Tuesday, August 30, 2011


Judge Lamberth Grants Defendant's Summary Judgement Killing Obama Social Security Number Case


ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [21], plaintiff’s opposition [31], the reply thereto [32], the entire record herein, and the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [21] is GRANTED.

Final judgment is hereby entered for defendant, dismissing this case with prejudice. SO ORDERED.

Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on August 30, 2011.

Continued in ORDER and Memorandum OPINION posted in the Scribd documents below.....

Statement from Commander Charles Kerchner:

They all in Washington DC think they are doing this to prevent riots in the streets if Obama is removed as the fraud and ineligible person he his. They think they are protecting the country and saving lives, etc., by preventing riots. But this is only short term rationalization on their part to protect themselves for allowing this fraud to go on this long. It is only going to get worse as they in Wash DC completely destroy the Rule of Law and our fundamental governing document the U.S. Constitution in order to protect Obama and their own butts for their respective parts in the cover up over the last 3+ years. They have painted themselves in a corner with the ongoing cover up and no institution is beyond corruption for the establishment in DC to protect themselves and thus Obama. They think they are saving the nation from a catastrophe (i.e., riots if Obama is removed) when instead they are destroying the very fiber this nation was built on ... the rules of law, not man. Homeland Security is likely briefing all the powers to be in the various institutions in background ... saying we have to keep the lid on this. If it blows their could be race riots in 100 cities. And Obama would likely do it too to stay in power. But, fear of some riots, real or conjured up by the cover up squad, are in the end going to lead to much much worse in this nation as the People learn more and more how corrupt the establishment in DC has become to the point of just ignoring the Constitution and the Rule of Law ... maybe even another Civil War. And the Obama cover up and all those who lead it and enabled it will be the cause. Of course they in DC will place the blame elsewhere and label the supporters of the Constitution and the Rule of Law as the troublemakers. They always do. JMHO.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
Taitz v Astrue USDC DC Memorandum OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Royce C Lamberth

Taitz v Astrue-USDC-D-C-35-ORDER-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-35-0

Taitz v Astrue USDC DC ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

90 comments:

  1. Sheriff Joe may be the only hope left to save this nation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is strong evidence that the occupier of the White House is a criminal and imposter. All of it has been published and is widely available.
    The worst part of these crimes is not of the accused, but rather those who are now duplicitous by their inaction to bring the criminal and his conspirators to justice.
    Our elected representatives have been elected by the people and took an oath to support and defend the constitution of the United States.
    All of them have refused to act, ignoring the will of the people.
    They are protecting a criminal from justice.
    They are co-conspirators.
    The law is a hindrance to them and they ignore it every chance they get.
    They simply do not care what the average citizen thinks anymore.
    They have become an elite oligarchy.
    They spend trillions of dollars for things we do not want or need and ignore constitution and do nothing about the criminal imposter occupying the White House.
    The people now pay their taxes not out of love of the constitution but because they fear the government.
    There is no need to vote anymore because no government official will do anything to end the corruption and bring the criminal in the White House to justice.
    They are addicted to power and the benefits of the ruling class.
    With these truths being self-evident, it is clear that the government no longer responds to the will of the people.
    Only a revolution can change the present state of affairs.
    It’s all the people have left.
    God save America.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And American taxpayer's cover their mouths and cough- B*** J**.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This ends the Hawaii Federal Court subpoena stuff, right? Including the September 14th hearing.

    But she still has the Hawaii DOH UIPA lawsuit, right. Is there any kind of hearing date for that or are they waiting for the DOH to reply to complaint?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Footnote #4 says that the SSN e-verify and the Selective Service records were obtained illegally. And cannot be used in court. Does that mean she will have to remove them from her exhibits?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Prejudice?" you old fool. If you have ever done anything for our Country,now is the time. Get some spine. Why don't you go check your wife's purse and see if you can find your balls.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Footnote 4 says the SSN e-verify report and the Selective Service Report were obtained illegally and cannot be used in any court.

    Does that mean she will have to remove them from her exhibits?

