Friday, September 9, 2011

Taitz v Astrue: Motion for Reconsideration with Exhibits 1-5
Obama's SSA Record Does Not Verify, SSA Found a Discrepancy in the Record.


Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.

While generally disfavored, a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 59(e) may be granted in circumstances where a party presents new evidence not reasonably available prior to the judgment, or where it is shown that the prior ruling was clearly erroneous or manifestly unjust. See e.g., Lake Hill Motors, Inc. v. Jim Bennett Yacht Sales, Inc. (7th Cir. 2000).

In support of the instant motion, Taitz presents both newly discovered evidence and argues clear error and manifest injustice of this Honorable Court's August 30, 2011 Memorandum Opinion granting the Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion. Taitz presents the following for this Honorable Court's consideration:

Newly Discovered Information and Evidence Warrants Reconsideration and Denial of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion.

a. Plaintiff Presents New Evidence Regarding Waiver of Privacy by Prior Public Release of Social Security Number...

After Taitz submitted her opposition to motion for summary judgment, she appeared on a number of radio shows. During one of the shows, talk show host, Mr. Doug Hagmann, who is also a private investigator, related to Taitz that when Mr. Obama originally posted his tax returns on WhiteHouse.gov, he left his full Social Security number on one of the pages, and it was the same Connecticut social security number which is listed in the sworn affidavits of investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson which were previously submitted to this court.

JUMP

A third piece of new evidence, received by Taitz, is a sworn affidavit of witness Linda Jordan, showing, that according to Ms. Jordan's affidavit, she was greatly concerned by the reports of licensed investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson, which were provided to your Honor in this case and in Taitz v Obama 10-cv-151RCL. Ms. Jordan repeatedly requested the social Security administration and other authorities to provide the public with information regarding whether Mr. Obama, is indeed fraudulently using a Social Security number which was never assigned to him.

Ms. Jordan never received any response from the Social Security administration. Ms. Jordan decided to investigate further. When any other individual but the President is concerned he has an employer or another individual above him in the chain of command. Such employer would do e-verify or SSVS verification, showing his employee's citizenship status and validity of the Social Security card, provided by this employee.

When President of the United States is concerned he does not have a specific individual who is higher than him in the chain of command. The U.S. President does not have one specific employer, who is supposed to do e-verify or SSVS check, to see that he has proper credentials. Citizens of the United States collectively employ him and pay his salary through their taxes. As such Ms. Jordan went to e-verify and submitted a request for verification.

Ms. Jordan entered Mr. Obama’s name and Connecticut Social Security number that was submitted by investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson and which she verified through the official US government selective service website www.sss.gov. as one being used by Barack Obama since 1980.

According to the official government site e-verify, the number Mr. Obama uses on his own tax returns and according to the official U.S. government selective service web site was never assigned to him. E-verify shows, that there is no match between Obama’s name and the social security number he is using. (Exhibit 3, hereto, the Affidavit of Linda Jordan and official e-verify response, showing no match between Obama's name and Connecticut Social Security number that Obama is using).

Ms. Jordan did this e-verify not by misrepresentation but in the good faith belief that every U.S. citizen is an effective “employer” of the U.S. President and after she undertook all efforts to get cooperation from the Social Security administration, and after she encountered unprecedented corruption within the SSA, she personally performed e-verify. This simple e-verify was supposed to be done by the employees of the SSA. Why didn’t they do it? Using lexicon of this Honorable Court, they “were toying with this court and the whole nation or they showed their stupidity.”

d. ...and that a number of members of Obama's family improperly and illegally used social security numbers:

On August 29, 2011 Mail on Line, The Australian, The Washington Times, and many other papers and radio shows around the world reported on an arrest of Barack Obama's uncle Omar Obama, who was in U.S. Illegally, and was ordered deported from the United States.

MORE HERE http://www.scribd.com/doc/64409913/Taitz-v-Astrue-Motion-for-Reconsideration-Draft-Obama-s-Social-Security-Number

EXHIBITS 1-5: http://www.scribd.com/doc/64409490/Taitz-v-Astrue-Motion-for-Reconsideration-Unredacted-Exhibits-1-5-Obama-s-Social-Security-Number

Attorney Orly Taitz: Download these documents go to every townhall meeting, confront every elected official, every candidate in front of TV cameras with this evidence and demand immediate criminal prosecution of Obama for Social Security fraud, for use of a stolen Social Security number: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25353 
Taitz v Astrue - Motion for Reconsideration(Draft) - Obama's Social Security Number

Taitz v Astrue - Motion for Reconsideration Unredacted Exhibits 1-5 - Obama's Social Security Number

Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants. MORE HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/private-investigators-respond-to-snopes.html

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. MORE HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-guilty-of-at-least-one-felony.html



Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration

We Have a Criminal and Forger in the White House! 20110627 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5

52 comments:

  1. Very, very interesting about the everify thing.

    But, will the courts or the ss admin or congress or the media do anything about it? We know the answer to that. They are co-conspirators. If they get their way, they'll stall for enough time for the ssa to redo their files. Like the state of haw doh.

