Friday, September 23, 2011



Update on my(Orly Taitz) trip to DC yesterday

I came back from DC in the middle of the night.

I will write a full report a bit later. I flew red eye there, red eye back I have to be back at work today. To add to the hardship, I was diagnosed with a stress fracture in my foot and had to walk between 6 large buildings all day long in a lot of pain, ending up going bare foot between the meetings and carrying my shoes in my hands together with my purse and my brief case and dying of heat in my black lawyers suit. I forwarded my information on Social security fraud to 12 high ranking senators and congressmen and had personal in depth meetings with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers for 4 high ranking senators and 3 representatives: Senator Tom Coburn-ranking member of the subcommittee on privacy on senate judicial committee, Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Marco Rubio, Congressman Lamar Smith-chair f the House Judiciary committee, Congressman Alen West, Congressman Steven King.

I also forwarded my information to Senator Schumer, Senator Lieberman, Senator Feinstein, Senator Lautenberg, Senator Blumenthal. Unlike prior 7 , who are conservative Republicans, these 5 senators are Democrats, (Lieberman is a former Democrat, currently Independent) but might join the fight for other reasons.

Some of the chiefs of staff and legal counsel will work together in arranging for me to testify at one of the committee or subcommittee hearings. I should hear from them within a week. It is very important for you as constituency to write to Chair of Judiciary committee Lamar Smith and his legal counsel Holt Lackey and to the ranking member of the House subcommittee on privacy within Senate Judiciary committee Senator Tom Coburn and his chief of staff Michael Schwartz, thanking them for the meeting, for reading the pleadings and investigating the issue and urge them to invite me to the committee hearings to testify on the issue. Keep in mind, they have subpoena power, they can subpoena Judge Lamberth, Judge Puglisi, director of Health Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Onaka, Commissioner of Social Security Astrue and demand answers, whether high ranking officials can commit crimes and use privacy as an excuse, knowing that their appointees and inferior officials will be afraid to do independent investigation. Can 311 million US citizens lose their Constitutional right for redress of grievances and be forced to live under illegitimate regime of an individual occupying the White Hose based on a fraudulently obtained Social Security number and a computer generated forgery instead of a birth certificate, due to the fact, that officials and judges refuse to take on the issues and use privacy as an excuse?

After I landed I was on the air with Doug McIntire KABC and was able to provide millions of people with above information. I also mentioned on the air my interview to Univision in Spanish and the fact, that Hispanic population is extremely angry, that they have to go through e-verify, but Obama can sit in the position of the President with a failed e-verify. Republicans desperately need Republican vote and will lose this vote, if they or their high ranking officials, Like Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Martinez, Governor Sandoval do not raise this issue. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25819 

UPDATE: Orly Taitz on her Meetings with Congressional Staffers and Legal Advisors - MORE HERE 

New Details: E-Verify Found Discrepancy in Obama's Social Security Number Record. DETAILS HERE 

Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants. DETAILS HERE 

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. DETAILS HERE



Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

Obama Using Stolen SSN & Forged Birth Certificate - Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Sep 2011 - pg 5

55 comments:

  1. Based on your headline, you might wish to re-read Orly's report.

    She did not state she met with any senators or congressmen, she stated she met with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers of 4 (she actually only listed 3) high-ranking senators and 3 congressmen. She then lists those senators and congressmen whose staff she met with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. if these congressmen and senators don't act now to remove this illegal son of a bitch from the white house they need to all go to jail. we the people need to let these public servants know we mean business and are not about to put up with this fraud nor their violating the constitution and our rights as Americans will not be trampled. we need to let them know we will see them prosecuted and jailed for this crime.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marco Rubio knows what the Constitution says. Yet he says nothing.

    This is the ONE person in this country that could bring this issue to critical mass in 5 seconds by simply saying: "I remove myself from any consideration for Vice President because I am Constitutionally ineligible not being a natural born citizen."

    I have zero respect for this guy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @bn
    "Marco Rubio knows what the Constitution says. Yet he says nothing."