    ReplyDelete
  8. gov't is the enemy of the people and the enemy of the constitution and the enemy of truth

    why in the world does anyone bother sending letters to them or taking cases to their courts

    anyone who didn't see either this or the haw judge doing the same thing is in complete and total denial

    ReplyDelete
  9. She will be lucky if she is not sanctioned and or imprisoned.

    ReplyDelete
  10. California birther/dualer/doubterAugust 30, 2011 at 11:01 AM

    So is there a way to legally obtain the SSN and Selective Service registration info, perhaps through the Freedom of Information Act?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anon 10:51 has it 100% correct.

    The government is our enemy. The court of law (???) will not provide the answer. The court of resistence will provide the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Amazing how he can arrogantly stand before the world and say you can't touch me because I am me. A fraud in plain sight?

    You can't investigate anyone's fraud since it will ruin their privacy? Great no more SSN, Tax or Selective Service investigations! Frauds need not to worry anymore, we will not breach their privacy. How nice :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here lies the United States of America

    born July 4, 1776
    died January 20, 2009

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Anonymous

    Yes, she still has the HI State Court action pending. It is awaiting an answer or motion to dismiss.

    She also has another case pending in D.C. Taitz v Ruemmler, also only in its early stages.

    She also is awaiting an opinion from the Ninth Circuit in Barnett v Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If I have understood what I read in the court's judgment, Taitz was found to have been in possession of documents that she obtained illegally, and which have been assumed by the court to possibly be fraudulent Is she likely now to be either sanctioned or prosecuted for holding fraudulent and illegally obtained government documents? The irony of all of this is amazing!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not fraudulent documents but fraudulently OBTAINED documents.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Some guy who claims to be a tea party conservative has just released a book that he says proves obama's bc is not a forgery.

    We need to get somebody working on debunking his crock of crap RIGHT AWAY!

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tea-party-conservative-refutes-claims-of-obama-birth-certificate-forgery-2011-08-30

    ReplyDelete
  18. On the first page the idiot judge says "plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy". What he neglects to mention is that the courts are complicit in, are covering up, are denying due process, are not applying the law equally, in this alleged conspiracy. Therefore the courts are part of this conspiracy, conspiring to defraud the American people. The evidence of fraud is overwhelming, and this judge just reaffirmed that the US judicial system is a joke, a sham, and corrupt beyond belief.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Anonymous
    Ms. Taitz's motion in Hawaii which was to be heard on September 14th now becomes moot because of Judge Lamberth's dismissal. Ms. Taitz was seeking the Motion to Compel with regard to evidence she needed for Taitz v Astrue.
    Taitz v Astrue is now officially dead.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Taitz v. Ruemmler is assigned to Judge Lamberth. Orly attached the same illegally-procured SSNVS and Selective Service verification to her complaint in that suit, too.

    Not looking good, even if Orly could figure out how to serve process in that case.

    ReplyDelete
  21. the post by Anonymous 10:37...you words are pointed and correct. I understand your meaning. And this all scares the hell out of me. I become more and more disillusioned with this once-great country each day. I now doubt things I once took happily for granted. I have to now consider things that I never would have before imagined. The Socialists now in control of our federal govt. are bankrupting this country, and other western societies ON PURPOSE. How can we prevent this if we cannot bring obama to justice? I am not so naive as to think that Repubs are not complicit in this, I realize they are. BUT at least they don't aim to bring down the USA within the next few years, as it now seems obvious, that the Socialists surely intend to do. Please join me in taking a deep breath now, and realizing we must continue our fight to expose the truth, while we still have a prayer of doing so. If we cannot help ensure real "justice" for obama and I don't mean the social kind, then we HAVE to make sure he cannot rule past 2012. Please everyone, consider what I say here, and help us make sure that at least he does not win this next election. We fight against a propaganda machine, we fight uphill against lib/prog desires to enslave us all which have now infiltrated all our american institutions. But truth and light is on our side. We must not give up.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Crap just shoot me now. This makes me sick, literally. I guess we all know now that nobody will help. We're freaking sunk.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Boy, that's a fat bastard if ever did see one.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Anonymous

    Now what?

