Sunday, July 10, 2011



The Ken Allen FOIA  response file now updated with a copy of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services DVD file listing "records relating to Barry Soetoro...." Do all the redacted pages in the FOIA response contain information about the living person named Barry Soetoro A.K.A. Barack Obama? And why would Barry Soetoro A.K.A. Barack Obama have immigration records?

The DVD was provided to Pixel Patriot by Ken Allen. You can view the original FOIA request related to the latest dump here.

Pixel Patriot: On the surface it would appear…
the list of contents inscribed on the FOIA DVD response #HQS2011000019 released by The U.S. Department of Homeland Security would be a bit trivial except for the realization that the implications of an illegal alien officially designated as and so named Barry Soetoro is Usurping the Presidency are astronomical, and consequently must not be ignored.

The name Barrack Hussein Obama II is merely a facade…although apropos for the treacherous and treasonous figure for whom even the presidential seal wont stick. Another dark day for the Republic no matter how you try spin it. http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com
FOIA Release: Records Relating to Barry Soetoro/Stanley Ann Dunham/Barack Obama Sr./Lolo Soetoro - Departme...
Ken Allen Freedom of Information Act Request Relating to Barry Soetoro / Stanley Ann Dunham / Barack Obama ...

Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here. 

Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
We Have a Criminal and Forger in the White House! 20110627 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5

31 comments:

  1. tick-tock-tick-tock-time is running out Congress-

    ReplyDelete
  2. So now all the evidence is coming out. Obama releases a doctored birth certificate to prolong his usurpation of the White House all while working to dismantle the country to usher in a third world hell upon its citizenry.

    Everything Obama has done and is doing is illegal. When ignored, it is how nations come apart.

    Republicans in Congress are said to be afraid of race riots in urban areas of the country? They should be more afraid of entire states declaring state emergencies due to federal intrusion on their sovereignty and whole swaths of America separating from the federal iron fist of Washington under a usurper, illegal, strongman, tyrant. Congress can peddle the feeble little lie for only so long. We are not fucking stupid. Either Obama falls or the nation plummets into a Greece like disaster.

    We are not afraid of race riots, Congress and Obama should be afraid of the penalty of their errors and that is America dividing itself into separate states to where their rancid egos will rule no more and their politics of hate and disgrace will implode on themselves.

    America will emerge from this disaster only after the weight becomes too heavy to shoulder it any longer on top of the people who already know the taste of freedom. It may be simple to enslave people who don't know the flavor of freedom, but to those who have known it, it cannot be written away, it cannot be mocked away and it surely will not be taken away from a two-bit hustler like Obama.

    Goodnight and God be with you all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi .I was reading trough Soetoro, his applications for the waiver, (http://www.scribd.com/doc/59560239/FOIA-Release-Records-Relating-to-Barry-Soetoro-Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Barack-Obama-Sr-Lolo-Soetoro-Department-of-Homeland-Security) 130/182.
    Is it me or what?He keeps mentioning his wife Ann, but not a SINGLE time Barack Hussein Obama II is mentioned in these documents!Mentioning that she has no income, mentioning a 4 year old child in her care would improve his chances to stay!

    ReplyDelete
  4. im telling everybody call rush limbaugh today and every day and sean hannity also. if necessary call on a subject and then abruptly change the subject to the obama forged birth certificate and blurt out as much as possible before he drops you. this will get the word out to his listeners and they will get curious as to why they are avoiding the subject. if nothing else call the screnner and talk about the forgery. the more calls sends the word to limbaugh and hannity that we are on to them as phonies and traitors and cowards. it may just take one caller bringing up the subject and putting out as much as possible before being dropped to break into the media on this. it worked before to a great extent and we have to try this. it just takes phone calls. we can embarrass limbaugh and hannity until they come around.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Will

    "Is it me or what?He keeps mentioning his wife Ann, but not a SINGLE time Barack Hussein Obama II is mentioned in these documents!Mentioning that she has no income, mentioning a 4 year old child in her care would improve his chances to stay!"