    Actually, you're wrong. He has said something. He said he believes he (Rubio) is a natural born citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As the originating Investigator and aide to Doctor Taitz I certainly attest to and support the excellent work done by Susan Daniels.
    As I said initially, there were many pointers some of which meant little on their own, but as a picture developed there was and is most definitely a pattern of deceit and fraud. I have studied the extremist influences on Society for over forty years. There is no doubt in my mind that this current regime stems directly from the days of Castro and Guevera at their worst. These people are Marxist, National Socialist Alinsky-ites and following closely the destructive doctrines of Cloward & Piven.
    They must not be allowed to continue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That Rubio will not take himself out speaks volumes about him. That's all you need to know about the man.

    As for Orly. No meetings. Anybody surprised? This, like everything else, will go NOWHERE.

    ReplyDelete
  7. bn,

    I agree with you about Rubio, Bobby Jindal is another who could bring the issue to the forefront.....but he won't.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Actually if I recall it wasn't Rubio that said it but someone in his campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Anonymous
    "When asked specifically if Rubio considered himself to be a natural-born citizen, the senator's spokesman Alex Burgos told WND, "Yes.""

    So, by extension, Rubio DOES indeed claim he is a natural born citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Kanbun
    So you have no problem stating that this will go no where.

    What I would like to ask you is: What have you done? Sit at your computer and be a negative influence.

    Fran

    ReplyDelete
  11. A call was place to each office Orly Taitz had meetings to thank them for giving her time to present her evidence. The response that was received after thanking them for having a sit down with her was that no one in their offices met with her. She just dropped of materials and left.

    But don't take my word for it. Call for yourselves. They said they'd already had several phone calls from Orly's supporters but that we were all given the wrong impression if Orly said that she actually had meetings with anyone other than the office receptionist to hand off her materials.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If Rubio claims he is a natural born citizen he can at least tell us why he thinks that. Then he would gain respect, because he would show he is straight forward and honest - even if he is wrong. That is what a person with integrity would do.

    But he won't, because he knows he's wrong, which means he knows he's lying. And that is not worthy of any respect. That is what we have now in BHO.

    All hope is not lost on Rubio. If we really want him, we as a free people can amend our governing document. But it would all start with Rubio stating the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rubio lusts after power, so his legal eligibility according to the law of the land, is irrelevant to him.

    He is a man without ethics or principals.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for taking the time to call Obuttlickers. I can't believe you stepped away from the comment threads long enough to dial numbers!

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Anonymous

    OBOTs are not funny. They are enemies of the USA and threaten the American way of life. I find nothing funny about that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @MIDDLE CLASS GUY
    That's because you obviously have no sense of humor but as long as the United States has a First Amendment with Freedom of Speech and as long as we are a multi-party democratic-republic, Obots will have as much right to their opinions as you have to yours.
    Don't like Obots? Defeat them at the polls and get sweet revenge.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Anonymous
    Wait, the first amendment allows Obots to make fraudulent documents?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @bn

    "If Rubio claims he is a natural born citizen he can at least tell us why he thinks that. Then he would gain respect, because he would show he is straight forward and honest - even if he is wrong. That is what a person with integrity would do."

    Speeking of Senator Rubio.

    ORYR got a mention in Miami,

    http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2011/09/marco_rubio_under_fire_from_bi.php

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wait, there are over 50 million Obama supporters in the U.S. (Over 65 million voted for him) ... All 50 million of these people could be considered OBOTS.
    Are you suggesting more than just one or two of them forged documents? If not Skeptic, WHAT does that have to do with anything?

    Yes. They are a free people. We are free to dislike them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Shut up Obot you aren't fooling anyone!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anonymous
    "...All 50 million of these people could be considered OBOTS."