    Just a thought. Check out Uncle Omar Obama's social security number and lets see if the goobermint makes the same BS claim that an illegal alien ordered deported back to Kenya has a "right to privacy" for his BS social security number. There could be a connection between illegal Omar and the usurper's BS SSN.

    ReplyDelete
  25. What needs to be done now is find out what it takes to have a judge removed. Some can be removed by special election. It does not take many signatures to start the process.

    We removed a city council member this way and had a big decision he voted for overturned. People need to start removing any politician that is in the cover-up. Most special elections does not take that many votes to replace the person. Most people won't take the time to vote but will sign a petition for special election.

    We can play the same game. I have been handing out fliers for a month now on peoples cars. I printed them in color at work and made them look professional. I have already seen options change here in my town already. The more the public see the truth the more there sub-conscious will believe.

    ReplyDelete
  26. linda @11:39

    you are right that the country is being destroyed

    I do not agree that electing people who are going along with the biggest scam in history will turn things around

    the only people who will turn things around are people who won't go along with the biggest scam in history and the complete trashing of the rule of law.

    getting rid of obamacare and the like seems really big, and it is.
    but the rule of law is the big kahuna. it is the rule of law being trashed that will destroy this country

    ReplyDelete
  27. It should have been obvious with the failure of SCOTUS to recuse 2 clearly compromised justices in the Kerchner v Obama cert plea that NO COURT IN THE US WILL EVER CONSIDER HEARING A CASE AGAINST BARRY!!! Actually hearing one would very probably save the Constitution from destruction and these Judicial liberals (all 6 of them) can't allow that to happen.

    Shame on them!!! There's an old saying that an oligarchs will always work to preserve themselves first and foremost.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Anonymous

    There is suppose to be a court meeting today with the judge in Hawaii today. According to the treasonous OBots, Taitz would be using the telephone to converse instead of flying in. The Hawaiian fed district court may have had a heads up about this summary judgment coming down since the Taitz v. Astrue case underlies the Hawaiian court action.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The Nazi's took over the government of Germany in the mid 1930s. The communists took over the Russian government in the 1920s.

    The result? Millions of dead.

    The same thing is now happening to the US.

    Meanwhile, people only react with a nervous laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The first page of the order seems very rude towards Atty. Taitz. So much for this judge being an unbiased third party.

    ReplyDelete
  31. To be honest, I am not sure we will ever be able to get rid of this guy in the WH. I remember him saying "I'm going to be here a long time", just like he said 5 days before the election 2008, we are only 5 days away from "FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORMING AMERICA". I new right then and there we were in deep trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I don't believe anything will ever be done about this horrible disaster in the white house. We will have to ride it out and wait and see what happens. One thing obummer has made me see is how terrible hell is.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I'm beginning to think that keeping Guantanimo open will be a good thing. ALL those who have betrayed their Oath of Office & allegiance to the Constitution -- including hundreds of judges, will find their "retirement years" in a tropical paradise -- hopefully run along the lines and policy of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. NO frills -- let them play checkers with rocks or seashells. Of course, ALL pensions and "benefits" will be stripped just as THEY did for LTC Terrence Lakin.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Anonymous

    You've obviously read very few court opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Remember all of the FEMA camps in place? PLENTY of room for all of these traitors.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Anonymous
    The problem is that while local and state judges are often elected, federal judges are appointed for life and they can only be removed via impeachment. There just aren't 67 votes in the Senate (with 53 Democrats) to remove federal judges from office.
    Judge Lamberth who issued this opinion against Orly Taitz was appointed by Ronald Reagan.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Hey Orly Taitz, are you REALLY a government plant who sees to it that all court challenges to 0bama's eligibility are LOST? Hmmmm..

    ReplyDelete
  38. @Anonymous

    It should have been obvious with the failure of SCOTUS to recuse 2 clearly compromised justices in the Kerchner v Obama cert plea that NO COURT IN THE US WILL EVER CONSIDER HEARING A CASE AGAINST BARRY!!! Actually hearing one would very probably save the Constitution from destruction and these Judicial liberals (all 6 of them) can't allow that to happen.

