaged in by Obama, in addition to being declared that he is "not a natural born Citizen of the United States", he would have been admitting his criminal identity fraud under oath in a court of law. So they defaulted the case to stall the inevitable collapse of their house of cards fraud. They know they are going down eventually and are now in the delay and stall mode.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  50. RS: You sound like the biggest unhinged and unhappy loser I have ever encountered.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I Tell it Like it isJanuary 26, 2012 at 1:44 PM

    @Anonymous
    How does a judge rule against a defendent that doesn't show up? They call it abstentia. This is what the judge did when the cosmetic heir fled California and went to Mexico. After Dog the Bounty Hunter captured him he began serving his sentance.

    What do you thibk. A person can be charged with murder and his lawyer and he not show up so the judge just sas "oh well he is not here let's just forget about it".

    ReplyDelete
  52. @Paul

    @RS
    Ready to bet yet computer coward?


    Oh Paul, still playing the Chump. You're lucky you didn't bet anyone that Jabber Jabber Jablonski crying whine letter to the GA SoS would get this "birther circus" thrown out of court.

    Or you're lucky someone didn't bet you...

    That Jablonski would throw down Obama's abstract birf certificate as the trump that would proooove "Obama is a natural born citizen"!

    Foggy-OBots exclaimed everywhere, yeah that's winning ticket! LoL!

    Or that Jablonski would even just show up in court.

    If someone would have bet you, you would be lighter in your OBum loafers.

    ReplyDelete
  53. @A Real Lawyer

    First of all, the COLB has no bearing on whether Obama is a Natural Born Citizen.

    Secondly, we know you are lying. No original copy of a birth certificate has ever been made availible for a forensic examination. All anyone has ever seen is a Photo Shop Internet generated hoax.

    Lastly, it is incumbant upon Obama to produce the subpoenaed evidence and to show up for court. Otherwise Obama automatically loses his case by default.

    And you wanna know what?

    There is not a damn thing he can do about it.

    Why?

    Because that is standard operating civil procedure my friend.

    BTW any "Real Lawyer" would know that.

    ReplyDelete
  54. what the hell i will be anonymous tooJanuary 26, 2012 at 2:06 PM

    If you were told to be in court at 9 am , you show up but the police who are acuusing you of a crime do not, Judgement by default. If the police show up and you don't YOU losse. Ocommie loses. It just proves to any one with a brain, to use the not so dear leaders words, *Aperson with nothing to hide.....* How ironic!
    Call today what you will and continue to call Oly all the childish names you want. In my view, WE WON!
    Do you really believe any Judge, except one who has been threatened and or bribed, will not see that by not only oliar not showing, but also his chicken a$$ psuedo liar (i meant Lawyer( not showing up with an excuse for odumbo, can really think he might be eligible?
    Are you immune to the smell of smoke and fire? Or a goose being cooked? Crap in his pants? This to me is a wonderful day. I believe he showed his true colors. NO That is not racist , it is a common expression used to speak of a fake being outed.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Judge Malihi called the lawyers into his chambers BEFORE the hearing even started. Dean Haskins---and everyone else---have no reason to "lie" about a court proceeding.

    ReplyDelete
  56. In the midst of all this a question arises in my mind. What if Obama simply decides not to be on the ballot in Georgia and does not collect any Georgia delegates?

    He is running unopposed from his own party and may be able to do without those in the total picture and still win.

    The Georgia matter will only have an impact if it becomes a domino which knocks over dominos in other States. Reduction in other delegates could take the election away from Obama.

    What say you?

    Also it all weaves into his plugging yet another company at the State of the Union speech - (and funding it over $100 million) and it immediately declared bankruptcy!!

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Paul
    @12:37
    Hey Paul - Fuck you. Wanna call me a cry baby? It would be the last time those words ever crossed your worthless liberal puke lips.

    ReplyDelete
  58. -If got a dollar for every prediction you have been proved WRONG...I would afford a cruise vacation.

    If you could SPEAK ENGLISH, you might be able to afford that vacation. You COMMUNIST RAT BASTARD..!

    ReplyDelete
  59. All media outlets reporting on this case are reporting that Malihi intends to issue a default Judgment. If this is true boy are you Birthers screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  60. First of all, a Georgia Administrative Judge can not make binding precedent for anyone. Second if it is true that the Judge will issue a default Judgment that means that he has not addressed the issue of whether Obama is eligible to serve in office. It means that he ruled against Obama because he did not show up and nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @RS: "So Foggy OBots....Whaaaat Happppeeened? Did yoooou Lose? "

    That's HILARIOUS coming from a person that's 0-96.

    What I want to happen is this: Malihi orders a summary judgment for plaintiffs based on Jablonski's absence.

    SOS ignores summary judgment based upon the law.

    Birfers aghast at treason. Somebody must have gotten to him.

    Book it.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I dunno if anybody reported this, but the funniest thing I saw this morning was when Orly started pontificating about some documents and the judge asked her if she wanted to testify or ask questions. She said she would testify. So the judge asked her if she had personal knowledge of the veracity of the documents in question. She said, "I'll verify that I downloaded them!!!"

    I like to died laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  63. This would qualify as a high crime and misdemeanor, so Congress should take action. I know he technically doesn't need impeached though.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @Mashman

    The reason the Judge didn't want to bother to hear the evidence was that Obama had already forfeited the case though a failure to appear.

    The Judge didn't need to hear any evidence after that, all that needed to happen was for Obama to not show up.

    Period, no paragraph!

    Game Ovah!

    Next!

    ReplyDelete
  65. Judging by all the posts and many other blogs and websites exceeding band width, this is a very popular topic this day. America is listening and struggling to get the news.

    I expect the day Sheriff Joe Arpaio releases his information the same thing will result. I just hope the media and congress is listening.

    ReplyDelete
  66. ....."Van Irion and Mark Hatfield made their arguments, and left. Taitz then presented her argument, calling several witnesses, until the judge asked her to make her closing statement. As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify. The judge finally asked her just to make her closing statement, which she did."

    What in the hell was Taitz doing, trying to blow it?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Well, considering that an Administrative Law Judge, which is what Malihi is, cannot issue a "judgment" of any kind, I'd say you folks are celebrating prematurely. What probably happened is that Malihi told the attorneys that since neither Jablonski nor Obama showed up, he was going to hold them in default. All that means is that Jablonski can't present evidence later. If this were a real court and a default judgement were entered, everything would have ended there. But the rules governing these hearings -- not a trial -- state that the hearing must proceed after the finding of a default.

    Irion and Hawkins entered and stipulated as to the authenticity of the COLB and LFBC; not a smart move because they're hair-brained two-citizen parent argument isn't going to sway the judge. They essentially gave him the gun to kill their own argument.

    In short, birther fail!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Orly Taitz knows what it is to live under Communism. She is from Russia. She has fought long and hard these past years. With English not being her native language, her accent is ridiculed. She took two hours because she wanted ALL of her evidence on the record. She has much more evidence besides the birth certificate, as to Obama's ineligibility.

    ReplyDelete
  69. @RS
    Where is your $1,000.00. The decision has not been made yet. You still have time to back up your BS. I've got mine. Wanna bet? Oh I forgot. If you actually have to stand by your BS, you run away like a girl.

    ReplyDelete
  70. California birther/dualer/doubterJanuary 26, 2012 at 3:46 PM

    Poor Jabba the Jablonski. He's probably wondering what he was thinking to defend this usurper. If he wants to save his hiney, his best bet would be to convince Bari/Barry/Barack to announce to the nation that he is bowing out as the result of the ruling that essentially determines him to not be a natural-born citizen. Good luck with that. Hopefully he will agree that he should get out while the going's good. Who's up for a champagne-soaked victory celebration?