    We have to face facts by now. There is only one way this is ever going to result in justice and that is if there is a revolution.

    ReplyDelete
  2. God bless you for trying to wake up, Legal, Law-abiding, Taxpaying, American citizens to the TRUTH! If any of us had used a fraudulent social security, we would be UNDER the jail!! Obama is NOT exempt from our Constitutional laws!! Of course, he is not really our president, he is a FRAUD, DECEIVER, DEVIL, ILLEGAL, and USURPER!! He should be in Gitmo for his HIGH CRIMES and FRAUD!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Does anyone know how Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigation is coming along? Why doesn't Sherifff Joe take the evidence of forgery before a Judge or Magistrate and ask the Judge of Magistrate to issue a warrant for Obama's arrest? There is no doubt that enough probable cause exists to make an arrest.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 2:21 PM is correct. 2:39 PM, you're kidding, aren't you? Try asking the tea party, heh heh heh.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Two weeks ago I contacted Congressman Marsha Blackburn's office to ask about the invalid SSN used by Obama-Soetoro. They asked for my Email address and said they would get back to me. I received no reply.

    I contacted the office again on Monday and received an Email from the Legislative Correspondent saying she would call me, and she left me her number. After not hearing from her this morning I called the office. The Legislative Correspondent just called me back.

    When I asked about how the person sitting in the WH have an invalid SSN she had no idea what I was talking about. She even asked me "how do you know this?". I told her about Susan Daniels and that the number was from CT.

    We all need to contact our reps and demand an answer to this. It is obvious that not many have been asking about the SSN. The LC mentioned the BC, but I just told her there were 20 experts that the court recognizes for other cases, but refuses to accept their determination with regard to Obama-Soetoro.

    I left off by saying my husband is a Vietnam Vet and is very upset as are all the other vets out here.

    She said she would get back with me to let me know what Marsha Blackburn has to say. I ain't going to hold my breath.

    ReplyDelete
  6. GIANT COVERUP AND CONSPIRACY

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why does that form state that "you" should bring this form with "you" to the SS office?

    ReplyDelete
  8. This will go nowhere - the ssn on the taxes was redacted, only by manipulating the image was the number revealed. The judge will dismiss this.

    On the e-verify, by now the President has been given a new ssn and the old ssn number has been flagged.

    ReplyDelete
  9. A month or so ago Orly posted a photo of she and Bachmann hugging. When I first saw it I immediately commented here what a mistake it was for Orly to be posing with Bachmann and then, worse, post it on her site. Within hours, the photo was scrubbed, for obvious reasons. Now she goes and does it again with Perry. I don't know what Orly is thinking. Problem is, I'm an Orly supporter. I know Perry will never, ever address the illegal alien in the WH. I have to believe that Orly knows that too. If anything, she should have asked him point blank, putting him on the spot. Instead, she waits for his autograph. WTF? Get this, she speculates he might hold out and use this issue if, and when, he deems it necessary. That makes absolute no sense whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It would seem like someone could commit some kind of minor identity crime using Obama's fraudulent SSN, and when charged with a crime make the Government prove that the crime was committed using a number belonging to Obama.

    But alas the law wouldn't concern themselves with proving that the number was a valid number for Obama, only that the person charged was using a number that was not a valid number that was issued to them.

    Bummer.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why does a bear shit in the woods, Obutts?

    ReplyDelete
  12. rev. manning says obama will win easily in 2012 and will also win in 2016 because america is in a guilt ridden coward state. all are afraid of obama. the courts , congress all politicians etc. and obama knows this.

    ReplyDelete
  13. after two and a half years of running interference for BHO ,the courts ,MS media and congress have nothing to gain by allowing ms taitz to vindicate her allegations ..

    alas, all three of these very powerful entitys have a have great deal to lose if taitz gets to present her evidence in any courtroom

    question,if BHO shouild lose the comming election ,can he hide his records for 25 years because of some legal POTUS precident ?.