    Shame on them!!! There's an old saying that an oligarchs will always work to preserve themselves first and foremost.
    **********************************

    I agree with you that they should have recused themselves. However, in conference when deciding to hear the case or not it would not have mattered. It would only have mattered if they were not recused from the actual hearing if the decision was to hear the case was made at conference. At the conference the rule of four would still have been in place even if the two OBOTS were recused. Meaning that 4 votes were required in either case to have the case heard. If there were 4 votes available in the room it still would have gone forward. There were not 4 patriots in the room for the conferences on theses cases, simple as that. As Clarence Thomas stated before the Senate "We are evading the issue."
    Sad but true.

    ReplyDelete
  39. -------------------------------------------
    A Summary Judgement can be appealed.
    -------------------------------------------

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party only has to show substantial evidence that a dispute of material facts exists, regardless of the strength of that evidence. For example, if one side on a summary judgment motion can produce the evidence of "a dozen bishops", and the other side only has the testimony of a known liar, then summary judgment is not appropriate. Deciding on the relative credibility of witnesses is a question for trial.

    Where appropriate, a court may award summary judgment upon less than all claims, known as "partial summary judgment."

    It is not uncommon for summary judgments of lower U.S. courts in complex cases to be overturned on appeal. A grant of summary judgment is reviewed "de novo" (meaning, without deference to the views of the trial judge) both as to the determination that there is no remaining genuine issue of material fact and that the prevailing party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

    ReplyDelete
  40. It's time to stop fooling ourselves. There is no way that any career bureaucrat will ever throw away their position, retirement and benefits which could lead to the downfall of BHO. They are politicians and bureaucrats--not leaders.

    They are feeding at the same trough as BHO and his henchmen.

    The government is corrupt to the core and the only way to change it is thru revolution.

    We have been hopeful fools but fools nonetheless.

    I love my country but hate this renegade government.

    The last ditch has been dug--will it be our grave also?

    ReplyDelete
  41. I agree that when Obama is finally arrested and placed on trial for treason, that this Judge should be named as a co-defendant, and if found guilty, should suffer that same fate as Obama after sentencing is imposed. Whatever that fate maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Anonymous 1:50 P.M

    Don't blame Orly. Why didn't some lawyers step up and help her? How anyone could accuse her of being on that disgusting cretins side is beyond me. Pretty much everyone sat back and watched what would happen.

    ReplyDelete
  43. To @anonymous at 1:54 p.m.

    You are wrong. If only 7 justices would have participated in the conference the Rule of 3 would have been in effect. One less that the majority (3) to move the petition to a hearing and 4 in the case hearing to win. See Supreme Court Practices by Cressman, et al. Thus it is my and others logical conclusion that there were likely 3 at SCOTUS considering taking the case and thus the 2 Obama appointees unethically did not recuse themselves and participated in the conference for Kerchner v Obama in order to keep the rule of 4 in place.

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  44. Continuing on the Rules of 3 vs Rule of 4 in the Kerchner v Obama petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, read my statement about that unethically run conference in which Kagan and Sotomayor, the Obama appointees did not recuse themselves when all ethical standards indicated they should. They breached the ethics standards of the court because they had to to save their boss by keeping the Rule of 4 in play, instead of the Rule of 3 when only 7 justices rule on a petition in conference:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/44813181/A-Statement-from-CDR-Charles-Kerchner-Ret-about-Kerchner-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Court-Decision

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous
    You are absolutely right. Not one of the major conservative legal foundations and think tanks such as the Federalist Society has assisted with ANY of the lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility. There are many conservative law firms and legal institutes whose lawyers argue the conservative position before the Supreme Court, and WIN. Where are they on defending the natural born citizen clause?
    It was way past time for them to set up to the plate.
    Where is former US Solicitor General Ted Olson? Where is Judge Robert Bork?

    ReplyDelete
  46. @Anonymous
    Some guy who claims to be a tea party conservative has just released a book that he says proves obama's bc is not a forgery.

    We need to get somebody working on debunking his crock of crap RIGHT AWAY!

