Monday, November 28, 2011


Official Challenge Filed Against Barack Obama Being Placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

To: Georgia Secretary of State Brian P. Kemp

From: Carl A. Swensson

Attn: Mr. Brian Kemp

It has come to my attention your office has posted Barack Obama as the sole Democrat candidate for President on the Ga. Primary Ballot. This notice is my challenge and request he be removed from our ballot as he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause V concerning the Natural Born Citizen status.

Jurisdiction falls squarely on the shoulders of your office as head of the Georgia Board of Elections and it is your sworn duty as a man of honor and Public Servant to protect and defend the Constitution. The very U.S. Constitution that is now under attack and assault by the DNC for having failed in their responsibility to submit an eligible candidate for inclusion on our ballot.

I have voiced this concern to you many times over the past year, citing Minor V Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875) but it would now appear as if those words of caution are going unheeded. Supporting SCOTUS cases have been scrubbed but are now re-surfacing thanks to the work of Leo Donofrio. Esq. and I would ask you and your research staff do your homework and look closely at Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) (aka In Re Lockwood at Justia), is essentially the holy grail of support for Minor v. Happersett, as it states:

In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word ‘citizen’ is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since…” (Emphasis added) and also the City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980)

I must bring these supporting cases for Minor V Happersett since your office has installed, as the chief arbiter, Former Central District U.S. Atty. Max Woods who has personally told me (see sworn affidavit attached) that even an “Anchor Baby” is eligible to hold the highest office in the land. I see this as an affront to the sensibilities of all Georgians and a fraud upon her citizens that only your office can now rectify.

Since we’re now talking of fraud, I must also add, to the mix, the use of a SS# from Connecticut by Mr. Obama (sworn affidavits from researchers Susan Daniels and Linda Jordan are attached) which was obtained while he was still living in Hawaii and still being used to this day. A number that, once plugged into the E-Verify database came back as not being verifiable.

The SS# discrepancy is worthy of investigation. His Naturalization, if it ever occurred, is another issue since he was officially adopted by Indonesian Lolo Soetoro (Attached research paper is from Stephen Pidgeon, Atty.). These additional two issues alone would constitute the need for further investigation and documentation from the DNC.

Admittedly, there is no Federal convening authority chartered with this responsibility which is why it falls squarely on the shoulders of this and every other State. You cannot fail us now and must uphold your Oath of Office by adhering to the Constitutional requirement that any candidate of the office of POTUS be a Natural Born Citizen. One of your main jobs is to make certain there is no election fraud. Do your Public service and be the man we elected to represent us.

The fear our Politicians feel, coming from the Media, can be a concern but, in no way, absolves the Ga. SOS’s office from doing its duty. There is no easy way around this so my request is a simple one… Man up, remove Mr. Woods from his involvement with this oversight committee and adhere to your Oath of Office by doing what every other Politician is afraid to do. Demand documentation, proving once and for all, that this man is either eligible or not. Based on what has been offered as such documentation, by the White House, he is not.

The eyes of the Nation are now upon you. Your timely response will be appreciated.

I have cc’d Sam Olens on this in the fervent hope he will initiated an investigation into Voter Fraud in the 2008 and upcoming 2012 elections. As the saying goes, “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me”.

Sincerely,

Carl A. Swensson

Affidavit - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Pidgeon/Soetoro - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

56 comments:

  1. From this Supreme Court Decision of 1964:

    http://supreme.justia.com/us/377/163/case.html

    From the case of Schneider: V. Rush.

    Quote:

    "We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity, and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1."

    ReplyDelete
  2. "HHmmmm" thinking about copy and paste this for Texas since the last pound of paperwork and phone calls didn't espouse any courage on the AG or the SOS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is Kemp a Dumbocrat? If he is this is truly a waste of paper and/or email. If he's a Republican, it still won't matter. NOTHING is going to come of this.

    Kudos for standing up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Expect ballot challenges in all 57 States Bari...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Every single Georgian must now take this letter of Swensson's, his enclosures and MUST craft such a letter addressing it to the SOS.

    Mr. Swensson should not stand alone. Each and every person who moans about no progress being made by others, must now take individual action. Please reach out now to every Georgian you know, post this letter/link on your FB pages and ask Georgian's to take action, Twitter this link and as all Georgian's to take action.

