Monday, June 20, 2011


Private Investigators Respond To Snopes Article 
On Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number

Private Investigators respond to Leftist husband and wife team called Snopes regarding their latest piece on Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants.

Response from private investigators Susan Daniels and Niel Sankey:

Susan Daniels: SNOPES is right. Obama is not using Jean Paul Ludwig’s CT social security number. He is using someone else’s. And in their delight in denouncing the use of Ludwig’s, they include a new addition to the Social Security Administration’s website that says a person does not have to live in the state for which the number has been set aside. That was never written there before Obama’s fraudulent use of his number was challenged.

Attached in the current information at SSA for filing for a number is the following. “NOTE: If you are age 12 or older and have never received a Social Security number, you must apply in person.”

Obama allegedly got his CT number of 042-68-4425 in March ’77, which can be proven since the person before him -4424 and after him -4429 both got theirs then.

Next is: “Show an address where you can receive you card 7 to 14 days from now” and a web address “to find the Social Security office or Social Security Card Center that serves your area.” Is there a single rational person in this country who believes a fifteen year old flew from HI to CT to get a social security number when he could have gotten his there?

Later this month they are going to start issuing the cards randomly. I think to prevent exactly what happened with Obama and his phony number. They were never randomly assigned before.

For him to have a CT number, there has to be at the SSA a form SS-5 that is hand-written (like the other numbers around his) and has a CT address where he was living. It doesn’t exist. Now that we have seen the phony “birth certificate,” let’s see the phony SS-5.

The other documents, which are self-explanatory, are a compilation of those I have found and some that were sent to me. The important documents included his falsified Selective Service application and the Selective Service Verification, which is a government run site. Of course, you won’t be able to pull up Obama’s because they shut his down — but not until after I printed it. You will find on it the last four numbers of his CT SSN. You can test its accuracy if you were in the military. Google Selective Service Verification, input the required information and watch yours Selective Service information pop up. -Private Investigator Susan Daniels

Neil Sankey: I will simply agree with, and support what Susan says.

This Ludwig story was not of my doing either, and I had no part in it, it was well subsequent to the compilation of lists and other data. I am firmly of the belief that these matters should be thoroughly and properly investigated, but by the correct Authorities who have the power to access the necessary material at source, i.e. the FBI, CIA etc. My job, as a concerned citizen with experience in this field is to raise the matter and present it for such investigation. I also performed that function with the lists I provided to Doctor Taitz, which are now exhibits in her lawsuits. They are not verified, or presented as being accurate, other than that that is the data that is available in public record. It should / MUST be properly investigated by the proper Authorities. If not THEY must answer to God (they took the oath) and the American People,whom they are supposed to protect. -Private Investigator Neil SANKEY

More details on Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants can be found here.





LiveLeak.com: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify - FULL INTERVIEW HERE

Failed E-Verify Letter to Barack Obama From Linda Jordan - Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number - LETTER HERE 

New Details: SSA Found Discrepancy in Obama's Social Security Number Record - DETAILS HERE 

Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. MORE HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-guilty-of-at-least-one-felony.html 

Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here. 

Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration
19 Dec 2011: Wash Times Ad - Obama SSN Fails E-Verify System - Support New Article II Super PAC Org

68 comments:

  1. What next, will the courts start to quote Snopes as a verifiable source rather than see actual evidence?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I tried to verify Obama's just now and received this message: Sorry.
    We apologize. Your request cannot be processed at this time because we are experiencing technical difficulties. One of our system components is not operational. We are aware of and are currently attempting to correct the problem. Please try again later. (6/20/2011 7:55:57 PM)

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Is there a single rational person in this country who believes a fifteen year old flew from HI to CT to get a social security number when he could have gotten his there?"

    Huh? He didn't have to fly anywhere. I applied by mail in the 1970s. At that time all applications were sent to Baltimore. Even today, when forms are processed in the local offices, one can still mail the SS-5 unless he/she lives in one of five metropolitan areas (Honolulu not included). From the SSA's website:

    "Where To SEND The Form"

    "Take (OR MAIL) your completed application and documents to your local Social Security office. ... Be sure to take or MAIL either the original copy of your document or a photocopy or extract of the original record certified by the issuing agency along with the form."

    http://www.ssa.gov/online/ss-5.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous - I think the operative word in your comment is "local" social security office!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Isn't the meat in the fact that when the SSA was asked to verify the number used (CT) with O's name attached to it, it came up as no match - that combination was never issued??

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ignore, Fakecheck and all the Commie propaganda sites.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Anonymous

    Check the SSDI for numbers around Oscamas and they are all from CT.

    If its a typo, why not just give Orly the copy?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was born in Arizona in 1973. My mother did not apply for my SS# until 1986. I lived in Texas at the time she applied. My SS# has a prefix of 601 which is an AZ SS#, where I was born, even though the application was made in Texas. The same went for my sister. Apparently, your SS# is decided on where you were born, NOT where you applied.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Retired Intelligence OfficerJune 20, 2011 at 8:25 PM

    On a side note. Michelle Bachmann allows her long form birth certificate on display for all to see in a Iowa courthouse. She's showing transparency for 'We The People'.


    Story:
    http://wcfcourier.com/iowacaucus/profiles/michele_bachmann/article_b6b338a5-a51f-5bee-9c3f-7814f534191e.html

    Monday, June 20, 2011

    WATERLOO, Iowa --- Considering the controversy over President Barack Obama's birth certificate, it only made sense to get the issue out of the way early for presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann.

    Bachmann was born in Waterloo in 1956, and her birth certificate is on file at the Black Hawk County Recorders Office.