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tea-party-conservative-refutes-claims-of-obama-birth-certificate-forgery-2011-08-30
    ***********************************

    I do not believe that this author is a real Tea Party member at heart or a Conservative at heart. He is more more likely a stinking Commie OBOT infiltrator pretending to be an American patriot.

    In order to get on with discrediting him you have to read his book first. That means putting money in the traitor's pockeet

    ReplyDelete
  47. California birther/dualer/doubterAugust 30, 2011 at 4:23 PM

    Think Judge Lamberth isn't feeling a little embarrassed for this decision in light of what has been revealed about Barry's Uncle Omar?

    ReplyDelete
  48. They all in Washington DC think they are doing this to prevent riots in the streets if Obama is removed as the fraud and ineligible person he his. They think they are protecting the country and saving lives, etc., by preventing riots. But this is only short term rationalization on their part to protect themselves for allowing this fraud to go on this long. It is only going to get worse as they in Wash DC completely destroy the Rule of Law and our fundamental governing document the U.S. Constitution in order to protect Obama and their own butts for their respective parts in the cover up over the last 3+ years. They have painted themselves in a corner with the ongoing cover up and no institution is beyond corruption for the establishment in DC to protect themselves and thus Obama. They think they are saving the nation from a catastrophe (i.e., riots if Obama is removed) when instead they are destroying the very fiber this nation was built on ... the rules of law, not man. Homeland Security is likely briefing all the powers to be in the various institutions in background ... saying we have to keep the lid on this. If it blows their could be race riots in 100 cities. And Obama would likely do it too to stay in power. But, fear of some riots, real or conjured up by the cover up squad, are in the end going to lead to much much worse in this nation as the People learn more and more how corrupt the establishment in DC has become to the point of just ignoring the Constitution and the Rule of Law ... maybe even another Civil War. And the Obama cover up and all those who lead it and enabled it will be the cause. Of course they in DC will place the blame elsewhere and label the supporters of the Constitution and the Rule of Law as the troublemakers. They always do. JMHO.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    ProtectOurLiberty.org
    CDR Kerchner's Blog

    ReplyDelete
  49. @California birther/dualer/doubter

    No.

    Judge Lamberth applied the law. How about you read those cases he cited and explain why you think the law is different.

    The bottom line is that Orly did no research about the precedents before she filed this case. You got all excited about a case that was doomed from the start.

    ReplyDelete
  50. well said, cfkerchner

    ReplyDelete
  51. how is gettting the social security/selective service information off the internet "illegally obtained"? It is, by then and by now, "Common Knowledge". obamafraud birth certificate is common knowledge now and it is clearly a fraud. why won't authorities act? the people are in a government/media brewed shitstew and there is no way out until people get off their arse, meet in the street and head to washington enmasse. enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  52. The Selective Service Verification for Obama was secured legally. I got it off a government site myself and on it the last four numbers identified as those of Obama are the same as the CT social security number which he is using fraudulently.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I agree with CDR Kerchner and have stated the same thing he says many times....but, I believe it's at the most 5% fear of riots and 95% cover their butts for members of Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  54. @Anonymous

    "Where is former US Solicitor General Ted Olson? Where is Judge Robert Bork?"

    You might not like their definition of natural born Citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Susan Daniels

    So if the SSV was secured legitimatley then the judge has ruled om an untruth making either his verdict or himself out to be a ????????

    ReplyDelete
  56. If I apply for a job in the US, I have to furnish three forms of identification, and the employer has to verify my eligibility to work with my SSAN through E-Verify. Otherwise the Feds will severely fine my employer, who will also be required to fire me under federal law.

    So what has happened to my privacy, when every credit bureau, every doctor, every bank, every employer I have ever had, every insurance company, etc etc, have more information about me than I can ever find out for myself.

    So why is the number one employee of the people of the United States not subject to the same identification and verification process?

    Could anything be more simply understood? I guess the Judge has never had to give up his SSAN.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Susan Daniels

    In your affidavit to the Barnett v. Obama, you list the occurrences of the President's SSN. On the second to the last page of the affidavit (page 13 of 14)there are two listings for a Somerville, MA address. One has a DOB of 1890 and one has a DOB of 1990.