    It's you. He's mentioned as Stanley's son on pages 101, 108, and 117/118. He's mentioned by name on page 34.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Missing Link

    http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/07/missing-link.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Will@11:13
    Did you not notice that ONLY Maya was claimed on the income tax form? Were Grandma and Grandpa already in charge of Barry? How unusual that she was not claiming him as a "dependent child" on her return......

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Will

    Strange isnt it?
    What is even more strange is that Obama snr when asked on forms he filled in , two of them, both after obama's alleged 1961 birth date, he claimed to have

    first application , no children,

    second apllication- one child named roy born in 58.

    Yet surely like you say about Anne, it would have worked in his favour in his applications to stay or extend his stay to the imigration office, if he could show he had a u.s.a born dependant new born baby.
    Yet he didnt and the imigration service although the memo's suggest they knew (could be fakes), he had a child , the immigration service did not bring the blatent lie obama snr had told on his froms and they chose to focus on soap opera that makes mainstream headlines today about adoption.

    I believe obama snr didnt lie on those forms, that the additional memos that showed up separately and later and are not offical government forms with numbers etc, are faked.

    Those imigration apllications were to valuable for mr oama to lie on them about an asset called a u.s born baby that could have helped his application to have more chance of being succesful if anything.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There is no mention of barry on these releases, so it is false to say they relate to him.

    ReplyDelete
  10. At this point, knowing what we know, we must all be converging on Washington. When I say all, I mean no less then 25+ million of us citizens setting things straight. The hell with this birther summit. There's something wrong with the name and the timing. We're going to wait till when? To do what? These people must be fucking crazy, or possibly work for Soetoro. The situation calls for an immediate call to all patriots and concerned citizens to prepare to march. And I don't mean next year. Drastic times call for drastic measures. We must act now. I'd like to think a leader is out there and will speak up. If not now, one will emerge during the march. Simply put, this is to become, or is, a Revolutionary March. And it can't wait.

    ReplyDelete
  11. A BOYCOTT OF RUSH LIMBAUGH AND BILL OREILLY HAS TO BE PROMOTED AND GO VIRAL. PEOPLE MUST REALIZE THAT WE CANNOT TAKE DOWN OBAMA UNTIL WE TAKE DOWN HIS PAWNS OR PROTECTORS. DO NOT WATCH AND LISTEN TO OREILLY. DO NOT LISTEN TO LIMBAUGH. BOYCOTT THEIR SPONSORS. THEY ARE LISTED ON DR. MANNINGS WEBSITE. LET THEM KNOW IF THEY SPONSOR LIMBAUGH OR OREILLY WE WILL NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THEM. MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ALL OVER THE INTERNET.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I haven't listened to radio in years. Like tv, it has been taken over. Thank God for Orly Taitz and this site. Let's march and arrest Soetoro and co., congress, and a few talking heads. I refuse to believe I'm the only one who wants our freedoms restored. And I'm not interested in waiting till spring. Whoever thought that up is a little fucked in the head. I want action now.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I bet congress is monitoring our progress on this more then the illegal. They know their ass is grass when we turn Washington inside out. They check in every morning to see where we're at. I don't know that for sure, but it makes absolute sense. I blame congress more then the illegal for allowing this to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If, however, Obama Snr had a son born OUT of the USA that would work against him.

    ReplyDelete
  15. A march on DC is not needed and, as with the Tea Party, it will be ignored. Nor do we need a Birther Summit or boycotts. The solution to this is simple, provided there are some honest people left in congress, everyone who is a taxpayer (those less than 50% of Americans who actually pay taxes) needs to simply STRIKE, don't go to work. What you'll lose your job, maybe, maybe not, but is your job worth the cost of your freedoms and besides if "MILLIONS" participate, there is just no way they can fire everybody. Who knows, maybe the company you work for will be willing to participate. You take away the incoming revenue to offset an already staggering outflow of spending, especially with this unstable economy, and congress will pay attention quick to your demands. Suddenly the threat of urban civil unrest (IMO unfounded) will diminish next to catastrophic loss of production and economic activity.