    I see what you did there. Nice try.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Anonymous

    I have a sense of humor, but I do not consider those who seek the destruction of our country as funny. I never suggested that OBOTs do not have a right in the USA to voice their hatred for our country, its laws, and the American way of life either. I just don't see that as humorous. You have a right to perceive that as funny. They have a right under the laws of our great country to spew their anti- American twaddle, but I say: ignore the Commie scumbags. Their Commie trashtalk is not worthy of response.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm confused.

    If the legal counsel are setting up Orly's testimony for next week, why on her website is she asking people to write the committee members and ask them to invite her to the hearings?

    Is testifing a done deal or not?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Thanks Bot for helping us identify another one of America's traitorous college professors who made this ignoramous statement in the article you linked to:

    "There's no serious question because he was born in the USA. Any contrary argument is birther-like silliness," Daniel Takaji, a law professor at Ohio State University, tells the paper. "His parents' immigration status is irrelevant to his U.S. citizenship under the 14th [Amendment]."

    Curious how I never see the Birther's argument's alongside of these law professor's opinions. I also wonder how the Press finds these Obot professors so readily.

    ReplyDelete
  25. If Senor'Rubio cannot speak up for fear of retribution he should state so for the record. The fact that Rubio hasn't said anything means to me that he will not say or do anything until HIS puppet masters say go!.. I believe our Government has been hijacked by a foriegner.. Barry Sorteo aka Barack Obama... folks there is not much time left to get your affairs in order.... Good luck

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Mary Joseph
    Technically, he has said something. He just used a mediator. Rubio considers himself a natural born citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @bn

    "I also wonder how the Press finds these Obot professors so readily."

    __________

    Takaji is one of the well known and respected experts on citizenship and immigration law. He has published articles addressing the subject, including a 2008 article (pre-election) in the University of Michigan Law Review about the meaning of natural born citizenship.

    I imagine the press finds professors by researching the legal publications.

    ReplyDelete
  28. BHO is the Ultimate Sleeper Cell...

    ReplyDelete
  29. Is that the same "respected expert" that first wrote a natural born citizen is one born on soil to two citizen parents then a while later changed it to only one citizen parent and now won't answer why he changed it?

    ReplyDelete
  30. @Anonymous

    9:30 "Takaji is one of the well known and respected experts on citizenship"

    If he is such an expert he would know that one MUST be a NATURAL Born Citizen to be President. NATURAL Born means one must be born to TWO AMERICAN Citizens.

    This is a point you forgot to make Obot. Seems like you Obots do this a lot.

    Fran

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mary Joseph,

    I think you are exactly right. Our government has been overthrown in stealth. We no longer have a government that does the will of the people it supposedly represents.

    And as suspcious and cynical as I've become...I question the whole Rubio shtick. What were the chances that a Ronald Reagan emerges, but has the exact same eligibility issue, at the same time as BHO? I find the timing amazing.

    I don't know enough about Rubio to make damning comments I'm only saying I'm suspicious.

    However I do know that those overthrowing our government are smart enough to plan for likely scenarios that will emerge due to their destruction. They plan for the backlash.

    I'm so cynical anymore I think they had something to do with Boehner, the crying weakling, becoming Speaker. We'll see to it you get Speaker, if you don't bring up the eligibility issue.

    It's sort of like the military...When they starting bombing somewhere they know the escape routes and plan accordingly and finish off the enemy during the escape.

    And with Rubio...I heard it again just yesterday of him being the dream VP pick for any of the presidential candidates. What would that do to the eligibility issue? Destroy it and give us 4 more years of BHO.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 2Fran

    "If he is such an expert he would know that one MUST be a NATURAL Born Citizen to be President. NATURAL Born means one must be born to TWO AMERICAN Citizens."

    There are law school all over the U.S. More than likely there's one near you. Call the law school or write/email them. Ask for the name of one of the constitutional law professors. Make contact and ask them the question.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Did Orly have a sit-down with anyone in DC.? And if so, who with?

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Anonymous

    Everyone keeps saying where are the congress and courts to address this issue.

    But where are the Constitutional History Professors? And Constitutional Law prefessors?