    What is the 1990 DOB? Should you be looking for someone born in 1990 not 1890?

    ReplyDelete
  58. The time to rise has been engaged...sound the alarm, and pray for final victory!

    The last best hope on earth is not the United States, but rather the PEOPLE of the United States.

    We must stand and fight against this scourge to not only save ourselves but the free world as well. We must re-constitute our nation NOW, otherwise hope, freedom, and liberty are all doomed.

    What else is there to live for? When it's gone it's hell to get back.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @cfkerchner

    What is amazing is people thinking that Judges are the final solution.

    When the courts deny inalienable rights and redress, then why should the people continue to abide by the judges decisions.

    Lamberth needs to stand before GOD and tell his sad tale of woo, as perdition awaits Lamberth the slimey bastard.

    ReplyDelete
  60. We know our judges our Congressmen are obvious cowards and traitors, but what gets me is the silence of the so called main stream conservative media.

    I've lost all respect for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin and all the rest that won't even look at the obvious grievance that we scream about. They've been told to shut up. How long will they continue to do so?

    I think the overwelming majority of the people in this country don't know about this whole traitorous scandal. And I blame our conservative media for that. It's sickening.

    ReplyDelete
  61. What I don't understand is the SSN was obtained illegally through Everify.

    We, the citizens of the US, through our vote actually hire the US President. We, through our taxes, pay his salary. We can also fire him, although we have to wait for the next election to do it.

    The ability of us to hire, fire and pay a salary to, any president would make each one of us his boss.

    Everify, was created, by the Federal Government, for all employers to check on the legal status of their employees.

    This was exactly what Orly was doing. Checking on an employee. I don't understand how this would be obtaining information illegally.

    ReplyDelete
  62. @cfkerchner

    First of all, I want express my appreciation for all that you have done attempting to dispose of the usurper.

    I do have a question regarding your statement regarding the rule of 4 becoming a rule of 3 if only 7 justices are present at the conference. My understanding is that the rule of four is a long standing tradition and not law. We do not really even know what happens at the conference aside from the orders listed after. I cannot find any reference to an application of the rule of 3 as you suggest. Can you make reference to a precedent where this rule of 3 was applied.

    Thanks again for all that you have done, Ken

    ReplyDelete
  63. @Susan Daniels

    But whatever you obtained from wherever you obtained it was not what Orly submitted to the Court. So, apples and oranges. Lamberth was not speaking to your find.

    Perhaps Orly can submit yours with her Motion for Reconsideration.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @Anonymous

    Col. Hollister impersonated the President, changed the President's mailing address in the Selective Service database, and had a registration confirmation mailed to Hollister's own address. That is what the judge is calling "fraudulently obtained". He is also calling it fraudulent to claim you are the President's employer for purposes of verifying his Social Security Number in a system that is limited to employers only.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Anonymous

    Orly did not argue that a dispute of material fact existed. If a dispute of material fact exists, the case goes to trial. But if there is no dispute of material fact, the judge applies the law to the undisputed facts. It was undisputed that the SSA refused to release the SS-5. Orly does not dispute that. The SSA does not dispute that. The only thing left was for the judge to apply the law to that undisputed fact. The judge found that the law allowed the SSA to withhold the SS-5. On appeal, Orly needs to argue the law, not the facts.

    She has conceded the material facts.

    ReplyDelete
  66. @MIDDLE CLASS GUY

    "Can you make reference to a precedent where this rule of 3 was applied."

    There was a case back in the 1970's when there were two vacancies on the court and a judge (IIRC - Justice Reinquest) said that they only needed three.

    ReplyDelete
  67. @Anonymous
    Judge Lamberth dismissed Taitz v Astrue with prejudice. There can be no Motion for Reconsideration.
    Ms. Taitz can appeal the opinion to the US District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and then on to the Supreme Court.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Orly Taitz blogged today concerning getting Hawaii to produce Obama's real birth certificate:


    "Today at 5:15 pm PST we had a hearing with the District Judge Susan Oke Mollway. She supervises magistrate judge Puglisi.