    ReplyDelete
  71. Okay. NOW what? The judge comes back on FEB. 5 with his decision. THE options are: 1) Obama cannot be on the ballot or 2) Obama's name can be on the ballot.

    Right?

    ReplyDelete
  72. @Anonymous @ 1:47

    Too bad you don't understand the mechanics of all things legal. "Default" merely means that the record is closed; Obama's team cannot submit evidence to the ALJ. It does not mean that the decision goes to the birthers; the ALJ cannot sidestep his statutory duty to evaluate the law and facts and make findings and a recommendation to the SOS.

    So you ask, what "evidence" would Team Obama have offered that it is now precluded from submitting? A COLB. But since two of the challengers offered the COLB as evidence, Obama's evidence would merely have been cumulative. The fact of birth in Honolulu on 8/4/1961 is now established, regardless that Team Obama did not show; it was "proven" by Hatfield and Irion.

    Moreover, Obama provided a certified copy to the SOS before the hearing; since the SOS makes the actual determination, based on the evidence that he has and the ALJ admitted, then it matters not that the record is closed in the ALJ hearing.

    That, therefore, leaves the ALJ to decide -- what? The law. And since on the appeal the judicial court decides the law questions de novo (new; from the beginning) -- without regard to what the ALJ decided -- then it doesn't matter that the "record" (which is factual") is closed. The legal question is and will remain open for any court.

    And the court that this is appealed to? The Fulton County Superior Court. The same court that decided -- on the merits -- a birther case in 2008. The Georgia Supreme Court agreed with the Superior Court and dismissed the birther-plaintiff's appeal.

    Given that, how much do you think this so-called "default judgment" really means? Nothing to the Superior and Ga. Supreme Court.

    So sorry to burst your fantasy. maybe you need some better pharmaceuticals.

    ReplyDelete
  73. @Anonymous

    "As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify."




    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!!
    The judge was being snarky and Oily Tits took him seriously. her testimony will be struck.

    What an idiot. She proves every day that she is the worst attorney in the galaxy.

    ReplyDelete
  74. "We believe that the default judgment automatically translates into the judge's recommendation to the Sec. Of State being that Obama should not appear on the ballot in Georgia."

    What - what??? "We believe"? BELIEVE? You mean that Dean is ... speculating?????????????

    I thought it was a "done deal" now we're hearing what Dean "believes."

    ReplyDelete
  75. @Anonymous

    "This establishes Minor as the precedent ruling ... "

    Uh, where did you get the silly notion that an administrative law proceeding establishes precedent, much less establishes Minor as the precedent ruling? Sorry, it doesn't work that way. You need a JUDICIAL court to say that in order to have precedent.

    But thanks for playing.

    ReplyDelete
  76. TRUE PATRIOTS (NAVY VET)January 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM

    Post & Email? I tried all day off and on too. Maybe attacted? We are lucky they can't get them all, right? God has been good to us today. Keep praying. God Bless America, and our courageous Patriots on the Front Line.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Orly is hardly an embarrassment. Her persistence and fortitude is unique. She has been publicly targeted and mocked relentlessly and even Carl Swenson has fallen for the mocking bait. People try to distance themselves from her, because she alone has been targeted publicly. The media has not put Swenson on national TV to humiliate him, they have not put Kerchner on national TV to mock and humiliate, and they did not put Dr. Lakin on national TV to mock and humiliate. I admire the wonderful people in this case, all of them. I hope they can reach the point of not falling victim and being fooled by the Alinsky tactic of mocking and destroying the value of a person they oppose, and realize the unusual strength it takes to continue in the face of that public mockery and degrading. Orly produced identify theft and forgery. Nobody else. Yes, it is good to remove Obama, but also to handle all the criminal activity against the Constitution and our laws. She has also presented the foreign father problem, so do not act like she is not aware of that issue. I think a little gratitude is more in order to her efforts. Thanks for all the others have done, but while you may think you have "saved the day"...Orly has shown light on some serious serious problems that seem to "big and complicated and risky" for others to tackle. Why would anybody belittle somebody who obviously has no background in this type of thing, and is fighting with all of her heart for a country that she loves, after growing up in the cruelty of communism. Why not cut her some slack and give her a break. Thank her for takign such heat pubilcly. Obama is the embarrassment.....not Orly. She brought public attention to our courts and their failure and fear of operating correctly, and the secretaries of states failing to do their job, and even New Hampshore election board. Had she been a citizen of Georgia, this would have ended in 2008. So thanks, Orly. You are a shining star. There are those of us who are not manipulated by Alinsky tactics into distancing ourselves from you. You are a target because they are scared of you. Thanks for drawing fire towards yourself, and others were able to pursue their goals quietly by your taking the shots.

    ReplyDelete
  78. OK, we have one honest judge and he's from Georgia, but before I take my hat to Georgia I will wait to see what the Secretary of State and TPTB in Gerorgia will do. Will they obey the law as the judge did?

    ReplyDelete
  79. @Anonymous

    Brian Kemp has a certified COLB. Complete with raised seal and signature. I have no plans to disclose my source. Let's just say that one of the other attorneys who appeared in the case shared that info with me. There is a LOT that Orly hasn't told you -- about motions, etc. that she lost.

    There is no requirement under Georgia law for a "DNC- WHO REMOVED THE WORDING OF "Candidate is constitutionally eligible"" for the presidential preference primary. The DNC provides such certificates AFTER the national convention, when the DNC certifies to each state that Obama was nominated at the convention.

    You are having a lot of trouble comprehending the difference between a primary and a general election, aren't you? This hearing was solely about the PPP ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Doesn't your ordinary civilian get a bench warrant sworn out on them for FTA? Failure to appear..

    ReplyDelete
  81. If the Judge issue a default Judgment he has taken the easy way out. He has not ruled if Obama is eligible. He has not interpreted Minor v Happerett and he has not ruled whether Obama is a Natural Born Citizen or eligible to be President. In other words. Birthers still have not received a ruling on the merits. If he is overturned he still has claim to not making a substantial error in law and at the same time appeased the birthers even though they do not get what they want.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I always wondered what the idea was when Obama and Hillary sponsored a bill to change the meaning of NBC. This video holds the key.
    This why Obama questioned McCain's NBC Isuues. He is sure slick maybe even more slick then Willie.
    A few posts back I comented that Congress has attempted 10 plus times to change the meaning. I was wrong , apparently it was only 8 times. I asked an Obot why he/ she thought they attempted this IF NBC does not mean 2 parents that are citizens, He/ she accussed me of pulling this out of thin air. I told them to google it in Congressional Records. I am guessing that was never done, so I am posting this fact based YouTube for her/him to see.
    A real eyeopener for any Obot who cares to clear the *fog* out of their eyes and open their alleged brains to some more facts surronding this devil who refused to go down to Georgia.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw&feature=share

    ReplyDelete
  83. SEE GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 21-2-5(b)

    "The court may reverse
    or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been
    prejudiced because the findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions
    of the Secretary of State are: (1) In violation of the Constitution or
    laws of this state; (2) In excess of the statutory authority of the
    Secretary of State; (3) Made upon unlawful procedures; (4) Affected by
    other error of law; (5) Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable,
    probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or (6)
    Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by an abuse of discretion or a
    clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion. An aggrieved party may
    obtain a review of any final judgment of the superior court by the Court
    of Appeals or the Supreme Court, as provided by law".

