Monday, January 23, 2012


Fox News' Bret Baier: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility Hearing - 1/23/2012 - VIDEO HERE



REMINDER: 
Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream 
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings

MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC

55 comments:

  1. HOW ABOUT TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS FRAUD IN OUR WHITE HOUSE FOX NEWS. MAYBE ITS TIME THE THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION NOT RENEW ANY OF YOUR LICENSES TO BROADCAST ON THE AIRWAYS. WE ARE SICK OF THE MEDIAS LIES AS WELL AS THE LIES BY OUR GOVERNMENTS ELECTED IDIOTS. ITS ABOUT TIME WE STARTED LOCKING THESE LIARS UP FOR VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION. WHO SAYS WE CANT? THE VERY ONES WHO NEED TO BE JAILED. THIS NEEDS TO CHANGE NOW!
    SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS IM PISSED!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where are the obat lawyers who will put their NAME and REPUTATION on defying the true definition of a natural born citizen (2 US Citizen parents, born on US soil)??

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, it's unfortunate when the media does not do research and proceeds to publish a grossly erroneous story.

    The judge did not order Obama to appear and testify. In fact, the judge knows he has no power to do that. All that happened is Malihi declined a motion to quash. It doesn't mean he thinks the subpoena has any validity.

    You know, don't you, that the separation of powers does not allow a state court judge to dictate that the President must show up in his court? Malihi knows it, and he knows the federal courts would bitch slap into the piney woods of Georgia if he tried.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Our Coward in Chief most likely has a round or two of golf to play, perhaps another fund raiser for his yet again another fraudulent election?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Let's see what the defense provides as evidence for Obama to meet the constitutional requirements to be POTUS. I suspect there will be an appearance by Bob Bauer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The court most certainly has juristiction of Obama, not as the President but as a candidate to be on the Georgia Ballot. While it is highly unlikely should, Obama disregard the subpoena, that the court would be able to do anything, Obama's candidacy to be on the Georgia Ballot would be greatly jeopardized. As far the subpoena is concerned, if Obama wants to be on the Georgia Ballot, he got to show up. It's really that simple.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In fact, I would argue that the subpoena has nothing to do with as has no controller power over Obama as the POTUS. The only issue that is relevant is the placement of Obama on the Georgia Ballot as a candidate. I see no argument that Obama can put forward that would allow him the escape the subpoena, a candidate to be Georgia's ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The judge has not ordered Obama to testify or come to Georgia in his official capacity as the POTUS. What the judge has ordered (Through the denial of the subpoena) is that Obama is required to testify or come to Georgia as a potential candidate to be on Georgia's ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What has taken the watchdogs so long to file impeachment charges against this racist, Islamist, anti-American subversive abominable Obama? What more is needed for it to stick? He has not proved (the onus is on him) that he meets the citizenship test. He has lied constantly and consistently to the people AND to CONGRESS! And his lies continue unabated and shamelessly! He hires scofflaws who aought to be in jail rather than in lofty government positions. He bows to Islamists, and denigrates the USA. What is NOT treasonous here?

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Anonymous

    Where, exactly, do you see the following:

    "IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant Barack H. Obama shall appear personally in this court on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM to give testimony.

    ENTERED this 20th day of January, 2012."

    Because that is what an order looks like.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Hotlanta Mike

    Ii suspect Bob Bauer will be seeing clients in his office in Washington, DC, or perhaps appearing in court in Washington, DC on a matter totally unrelated to this case, or maybe attending a CLE course, or directing research efforts of a team of junior attorneys.

    Bob Bauer must definitely will not be in Atlanta.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bad Publicity is the whipped cream. Either way, Obama's reputation is diminished especially by independents, whom he desperately needs.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous @ 8:45

    If you think the ALJ has jurisdiction to do squat if -- no, when -- Obama fails to show up, then are not acquainted with Georgia law.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Anonymous @ 9:50.