    Why are they not coming forward to support the two-citizen-parent requirement?

    Some of them must e conservatives. Where are they?

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Anonymous
    Here are some of the major conservative legal think tanks and law firms. These are the people who are admitted to the US Supreme Court Bar (able to argue cases before the Supreme Court) and who argue appeals from the conservative-originalist-strict constructionist points of view:
    The Center for Individual Rights
    The Washington Legal Foundation
    The American Center for Law and Justice
    The Landmark Legal Foundation
    The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
    The Institute for Justice
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    The Alliance Defense Fund
    Judicial Watch

    I would think that someone from one of those organizations would take up the Obama eligibility cause. Additionally, there are states that have conservative state Attorneys General who should be convening Grand Jury investigations into Obama's eligibility or possible election fraud.
    Why this hasn't happened in the four plus years since January 10, 2007 when Obama announced that he was a candidate for the presidency is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Anonymous

    Anan 5:08 aka Obot

    I don't need to talk to a liberal professor because we have the definition directly from the Supreme Court.

    Minor v. Happersett
    It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural)… eligible to be President.

    According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President. And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth.

    Fran

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Anonymous
    Big names in the conservative media, namely Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, among others, are supporting him for being a Vice Presidential candidate and eventually a Presidential candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  38. California birther/dualer/doubterSeptember 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM

    Just fired off a letter to Prof. Tokaji mentioned in the article published in the Miami New Times:

    I just read an article in which you stated: "There's no serious question because he was born in the USA. Any contrary argument is birther-like silliness," Daniel Takaji, a law professor at Ohio State University, tells the paper. "His parents' immigration status is irrelevant to his U.S. citizenship under the 14th [Amendment]."

    You are correct to say that he is a U.S. citizen, but that does NOT make him a natural-born citizen. Rather, Rubio is only a naturalized citizen -- naturalized because the 14th amendment grants him citizenship simply (albeit wrongly) by being born here. In other words, this is called "birthright citizenship," which only a few countries in the world grant. Additionally, the 14th Amendment says NOTHING about a 14th Amendment citizen being a natural-born citizen. The latter is reserved exclusively for those who need no naturalization simply because they are naturally born of parents who themselves are citizen of the United States.

    This is a difference that anyone with a modicum of critical thinking skills should be able to discern, especially one like yourself who professes to be an authority on election law and voting rights.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Anonymous

    "According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President."

    That is an opinion from Leo but others with as much experience disagree.

    It may in fact only be non binding dicta. Someday maybe the Supreme Court will clear it up.

    ReplyDelete
  40. "It may in fact only be non binding dicta. Someday maybe the Supreme Court will clear it up."

    September 24, 2011 6:08 PM

    I'd like to here them explain away the common sense involved in the founders having a separate eligibility requirement for president from other elected offices, which just require "citizen", and how natural born Citizen means the same thing as citizen....and the reason for the grandfather clause following natural born Citizen.