    ReplyDelete
  84. Thank you to the men and women who are fighting for justice. Obama is the worst threat to our national security since 1861.

    ReplyDelete
  85. I would love and vote for Allen West, he is a Black American. Not a stinking muslim slime that obummer is!!

    ReplyDelete
  86. Obama's minions will find a way to escape the exposure of his fraudulent candidacy. As Mark Levin has written in "Ameritopia," we are already living in a "post-constitutuion" society.

    ReplyDelete
  87. I Tell it Like it isJanuary 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM

    I love how the Obots are talking down a default judgement, saying it proves nothing. Yet when other judges simply refused to hear the case they claim victory. What a bunch of BS the Obots throw.

    As for a default judgement ruling, the judge said he was going to issue a default judgement. He did NOT issue a default judgement. The attorneys agreed to present their evidence. The judge is NOT required to now issue a default judgement. He may choose to issue the judgement based upon the evidence that was presented, which happens to be only plaintiff evidence.

    My hope is that the judge recommends a sanction for jablowski, for refusing to attend a hearing which he was required to do so in order to defend his client. Not having any way to defend his client does not give him a pass.

    ReplyDelete
  88. It's pure BS if the Obots are claiming this is some kind of setback for us.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Thank you to all of you and congratulations on this win! The way Obots are hanging onto a newspaper announcement and the way he is folding his arms in refusal to prove his eligibility, we know this disaster is coming to an end. Thank you to Congress for reaffirming "In God we trust" as our national motto, because most of us still do and God is delivering us from this evil fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  90. @A Real Lawyer

    What is a Default Judgment?
    A default judgment is a judgment entered by the Court granting the other party’s request for relief contained in his/her Motion.


    The judge still has to explain the conditions of his default judgement. That could be to order what the motion demanded originally. If it is presented it will be examined for truth and decision re: ballot eligibility will be made. If it is not presented the recommendation will be made according to GA law to exclude Obama from ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  91. from another blog posted by lawyer12
    "Obama supporters are just using straw arguments. OBAMA LAWYERS KNOW (OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER). By them even entering the Motion to Dismiss and arguing in the State Court level, they ASSUMED JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANT. In my opinion, that was a dumb move. This is different than Federal Courts. State Courts are protected under Federalism and are SEPARATE FROM THE FEDERAL COURTS. They have their own Constitution which mirrors the U.S. Constitution and their State Constitution are the law of the land. What is horrible for Obama is that this is not a birther issue. THIS IS A FEDERALISM ISSUE AND THEY LOST BIG TIME. Georgia led it and other states will follow and watch that more states will remove the 2nd Usurper (first was Chester Arthur) off the ballot. And like FDR, a Constitutional Amendment will be enacted to ensure the Natural Born Citizen Clause is enforced..."

    ReplyDelete
  92. @Anonymous

    @5:08
    Now there's a concept. Post-constitution society - yep, sure enough. Mark Levin gets that one right. But where is he on this issue - he thinks you are a loon for your views on Barry's status. Levin is a real tough guy until it's an issue that matters and then he's no better than the OBOTS when he calls you and others that believe in this constitutional issue, names.

    Levin covers for Barry on this, just like FoxNews. He can go straight to hell.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Minor has now been used a precedent to establish the definition of natural born citizen: 2 US Citizen parents ,born on US soil.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw&feature=player_embedded

    Between 2003 and 2008, eight attempts were made to change the definition of a Natural Born Citizen. Only Rohrbacher is a "GOP" (RINO).
    1) 6-11-03 HJR59 Vic Snyder
    2) 9-3-03 HJR67 John Conyers
    3) 2-25-04 SB2128 Don Nichols
    4) 9-15-04 HJR104 Dana Rohrbacher
    5) 1-4-05 HJR2 John Conyers
    6) 2-1-05 HJR15 D. Rohrbacher
    7) 4-14-05 HJR42 Vic Snyder
    8) 2-28-08 S2678 McCaskill Clinton Obama
    9) 4-10-08 SR511 McCaskill Clinton Obama

    The latter one (SR511) said McCain was a NBC since he was born on US military base to 2 US Citizen parents (he was actually not born on a military base, he was born in Colon, Panama hospital) and that NBC was not defined in the constitution -- and this misdirect is what the Congressional Research Service used to muddle the definition which actually IS in the Constitution (the Law of Nations is mentioned in Article I section 8) and by contrast of Article II's requirement for POTUS vs. Article I's requirement for Congress.

    Then Obama met with 8/9 of SCOTUS (Alito was missing, bless him) while ineligibility cases sat on the dockets. Did Obama threaten them or their families with death if they pursued any ineligibility cases? Or Civil Unrest? Kagan was in the position to remove them, and they disappeared. What did they discuss?

    The video says "they" placed a usurper to end US Supremacy and destroy the Constitution. Notice it's the same players, Rohrbacher, Conyers, Clinton, Obama, McCaskill, Snyder, repeatedly.
    To Lawyer, "DOES A USURPER DESTROY THE CONSTITUTION?"
    Edwin Vieira JD PhD Harvard says everything OBAMA has done is null and void, not that the Constitution itself is null and void.

    Obama will rack up some $25T in debt, but The People were DEFRAUDED in a paper scam by a usurper so they are not liable for this debt.

    ReplyDelete
  94. @Anonymous

    they're hair-brained two-citizen parent argument isn't going to sway the judge.

    It wasn't their argument. It was already established argument historically. You don't know that? Oh yeah, it isn't part of the brainless knee jerk talking points for the lemmings still trying to clothe their naked emperor. It's one thing to have to lie to cover for one's own self, but to do it for a loser is just....well, insane and suicidal.

    ReplyDelete
  95. WWW.ATTACKWATCH.COM

    ReplyDelete
  96. Mark Levin is a joke he despises Ron Paul the only real candidate with a sound policy and views. Also hes owned by the same radio station as hannity google it and youll find out who runs it and what their ties are so take Mark Levins comments with a grain of salt or maybe with some tequila and a lime also. On a serious note im interested to see if this ruling will be in our favor not we as "birthers" but we as concerned citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Finally, FINALLY. The ball is rolling and with a favorable ruling against Obama, should it come, will start a groundswell from other states. Right now I suspect Obama is whistling Dixie. Sleep well, sir.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Reading all the Obot comments on here just proves this is BIG and they are schitting in their pants. I like it, I like it a LOT! LOL Alright, come on States, lets DO THIS!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  99. @Paul

    You're a twit Paul. You need the the money? Go beg Obama for cash like a good little socialist. Maybe he'll pay for your car payment too. Little twit. LoL.

    ReplyDelete
  100. What if the judge came out and ruled Obama does not meet the status of natural born citizen?
    The SOS couldn't put him on the ballot and unless a higher court overturned his ruling anyone else could use that ruling to keep him off the ballot in another state. Without appeal it could also lead to a law suit to remove him from office.
    Just wondering?

    ReplyDelete
  101. Years ago my ex-wife sued me chid support. I offered cancelled checks to her attorney, but he declined saying he didn't need them, just a list of what I paid. Of course it didn't match what she claimed, so he then told me he needed the cancelled checks. Upon him recieving them he promptly sent me a letter stating he was no longer representing her since the nut case was obviously making a false claim.
    My point is did Obama's attorney not show up or did he really just quit, because he knows he would be making false representations to the court?

    Imagine yourself as an attorney telling your client that it is in your best interest to just pony up the LFBC or COLB and he won't. Do you still continue to represent him and risk losing your law license?