    Allow me to expand my thoughts. First my reasoning for strike vs. march. The Obots, want us to march, marches can be manipulated both in perception and response (aka MSM). It is extremely hard to say that a person, in their own home, minding their own business, is causing civil unrest warranting the declaration of Marshall Law. During such a strike, in order to cause as much damage to those who ignore the obvious as possible. No working, No purchasing (except required needs), NO TV at all (hit the MSM while we're at it), No driving, No nothing... Stay home... Period. Communications could simply be through Twitter or FaceBook (Don't you like using their methods against them). Further and for longer, no union made products should be purchased, nor should any establishment whose employees are represented by SEIU be patronized, until the rank and file of any particular union takes back control of their leadership and limit their activities to those directly affecting their members.

    People simply do not have the money to go to rallys, but a strike however will cause pain for the striker also. You may become delinquent on your bills (enough of that happening and the Banks and Corps will be changing their tune also.), lose your home or worse. But, is there any doubt that if something isn't done, that will happen anyway?

    This my friends is a bold new approach, but one that makes far more sense than those displayed in European countries. We are not anarchists, we are just fed up with a non representative congress and an administration that has gone totally out of control. Remember what Maggie said "The problem with socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people's money". IMHO No harm pointing this out, in the above manner, sooner rather than later.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This isn't your every day, run of the mill, political problem. We are in a full blown constitutional crises. A multi-million man march is the only way to resolve this. I don't care if the media covers it or not. After we lock up congress, a few media types, and Soetoro and co., the media can report whatever the fuck they want. I really couldn't care less. They're already lying in their reporting. Having a Birther Summit won't change their non-reporting on this issue. BTW, the birther summit is too little too late. It is not a good idea. I want serious action now.

    ReplyDelete
  17. All your march will do is provide them with exactly what they want, an excuse to declare Marshall Law. Not even the Obots can survive without money coming in. Marches, Rallys, Summits, they all require too long to organize. A strike can, if it goes viral, be very quick and have immediate effect that can not be manipulated or ignored. Think about it.

    Personally I feel the Obots are sometimes (note I said sometimes) the very ones suggesting massive marches on Washington. THEY NEED IT TO HAPPEN! It is to be done only after all else has failed.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Mairi

    Not at all unusual. In order to claim a child as a dependent, the child (1) must live with the taxpay more than one-half of the year and (2) the taxpayer must provide more than half of the child's support. Since Barack lived with his grandparents for at least the school year, then the first prong of the dependency test was not met. Stanley and Madelyn Dunham were entitled to claim him as their dependent.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This bunch of crap called "documents" proves NOTHING to me except one thing. The Obummer is NOT the son of Obama, Sr. or Stanley Ann Dunham! All of those handwritten notes could have been written yesterday. And yes they do still sell typewriters so take NOTHING at face value. IMO he's an illegitimate son of Barry Rockefeller, born outside of the USA. Bar(Barry) Rack(Rockefeller). Say it out loud. And they always take care of "their own". Makes more sense than saying he's the son of a BLACK (note - dark black) man from Kenya and a white woman from Hawaii. Either way he's not my president & has got to go!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. "Will@11:13
    Did you not notice that ONLY Maya was claimed on the income tax form? Were Grandma and Grandpa already in charge of Barry? How unusual that she was not claiming him as a "dependent child" on her return......"

    Barry is not named as a dependent on Ann's Income Tax form? Barry Soetoro [Barack Obama] may not have been her natural child. No one ever saw Ann Dunham as being pregnant. Barry was the child of a Honolulu bar prostitute and Obama Sr. was possibly the father. Ann was given the baby to raise as her own. That's my theory.