    Hardly. Outside of birther blogs and anti-birther blogs, very few have heard that this hearing is occurring. The independents want a candidate who talks about the economy, not conspiracy theories. This proceeding, if it gets the widespread coverage you are hoping for, will further confirm for them that the Republican Party has gone round the bend.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Obama iniated this whole thing when he "signed" an application to be on the Georgia ballot stating that he meets the Constitutional requirements to be President. Georgia "voter's" have the right to challenge his credentials. Either Obama shows up and produces evidence that he is a "natural born Citizen" subject to verification, or else he withdraws his application. Possibly getting nailed for perjury for filing a false statement that says he meets the Article II requirements. He's screwed either way.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Although Orly Taitz was born in Communist Russia, she is a better American patriot than most Americans, who should be ashamed of themselves for not marching on the White House in reference to the usurper occupying the Oval Office.

    ReplyDelete
  17. California birther/dualer/doubterJanuary 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    It's going to be interesting to see what excuse the Obama crime syndicate will come up with this time. It better be a good one because we've seen all the games that have been played on us.

    ReplyDelete
  18. where does his new NDAA fit in here? Did he exclude himself from being an enemy?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Obama's lawyer has already stated to the Judge that their "proof" that Obama is eligible is his already-made-public long-form B.C.!!! Some of "America's finest" have gone public stating that this B.C. IS A FAKE! (I cannot believe the audacity of these people!)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Obama STILL has to "show cause" why he cannot attend---and needs the Judge's "permission" to allow his attorney to "show" for him. Judge Malihi is treating him as A CANDIDATE, not as the President. Because that's the whole issue in this case.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "As far the subpoena is concerned, if Obama wants to be on the Georgia Ballot, he got to show up. It's really that simple."

    Absolutely wrong.

    The SoS may allow Obama to remain on the ballot or not (you do know he's on the ballot, right?), but that decision has nothing to do with whether he shows at this hearing or not.

    And Bob Bauer will not be there either.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Anonymous January 23, 2012 9:47 PM

    What, exactly, don't you understand about the following:

    "ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

    Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

    [paragraph detailing Obama's motion to quash]

    [paragraph about Obama's claim that subpoena service was defective]

    Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.

    SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012."

    Because that is what an ORDER denying Obama's motion to quash a subponea compelling his attendance at the hearing looks like.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous said...[Reply]
    The court most certainly has juristiction of Obama, not as the President but as a candidate to be on the Georgia Ballot. While it is highly unlikely should, Obama disregard the subpoena, that the court would be able to do anything, Obama's candidacy to be on the Georgia Ballot would be greatly jeopardized. As far the subpoena is concerned, if Obama wants to be on the Georgia Ballot, he got to show up. It's really that simple.


    Anonymous said...[Reply]
    In fact, I would argue that the subpoena has nothing to do with as has no controller power over Obama as the POTUS. The only issue that is relevant is the placement of Obama on the Georgia Ballot as a candidate. I see no argument that Obama can put forward that would allow him the escape the subpoena, a candidate to be Georgia's ballot.

    Anonymous said...[Reply]
    The judge has not ordered Obama to testify or come to Georgia in his official capacity as the POTUS. What the judge has ordered (Through the denial of the subpoena) is that Obama is required to testify or come to Georgia as a potential candidate to be on Georgia's ballo

    Wrong, wrong and wrong... you all will find this out on Thu...

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous said...[Reply]
    What has taken the watchdogs so long to file impeachment charges against this racist, Islamist, anti-American subversive abominable Obama? What more is needed for it to stick? He has not proved (the onus is on him) that he meets the citizenship test. He has lied constantly and consistently to the people AND to CONGRESS! And his lies continue unabated and shamelessly! He hires scofflaws who aought to be in jail rather than in lofty government positions. He bows to Islamists, and denigrates the USA. What is NOT treasonous here?

    watchdogs can't file impeachment charges , only the house can... Did you go to school??