    On another note, we can now see how Oscama or Moochelle could have lost their licenses.

    He really looks like nothing more than big cry baby not showing up and also crying about what's fair in the state of the union campaign speech.

    ReplyDelete
  102. The lawyers should have subpoenaed the person who released that 'Hawaiian' birth certificate that was entered into evidence, and asked them about the discrepancies that show cut & paste, scanning, and layering irregularities and make them explain how that happened. I bet they wouldn't show up either since it can't be explained in a truthful manner without incriminating themselves as part of the cover up. If half a dozen States would do the same thing and keep him off the ballot it would just about guarantee his removal come January 2012.

    Don't count on the US Supreme Court doing the most important job the Constitution gives them in verifying the eligibility of a Presidential candidate to hold the highest elected office in our great country. Chief Justice Roberts already kicked the can down the road in the months after Obama became President.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Head up everyone. MSNBC's Rachel Maddow is doing a segment on the events from today!!

    ReplyDelete
  104. @Anonymous @ 6:53

    See OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.30

    Even with a default order the judge has to determine all issues in the proceedings. The rule don't say "Default, and this side wins", but rather "Default, and let's hear your side and if I decide your evidence is admissible and credible I will rule based on that."

    ReplyDelete
  105. The reality is: Birthers and Constitutionalists will continue their pursuit upon this unconstitutional (non natural born citizen) bogus "president." Personally, I think they are wearing him down. Hence, Obama's new strategy is, not to give court cases like this anymore attention than (they think) need be. Besides, Obama doesn't need Georgia's electoral votes to win a 2012 general election, as it already is a forgone conclusion that the Republican nominee will handily win the state.

    In the end, (sooner than later) this whole Obama ineligibility house of cards deception will collapse. Those from both political parties who have complacently gone along with this whole eligibility deception charade would do well to quickly wake up, repent of their unconstitutional complacency sins of omission, and join the birther bandwagon to drive the unconstitutional occupier from the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  106. @I Tell it Like it is

    Hope all you want. An ALJ does not have the authority to sanction.

    ReplyDelete
  107. This Sunday, Fox News is going to air a very important documentary about Barack Obama, Sunday night at 9 P.M. Eastern. The report will go back to Obama's earlier days, showing his close ties to radical Marxist professors, friends, spiritual advisers, etc. It will also reveal details about his ties to Rev. Wright for 20+ years, i.e., how he was participating with this man, and not for the reasons he stated.

    Might be of interest.

    ReplyDelete
  108. @Anonymous @ 4:10

    "Doesn't your ordinary civilian get a bench warrant sworn out on them for FTA? Failure to appear.."


    You must have this civil proceeding confused with a criminal proceeding. FTA warrant is only for criminal cases.

    But thanks for playing.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Covert, Rachel Madcow will surely obotify-it as in eff it up and obotfuscate until it's an unrecognizable blob of socialist goo.

    All socialists should be euthanized, sorry, they're scum.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Ron paul is not the only good candidate. One who is completely clean of lobyist is rod class:

    Subject: Rod Class for President   Today at 1:18 pm
    Must listen to his reason for becoming President. He would change it totally for the people. Give him a chance by listening to this MP3.

    Listen to Jan 25th file and you will see that he makes the most sense if we want change.

    http://www.talkshoe....Id=48361&cmd=tc

    ReplyDelete
  111. Dr. James David Manning interviews Carl Swensson

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hxx33V4WuY&feature=channel_video_title

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  112. Orly, you magnificent bitch!

    I wouldn't want her defending me, but I gotta credit her tenacity. It's hilarious that she would be involved in the case that opens the floodgates to challenging the Usurper. 0bots have got to be going NUTS over that!

    ReplyDelete
  113. U know what the problem is? Boh has ties with the CIA that date back to his "moms" parents. U think u can beat the CIA? They will forge and make any document they need and then what? Obama was part of the mars program in 1980 he's protected super VIP. Try starting with Colombia docs? Good luck

    ReplyDelete
  114. "U know what the problem is? Boh has ties with the CIA that date back to his "moms" parents. U think u can beat the CIA? They will forge and make any document they need and then what? Obama was part of the mars program in 1980 he's protected super VIP. Try starting with Colombia docs? Good luck
    January 26, 2012 10:37 PM"
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    If the CIA forged that Apr. 27, 2012, LFBC PDF, they are rank amateurs. You can get a better one in Tijuana, Baja.

    ReplyDelete
  115. bn,

    You sure about this?

    "This Sunday, Fox News is going to air a very important documentary about Barack Obama, Sunday night at 9 P.M. Eastern"

    I got the same email and figured it was from a couple of years ago. There was no date for the supposed upcoming show,and Fox News now leads the Obama protecting media. The email I got even mentioned possible conflict with a non-existent pro football playoff game.

    ReplyDelete
  116. What you "OBOTS" fail to realize, is that the Judge has to decide on "THREE" cases seperately. Obama is screwed either way. Van Irion's complaint is strictly based on the fact that Obama's father was NOT a u.s. citizen and fails the nbc requirement defined by Minor vs Happersett. Swenson's case complains that the "colb" is a forgery. Orly's cases includes the nbc issue and several forged documents. The Lawyers were correct to demand their evidence be put "on record". GA statutes say that only the evidence "on record" can be used for a determination. Jablonski cannot "add" evidence to an appeal as he was negligent to show up and warned by the S.o.S. The Judge has to include evidence & testimony in his default judgement or else the "three" Lawyers will ask for it to be included if an appeal is needed.

    ReplyDelete
  117. @Anonymous

    Maybe he will willing deport himself !!! What do you think

    ReplyDelete
  118. It's interesting that Obama's social security number is attached to a person of 1890. Social security numbers didn't start until 1936. Whats up with that?

    ReplyDelete
  119. Obama started this when he signed a document "stating" that he meets the Constitutional requirements of the Office he is seeking to be on the Georgia State ballot. Obama should of been aware that he could be challenged. Ooops, too late. Now, when asked to prove it, he couldn't, so he ran away.

    ReplyDelete
  120. You do not give Attorney Taitz any credit--she has been the one that has kept this issue in the forefront---She deserves much of the credit for the Atlanta hearing and keeping this issue going.

    ReplyDelete
  121. @Anonymous
    You said, "they're hair-brained two-citizen parent argument isn't going to sway the judge."

    My response: You rely on believing something which is false. A native born citizen is not the same as a natural born Citizen. Native born citizen is one who is merely born in the U.S. regardless of parents' citizenship. A natural born Citizen is one born within U.S. jurisdiction and whose parents are both US citizens. To prove this, read the following:

    INS administrative law:

    Interpretation 324.2(a)(7)
    The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.”

    Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3)
    “The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…”

    ReplyDelete
  122. soooo...last night Romney admitted his dad was born in Mexico so in GOP eyes, he's ineligible to be POTUS. Kinda stops this bigoted judge in his tracks, doesn't. Or is the GOP just showing its hypocrisy again? You decide. One poster defended Romney saying "His dad isn't running for potus". well, neither is Obama's. Still kinda stops this argument in it's track and you all look like jealous little kids.

    ReplyDelete
  123. “As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

    I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments

    so in other words you don't want the truth to be known. Typical GOP moron. Don't bother posting my comments - this site isn't worth it. Plenty other places to get the word out on your hypocrites. bye bye

    ReplyDelete
  124. The problem with this default judgement is that we are STILL in the same boat we were in before - no court has made a decision based on the merits.

    Because of the default judgement there was no finding of facts. And because of that, nothing out of this case will be usefull in challenges in other states.