    ReplyDelete
  14. We need to let our elected idiots know we are on to their scam and we intend to see them jailed and prosecuted for their acts of treason. let them know the constitution is the law of this land and we intend to make sure it stays that way. its time to let them know your willing to lay down your life to defend it and just as willing to take the life of anyone who don't. we need to let them know we the people stand behind our founders and will follow their teachings not these phoney progressive p/c crap they are pushing. make it clear your willing to make sure they die for their cause.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @Anonymous It is very sad and heartbreaking that our elected officials are so intoxicated with their power that they won't listen to US, their bosses, and also ignore the incredible amount of evidence against soetoro!!! We don't even know OUR president's legal name! I very much dislike admitting you are right about revolution, but you are. OUR government employees ignore US! Unfortunately, it's going to be bloody because soetoro already has everything covered. He'll kill the internet and bring in UN troops to kill all American patriotic resistance. He's doing it right now in Libya and sending the bill to US!

    ReplyDelete
  16. From the conservative Washington Times editor.
    On September 09,2011.
    "9 Sep 2011 editorial:

    “…Earlier this year, prospective Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump brought mainstream attention to the question of the circumstances of Barack Obama’s birth. The White House responded by finally releasing a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii, which for the most part put the issue to rest…”

    ReplyDelete
  17. The problem as I see it is that the media has succeeded in brainwashing the American public into believing that we are a fringe lunatic group that is delusional.

    If we had the numbers, we could "throw a ring" of people around the White House and shut it down for days until Congress agreed to hold a Congressional investigation into the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Dealio

    I agree, Orly really needs to do her homework on Rick Perry. He is trying to pull a Donald Trump on her. Perry also called Joe Arpaio and had "great discussion" with him regarding immigration. Rick Perry is Bilderberger and a complete double talking, two faced RINO and nothing more.

    Get the dirt on Rick Perry here

    http://www.commieblaster.com/RINO/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. TRUE PATRIOTS (NAVY VET)September 10, 2011 at 6:43 AM

    5:05, Dealio: I too saw that pic of Orly & Bachman. I was mad. I haven't seen the one with "Bilderberger Perry" yet. I have donated to Orly, and advocated for people to donate. but when I saw that pic, AND with no explanation about it, I ripped Orly's ass. in a comment, and it was scrubbed the next day. How is it then Bachman is not bringing this issue up? They all know that this is brewing big with Americans, and also, looks like backdoor amnesty was right on time for the Usurper's family. Either this Cabal is trying to follow endtime scenerio, or this IS what is spoken of in the Bible. Gives you pause, does it not??? Considering the 9/11 false flag.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Revolution will run it's course. I have to think that there are many of us who have known for quite some time it has been us vs them (gov't). This fraud in the WH brought everything to a head. We've been heading there for awhile but with an illegal holding office, that accellerated the marxists time frame. Knowing what we know, I don't believe revolution, as the only way to remove this regime and restore the country, would come as a shock to most casual observers. I bet a lot of people have to know something is wrong, without having to vist ORYR, a leading site on this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Tulsa Rob
    Obama has the launch codes to America's nuclear missile arsenal. Congress is well aware of that, as are the judges.
    I think they've made the calculated judgement to just wait and see if he is voted out of office next year.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @sallytudorgo to you tube and type in Who Are The Bronfmans, TruthBrigrade.com video part 1

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think the idiots in Congress must be thinking...Obama is going to lose anyway - so why bring up all this stuff?

    But if a man will forge a birth certificate, use a fraudulent SSN, commit real estate fraud, and lie about everything right into a camera without batting an eye...do you think he would have any issues with CHEATING to steal the election? It is naive to think he wouldn't.

    Communists don't give up power they've worked so hard and spent so much money trying to obtain. If this country does not address these issues in the light of truth...we are doomed.

    ReplyDelete
  24. You "Anonymous" people, please get a name, a "handle" and use it! It doesn't have to be your "real" name! Use it wherever you post! We need to get together and stick together! We know that SOON we are going to have to do "something", whatever that is, to bring the TRUTH to light! Let's Roll!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Congress and all the other obots out there think that this all will go away if they just do nothing and ignore the issue!!
    But, it's not is it?? Too many honest patriots left in the USA!! This ball will never stop rolling until the truth is known to everyone in America!! Obama is just an actor with no talent and stupid ideas. He says that we have to do such and such but, doesn't explain how---- what a stupid man he is!! Wake up obots!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. bn is correct. Pesky elections don't get in the way of marxists. Whether we like it or not, a confrontational march is in order. I suspect sooner, rather than later. It would be insane to wait and see how this plays out. Either this is our country or it's not. By God's blood, we must take back what we know is ours. Hanging is too good for these bastards.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yep, Barry has the launch codes for several thousand nukes, even though he could never pass the lowest possible security clearance if he had to pass a background check, Even "confidential" would be more than he could get.