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Hotlanta MikeWhat about this, if Obama has forgeries of all the documents the judge has ordered to see produced. Except for the BC of course. The prosecution wouldn't have time to prove them as forgeries. Then Have the judge declare them valid. Tell the judge that he just cannot rule on the NBC issue regarding citizen parents. Basically say the supreme court needs to decide that. Then dismiss testimony about the forged BC because they don't have the real one in front of them. Then say the prosecution has insufficient evidence. Decide in favor of Obama and have the media trumpet it as a great victory thereby giving Obama a political boost.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Where are the obat lawyers who will put their NAME and REPUTATION on defying the true definition of a natural born citizen (2 US Citizen parents, born on US soil)??

    Professor of Law Lawrence Solum: "the much stronger argument suggests that if you were born on American soil that you would be considered a natural born citizen."

    Professor of Law Ronald Rotunda: "There's some people who say that both parents need to be citizens. That's never been the law."

    Professor of Law Polly Price: "It's a little confusing, but most scholars think it's a pretty unusual position for anyone to think the natural born citizen clause would exclude someone born in the U.S."

    Professor of Law Gabriel Chin: "there is agreement that 'natural born citizens' include those made citizens by birth under the 14th Amendment."

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous
    "The court most certainly has juristiction of Obama, not as the President but as a candidate to be on the Georgia Ballot. While it is highly unlikely should, Obama disregard the subpoena, that the court would be able to do anything, Obama's candidacy to be on the Georgia Ballot would be greatly jeopardized. As far the subpoena is concerned, if Obama wants to be on the Georgia Ballot, he got to show up. It's really that simple"

    Exactly.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Even if you give Obama the benefit of the doubt that nbc has not been specifically defined as being born in usa to two citizen parents(Minor v. Happerset is not totally clear), nowhere does it say nbc is born in usa to one citizen parent ie mom and foreign dad so until a court case is decided by the SC, he is ineligble..

    Therefore, even if Obama can prove he was born in HI(which i dont think he was), and can explain that he did not lose his usa citizenship via an indonesian adoption, he still has not proven he is in fact a nbc. The burden is on him to prove he is eligible.

    The fact he was not vetted and a SC case made in 2008 to specifically decide if he is nbc shows the whole leadership of usa is corrupt. We need a SC case immediately and Obama needs to be ordered to produce birth and adoption records asap. Let the SC decide the definition of nbc and be done with it.

    Any true american who opposes this vetting with legal tricks is simply a traitor. Obama and probably McCain too need to be in prison for doing what they did so they could both run while pissing our on Constitution when both knew they were not eligible.

    Arrest all the Congress too for allowing it to happen and for doing nothing for four years.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Anonymous
    Which 20 Senate Democrats do you think would go along with an impeachment conviction?

    Because that is what it would take to remove Obama via impeachment, 67 Senators voting to convict.
    And that's why Congress has held zero hearings regarding impeachment.
    There are currently only 47 Republicans in the Senate.
    Plus, the man who would preside over an impeachment trial is the man who swore Obama in as President, Chief Justice John Roberts.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Agreed. The bad publicity alone is worth this effort. Most people will just take away that Obama was ordered to go to a hearing on his eligibility.

    On a side note, it's interesting how Fox has no problem reporting unsubstantiated claims about Cain and Gingrich, but doesn't report anything about the Obama efforts until there is a concrete development...such as this hearing on the merits and unquashed subpoena.

    Methinks it stinks in Denmark.

    ReplyDelete
  31. OMG...Oh Monkey Guts!! Never thought I would see a FOXer announce anything "real" about O.whodat's case. Also v-e-l-l-y in-tu-r-r-r-esting is the fact that O.goofoff can't be taken away from his day job except for 90 rounds of golf. What a BOGUS POTUS! This hope that someone in authority will want to change the embedded corruption that BHO's ineligibility as a non-"natural born Citizen" represents,and the ramifications of a future POTUS coming from the pool of anchor babies and Chi-coms on designer birthing trips to obtain US citizenship for their foreign babies just because they download them here through the current misinterpretation of the Amendment XIV, will do irreparable damage to our Constitution just as allowing O.whodat to remain illegitimately posing as POTUS. Nothing may come of this like all the other suits brought against the Fraud in Chief...but at least the salvos are being reported and are beginning to be heard.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I am not a lawyer, but seems to me that "impeachment" would not be necessary.