    Georgian voters/citizens MUST flood the SOSs' office with respectful, firm demands that his office fulfill his constitutional duties. Georgia's state code demands all Pres/V Pres nominees must meet the qualifications set out in the Constitution under Article II. Therefore, it is Georgia's SOS legal responsibility to ensure those names placed on the state ballot, which is paid for by Georgian's taxes, MUST meet Article II qualifications, period.

    Folks have asked again and again what they can do. The answer - FLOOD GEORGIA'S SOSs' office with such direct and respectful requests.

    Great job, Mr. Swensson!

    ReplyDelete
  6. @John Doe Sr.

    "From this Supreme Court Decision of 1964:"

    So natural born and native born mean the same thing?

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Anonymous

    You would like it to mean that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nice job, but is Carl early or late?

    The statutory deadline for challenges to the primary was Nov. 15. As for the general, it's months away from being ripe.

    @fogblow... The US Supreme Court has consistently and repeatedly equated the concept of "natural born citizenship" with "native-born citizenship" and "born a US citizen." Indeed, there is no case in which the Court makes any distinction between a "natural born citizen" and a "native born citizen" or "born US citizen."

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, Obot. The deadline to challenge in Ga. is 11/29. I believe you have two weeks after the candidate files.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @FOGBLOW.COM

    "You would like it to mean that"

    So how do you interprete this statement'

    "We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity, and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1."

    The rights of the native born and naturalized are the same except for the one difference that the natural born can be President.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Deadline for filing is tomorrow so, yes, mine made it under the wire (being a classic slacker and all).
    Thanks to Leo Donofrio, 25 supporting cases (supporting the definition in Minor V Happersett) have been identified with the latest being in 1980. That's the second one I referenced. BTW, THANKS LEO!!!!!
    Now to find out when this will get before that board I referenced and have some people show up by my side and Video tape the results.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, you have two weeks after the candidate files. And the candidate's deadline for filing is November 1st.

    O.C.G.A. 21-2-193:

    "Not later than November 1 of the year preceding the year in which a presidential preference primary is to be held, the state executive committee of each party which is to conduct a presidential preference primary shall submit to the Secretary of State a list of the names of the candidates of such party to appear on the presidential preference primary ballot."

    http://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-21/chapter-2/article-5/21-2-193/

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't think a Supreme Court decision would use different words to describe the same thing in one sentence.

    Here is what it means:

    It means that a person can be native born or naturalized and have the same citizen rights except for presidential eligibility. A person can be native born and not natural born, (anchor baby or Obama if he was born in the U.S.A. with his non-American citizen father), or native born and natural born,(born of citizen parents). A person cannot be naturalized and natural born.

    Only the natural born citizen can be president, which eliminates anchor babies and Obama.

    That makes sense to me and goes right back to the requirement for citizen parents in order to be natural born.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "FOGBLOW.COM said...[Reply]

    No, Obot. The deadline to challenge in Ga. is 11/29. I believe you have two weeks after the candidate files.
    November 28, 2011 1:56 PM "

    I could of course always be mistaken but I believe the statute states two weeks from the date of qualifying and the date of qualifying was Nov. 1 in GA. It doesn't appear to make a distinction between primary and general, so the deadline "could" be the latter.

    Just sayin'.

    I really don't care one way or the other, just was asking a question and supplying info.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Anonymous

    What color is the sky on the planet where you live? You friggin idiot.

    Ignorant can be fixed. Stupid is forever. You're stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @John Doe Sr.

    John Doe Sr. said:

    Your citation proves the difference between a native born (ex: anchor baby, or dual national) and a natural born citizen.

    That case states:
    1. The "rights" are the same between the two different classes of citizenship.
    2. Except for (i.e. "The only difference") only a natural born citizen is eligibile.

    This case is yet another that confirms a native born is not eligible. Must be natural born.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Anonymous

    No, it doesn't mean the same thing. Re-read the SCOTUS decision.

    Clearly, they are saying that they are, in fact, different.

    Their "rights" are the same...except for the POTUS eligibility. Only an NBC is eligible. Meaning, a native citizen is not eligible.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Anonymous

    Wrong.

    The very SCOTUS case posted on this thread makes the distinction...saying that there IS a difference (for POTUS eligibility):

    "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1.""