    I'm afraid that the SOS will find a way to keep Obama on the ballot. If the judge had made a ruling on Minor, and decided that it was established precedent, I think that would have given the SOS enough cover to keep Obama off the ballot. But I really don't think that this default judgement is going to provide the kind of political cover that SOS Kemp is going to need. But maybe the fact that he can say Obama did this to himself by not showing up will be enough - I hope so!

    ReplyDelete
  125. I'd be interested to hear how many people viewed the live coverage. I posted it on Fox Nation and several other sites message boards and noticed others had also. The OBOTZ and Obama supporters keep saying there is NO PUBLUC INTEREST, but I beg to differ, everyone I know watched it but as usual, from the MSM including Fox, NOTHING. You could hear a pin drop from their muted silence.

    ReplyDelete
  126. @ Anonymous 10:37PM

    If OBO had the CIA behind him he would have a better forgery posted. I have never bought this argument.

    ReplyDelete
  127. While you are doing your happy dance and slapping each other on the back, stop and think --two plaintiffs offered evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu. Did any plaintiff disprove that Obama was born in the USA?

    Your entire case rides on convincing a state agency admin judge to accept a novel legal interpretation of federal law.

    Whether the ALJ does or does not make this legal conclusion, the question will be answered by a higher court, because only the judge's factual findings are given deference. Questions of legal interpretation are reviewed de novo -- meaning the appeals court makes a new

    ReplyDelete
  128. @DGroundhog
    What, exactly, did Orly present yesterday that disproves that Obama was born an American and born in the U.S.? She offered a lot of jumbled evidence that casts suspicion on the SSN and online BC. But how does this disprovewhat Hatfield and Irion's evidence established? What they stipulated to?

    Did Orly prove ineligibility? Or did she just accept Hawaiian birth by not objecting to the other plaintiffs' proof?

    ReplyDelete
  129. -Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.

    “Birther” Orly Taitz. With all due respect to Mr. Carl, Just what the F$%CK does that mean..?

    Orly is the reason that S.O.B. is in DEFAULT. It was HER suposedly FAKE subpoena that STUCK. Additionaly she presented no less than SIX powerfull witnesses, who at their own PERSONAL risk, each gave CRUSHING EXPERT TESTIMONY, that at the very least TEARS A NEW ASSHOLE in Bozos FACE. And she did it all with (according to some here) an ONLINE DEGREE. Meanwhile the other 2 more proffesional assholes who DON'T WHANT TO BE ASSOSIATED, wraped their cases up in what, 10-15 min. a piece. And yet it's Orly we're EMBARRASSED about..!

    Well Mr. Carl and all who simpathise, YOU may be embarrased by Orly and that's OK. But I have never been PROUDER of a fellow patriot IN MY LIFE..! I "LOVED IT" WHEN SHE TOOK THE STAND..! YOU GO GIRL..! And with all due respect and in all honesty, it is your NEEDLESS and POINTLESS attack on Orly that embarrasses ME.

    LONG LIVE THE QUEEN..!

    ReplyDelete
  130. D groundhog, I find your name calling reprehensible! do not use language like that, there are decent people who are dedicated to exposing the fraud of obama, like myself. Denigrating a woman with that word is nasty and demeaning. Please use adult civilized language.

    ReplyDelete
  131. THROW THE BUM OUT.........NOW!

    ReplyDelete
  132. To whomever wrote that bench warrants can't be issued in civil or administrative matters for a failure to appear.

    A little research quickly revealed that you are quite mistaken.

    http://www.essortment.com/law-definitions-bench-warrant-53966.html

    ReplyDelete
  133. Want to thank all of you, for your Powerfull stand against Oboma & His Corrupted political partners.

    But there is so much more we can do. Being aggressive and focusing on the facts and truth is only the first step.

    We musT follow Up with more details standing by our convictions and dont back down.

    Oboma has NOT brought CHANGE, In fact ~! ~ THE ONLY real THING needing CHANGE !....Was Barack Hussein Obama II.

    HIMSELF

    Barack Hussein Obama II ( Who hates American Values ) who is A " SELF PROCLAIMED Enemy" ~of responsible, Morally Conscious HARD WORKING Americans.

    oBOMAS Irresponsible & DRUG MAFIA and reckless supporters KNOW~ that Barack Hussein Obama II, WILL FORCE YOU to paY THEM, out of your PockeT .{ FOR all of their UNCHECKED Vices and THRILLS/

    { All on YOU | /

    At your COST & Sacrifice

    ...This UN~CHANGABLE fraud, has done His VERY BEST to Inspire VIOLENCE. For THESE ARE OBAMAS Very OWN WORDS.. saying .........To his supporters.

    Saying “Get ready for hand-to-hand combat with your Fellow Americans”

    – Obama has ALSO DECLARED to his Supporters....“I want all Americans to get in each others faces!– Obama demands !

    “You bring a knife to a fight pal, we’ll bring a gun” –

    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. /and ANGER VIOLENCE and more taxes..... THIS IS OBAMAS Change for america “Hit Back Twice As Hard”. He commands !*Obama on the private

    sector: ~~ “We talk to these folks…~ / so I know whose a*$ to KICK.“ OBOMA wants to KICK your a*$ / Shouting THAT Republican victory would mean ~ “hand to hand combat”

    HE IS EXPECTING people to be on Edge and BORDERLINE killing MODE, VIOLENT / and STAND up for their immoral CAUSES

    THIS IS WHAT HE LIVES FOR ./ ./ ./ THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. !

    * Obama Tells democrats: “ I’m itching for a fight.” !

    ....PLEASE.... go to reXes NEW WebsiTe ~ ! Oboma *( Just like Adolf Hitler~~\oBOMA~~~ Demands ! -- [ THE FINAL SOLUTION - for Un~Wanted Children

    Barak Obama is A MURDERER .~Torturing UNWANTED babys on DEATH ROE

    CLICK HERE http://obomlnation.webstarts.com/index.html

    OBAMA TAKES a little NEW BORN innocent child. BORN. ALIVE sTabS it iN the
    head SUCKs ITS BRAINS OUT.

    This is just too wrong and horrible. Please stand for Loving Children and the USA

    ReplyDelete
  134. I Tell it Like it isJanuary 27, 2012 at 2:18 PM

    @Anonymous
    Obot posts this.
    It's interesting that Obama's social security number is attached to a person of 1890. Social security numbers didn't start until 1936. Whats up with that?

    You guys are truly stupid. Obviously your boss has not given you your talking point on this issue. The person was BORN in 1890 but didn't get his SSN until way later.

    To the other Obot idiot that commented about Romney's father being born in Mexico. It doesn't matter stupid if he became an American Citizen BEFORE Romney was born. Just so you know, I do not support Romney but you guys really better ask your boss to update your talking points.

    ReplyDelete
  135. LOL
    Obama is getting reelected and there is nothing any of you can do about it besides gnash your teeth and pout.

    ReplyDelete
  136. @I Tell it Like it is You're not to bright, the record didn't say that the person enrolled in SS in 1890 it said the perso was born in 1890. Wake up OBOT, Pull yourself together and grab another hit or cocktail, time for your nap again I see.

    ReplyDelete
  137. Commykiller,

    I was going to make a comment about Orly but I am just going to second yours...good job!

    And, the Obot comment about Romney's father being born in Mexico, (Anonymous @ 6:32 AM), reveals an ignorance on the subject of natural born citizenship that is almost unbelievable.....I think some of the Obots need more than just a talking points upgrade.

    ReplyDelete
  138. @Anonymous

    > GA statutes say that only the evidence "on record" can be used for a determination.