    When you are getting paid to protect The One, there is no place for common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  41. THIS JUST GOES TO SHOW US WE NEED TO THROW THEM ALL OUT AND ONLY ELECT PEOPLE WHO ARE WILLING TO GO AFTER EVERY DAMN ONE OF THESE SLIME BALLS. THEY HAVE BEEN SCREWING US FOR YEARS NOW THEY THINK THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING. THEY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION AT WILL. THEIR OATH OF OFFICE MEANS NOTHING. ITS ABOUT TIME WE MAKE SURE IT DOES. THIS INCLUDES RECALLING ANYONE WHO FORGETS WHO THEY ARE WORKING FOR. THEY NEED TO KNOW WE MEAN BUSINESS. THEY ARE NOT THERE TO FIDDLE FUCK AROUND AND FILL THEIR POCKETS WITH OUR MONEY. THIS LIFETIME PAY CRAP NEEDS TO HAVE A LIFE TIME JAIL TERM ATTACHED TO IT. I BEEN RATTLING EVERY ONE OF THEIR CAGES WITH LETTERS SAYING THAT WE THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE THEY GO TO JAIL FOR THIS CRIME OF ACTING LIKE THEY CANT BE TOUCHED. ALL WE NEED IS ONE GRAND JURY THAT SAYS NO THIS IS WHAT I WANT. BRING ME THE INFO ON OBAMA A GRAND JURY HAS A RIGHT TO DEMAND ANY INFO THEY THINK THEY NEED. ITS CALLED A RUN AWAY GRAND JURY AND ITS LEGAL AS HELL AND THEY KNOW IT. OBAMA GOT ON THE BALLOTS IN EVERY STATE BY FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS. THIS IS A CRIME IN ITS SELF. ALL WE NEED IS JUST ONE TO CRACK. A GRAND JURY HAS A RIGHT TO DEMAND ANY INFO THEY CAN GET AND THEY CAN SUBPOENA ANYONE AND ANYTHING. ITS TIME WE MADE SOME NOISE AND MADE SO MUCH OF A STINK THEY CANT IGNORE US ANY LONGER. ITS TIME TO ROCK THESE LOSERS WORLD!

    ReplyDelete
  42. "But where are the Constitutional History Professors? And Constitutional Law professors? "

    Anon,

    You got a good point here. Where is Hillsdale College that constantly promotes itself as the Rock of Gibraltar of Constitutional purity? Or the Heritage Foundation?

    Are all these places just frauds?

    I'll tell you a scary observation. The other day I was listening to this 10 year old kid, who I know has been in Christian schools all his life. He was saying what a great leader BHO is. It's troubled me as much as anything ever has.

    This generation is being and is brainwashed.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The ineligibility similarities between the first usurper POTUS Chester A Arthur and the second usurper POTUS Barack H Obama, or whatever his actual legal name is, serve well to underscore the ages old adage "History ignored is history repeated."

    RacerJim

    ReplyDelete
  44. Check out this excellent new article that discusses the similarities between the usurper Chester Authur and the usurper Obama...and slams Congress for their pretending to know nothing:

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40646

    ReplyDelete
  45. ANY Patriot who wins a seat in congress or the senate should immediately surround themselves with true patriots like Joseph Farah, Jim Corsi, Orly Taitz, and others who are fighting the good fight. The newly elected officials in 2010 has NOT attempted any of this. They must have ran for office under false pretenses. LIARS, AND DECEIVERS!

    ReplyDelete
  46. "THIS JUST GOES TO SHOW US WE NEED TO THROW THEM ALL OUT"

    Typing in ALL CAPS is a sure fire way to make sure no one pays attention to you. Learn to turn off your caps lock. It's fairly simple and it makes it so much easier to read what you have to say.

    ReplyDelete
  47. "Typing in ALL CAPS is a sure fire way to make sure no one pays attention to you"

    This is exactly right.

    I wish somebody would tell this to Orly Taitz and her webpage designer. And while they are at it, have them get rid of that banner page you see every time you go there first thing. The first thing you have to do on her page is scroll....no likey.

    New stuff should be immediately seen when you come into the site - like this site does.

    ReplyDelete
  48. And John Doe, that is indeed a very good article you linked to about the similarities between Arthur and BHO.

    What's ironic, or more likely deviously planned is that Arthur is the President that appointed Judge Horace Gray who wrote the Wong Kim Ark decision. That decision like it or not gives the other side something to stand on. But even so it doesn't let our Congressmen, who are ignoring this off the hook. They aren't honest and straight forward. And there is still the matter of the forgeries which they say nothing about.

    And what a great quote at the end of that article:

    “We cannot afford to differ on the question of honesty if we expect our republic permanently to endure. Honesty is not so much a credit as an absolute prerequisite to efficient service to the public. Unless a man is honest, we have no right to keep him in public life; it matters not how brilliant his capacity.” — Theodore Roosevelt

    ReplyDelete
  49. There is a detailed article about who Orly met with. It is interesting to read how they all know about the problems.