    ReplyDelete
  19. Under Georgia law, the presidential preference primary is actially two separate primaries conducted by the state executive committee of each respective political party. Given that Carl is a registered Republican and a Republican party official, he lacks standing to challenge the Democratic candidate in the primary.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sheriff Joe Arpaio said, “This false identification is a very serious crime,...." refering to id’s used by illegal aliens in our country. How much more serious is the crime of fraudulently usurping the office of President of the United States of America and the military rank of Commander-in-Chief?
    Abrogation is the only answer. To permit the criminal to resign or impeach the fraud one would first need to recognize his legitimate occupation of the Oval Office which is not now and has never been the case. Everything Barry Soetoro and his illegitimate administration has accomplished while illegally occupying the White House has been accomplished while in the commission of a crime against the highest law of this land, the Constitution of the United States of America, and therefore, by definition, an high crime. He should be incarcerated in the same prison cell in Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas where Lt. Col. Lakin, surgeon in the 101st Airborne Infantry Division was imprisoned. The 101st Airborne Division's famous cadence called is "Pick-up your weapon and follow me; I am the Airborne Infantry!" and Lt. Col. Lakin can hear America's response to those words loud and clear: 'Standing by, Sir! At your command!'
    Obama's minions will drag things out in the courts. Keep in mind that "After his election,..." "...Obama held a secret meeting with eight of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court -- from which no public information was released. The meeting was held even though there were legal challenges in which Obama was a defendant pending before the Supreme Court at the time. The attorneys for the plaintiffs never were told of the meeting or invited to participate in what critics have described as extrajudicial contact between the court and a defendant." ('What Did Congress Know About Natural-Born Citizen?' 07/01/11; By Bob Unruh. WND.COM.) The enormity of the arrogance of the Supreme Court justices involved to disregard the all but sacred separation of powers given to us at great cost - a bulwark against tyranny - is incomprehensible. Could members of the Supreme Court be involved in this conspiracy to contravene the constitution too? If it is determined that those Supreme Court Justices who have obviated the separation of powers we hold so dear and broken their oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, then they should be removed from the bench in disgrace and prosecuted for their treasonous contravention of the constitution.
    Clearly, Gov. Abercrombie of Hawaii has been complicit in this, the greatest crime perpetrated against 'We the People' in American history. You may recall his broadcasting that he, and I paraphrase, 'was going to get to the bottom of the birth certificate thing.' ; then he came out and reported that 'his people' were unable to locate the original long-form birth certificate. All the while, Dr. Jerome Corsi had an undercover detective working in the very building where the birth cert. should have been. Dr. Corsi's mole was able to get into the very filing cabinet where, were there one, it should have been - with a cell phone in one hand and a camera in another, but no birth cert. Then at a later date the same detective called Dr. Corsi with the drawer to the filing cabinet open in front of him and reported that he was looking at the birth certificate. I would imagine he took pictures. Could this be anything but a conspiracy to contravene the constitution? Gov. Abercrombie should be persecuted for treason. The hospital administrators in Hawaii and responsible administrators at Columbia, Occidental and Harvard Law School should too be prosecuted if it is found that Barry's records show his higher education was financed by Islamic interests or if they have been aware all along that he was registered as a foreign student while attending their respective institutions.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The preeminent questions that need NOW to be asked of all current presidential candidates are: 1.) If elected president, would you issue an executive order for a forensic investigation into the forged birth certificate and fraudulent Social Security Card which Mr. Soetoro / Obama has presented as evidence for his constitutional eligibility to have run for that office and honor the demand of 'We the People' within America's Tea Party for the satisfaction of our demand for our constitutional right of redress of grievance; said grievance being the illegal election of an ineligible candidate to the office of president whose fraud and forgery has dishonored that office and made a mockery of our constitution? And 2.) When Mr. Soetoro / Obama's crime is legally recognized, would you then proceed as president - compliant to the oath you would necessarily take to defend the Constitution - with the retroactive ABROGATION through EXECUTIVE ORDER of the unconstitutional election of the fraud and all that the criminal's illegitimate administration has accomplished while illegally occupying the Oval Office?
    If Congress continues to neglect its duty to perform an investigation - as Dr. Charles Rice of Notre Dame School of Law said, and I paraphrase - 'an investigation by a House Committee would be a proper exercise of Congress' 'informing function' - and conduct forensic analysis for the purposes of authentication and validation of THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS that Barry has presented as evidence of his status as a natural-born citizen, then American patriotic defenders of the Constitution must consider the possibility of resorting to actions not dissimilar in spirit to those of the patriots who conducted the original Boston Tea Party, a commando raid conducted by volunteer citizen militiamen who risked their lives and liberty for God and country. Another dimension of this travesty of justice is only now beginning to be discussed: If it is true that this imposter, Mr. Barack, or Barry, 'King Hussein,' Obama / Soetoro who attended Muslim madrassa schools for 6-8 of his formative years in Indonesia - schools where students bow down in the direction of Mecca several times a day and pray to the Moon-god, Allah; schools with one book: the Koran; schools wherein young men are indoctrinated into the ideological beliefs of our enemy, the cult of Islam, has committed the most notorious crime in history, then America's national security administrators must consider the probability that Barry's deception was nothing less than a Muslim's covert operation while walking in Islamic taqqiya. The 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombassa can not be set free for he has availed himself of far too many state secrets the release of which would imperil our national security.
    PETITION TO ABROGATE:
    To; Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States of America
    I, the undersigned American citizen, demand that the unconstitutional election of an ineligible candidate to the office of President of the United States of America, fraudulently representing himself as a natural-born citizen be ABROGATED forthwith in accordance with Article I, pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America.
    God Bless America,
    Signed: ___________________________
    Printed Name: ______________________
    Social Security Number: _________________________
    Month: _____________, Day: _________, Anno Domini 2011.
    Send to: Chris Farrell
    P.O. Box 791301
    New Orleans, LA 70119
    VICTORI TE SALUTAMUS!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hey Chris, where's the prosecutor who's going to bring charges in Maricopa County on the basis of Joe's opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  23. @chris