    Correct. But not that the judge must accept everything as true that wasn't contested:

    First, as you probably noticed, this was a hearing on an eligibility challenge, not a trial "Orly Taitz vs. Obama".

    Second, if everything both Van Irion and Taitz "submitted into evidence" was to be accepted as truth, the judge would simultaneously have to consider Obama American-born (Van Irion evidence) and Indonesia-born (Orly claim).

    Even you should realize that is absurd.

    Third, it wouldn't matter anyway because none of the stuff Orly brought up would result in ineligibility (last I checked, a proper SSN or an unforged online PDF wasn't required for the Presidency).

    So all Malihi has to rule on is whether he thinks you need to have two citizen parents.

    He can't accept that "by default" if he thinks it goes against SCOTUS precedent. Courts don't work that way. Argument still has to be valid on default rulings (this also applies in all other cases - if I sue you claiming you stole me the moon and you don't show up, I still don't win if I can't prove I own the moon in the first place).

    ReplyDelete
  139. @Anonymous

    A bench warrant can only be issued after a party has already been ordered to court. A subpoena is a summons, but it is not an order. Only after the court issues an Order to Appear and the reluctant party continues not to show up -- only then can a judge issue a warrant.

    Stop practicing law. You are committing malpractice with you erroneous advice.

    ReplyDelete
  140. -Obama is getting reelected and there is nothing any of you can do about it besides gnash your teeth and pout.

    That would'nt suprise anyone here. After all he's there now and he's a FREAKING FRAUD isn't he...?! The AMAZING thing is that folks like you enjoy being HAPPY SLAVES..!

    Thank you Mr Doe.

    ReplyDelete
  141. "Third, it wouldn't matter anyway because none of the stuff Orly brought up would result in ineligibility (last I checked, a proper SSN or an unforged online PDF wasn't required for the Presidency).

    So all Malihi has to rule on is whether he thinks you need to have two citizen parents."

    Maybe true, but the evidence presented is that of which a non-citizen would have or do to knowingly fake citizenship. No citizenship would mean not having two citizen parents and possibly not even being born on US soil.

    Either way it doesn't look good and is now submitted on record and uncontested. Any reasonable person that went to court and the other party was a no-show would believe their point had ben proven.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Editor:

    Why don't you post Carl's apology to Orly. It reads as follows:

    "... I must now make a Public apology for words I used, in a deragatory fashion, concerning Patriot Orly Taitz. We all make mistakes and that one was a real boner on my part. I do hope Orly will accept my apology as we are ALL in this fight together. ..."

    ReplyDelete
  143. @Anonymous

    Are you serious? Is that news?

    Tell you what. When Dr. Taitz apologizes to Article II PAC, Gary, Pam, Helen, George, Kevin, Mark, Bob, Van, and other Patriots that she has publicly and privately slammed and or libeled we will think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  144. This may be the single biggest group of delusional idiots I've ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  145. @Anonymous

    "This may be the single biggest group of delusional idiots I've ever seen."

    I agree! All should stay away from the Fogbow forum.

    ReplyDelete
  146. The 25th ammendment is quickly approaching....
    Either dumb joe is going to step aside to make room for Hillary who is talking about "retirement" or the illegal is going to resigned so she can take over. One of the two scenerios is going to take place. The communist are trying very hard for another four years.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Jablonski made a wise decision? Well, maybe. As he has no defense to the charges made, he'd have had his fat ass handed to him on a platter.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Commie-Killer said: "Additionaly she presented no less than SIX powerfull witnesses, who at their own PERSONAL risk, each gave CRUSHING EXPERT TESTIMONY, that at the very least TEARS A NEW ASSHOLE in Bozos FACE."

    One of Orly's "powerful" witnesses was Doug Vogt.


    Doug Vogt corralled me after the hearing, not knowing who I am. He told me that Obama had "hoodwinked" African Americans about his eligibility and he explained what "halo-ing" is and why the "halo" effect renders Obama's online BC worthless. He said Obama was born in Kenya and he had the Kenyan BC with him, but Orly didn't allow him to present it.

    I didn't have the heart to tell him the I PERSONALLY had a hand in creating the Kenyan BC, which he claimed was authentic.

    The reason Vogt chatted me up was that, when Orly called him to testify, she didn't establish his credentials or even his name. Her FIRST question to him on the stand was to get him to explain why the "halo" effect rendered Obama's BC worthless. She didn't attempt to explain with Halo-ing is. Nor did she attempt to explain with the "kerning" effect is. She didn't try to get him to explain why he is an "expert". She just led him into a technical explanation of his theories, which cause most observers to laugh.

    Then Vogt produced a Kenyan parliament resolution that said Obama was "born of this soil". And that clinched it for him

    I asked what would happen if the State of Hawaii testified that Obama's BC was valid. He said they should be arrested for lying, because no Hawaiian BC exists.

    And he was VERY powerfully confident, Commie Killer.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Obama State of the Union 2012, starring Orly Taitz
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G271ckpr7hg

    "Shit's gettin way too complicated for me. There are white folks, and then there are ignorant mutherfuckers like you! You can put lipstick on a pig. Sorry ass mutherfucker's got nuttin on me. I inhaled frequently - that was the point. Pot helped, and booze. A little blow when you could afford it. Junkie, pothead, that where I was headed."
    -Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro, Dreams From My Father MP3
    http://www.archive.org/details/ObamaInauguralMashup/
    http://piratenews.org/obamacrimes.html

    "I'm training my grandchildren to use long-range rifles. For what purpose? Well, I'm not going to say the words 'Barack Obama,' but ... we are heading for a major conflict between the haves and the have nots. I came here many years ago with a biker movie and we stopped a war. Now, it's about starting the world. I sent an email to President Obama saying, 'You are a fucking traitor,' using those words... 'You're a traitor, you allowed foreign boots on our soil telling our military — in this case the coastguard -- what they can and could not do, and telling us, the citizens of the United States, what we could or could not do'."
    -Peter Fonda, producer of "The Big Fix" about the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Cannes Film Festival 2011,
    www.infowars.com/peter-fonda-issues-threat-against-obama-is-there-a-dhs-double-standard/

    Al Qaeda CIA agent Hussein Obama Soetoro massacred 1,500 Christians and burned down 800 churches for his Commie cousin in Kenya
    http://piratenews-tv.blogspot.com/2008/10/obamanation-raped-killed-1000_25.html
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0h4I2Lfkek

    DE FACTO.
    i. e. in deed. A term used to denote a thing actually done; a president of the United States de facto is one in the exercise of the executive power, and is distinguished from one, who being legally entitled to such power is ejected from it; the latter would be a president de jure. An officer de facto is frequently considered as an officer de jure, and his official acts are of equal validity. 10 S. & R. 250; 4 Binn. R. 371; 11 S. & R. 411, 414; Coxe, 318; 9 Mass. 231; 10 Mass. 290; 15 Mass. 180; 5 Pick. 487.
    -Bouvier Law Dictionary, 1856

    Jerry Bruckheimer and Walt Disney predict US Civil War in 2012 with assassination of Obama and Congress and a fascist Amerikan dictator nuking US cities
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRJ2pUV6wEM

    ReplyDelete
  150. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    @I Tell it Like it is You're not to bright, the record didn't say that the person enrolled in SS in 1890 it said the perso was born in 1890. Wake up OBOT, Pull yourself together and grab another hit or cocktail, time for your nap again I see."

    No, the record doesn't say that either. It's a number, unexplained, all on its own, related to nothing else on the document.