    IF he is "inelligible" then a case can be made that he is NOT the "president", but simply a fraud impersonating one.

    It thus follows that any police officer (SHERIFF) could simply "arrest" him.

    I do admit it will be a constitutional crisis, (never let a crisis no to waste).

    I am HOPING (beyone hope) that there is fruit from the Arapaio investigation. I don't understand why it is taking so long, but I do HOPE it means he is finding out more than we already know.

    ReplyDelete
  33. My take on impeachment:

    Impeachment of Obama or whoever he is would work, which is why it won’t happen.

    If Obama was impeached, whatever the specific reason was, (and there are many), it would force a discussion in the media, the public, and even Congress of, “Who is Barry Soetoro?” Impeachment would not occur in a vacuum with rules of what can be said…or not said. The vetting that never happened would happen and the truth would win out. Congress knows impeachment would put them one step closer to losing control of the massive cover-up they have been working since the usurper was fraudulently elected, and they will never impeach Obama for that reason.

    It makes no difference how many in Congress would vote for or against impeachment, it’s the process of impeachment Congress fears and will never allow to happen

    Obama, as he has demonstrated, can tear the Constitution to sheds and violate any law he wants…,and nothing will happen…..he is impeachment proof.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @anon 12:43

    Irrespective of what you seem to think, this is still a Constitutional Republic and the Constitition is real simple.

    The man won the largest number of popular votes cast, he won the largest number of Electoral College votes, these votes were certified by Congress and the then Vice President Dick Cheney, no objections were filed, he was sworn in and he took office.

    There are precisely two legal methods of removal, via the Constitution (impeachment etc)or vote another President in during the upcoming elections.

    Any thing else you want to believe is just nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Maybe I had the good sheriff pegged all wrong. Maybe he's out right now planning Soetoro's arrest. Inbetween my laughing, I hope so.

    ReplyDelete
  36. ANY JUDGE CAN ISSUE A WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST THIS TELLS EVERY LAW OFFICER IN THE NATION TO ARREST HIM ON SITE AND HOLD TILL HES BROUGHT BEFORE THE JUDGE. LETS JUST HOPE THIS IS THE FIRST HONEST LEFT IN AMERICA.

    ReplyDelete
  37. 1:58 PM, Thats good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Maybe we ought not lose sight of Soetoro these next few days.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Just for the fun of it, where is Nancy hanging out these days?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Terri, If NBC has never been decided why has Congress attempted 10 plus times to take the 2 citizen parent clause OUT? Someone please answer!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Real simple: either barry wants to be on the ballot in GA and shows on Thursday, OR he has his attorney in court with some lame excuse for a continuance because of his "busy" schedule, OR barry does not appear and is barred from being on the GA ballot.

    Period.

    ReplyDelete
  42. If Obama is there only as a candidate and not as POTUS, Orly and her buddies are forbidden to ask any questions regarding acts he has undertaken as POTUS, including release of the long form BC in April. In fact, if they have challenged him as a candidate only, the only question will be whether or not he has a valid COLB which Hawaii has already certified. Can't have it both ways. Either current candidate or President, but not both. He knows that, I know that, OBOTS know that, and birthers will learn that in a day and a half.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Anonymous
    @1:10 p.m.

    Yeah, a constitutional republic except when it applies to the lying low life that you are defending. He doesn't give a fuck about the constitution. He lies, cheats and steals in anonymity, admits his foreign allegiance, and the dumbocrat party ignores and twists the constitution for what? For what? To defend one (low life) person?

    If you are defending that by talking about a 'constitutional' solution, you are a fucking fool. If you are an Obot, go fuck yourself. If you're not, get a grip and see what's happening to this 'constitutional republic'.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Anonymous

    Anon @ 9:01 a.m.
    Professor of Law Ronald Rotunda: "There's some people who say that both parents need to be citizens. That's never been the law."