    Check it out at:
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/09/25/exclusive-orly-taitz-on-her-meetings-with-congressional-staffers-and-legal-advisors/

    Fran

    ReplyDelete
  50. @bn
    The members of Congress know that their oonstitutional move is impeachment and impeachment without 67 votes to remove a President for High Crimes and Misdemeanors in the Senate is a fruitless exercise, as the impeachment but not guilty verdicts in the Andrew Johnson and Clinton impeachments proved.
    The Republicans in the Senate would need to hold every one of their 47 members, including the RINOs and get 20 or more Democrats to go along with a guilty verdict with Harry Reid controlling the legislative process and John Roberts, the man who swore Obama in, presiding over the trial. That is a high hurdle to overcome.

    My personal view is that a criminal grand jury investigation of Obama with indictments handed down would force his resignation like it did with Nixon.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @John Doe Sr.

    "I'd like to here them explain away the common sense involved in the founders having a separate eligibility requirement for president from other elected offices, which just require "citizen", and how natural born Citizen means the same thing as citizen....and the reason for the grandfather clause following natural born Citizen."

    Some of what you ask can be answered by looking at the Constitutional Convention.

    The distinction in the Constitution between citizen and natural born citizen simply means that the Framers wanted to exclude naturalized (foreign born) citizens from being President.

    If you read a timeline of the Constitutional debates you see the following:

    June 18th, 1787 - Alexander Hamiliton presents a draft plan. This plan has no presidential qualifications because it does not have a President. It has an executive called a Governour and he serves a life term.

    July 24th, 1787, the Convention delegates appointed the Committee of Detail to draft a constitution using the previous debates as reference.

    July 25th 1787, Jay writes a letter to Washington suggesting that the Commander-in-Chief (Jay did not know the Conventions plans for a President) be a natural born citizen.

    August 6th 1787, the first draft is presented to the Convention by the Committee of Detail. Article 10 Section 1 - "The Executive Power of the United States shall be vested in a single person. His style shall be, "The President of the United States of America;" and his title shall be, "His excellency." He shall be elected by ballot by the Legislature. He shall hold his office during the term of seven years; but shall not be elected a second time." There are no eligiblity requirements for the President.

    August 9th 1787, after several delegates to the Convention suggested that Senators be limited to native born persons, James Wilson gave a speech in which he said it was not fair that people like him who were not native born, but who had served the new country would be excluded from from holding office. You can read that particular debate here:
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18t...

    September 12th, 1787, final draft is presented to the Convention. This draft has the presidential eligiblity requirements of natural born and the grandfather clause.

    Sometime after this, Alexander Hamilton gave James Madison a copy of a draft Constitution, it has a Presidential eligiblity clause but no natural born citizen clause. In its place, he suggests that anyone born a citizen be eligible to be President. The Convention does not see this draft constitution.

    It appears a common sense explaination is that the natural born citizen clause was meant to keep foreign born persons from being President but not from serving in Congress. And the grandfather clause was meant to allow people like Wilson and Hamilton, who were not born in the colonies, to be President.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Orly's visit to Washington made Salon.com

    http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/09/26/orly_taitz_republicans

    ReplyDelete
  53. @Anonymous

    Here is a link to Hamilton's June 18th plan.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_618.asp

    And to the debate of native-born Senators with James Wilson's speech.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_809.asp

    ReplyDelete
  54. All the Obots are big time on the native vs. natural born meaning. And admittedly, sadly I think they have a case. Although saying someone is "natural born" when they have a foreign parent in every sense of common sense argues against that logic. It would be like saying a plant is native to this country, but must be pollinated from Kenya. It's stupid. But legally, as all things liberal, murkiness and ambiguity built into the laws distort it sufficiently so they can do whatever they want.
    So again admitted, they have a case to make.

    But to me their actions help to prove that BHO was born outside of this country. And it's why the birth certificate is important. They KNOW he can't be President if he were not born in this country. And that birth certificate is a forgery. What a time we live in.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.