    Few seem to care that the mother of all security risk is the imposter in the White House.

    There is no way Barry getting "voted out" in 2012, if that can even happen, will end this. His crimes and those of many others must be revealed, and appropriate punishment must take place for the survival of America.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @bn
    Obama will use the same strategy in 2012 that he used in 2008: pick his preferred opponent. That way he doesn't have to risk committing crimes like election fraud.
    George Soros, Obama's financer, put enough money behind John McCain to get him the Republican nomination. Obama knew that he could beat McCain.
    This year Soros money will also secretly fund Obama's preferred Republican opponent.
    Just like with Watergate, you have to "follow the money."
    When a former Democrat like Perry zooms to the lead, there's Soros money behind him somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Where are the fair and balanced lap dog hacks on this issue, nowhere to be found. This proves that FOX NEWS is in the tank with the rest of the Commie media.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @bn
    I wouldn't rule out murder either. There is too much at stake for so many to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anons,

    I agree the Democrats selected McCain in 2008 in the early primaries.

    The problem this time however is that ANY of the Republicans will be be more appealing than BHO. There is not an old man in the bunch...except Ron Paul, who I don't think they want BHO debating. He wins all the debates now.

    So what are the alternatives? again they will cheat. Check out the You Tube video of the computer programmer who says its a simple task, and almost impossible to detect, to flip a close election. And isn't it true that all voting machines are now made in foreign countries? Diebold?

    They've had 4 years to perfect what they have in mind.

    And I don't rule out political assassination either. That is how BHO has won the Illinois Senate election. Who was really behind releasing Ryan's divorce records in his first Senate race?

    And like you Anon, God forbid, real murder. Take out your competition. Call me a conspiracy theorist...but a Constitutionalist judge, lifetime appointed, who was prosecutiong illegals in Arizona? and he just so happens to be the one who gets shot and killed in Tuscon? And BHO appoints the new judge? Smells to me.
    And Donald Young and Leiutentant Harris...?

    The thing with Communists is that everyone is on the take. It's a criminal enterprise. A direct order doesn't have to come down from on high. They all know who butters their bread and who it is allowing them to live the good life doing next to nothing. So yes that wouldn't surprise me at all....Although, on the flip side it would be rather obvious, don't you think?

    For an interesting theory on this very subject read Lamecherry's blog today about the Libyan surface to air missiles.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Quote:

    "Where are the fair and balanced lap dog hacks on this issue, nowhere to be found. This proves that FOX NEWS is in the tank with the rest of the Commie media."

    Fox has been no better that the rest of the Commie media for years now. Actually they are even worse because some people, especially conservatives, still believe Fox News is "fair and balanced".

    They are worthless and should be tuned out. Hit them were it hurts, do not watch.

    ReplyDelete
  33. TRUE PATRIOTS (NAVY VET)September 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM

    How to put your name or ( HANDLE,something you pick ) into this site. By the way, someone on here explained it once, and that is how I Know), Select Profile, type in A name. True or whatever you want to call yourself, ( AT FIRST I THOUGHT I HAD TO HAVE A URL, BUT YOU DO NOT ). Just type in a name,,, go to Preview,,, then wait a few minutes,, then push Post Comment. This way we can keep up with the "OBOTS" who sneak in. This is for 5-105 years old. Hey, this is how I learned it. Smiling. We might be able to get a count on how many strong we really are. God Bless

    ReplyDelete
  34. John,

    You are exactly right about Fox News. They aren't what they once were. In 2004 it was Jerome Corsi exposing the Swiftboats on Fox News that brought down John Kerry. It wasn't just the book...it was Fox News publicizing the scandal by discussing it. Most people don't read books.

    This time though, it was Fox News who did THE hatchet job on Corsi. Ann Coulter on Fox News declaring smiling that BHO was born in Hawaii, did a lot of damage also.

    And Hannity was supposed to have him on his radio show as the first interview and cancelled just hours before.

    It's sad and treasonous what is happening in our nation.