    Yes, let's all sign a document with our social security numbers and send them to Chris.

    Yikes.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Chris, paragraphs are your friends. Using them would make your posts much easier to read.

    ReplyDelete
  25. At the very least sheriff joe should have sway in Arizona to remove Barry Soetero from the ballot?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Chris... You need to get back on your meds.

    And if you're going to write in Latin you should learn how to spell in Latin.

    Just Sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous
    I would love to see a warrnat issued for Oscama's arrest.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Matt

    Okay, Matt, name the judge that issue the warrant.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Anonymous

    "At the very least sheriff joe should have sway in Arizona to remove Barry Soetero from the ballot?"

    Nope. Joe holds sway over the northwester and southeastern suburbs of Phoenix. Enough to get him elected in Maricopa County. But the rest of the state thinks he's an idiot. He holds NO sway over the SOS or Governor. The SOS determines who will be on the ballot, and Ken is not a birther.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The US Supreme Court, in the 1964 case of Schneider v. Rusk, clarified what a born citizen was under the 14th amendment. Their reference to the citizenship of native born and naturalized persons is very similar to what is stated in the 14th amendment:

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

    Compare the above to the first sentence of the quote from the Schneider case:

    “We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity, and are coextensive.”

    The Schneider court then differentiated between a native-born citizen and a natural born citizen:

    “The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the ‘natural born’ citizen is eligible to be President.”

    Both the native-born citizen and natural born citizen are born in the country, but the natural born citizen is also born to citizen parents, and it is this additional attribute that makes him eligible to be President.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Forget the sheriff. Don't make me laugh. Am I the only one who remembers "Smokey and the Bandit"?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Anonymous

    It will be the honorable Judge Wapner, Obot!

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Anonymous


    Joe doesn't have the authority to keep anyone off the Maricopa County ballot, much less the State's.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Our government, handed down to us at great cost, is still the government 'of the People, by the People and for the People.' It appears that Sheriff Joe Arpaio is going to come out with some earth-shattering, irrefutable evidence that Obama / Soteoro is guilty. Obama may attempt to resign and there will those who call for impeachment, but we must abrogate his election. Joe Biden is equally guilty of aiding and abetting (I really don't know what the hell abetting means) a criminal in the commission of a crime, you feel me? What I'm saying is that we can't let one criminal resign and have another, his illegitimate V.P., issue him a pardon, no indeed. Were such a deception to have taken place in the nineteenth century both Barry and Joe would have been properly strung-up for high crimes and treason. NOPARDON-NOBAMA

    ReplyDelete
  35. i got news for you idiots who dont realize what kind of power a sheriff has. a sheriff has the power to issue a warrant for Obamas arrest by every police officer in the nation and return said person to this state to answer to the courts for said warrant. so fog blower try your bull somewhere else. a warrant is a demand that every officer arrest and hold said crook till they are returned to the state where the warrant was issued

    ReplyDelete
  36. Only a Communist Rat Bastard FU$%ING TRAITOR would EVEN CONSIDER allowing a non-Natural Born into the Presidency.

