Tuesday, November 29, 2011


Alabama Election Fraud & Ballot Access Complaint Against Obama Submitted To Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman

Alabama Election Fraud Complaint Against Obama Submitted To Alabama Secretary of State - 11/29/2011

Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 17 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5

22 comments:

  1. GOVERNOR:
    Robert Bentley (R)

    LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR:
    Kay Ivey (R) |

    ATTORNEY GENERAL:
    Luther Strange (R) |

    SECRETARY OF STATE:
    Beth Chapman (R) |

    STATE AUDITOR:
    Samantha "Sam" Shaw (R)

    STATE TREASURER:
    Young Boozer (R) |

    STATE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & INDUSTRIES:
    John McMillan (R)

    The whole state of Alabama including the House and Senate are run by Republicans. Our courts are filled with Conservative Judges. Not to mention that the window for an injunction is still open here in Alabama.

    GBA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @theobamahustle

    All those (R)'s mean nothing in this case, unless they act upon the evidence that Barry, the born British subject, is usurping the office of the CinC.

    ReplyDelete
  3. the penalties cannot be stiff enough for all of these elected State officials caught in criminal wrong doing,violating their oaths and our Constitution. Federal also. Notice,not a word from the commie media? I guess they honestly think they are going to get away with this conspiracy. Truth and Justice will prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Mauibrad
    Wow! Look at how nice and clear that notary stamp is at the end of the complaint.
    Imagine that, its so clearand easy to read yer Oscama's if it is there looks to be a digital watermark, not an actual stamp from a seal.

    If our elected officials can't see the difference, they don't deserve to be in office. Likewise if they can, yet do nothing, they don't deserve to be in office.

    How can we trust any presidential candidate to make rational decisions when they can't even spot a blatant forgery.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Way to go Albert!!!! Yes, as of 2010 our State government is controlled by Republicans, for the first time in 100 years. If Beth ignores this and any other complaints that come in, I'll be very surprised and disappointed, not to mention outraged and disgusted.

    I saw something about a "Mr. Woods on an oversight committee"? Was that a c&p mistake from another letter? Just curious as I didn't understand that part.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's rather unfortunate that Al did not do his homework before filing this. Under Alabama law the challenge is NOT filed with the Secretary of State.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Anonymous 9:08 PMToo bad you didn't do your homework chief. Wrong! Thanks for playing though. Read it and weep....

    Section 2. Sections 17-1-8 and 17-1-7 of the Code of Alabama 1975, is amended and renumbered to read as follows:

    "§ 17-1-8 17-1-3.

    "(a) The Secretary of State is the chief elections official in the state and shall provide uniform guidance for election activities. The Secretary of State is granted rule making authority for the implementation of Act 2003-313 Chapter 2 under the Alabama Administrative Procedure Act."

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Anonymous
    Anon 9:08 (aka OBOT)

    What is unfortunate is that there are Obots in a country that they hate and so they will defend a Marxist that is hell bent on distroying the country.

    Yes, I know htat you hate American because my mother is an Obot and has always said she hates America. She is 92 years old and losing her mind. What is your excuse.

    You can try to nitpick legal points, but the truth is still that you are defending a lie.

    This case will move forward and you will have to change your underware.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Reporting Methods
    There are five methods available for reporting allegations of voter fraud. All complaints received will be kept confidential.

    *You may file your allegation online via our web form.

    *You may email your allegation to: voterfraud@sos.alabama.gov

    *You may speak to one of our staff members by calling us toll free: 1-800-274-VOTE (8683)

    *Allegations may also be filed via fax using the following fax number: (334) 242-4993

    *If you would prefer to send your allegation via postal mail, it may be sent to the address below.
    Mailing Address:
    Secretary of State Beth Chapman
    Voter Fraud Unit
    P.O. Box 5616
    Montgomery, Alabama 36103-5616

    Anonymous can kiss my azz. As a matter of fact just to make sure that there are no slip-ups or that the mailed copy gets lost, I am also going to hand deliver a copy of the same complaint to the AL SOS Office this morning. Montgomery is less that 60 miles away from Birmingham.

    A meeting will be held, you can trust me on that. The Alabama SOS Office can keep a candidate off of the ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you my friend. I have been using a template that we created. That was left in in error. However, Like I said in another response, I will also be hand delivering another copy to the AL SOS Office this morning. Her office is less that 60 miles away from Birmingham, so...

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Matt

    Wow indeed!

    Also look how nice and clear to the naked eye at actual size the embossed "* HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH * STATE OF HAWAII *" seal is on both Nordyke twins long-form birth certificates versus no visable to the naked eye at actual size seal on Obama's long-form birth certificate. Also notice the printed statement "THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE IN THE RESEARCH, PLANNING AND STATISTICS OFFICE HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH" on the Nordyke twins long-form birth certificates versus the stamped statement "I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OR ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD ON FILE IN THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH"

    You opinied: "If our elected officials can't see the difference, they don't deserve to be in office. Likewise if they can, yet do nothing, they don't deserve to be in office." Indeed, in either case such elected and/or appointed officials don't deserve to be in office.