    ReplyDelete
  35. You have to keep in mind that Fox News is partly owned by a Saudi Prince. People like Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly are not stupid, they know which side of the bread the butter is on.

    If our Government ever did the about face and started to act in the best interest of 'We The People' who would these pundits sell their books to? What would these pundits have to say that would interest us? Why would we still need them for anything?

    If Obama is removed from office before the next election, if all of his socialist policies are rendered null and void, if the American People find out that Fox News has been knowingly lying to them about Obama's Birth Certificate and invalid Social Security Number what then?

    They have a stake in keeping Obama in office, they have a stake in misinforming the public about his birth certificate, and they are afraid of what will happen when the truth becomes known. Especially since they have been negligent in their research at best, or more likely, complicit in the cover up.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I watch fox news, but skip o'lier etc.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I used the government run E-Verify system to check Obama's legal working status.

    I figured I would be challenged for using E-Verify but I concluded it was a legitimate gray area as to exactly who is considered the employer of POTUS. I was willing to argue that I was one of his employers, particularly given the fact that so many people in positions of authority and responsibility said they had no idea who was responsible for vetting a potential POTUS. The results I got back pointed directly to fraud. But here is what I thought you would find interesting.

    It has been pointed out to me recently that the section of E-Verify I thought was the "self service" section for employers was reserved NOT for employers but for potential employees.

    I admit that I did not read the fine print, I barely read what I needed to in order to input the data and I am in the habit of always scrolling down and clicking "I agree" and then "next" without reading. I figured it was boiler plate language and skipped over it.

    I am sure it did not register with me at all because why on earth would a person have to ask the goverment to tell them whether or not they are a citizen of the United States? I mean that is something each person knows about themselves. It would be like the government setting up a website for people to go and ask them "Do I have brown hair?" Why would a person have to ask the government if they are a citizen? An employer would need verification from the government about an employee but not the employee, he or she KNOWS if they are a citizen. So it never entered my mind that this section was not for employers.

    But apparently the part of E-Verify that I used IS for potential employees to go to so they can find out if the name, SSN and birthdate they are using passes goverment muster or raises red flags. I have since gone back to actually read the directions and find that the potential employee is promised that IF the data they enter raises alarm bells that the information will be shared with no one.

    Doesn't that boggle your mind? The E-Verify website was set up for employers to verify the legal working status of their employees or potential employees, and in fact employers are requiered by law to check the legal working status of their employees. The whole point of it is to catch undocumented, illegal workers. BUT E-Verify also offers, on the same website, a section for potential employees to check whether or not the government knows they are undocumented so they can AVOID getting caught and the government has assured them that if the data they enter comes back as not legal they will deep six their illegal status. Linda

    ReplyDelete
  38. Linda @ September 11, 2011 10:42 PM

    Thanks Linda, get the word out far and wide

    ReplyDelete
  39. Here are some more details on exactly what Obama's "Notice of Mismatch" most likely means. When I got back a notice that said "Possible Mismatch" I had the option of saying that you would go to a SSO to find out what was going on or not. I tried it both ways. When I chose "No" that was the end of it. But when I chose "Yes" another screen came up with a letter to print out that I could take to the SSO when I was going to find out what the "Possible Mismatch" meant.

    (the letter is attached to the affidavit)

    The letter said "Notice of Mismatch with SSA Records" Here I got more information than the "Possible Mismatch" screen. Below that there was a list of sub-reasons and there was a check next to "SSA record does not verify, Other Reason."

    I started researching what this meant.

    1. I typed in Google..."SSA record does not verify, other reason".

    2. And got this "SSA- POMS: RM 10250.005-The Self Check Process and the Self.....https://secure.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0110250005
    March 15, 2011-SSA record does not verify, other reason. Special indicator..."

    3.Which led to this; "RM 10250.005 The Self Check Process and the Self Check Notice" and further down undewr B2. a chart "Mismatches defined....Reason on Self Check Notice, SSA Record does not verify, other reason." and in the next column (Interpretation of Reason" next to "SSA record does not verify, other reason" it says "Special indicator present."

    4. So, twice now "special indicator" has popped up as an explaination for "SSA record does not verify, other reason". So what is a Special Indicator?

    5. I typed in "special indicator present, SSA" and got this:
    A-08-09-19099-Social Security Afministration Aug 26, 2009-Subject Effectiveness of Special Indicator Codes on the Social Security....from non-citizens who do not have a current immigration status."