    She gave me ECF privileges to file electronically.

    Deputy atorney General of Hawaii Jill Nagamine and assistant Attorey General Rebecca Quinn were there and demanded to dismiss the case and the hearing in light of todays’ order by judge Lamberth.

    I argued against it and stated that according to the rules of court I have an opportunity to file a motion for reconsideration and in light of newly discovered evidence, I have no doubt that such motion will be granted, as such the case is still active.

    Judge Oke -Mollway denied oral motion by the deputy Attorney general and the assistant Attorney General, she did not dismiss the case and she simply rescheduled the hearing.

    She originally rescheduled the hearing to October 23, later she said that because of some big conference in HI she will reschedule for November 21, 9:30 am before judge Puglisi(I could not hear well, which conference it was, I thought she said AIPAC, but I am not sure and I did not want to ask too many questions) .

    I asked for more time to respond to the opposition, she gave me until September 16 to reply and I can do it electronically.

    Meanwhile I will be working on my motion for reconsideration with judge Lamberth and providing him with new evidence about our dear Usurper- in- Chief.(what fun)

    Well, dodged the bullet here, I am off to have dinner with my family and celebrating my B-day. It did not turn out that bad after all"


    "http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=25047

    ReplyDelete
  69. Regarding the gutless judge, I could only think of what my one friend was accustomed to say of those who lacked spine and were disingenuous: "Sick bastard!"

    ReplyDelete
  70. The rule of 3 when only 7 justices are considering granting certiorari for a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court is cited Supreme Court Practices, 9th edition, by Eugene Cressman, et al, page 324. I references the case Pryor v United States (1971) as an example of the Rule of 3 being used. If the Kerchner v Obama case was a slam dunk "not gonna hear it" at SCOTUS, the two Obama appointees would have recused themselves. One did for the case petition before Kerchner v Obama and for the case petition after Kerchner v Obama. The two Obama appointees wanted to participate in the Kerchner v Obama conference to keep the Rule of 4 solidly in place. Thus the two Obama appointees committed a gross ethical violation of the court rules by participating in a case for which the outcome would determine their very jobs. So they stayed in participation to save their patron boss Obama and their very jobs. Corruption and gross unethical behavior in the highest court of our land.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    ProtectOurliberty.org
    http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  71. The first thing on our agenda, SHOULD be, to thank Orly for her RELENTLESS ASSAULT on the Serpent. How anyone here can attack her at this point, after everything she has been through, I think says a lot about you.

    I for one am eternally grateful for what she has done. For what she is trying to do. And I THANK and PRAY TO GOD, for her CONTINUED STRUGGLE, safety and well being.

    The failure of many here to recognize her as the true leader of our movement is our greatest weakness.

    Whether she's a good or bad lawyer is irrelevant. The more inept she is the more praise she deserves. Orly is the one among us to imitate.
    She is NOT our problem. Our problem is that she is the THE ONLY ONE THAT HAS ANY BALLS..!

    If we had ONE more like her the Jackal would already be caged.

    I am beginning to doubt that we have the COJONES
    that it takes to be free. Look at Latin America and learn: ONCE YOUR FREEDOM IS TAKEN FROM YOU. YOU WILL NEVER GET IT BACK. I repeat, YOU WILL NEVER GET IT BACK..!

    ReplyDelete
  72. @MiddleClassGuy

    Read my full statement about the SCOTUS decision regarding the Petition for Certiorari in the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit at this link. Our court system and the Rule of Law has been corrupted from bottom to top to protect the usurper in the Oval Office, those who put him there, and the cowards that are allowing him to stay there. We have a Neville Chamberlain court system left here in the USA at this point and the end result of this appeasement heading our way. Appeasement is never the way to deal with corruptions, wrongs, criminal activities, evil, and threats of violence:

    http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/a-statement-from-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret-about-the-u-s-supreme-court-decision-on-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-congress-et-al-2/

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    ProtectOurLiberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  73. @cfkerchner