    ReplyDelete
  21. audit all the tax returns...find barry

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Anonymous

    im telling everybody call rush limbaugh today and every day and sean hannity also. if necessary call on a subject and then abruptly change the subject to the obama forged birth certificate and blurt out as much as possible before he drops you. this will get the word out to his listeners and they will get curious as to why they are avoiding the subject. if nothing else call the screnner and talk about the forgery. the more calls sends the word to limbaugh and hannity that we are on to them as phonies and traitors and cowards. it may just take one caller bringing up the subject and putting out as much as possible before being dropped to break into the media on this. it worked before to a great extent and we have to try this. it just takes phone calls. we can embarrass limbaugh and hannity until they come around.

    *****************************

    I love the idea, your passion and confidence in the success of this kind of strategy. Thumbs up, patriot. I'm in.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Anonymous

    How about you familiarize yourself with the instructions for tax returns before spouting s*** like this. You make the birthers look stupid, calling for adherence to the "rule of law" and then demonstrating their ignorance of how the law treats (non) dependents for tax purposes.

    Barry COULD NOT BE CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT because he did not live with Ann. Duh. Get a clue, would ya?

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Mairi

    Yes and someone had to claim him. Someone should look into grandparents tax returns if possible and see if they claimed him.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Is there anyway to download this report without a facebook account? Does anyone have a link? I don't have Facebook and don't want one, but I would like a complete copy of the FOIA.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Matt

    Why push it off onto "someone"? Matt, how about if YOU make a FOIA request for the Dunhams' tax returns.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous

    Good point. I thought of that as I wrote the comment.

    ReplyDelete
  28. ANON SAID
    Barry is not named as a dependent on Ann's Income Tax form? Barry Soetoro [Barack Obama] may not have been her natural child. No one ever saw Ann Dunham as being pregnant. Barry was the child of a Honolulu bar prostitute and Obama Sr. was possibly the father. Ann was given the baby to raise as her own. That's my theory.

    ANOTHER ANON REPLIED

    @Anonymous

    How about you familiarize yourself with the instructions for tax returns before spouting s*** like this. You make the birthers look stupid, calling for adherence to the "rule of law" and then demonstrating their ignorance of how the law treats (non) dependents for tax purposes.

    Barry COULD NOT BE CLAIMED AS A DEPENDENT because he did not live with Ann. Duh. Get a clue, would ya?

    ME SAYS
    Cant help but notice now agititated people get when the official birth narrative is challenged.
    I myself have had to fight to out neither Obama Snr Nor Stanly man dunham have ever been shown to the the true birth parents, and when i pointed out Mr Corsis assumes stanley anne is his mother, i got attacked vemonously.
    I wonder why?

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Anonymous

    Then if that is so and it may be, why did obama snr mention Roy who was foreign born, and not cover him up?

    Barack Obama's half-brother, also known as Abongo or Roy, born c. March, 1958,[85] son of Barack Obama, Sr. with his first wife, Kezia.[89] Malik Obama was born and raised in Nairobi, Kenya.[90]


    And if it is true that Obama jnr was registered covertly as born in Hawaiia as mr Jerome corsi maintains, then why didnt OBAMA snr carry on The Hawaian birth myth when filling out those forms?
    The only conclusion one can logically come to with all the evidence is Obama Snr was not the father, nothing else makes sense when you look at all the factual circumstances these official forms help us to verify.

    ReplyDelete
  30. For all of those readers who want to do something now: meet me for the BIRFDAY PARTY beginning at the SCOTUS on AUGUST 4, 2011 at high noon!!! Look for the INVERTED AMERICAN flag(s). We will speak, shout, sing, throw water balloons, stamp dollars, and march to the White House where we will do it again!!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Barry is not named as a dependent on Ann's Income Tax form? Barry Soetoro [Barack Obama] may not have been her natural child. No one ever saw Ann Dunham as being pregnant. Barry was the child of a Honolulu bar prostitute and Obama Sr. was possibly the father. Ann was given the baby to raise as her own. That's my theory.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.