    The mere entertainment of the thought itself is TREASON..! You sick Bastards...

    ReplyDelete
  37. This is my favorite website. Every day I look forward to some new revelation or breakthrough, which will blow the lid off of Obama's disgusting usurpation of the Office of The Presidency of my beloved USA. I googled 'birther', and found a preponderance of articles employing the Alinsky tactic of mockery and ridicule. For a while now, I have proudly proclaimed that I am a 'birther'. By embracing the term, we neutralize the effectiveness of their campaign to marginalize us as 'kooks' and 'loony conspiracy theorists'.
    I think we may have some success in keeping Obama off the ballot in States with Republicans in all of the crucial election related positions. We must begin to make inroads before the despicable forces of deceit and fraud, once again allow this monstrous man to claw his way back into the seat of power which he stains with his illegitimacy!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Another challenge was submitted yesterday (late)and I hope more will come today. Research is currently under way to find out about the judges who are on the OSA panel. David Farrar's case has already been asigned to Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi (Muslim). Don't know who will be getting mine yet.
    Someone made mention of standing. ALL legal, eligible voters in Ga. have standing to bring these challenges regardless of party so that statement was just rediculous.

    ReplyDelete
  39. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    i got news for you idiots who dont realize what kind of power a sheriff has. a sheriff has the power to issue a warrant for Obamas arrest by every police officer in the nation and return said person to this state to answer to the courts for said warrant. so fog blower try your bull somewhere else. a warrant is a demand that every officer arrest and hold said crook till they are returned to the state where the warrant was issued
    November 28, 2011 7:44 PM "

    Newsflash for you... sheriffs can't issue warrants, only judges do.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I vote for Judge Roy "Hang 'Em" Bean to issue an arrest warrant for Barack Hussein Obama et al aliases.

    RacerJim

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Texoma

    Nope. The same justice (Justice Douglas) in Knauer v. United States said that the only Constitutional "right or privledge" between "naturalized citizen" and the "native-born" is the right to be President.

    And he uses Luria v. United States as his guide. Luria says "naturalized citizens" and "native citizens" are equal except "naturalized citizens" cannot be President.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Commykiller said...[Reply]

    -Only a Communist Rat Bastard FU$%ING TRAITOR would EVEN CONSIDER allowing a non-Natural Born into the Presidency.

    I agree... when such a candidate is presented I'm also certain he/she will not be elected.

    -The mere entertainment of the thought itself is TREASON..! You sick Bastards...
    November 28, 2011 11:08 PM

    Well, no, actually it wouldn't be.

    ReplyDelete
  43. What idiots. Sheriffs do not issue warrants, judges do and only upon probable cause. Please direct the moron to the 4th Amendment.

    This argument that a sheriff somehow has powers beyond his county has been developed as a way to justify the Maricopa Sheriff operating beyond his authority. Even in Arizona, county sheriffs authority do not extend beyond the county limits.

    ReplyDelete
  44. 7:44 PM., I hope and pray you're right about the sheriff. Unfortunately, the sheriff has done nothing as we speak and talks about releasing a report next year. There is an on-going illegal occupation of the WH, and he's going to tell us about it next year. He must be out of his fucking mind. John Richert, you too are dreaming. There are no republicans who would give this issue the time of day. In fact, there aren't even any republicans. Period. Everyone and their mother knows they're all complicit and guilty. We're going to have to squarely look at ourselves, and decide when.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous
    Sheriffs can issue all the warrants that they want. The Constitution provides that the ONLY crimes that a president can be charged with are "high crimes and misdemeanors" on a Bill of impeachment passed by the House of Representatives and the only punishment for a president while in office is removal from office on a vote of 2/3rds of the US Senate following a trial by the Senate presided over by the Chief Justice.
    Any sheriff in the nation who knows the law would be convincing the elected federal representatives in his state to hold hearings on introducing a Bill of Impeachment based on any evidence of criminality or civil liablility that the sheriff might have uncovered.
    I'm frankly shocked that this hasn't happened in the eleven months since the Republicans took control of the House of Representatives.