    Thank you for the reference. That explains it for me. It is a crime that that were not four votes for hearing the case with Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia all present. You would expect more respect for the constitution and sense of patriotism from those guys. I Guess not. I think that you are correct regarding the fear of riots, but that is a sad excuse to ignore the rule of law. Choose to ignore crimes because you fear more lawlessness, nice precedent to set.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I believe Chief Justice Roberts was the obstacle to getting the needed 4 votes from a full panel of 9 justices. He was just too cordial to Mr. Zero in the run up to the various cases being brought to SCOTUS about Obama's eligibility and the lack of vetting of Obama. That is why have nicknamed Chief Justice Robert's Court, the Neville Chamberlain Court. When the crap hits the fan ... as it will ultimately, history will write about how the Roberts court could have prevented it using the Rule of Law and legal recourse and resolution and using fact finding hearing by accepting one of the cases brought to them and shined sunshine regarding the questions about Obama's nativity and life story ... before it was too late, but did not. The truth always comes out. But will we have a USA left as we once knew it when it does?

    ReplyDelete
  75. Colorado Station picks up on LFBC. Maybe MSM will finally realize they have to address this????

    ReplyDelete
  76. CDR Kerchner....Please let your contacts know that they are forgetting one thing - the media is not what we think it is, it is propaganda for the Socialist agenda! And they do a fantastic job of brainwashing the masses! If true Americans, regardless of party, really want to prevent the USA from becoming the USSA, then we HAVE to end this propaganda machine. The simple, obvious key to that is exposing Obama for what he is! and throwing him and all his conspirators in prison where they belong. The very survival of this country depends on preventing Obama from "ruling" for another four years! I vote, I participate, but it could all be for nothing, as we know the Socialists have the media working overtime for them! Pls make this point to whomever you can! If we want a real media, and fair elections again, we have to expose and shame all the mainstream media as corrupt, and that includes Fox News! They present some fairness, but they are also corrupt! please help us get this across! God Bless you for all that you do, Please keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  77. cfkerchner, The truth is out. The country is gone. All bets are off. I won't vote. All candidates are useless. Revolution is the only way.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Dealio: bring it on ...

    ReplyDelete
  79. There has been a Communist overthrow of the U.S. government. And no Communist is going to give up power through an open election. He will cheat.

    It's either revolution, or learn to love him...and his religion: Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Yep, that's the dealio now, folks. Live free or die!

    ReplyDelete
  81. Revolution. The time has come (although we knew it was always just a matter of time). Washington is way over due for a "drag 'em out by their feet" party.

    ReplyDelete
  82. @Dealio
    September, 2011 is a big month for solidifying the military control of the Obama regime.
    General David Petraeus takes over as Director of the CIA and changes in the Joint Chiefs of Staff mean that only Air Force Joint Chief General Norton A. Schwartz won't be a flunky appointed by the Usurper.

    ReplyDelete
  83. is this the same case that was being heard in the 9th dist ct of appeals in california?

    ReplyDelete
  84. If Obama has a right to such privacy, then why would he be spending so much money keeping secrets?

    ReplyDelete
  85. SCOTUS CJ Roberts cannot impale himself on a sword for the usurper in Chief because he is complicit in the fraud...he allowed the oath of office to take place, and gave it twice to the little charlatan...once in front of the world and the second time in private...maybe because it had to be given using the Fraud's real name??? Mr Soetoro and his international backers (the ones who met in Chantilly VA just before the "election" and gave their blessing to the ghetto Gumby to become the "prez") have maneuvered our nation skllfully for the past 3+ yrs and the preceding 94 before that, into a place of dictatorial chicanery. You didn't really think this happened overnight, do you?

    TPTB have been at this game for generations...they will be loathe to surrender their prize accomplishment easily.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Off topic and from ACLU...BUT...

    D.C. Judge: Government Doesn't Need a Warrant to Demand Cell Phone Location Information

    THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE 4th AMENDMENT AND SHOWS ME THIS SO CALLED JUDGE SUPPORTS THE SO-CALLED PATRIOT ACT!

    http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/dc-judge-government-doesnt-need-warrant-demand-cell-phone-location

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.