    6. Which led to this: Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Administration, Effectiveness of Special Indicator Codes on the Social Security Administrations Numident File, August 2009 A-08-09-19099, Audit Report"

    7. And in the report I found this: Table 1, a list of the special indicator codes as of November 2008. There are 9 of them;
    Code (#) Description
    1. False Identity
    2. Noncitzen Not in Status
    3. Multiple SSN's with Different Identities
    4. Scrambled Earnings with New SSN Assigned
    5. SSN Obtained Using Fraudulent Documentation
    6. SSN Assigned Based on Harassment/Abuse/Life Endangerment
    7. Fictitious Identity
    8. Fraud-OIG Investigated
    9. Fraud SSN Misuse


    Eight of the Special Indicators have to do with fraud of some kind. I do not think option #6 was even available until long after Obama started using the SSN in question. It looks to me like the SSN Obama is using has been flagged with a Special Indicator indicating fraud.

    I hope this information is helpful to you.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Anonymous
    Look for major dirt to knock the Rep candidate out of the race.
    The same way Oscama won in Il.

    No info published on Oscama by media, but anyone against him gets brutalized by the media. A true sign the man cannot win on merit alone.

    I once heard a saying and the more I think about how Dems are so childlike it fits more and more every day.
    It went something like this:
    There are two ways for a child to stack his blocks higher than the other child. One way is to work hard to stack them higher, the other way is to simply knock the other kids blocks down.
    The Dems and Oscama are nothing more than children that have to knock other people's blocks down to make themselves look good.

    Quite a pathetic bunch of kids in adult's bodies.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Testing for profile info....

    Interesting info Linda! Thanks!!!

    ReplyDelete
  42. A musical salute to the Birther Report:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-IDR7n0jPY

    ReplyDelete
  43. what ever happened with those curiously rephrased papers from pelosi to various state DNC officials endorsing BHO as legit pre the 08 election ? then HI DNC refused to sigm off and rewrote their own version to submit ?

    i woulda thought that was a killer smokeing gun but it never went anywhere ,was it not genuine ?

    ReplyDelete
  44. E-Verify 'flags' Obama's Social Security Number. System crunches prez's data, determines 'likely fraudulent'

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=344461

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous
    So, E-verify helps illegal aliens make sure the Social Security Numbers they steal/purchase are valid and can reported to employers/prospective employers as their very own.

    ReplyDelete
  46. @Anonymous

    @Linda,
    WELL DONE on this e-Verify work! I have a question. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know, but I'm curious though if one thing might make a difference. Has anyone tried using "Barry Obama" and/or "Barry H Obama" as name variations in e-Verify? That was the name he was going by in 1977 as evidenced by his HS yearbooks and the memories of those who knew of him at Occidental College.

    ReplyDelete
  47. @Anonymous

    it will be squashed as fast as a cock roach on the floor of the white house. Joe is a brave man for sure, i fear for his life. This is so big. Who is behind all of it is the question i have. Check out alex Jones does provide some answer and it makes sense, very scary to even think about.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Anonymous Obama can't run in 2016; a President can serve only 2 terms.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @Anonymous I have even filed a complaint online with the FBI against Obama when I saw his forged birth certificate, and not only was there no reply, the three times I attempted to send the form, to turn Obama in to the FBI for Fraud, as soon as I hit "send" a page consistently came up that had an error message. So, I filed a complaint against an internet phishing scam, and it went through. They aren't even ACCEPTING criminal complaints against the impostor, and they ALL are already aware he is an impostor. This tells me ONE profound thing: Our Federal government has A. Either already been overthrown, for all intents and purposes, or B. Our government body already has knowledge of an extinction event coming- whether its the financial meltdown of the world, or something far more sinister (if that's even possible)and they are merely attempting to keep someone EXPENDABLE in the White House while they all get as ready as possible for the day that We the People figure out what is really happening and we rush the place. To me, it is completely fishy that we have so many people in our governing body,and in our interrogation and crime-fighting armies, and yet not ONE of them is standing up to demand that justice be served! Can that many people from all areas of America really be that cowardly or crooked? Well, although unlikely, I suppose they can be, and obviously are, if my A. and B. suppositions aren't true. Either way, it is a sad day for America that our own electorate has turned en-masse against us! Evil is alive and well!

    ReplyDelete
  50. Even if Obama finishes his Term. He is using another persons SSN. Therefore, Can someone "STOP HIS PAYCHECK"?

    ReplyDelete
  51. It is 8 months down the line, has there been any new developments in this matter?

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.