    RacerJim

    ReplyDelete
  12. The paragraph #5 & 6 on page #3 is a citation worthy of reflection...........Rule of Law...?...or law of the jungle...?........the natural born Citizen "prerequisite imperative requirement" is an "exclusionary provision" that is unambiguous on its face and the 'common law' meaning as applied to the 'natural law' Constitution is easily discernible as noted in the Scott v Sanford and Minor v Happersett findings........each, making their determinations under the Rule of Law as they found the Laws to exist when written and NOTHING written since have changed those 'propositions of law', nothing emanating from the Congress in promulgated laws nor Amendments.........next week the State of Oklahoma may be added to the States where Challenges are being made.............

    ReplyDelete
  13. The latest CRS report ripped apart!

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2813999/posts

    ReplyDelete
  14. The last 2 paragraphs of the CRS

    "The constitutional history, the nearly unanimous consensus of legal and constitutional scholars, and the consistent, relevant case law thus indicate that every child born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (that is, not children of diplomatic personnel representing a foreign nation or military troops in hostile occupation), is a native born U.S. citizen and thus a
    “natural born Citizen” eligible to be President under the qualifications clause of the Constitution,regardless of the nationality or citizenship of one’s parents. The legal issues regarding “natural born” citizenship and birth within the United States, without regard to lineage or ancestral bloodline, have been well settled in this country for more than a century, and such concepts date back to, and even pre-date, the founding of the nation.

    The weight of more recent federal cases, as well as the majority of scholarship on the subject, also indicates that the term “natural born citizen” would most likely include, as well as native born citizens, those born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents, at least one of whom had previously resided in the United States, or those born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent who, prior to the birth, had met the requirements of federal law for physical presence in the country.233...."

    ///////////////////////////////////////////////
    The Constitutional history is that it was written on the principles of ‘natural law” and established as the Supreme Law of the land. That, in its-self would suggest that the usage of the ‘term of words’ being without accreditation to some other “Nations/States” usage makes it implicitly of the “natural laws” commonly understood usage. Couple that with the FACT that it was the Fathers/Husbands Citizenship which was determinative of the “family’s” Citizenship leaves the remainder of the 1st paragraph as obfuscations and ignorant of the Constitutional Rule of Law. The 1790 Act to make an uniform Rule of naturalization firmly established Jus Sanguinis determinative of U.S. Citizenship and the 1795 Act ‘repealing’ the foreign born NBC provision firmly established that BOTH Jus Sanguinis and Jus Soli were requisite circumstances to ACTUALLY be a natural born Citizen. In NO Act will Jus Soli Citizenship be found for persons born to persons who were not already Citizens except in the circumstance of a person having died while under application for naturalization.
    The weight of the current case are without weight given that NONE have been heard on the merits for want of jurisdiction and/or standing. But what is telling is the lack of citations of Scott v Sandford and Minor v Happersett, both precedent setting and seminal cases, the former laying the groundwork for both the Civil War and the 13th & 14th Amendments and the later highlighting the FACT that under the Constitutional Rule of Law an Amendment would be required to provide women with suffrage in for the National (Federal) Elections.

    The point being, NO LAWS or Court Opinions can “abridge, enlarge or otherwise modify” the needs of the subject Clause except by Amendment and NONE can be said to be a “controlling legal authority” without THAT assertion being adjudicated.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I had written a person objection to Beth Chapman a week earlier than this complaint. I wonder how many other people are writing complaints.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @slcraig

    The CRS memo does discuss Scott v. Sanford and Minor v. Happersett.

    And Craig v. United States.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @theobamahustleYou're most welcome! You go!!! I'm so proud of you! I pray that this movement takes WINGS and flies all over the Country!! Will be looking forward to hearing what Beth does. :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. TRUE PATRIOTS (NAVY VET)December 2, 2011 at 4:13 AM

    Everyone needs to start sending complaints to Secretary of State in ALL States. I know what I will do today. Thanks Al.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Perhaps it's time to E-Verify Obama, the lie.

    http://E-VerifyObama.com

    http://ObamaTheLie.com

    http://EligibleOrIneligible.com

    http://HawaiianOrLyin.com

    http://ImportedFromKenya.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. This moron needs to be thrown in prison for life without parole along with all the democrap pigs that were involved in him being elected. Everything he did or signed into law should be null and void. I hope they win this in Alabama, and elsewhere. If the S O S does not do her job she is condoning fraud in her state and should be locked up as well.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.