    ReplyDelete
  46. @Anonymous

    I got news for you about warrants, dumbshit. NO sheriff has the power to issue a warrant of any kind. Not an arrest warrant. Not a search warrant.

    Only a judge has the power to issue a warrant.

    ReplyDelete
  47. @chrisWhy do you want our social security numbers on that form?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Congress Tried to change the meaning of Natural Born Citizen EIGHT times since 2002-03 to 2008...All Failed.

    Pardon and Pacify only way to set this Republic on the path to Freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  49. "Anonymous said...[Reply]

    @Anonymous
    Sheriffs can issue all the warrants that they want. "

    Well, if they did, they would be illegal and useless. Sheriffs can execute a warrant they no sheriff has the authority to "issue" a warrant, not an arrest warrant, not even a search warrant.

    Read my lips (and I'll try to speak very slowly) only... judges... may... issue... a... warrant... and... only... based... on... probable... cause.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I'm pretty sure that the great state of Texas is on to the fraud. Whether you like him or not, Gov. Perry has got more common sense than most, and he smells a rat, I'm sure of it. Be bold Dean Haskins, and my Texan brethren, do the right thing!

    ReplyDelete
  51. -I agree... when such a candidate is presented I'm also certain he/she will not be elected.

    So was I, then came YOMAMA..!

    -Well, no, actually it wouldn't be.

    Well yes actually it is.

    ReplyDelete
  52. "Well yes actually it is."

    We don't have thought crimes in this country.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Linda, I am sure Perry is aware of Soetoro being an illegal alien, etc. I am also sure Perry is going to do what he can to allow Soetoro's name to remain on the ballot. In no way, shape, or form will any sos of any of the 57 states remove the illegal's name from any ballot. Period. Gee whiz, don't they teach this in commie 101?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Commykiller said...

    Well yes actually it is."

    I'd love to be educated how someone thinking treasonous thoughts, even 24/7/365, would rise to the crime of treason.

    I have lots of time. I'll wait.

    ReplyDelete
  55. -We don't have thought crimes in this country.

    But we have TRAITORS lots of them. Like those that defend the USURPENT arguing the OBVIOUS meaning of natural born: "BLOOD-n-DIRT".

    As for thought crimes; "As a man thinks so he is"
    While we might not be able to legaly charge you with a crime, If you're OK with allowing an ILEGAL ALIEN into the Presidency, you're a Traitor allright, as far as I'm concerned...

    You're a traitor to the People. You're a traitor to the Republic and you're a traitor to the Constitution..! Hope that clears it up for you...

    -I'd love to be educated how someone thinking treasonous thoughts, even 24/7/365, would rise to the crime of treason.

    I have lots of time. I'll wait.

    I'm so glad you said this! You see, all that is about to change, Guess what..? YOMAMA'S been busy working on it. Lets see what your HOMOMUSLIMLSATANICEADER has to say about that:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/obama-watch/obama-on-the-verge-of-getting-his-wish.html

    P.S. SLAMMER..!

    ReplyDelete
  56. -We don't have thought crimes in this country.

    But we have TRAITORS lots of them. Like those that defend the USURPENT arguing the OBVIOUS meaning of natural born: "BLOOD-n-DIRT".

    As for thought crimes; "As a man thinks so he is"
    While we might not be able to legaly charge you with a crime, If you're OK with allowing an ILEGAL ALIEN into the Presidency, you're a Traitor allright, as far as I'm concerned...

    You're a traitor to the People. You're a traitor to the Republic and you're a traitor to the Constitution..! Hope that clears it up for you...

    -I'd love to be educated how someone thinking treasonous thoughts, even 24/7/365, would rise to the crime of treason.

    I have lots of time. I'll wait.

    I'm so glad you said this! You see, all that is about to change, Guess what..? YOMAMA'S been busy working on it. Lets see what your HOMOMUSLIMLSATANICEADER has to say about that:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/obama-watch/obama-on-the-verge-of-getting-his-wish.html

    P.S. SLAMMER..!

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.