    Ms. Daniels (and since then everyone else apparently) speculates that it's a birth year and further speculates that the SSN was issued to "someone" who has never been identified born in 1890.

    ReplyDelete
  151. "Orly is the reason that S.O.B. is in DEFAULT. It was HER suposedly FAKE subpoena that STUCK. Additionaly she presented no less than SIX powerfull witnesses, who at their own PERSONAL risk, each gave CRUSHING EXPERT TESTIMONY, that at the very least TEARS A NEW ASSHOLE in Bozos FACE. And she did it all with (according to some here) an ONLINE DEGREE. Meanwhile the other 2 more proffesional assholes who DON'T WHANT TO BE ASSOSIATED, wraped their cases up in what, 10-15 min. a piece. And yet it's Orly we're EMBARRASSED about..!

    Well Mr. Carl and all who simpathise, YOU may be embarrased by Orly and that's OK. But I have never been PROUDER of a fellow patriot IN MY LIFE..! I "LOVED IT" WHEN SHE TOOK THE STAND..! YOU GO GIRL..! And with all due respect and in all honesty, it is your NEEDLESS and POINTLESS attack on Orly that embarrasses ME."

    No one is in default. Her subpoena didn't stick to anything, it was and is unenforceable. Only the witnesses whow would have shown voluntarily anyway showed up. Even Sheriff Joe blew her subpoena off for the same basic reasons as was in the motion to quash. If they're so valid and capable of sticking, why didn't she move to compel? She didn't... not on any of them.

    None of her witnesses were ever qualified as expert witnesses, none gave what would be considered expert testimony in a judicial proceeding.

    And if you loved it when she took the stand, that says a lot. Any attorney or anyone connected with courtroom procedures and conduct of attorneys seeing that would have, and are, embarrassed that she somehow has a license to practice at all.

    ReplyDelete
  152. “OBAMA PRESIDENCY CHALLENGED IN GEORGIA COURT TODAY: INELIGIBILITY EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN TRIAL FOR THE FIRST TIME ~ STATE OF GEORGIA JANUARY 26, 2012″


    Article & A Video Of Susan Daniels 1/26/2012
    At The Court Hearing And Many Articles & Links Here:


    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/26/video-today-obama-on-trial-in-georgia-constitutional-eligibility-hearing-in-georgia/

    * * * *


    “OBAMA BLOCKED FROM REGISTERING FOR ALABAMA STATE PRIMARY UNTIL ELIGIBILITY IS VALIDATED BY COURT”


    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/13/obama-blocked-from-registering-for-alabama-state-primary-until-eligibility-is-validated-by-court/

    * * * *

    “BREAKING => TWO NEW STATES MASSACHUSETTS AND OBAMA’S VERY OWN ILLINOIS CHALLENGE BARACK’S OFFICIAL BALLOT ELIGIBILITY”


    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/21/breaking-two-new-states-massachusetts-and-obamas-very-own-illinois-challenge-barracks-official-ballot-eligibility/

    ReplyDelete
  153. @rikker

    LoL FoggyObutt, your lawyer didn't even show. LoL.

    Obama's Internet picture is worthless as Foggy poop and the court understands this.

    And gee OBot, again you clowns fail to bring into evidence even a certified copy abstract COLB! You dumb clowns were incessantly chanting - just you 'Birthers' wait and see - Obama is going to show you his, for suuuure. Obama will put you "Birther" in your place by being in your face showing the court "a genuine" birth certificate! Nope you OBot losers - it didn't happen. LoL.

    ReplyDelete
  154. I want Nancy Pelosi charged with a crime as she signed off on Obama being Democratically eligible and not Constitutional eligible in Hawaii when she knew he wasn't in August of 2008. High crimes and misdemeanors should at the very least expell her from Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  155. @rikker

    Rikker @ 1-28-12-1:23 am:

    Why would you assist in creating a Kenyan Birth Certificate for Obama?

    What is in it for you?

    ReplyDelete
  156. @Anonymous@ 6:14

    "Any reasonable person that went to court and the other party was a no-show would believe their point had ben proven."

    And the point "proven" by the plaintiffs in this case is that Obama was born in the United States. Exactly the point that Obama sought have sought to prove. What the plaintiffs "proved" is uncontested. So now Obama doesn't have to worry about it because that evidence is in the record t to support the judge's finding of fact that Obama was born in Hawaii, U.S.A.

    ReplyDelete
  157. @Anonymous @ 12:48

    Jablonski made a brilliant strategic move. You birthers just cannot see that.

    The judge called a pretrial conference and advised the plaintiffs that Jablonski was not going to show up. He offered a default order -- basically, saying that "Obama is not here to offer proof of eligibility, therefore there is no need for a hearing for me to find that he failed to meet his burden to show natural born citizenship." Had the proceeding s stopped right there, Malihi could have ruled that there is no evidence that the candidate is a NBC.

    But then the plaintiffs did something very, very stupid. They said, "No judge, we don't want a default order. We want to put on our evidence." So he let him.

    Then they proceeded to offer evidence that Obama was born in the United States. Now Malihi has evidence in the record to support that finding.

    ReplyDelete
  158. @bn

    Sorry bn, that is a two-year-old rumor. From Truth or Fiction:

    "Rumors have once again hit the Internet telling readers to set their recorders for a special Fox investigation of the friends of President Obama."

    The e-rumor originally claimed that the Fox show would air on January 23, 2010.

    But you go right ahead and tune in on Sunday night, okay?

    ReplyDelete
  159. Way to GO. Of course, I don't believe the 'liberal' media, but have also been SO disgusted that the so called 'conservative' media has SO obfuscated this issue. It is not so much about 'place of birth', but the FACT that (far as I know) KENYA has never been part of the USA, and I also never heard that Obama's father ever became a naturalized US citizen. Obama IS NOT eligible, and never has been. Also, I heard that this SAME issue applies to Mit Romney, AND Rick Santorum - and would also prevent Marco Rubio (who I like VERY much) from being president as well. Lynda Farley - www.libertyvan.com

    ReplyDelete
  160. I see some of the Obots are attacking Romney as not being NBC. He is of course, both of his parents were citizens at his birth. That fool Andrea Mitchell claimed on CNN that Mitt's parents entered the U.S. illegally when they returned from Mexico - this is the kind of crap the left will pull - when Romney's parents returned from Mexico they were already citizens so it's not possible that they entered illegally.

    The bigger issue for constitutionalists is the Republican VPOTUS nominee for '12. There is too much noise about Rubio, Jindhal and Nikki Haley. We know for sure that neither Rubio or Jindhal is eligible, yet Gingrich was making noise about him this week in Florida. There is apparently still some uncertainty about Haley, but looks like her parents were probably not naturalized when she was born, so she would be ineligible too. If the Republicans nominate one of these three, it's over. NBC will be a memory cause then the argument against Barry really becomes moot.

    ReplyDelete
  161. Robert W. Winstead Sr.January 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM

    Why doesn't the moderator of this site require all of these "Anonymous" posters to use different titles. This is totally confusing for an Obot to understand. They don't have to use their own name. Just Obot #1, #2 etc.

    ReplyDelete
  162. You guys are a bunch of freaks. Obama is and will be your daddy for a loooong time!

    ReplyDelete
  163. Sheriff Joe Arpaio also failed to appear. Should there be a bench warrant issued for him too?

    ReplyDelete
  164. @Anonymous
    "LOL
    Obama is getting reelected and there is nothing any of you can do about it besides gnash your teeth and pout."