    So what? If that's not the law, then what is? The spin that you apply has been not just deconstructed, but demolished because that's exactly what it is - spin - no, no, it's bullshit. Any reasonably intelligent person that understands plain English can read what SCOTUS said in M v. H and understand what it means. The word "natural" has meaning and all the lying, spinning and bullshitting in the world won't change it.

    M v. H is the law until it's overturned.

    Bite me Obot. Bite me.

    ReplyDelete
  45. "Irrespective of what you seem to think, this is still a Constitutional Republic and the Constitition is real simple."

    It is really NOT that "simple"; but then again maybe it IS. If you are not "constitutionaly" ELIGIBLE, then NOTHING that takes place after that changes anything.

    If you are only 14 and claim you are 17 and get a drivers license, are you still allowed to drive if they find out ???

    If you rob a bank, and are successful and get away with the money, can you get "keep" it cause you got it already in your hand ???

    (Actually the drivers-license is a bad example BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO SHOW YOUR "certified" BIRTH CERTIFICATE to prove your age -- something Obama has not done.)

    ReplyDelete
  46. Poor "Zamas"

    Why do you hate the Cnstitution and its laws so much..?

    The poster showed you precisely what are the ONLY options and yet all we hear is whine, whine, whine.

    If it's all so importam to you, lurch out of the Barca Lounger, brush the Cheeto's from the wife beater, tell your mommy you're going out with your little buddy "black belt" and do something about it.

    Volunteer to help your Republican candidate of choice, participate in the democratic process all those good things.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Govenor Moonie wasn't "impeached". He was removed by the Court.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_H._Moodie


    After Moodie's inauguration on January 7, 1935, it was revealed that he had voted in a 1932 municipal election in Minnesota. In order to be eligible for governor, an individual has to have lived in the state for five consecutive years before the election. The State Supreme Court determined that Governor Moodie was ineligible to serve, and he was removed from office on February 16, 1935. After his five-week stint as governor

    ReplyDelete
  48. So very sorry Terri, I did not mean to adress you. I read wrong and typed without confirming. VERY Sorry.
    Charlene

    PS I sure wish all the obot annon's would use a name. Make one up! If you need help thinking of a name for yourself I bet ya we could think of a few.

    ReplyDelete
  49. JFK really tried to warn ALL OF US.

    "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." -Galileo

    IN JFK’S OWN WORDS HE IS TRYING TO WARN THE U.S. ABOUT A MONOLITHIC & RUTHLESS CONSPIRACY AROUND THE WORLD WHERE HE ASKED THE MEDIA TO HELP ALERT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE MEDIA DID NOT ALERT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE EVIL CONTINUES!!!

    JFK "The President and the Press," before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDe6QCqFu4c

    Ron Paul 2012

    ReplyDelete
  50. Ms. Orly Taitz IS a patriot!

    She knows a communist dictator when she see's one-

    and she's about to start Barrys downfalll

    ReplyDelete
  51. @Black Belt:

    Professor Rotunda graduated from Harvard Law School, is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, taught law at the University of Illinois, and presently teaches law at Chapman University. He has written a legal textbook on the U.S. Constitution. When someone of his stature says that natural-born citizenship does not require two citizen parents for those born in the United States, people listen.

    And you? From which law school did you graduate? Where do you teach? How many legal textbooks have you written?

    ReplyDelete
  52. @Charlene:

    The attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution to alter the natural-born citizen clause have been to allow naturalized citizens (like Schwarzenegger or Kissinger) be the president (or vice president).

    ReplyDelete
  53. So.. has it gone too far. Is the country in such bad shape,that the powers/money/people that put this Obama in the White House are they running and covering them selves?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Everyone who has ever applied for a passport knows you must produce a certified birth certificate. If Pres Obama never had one or any document accepted as a certified birth certificate, how did he obtain a passport long, long before he was elected President?

    ReplyDelete
  55. The man is simply a fraud-I'm puzzled as to why more people are not the least curious as to his unwillingness to provide any personal info.What is he hiding?

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.