    Obama might not even be on the ballot in enough States to get elected and even if he is he's gonna lose in a bigger landslide than he won in 2008, and there's not a damn thing any of you can do about it except guzzle more kool-aid and throw a hissy-fit.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Listening to one of the plaintiffs, Kevin Powell, last night on Chalice's show.

    Well, well, well. It turns out that the plaintiffs were OFFERED a default BUT THEY TURNED IT DOWN! That's quite different from what Carl said, isn't it.

    IOW, they decided to throw the dice and take their chance on evidence instead of taking the default. Very foolish move.

    ReplyDelete
  166. @anonymous 11:26
    "Why would you assist in creating a Kenyan Birth Certificate for Obama?

    What is in it for you?"


    I'm only in this for entertainment. And that's true. One day you'll find Obama's Indonesian adoption papers. And it'll be me that leaked them.

    ReplyDelete
  167. Hate to say it there leftists, but you are no better then communists or muslims...you have disdain for the Constitution cause as Pelozi said, "...gets in the way..." of your leftist ideals which are anti-American and anti-moral and anti-Constitutional. So that having been said, as far as I or any red blooded patriotic American is concerned, YOU are not eligible to even comment or even call yourselves Americans.

    ReplyDelete
  168. @Anonymous
    First off, he didn't show because they can't present the BC in court because its fake. Funny how they love to show it only to those that won't scrutinize it.
    Second, if he knew he met the natural-born arguement he would have no problem goin to court 3 years ago.
    Third, it doesn't matter where in America he was born (without a legit BC, you can't even argue he was born here)since his father was not a US citizen, making Oscama a dual citizen.
    Shouuld Bin Laden's kid be allowed to run for president, just because he bought a plane ticket for his kid and he was popped out on US soil? If you think so, then you must it care too much about securing your nation/your liberty.
    The founders realized that the children of enemies of our country should not be allowed to run and that is why they put the strictest qualifications on our presidency.
    Finally, you try NOT going to court and tell the judge its because you already proved your point. Good luck. Unless you want a king you should at least want him to show, because now it is no longer about the BC, its about are we a nation of lawes or a nation of men.

    ReplyDelete
  169. @RacerJim
    It will be hillarious when he loses by the biggest lanslide ever.
    He will cry like a baby and throw a tantrum saying "It's not fair, you gave Bush two terms, I should get two terms, its just not fair,its just not fair, wah, wah, wah. Then he will say, " I don't want to be the president of this stupid, angry, racist country anyway!" ... Stomps feet and leaves the room.

    ReplyDelete
  170. @ Matt.. "Shouuld Bin Laden's kid be allowed to run for president, just because he bought a plane ticket for his kid and he was popped out on US soil? If you think so, then you must it care too much about securing your nation/your liberty."

    You are confusing "eligible" with "electable."

    "The founders realized that the children of enemies of our country should not be allowed to run and that is why they put the strictest qualifications on our presidency."

    Of course they did, that's why the excluded children of ambassadors and enemy combatants.

    ReplyDelete
  171. @Anonymous
    Sung Manitu-Tanka | January 27, 2012 at 7:20 am | Reply

    Given the evidence submitted…why doesn’t someone file criminal charges in a state obama will be visiting and have them arrest him given the fact he is not eligible to hold the seat of POTUS and is a foreign usurper he is in fact NOT the POTUS but a criminal imposter and subject to arrest by any law enforcement agency city, county, state, and federal!!! Now get on it have 5 criminal lawsuits filed in every state of the union and have him arrested you got the internet and email and social networks get busy and start filing charges!!! Impeachment is for those who are eligible for POTUS like Nixon but this is different he is a fraud and NOT eligible have him arrested and charged!!!! he is unlawfully and illegally holding the Office of the POTUS!!!

    ReplyDelete
  172. -And if you loved it when she took the stand, that says a lot. Any attorney or anyone connected with courtroom procedures and conduct of attorneys seeing that would have, and are, embarrassed that she somehow has a license to practice at all.

    That's correct, it say's I'm not a COWARD, like you. Only a coward would be EMBARRASED by Orly.

    How many cases has "Any attorney or anyone connected with courtroom procedures and conduct of attorneys" filed..?!

    ReplyDelete
  173. "That's correct, it say's I'm not a COWARD, like you. Only a coward would be EMBARRASED by Orly."

    No, it says your delusional and in denial.

    "How many cases has "Any attorney or anyone connected with courtroom procedures and conduct of attorneys" filed..?!"

    None. And there's a good reason for that, that you've been told, but you'll never "get it."

    ReplyDelete
  174. Want to thank all of you, for your Powerfull stand against Oboma & His Corrupted political partners.

    But there is so much more we can do. Being aggressive and focusing on the facts and truth is only the first step.

    We musT follow Up with more details standing by our convictions and dont back down.

    Oboma has NOT brought CHANGE, In fact ~! ~ THE ONLY real THING needing CHANGE !....Was Barack Hussein Obama II.

    HIMSELF

    Barack Hussein Obama II ( Who hates American Values ) who is A " SELF PROCLAIMED Enemy" ~of responsible, Morally Conscious HARD WORKING Americans.

    oBOMAS Irresponsible & DRUG MAFIA and reckless supporters KNOW~ that Barack Hussein Obama II, WILL FORCE YOU to paY THEM, out of your PockeT .{ FOR all of their UNCHECKED Vices and THRILLS/ { All on YOU

    | / At your COST & Sacrifice.

    ...This UN~CHANGABLE fraud, has done His VERY BEST to Inspire VIOLENCE. THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. saying

    .........To his supporters.Saying “Get ready for hand-to-hand combat with your Fellow Americans”

    – Obama has ALSO DECLARED to his Supporters. “I want all Americans to get in each others faces!– Obama demands !

    “You bring a knife to a fight pal, we’ll bring a gun”

    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. ANGER VIOLENCE and more taxes..... THIS IS OBAMAS Change for america /“Hit Back Twice As Hard”. He commands !

    *Obama on the private sector: ~~ “We talk To these folks…~ / so I know whose a*$ to KICK.“ OBOMA wants to KICK

    your a*$ /```Shouting THAT Republican victory would mean ~ “hand to hand combat” and HE IS EXPECTING people to be on Edge and ON BORDERLINE killing MODE, `` VIOLENT / and STAND and STOMP and MOB for their immoral CAUSES and THIS IS WHAT HE LIVES FOR ./ ./
    /
    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. !* Obama Tells democrats: “ I’m itching for a fight.” !

    ...PLEASE.... go to reXes NEW WebsiTe ~ ! Oboma *( Just like Adolf Hitler~~\oBOMA~~~ Demands ! -- [ THE FINAL SOLUTION - for Un~Wanted Children Barak Obama is A MURDERER .~Torturing UNWANTED babys on DEATH ROE

    CLICK HERE http://obomlnation.webstarts.com/index.html

    OBAMA TAKES a little NEW BORN innocent child. BORN. ALIVE sTabS it iN the head and SUCKs ITS BRAINS OUT.

    This is just too wrong and horrible. Please stand for Loving Children and the USA.

    Respectfully and Thankfully Thank you ALL for your Time.

    To see the CLINTON, RENO, ATF and DEMOCRAT Media ATTACK And HONOR Killing, [ Slaughter] ` of 21 LITTLE Helpless Children at Waco.

    Please Click Here http://obomlnation.webstarts.com/partly_born_totally_murdered.html

    ReplyDelete
  175. -No, it says your delusional and in denial.

    No, It says YOU'RE a coward.
    Delusional is being embarrased by Orly.
    You've been told but you'll never get it.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.