    The copy is tucked away in a faded green 6-inch-thick hard-cover tome on the second floor of the courthouse on page 104 along with birth certificates of three other people.

    Anyone can look at the book and take notes, but copying birth certificates is only allowed for relatives, a recorders office staff member said.

    The "Certificate of Live Birth" states that Michele Marie Amble --- her maiden name --- was born April 6, 1956, at Allen Memorial Hospital.

    It lists her mother by her own maiden name, Arlene Jean Johnson. She was 24 at the time and born in Mason City.

    The father is David John Amble, then 26, a native of Adams, Minn. His occupation was "student" at Iowa State Teachers College, the predecessor of the University of Northern Iowa.

    The family home at the time was 210 E. Ninth St., Waterloo. The birth certificate was signed by Dr. Howard P. Treichler.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Actually, it does not stretch the imagination to believe that SSA is like most other Government agencies: FUBAR. Only God knows if there's any rhyme or reason as to how they issued their numbers.It will be interesting to hear the testimony given in court (if we ever get there).
    ELmo

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think where O'blabla is concerned, it should be investigated as to whether or not he is using a SS# originally given to someone else. SSA does NOT reissue #'s.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @MIDDLE CLASS GUY
    "Ignore Fakecheck.." I suppose you are referring to "Factcheck[dot]org"
    Well, I , for one- will not as they are one of the few such mouth-pieces that has stated succinctly , clearly why B.O. Jr is ineligible to the Office of President of the United States
    He was born a Citizen of the United Kingdom & Colonies; HIS citizenship status "GOVERNED BY" the laws of a foreign power
    They've put it out there for all the world to marvel; if 'the world' chooses to turn a blind eye , then so be it
    The rest of US can only continue to hammer away at this inescapable truth

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous
    Wrong (ARIZ vs TX ) Your SS# is NOT "decided on where you were born" It issued based upon the mailing address provided on the application , perhaps you should talk to your mother re details of application

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for a nice share you have given to us with such an large collection of information. Great work you have done by sharing them to all. simply superb. Photo Recovery

    ReplyDelete
  15. From Susan Daniels:

    Nice try 'Anonymous." Your Poseur is a phony and would throw you under the bus in a heartbeat, if it benefitted him. He and "Michelle the Mooch" are out to grab everything they can. They are the White House equivalent of looters.

    How is that Hope and Change working for you?

    Like it or not, he's using someone else's SSN and it should scare the hell out of you and make you wonder why.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Anonymous

    Anonymous said...[Reply]
    I was born in Arizona in 1973. My mother did not apply for my SS# until 1986. I lived in Texas at the time she applied. My SS# has a prefix of 601 which is an AZ SS#, where I was born, even though the application was made in Texas. The same went for my sister. Apparently, your SS# is decided on where you were born, NOT where you applied.

    June 20, 2011 6:35 PM

    ===================================

    You stated that your mother applied for you while she was living in AZ.

    I was born in MI and applied when I was living in California in 1974. Guess what? My number is consistent with numbers reserved for California residents (563...).

    ReplyDelete
  17. The obotos are in serious denial if they think that eligibility of Obama/Dunham/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel to hold the office of the presidency is the only issue that's about to blow up in his face. Never before has our Republic ever elected such a criminal to the highest office in the land. Now America knows what it is like to be living under the control of a criminal syndicate in Chicago and Illinois.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And so the narrative begins by the LSM to allow Obama to walk away...

    The Increasingly Feeble Case for Obama's Reelection

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/06/21/here_come_the_extremists_110289.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Anonymous
    I was born in Oregon, got my SSN in Maryland about 1969 where I only lived a little over 2 years, and my SSN begins with "217". What about the theory that the clerks who processed Obama's app mistakenly entered a "0" instead of a "9" for the 1st digit of his zip code, resulting in a Connecticut zip code for his residence?

    ReplyDelete
  20. From the Social Security Administration web site:

    Area Number

    The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

    Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

    Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

    http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html

    ReplyDelete
  21. The Social Security Administration does screw up sometimes. Or does it?

    Two Alyssas share same name, birthdate -- and Social Security number
    http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/06/two-alyssas-share-the-same-name-birthdate----and-social-security-number/1?csp=34

    Delco Woman Given Same SSN as NY Woman
    Government gave same social security number to two women in two separate states
    http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Delco-Woman-Given-Same-SSN-as-NY-Woman-95779019.html

    I find it more than coincidental that both of these stories were reported in June 2010 and the CN social security number story broke no later than May 2010. Also odd is that neither of the duplicate social security number stories report on how the mistakes might have been made.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Huh? He didn't have to fly anywhere. I applied by mail in the 1970s.....

    =================================================
    Uh, what 15 year old do you know who is thinking about applying for a SS# at that age? The mind of a 15 year old is far from thinking about applying for a SS#, if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @MIDDLE CLASS GUY

    Egg-zactly! Snopes.com is a liberal husband/wife team and Factcheck.com is Soros financed.

    Can't believe either one. Disinformation websites set up to confuse and befuddled rather than clarify.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I don't know how true the article shown on the link below is, but it's worth a read: Obama's multiple social security numbers linked to his former occupation as a CIA asset:

    http://novakeo.com/?p=6138

    ReplyDelete
  25. Look at all these nutjobs trying to defend Obama. And for what? It's not like they even have a clue who the guy is anyway.

    What kind of moron would defend someone they don't even know who is? Because they voted for him? Because they have a hunch? No. It's because they believe in him. And once someone starts 'believing' something, facts no longer matter. Ignorance ensues, and we are left with a bunch of useful ignorant idiots who support a fraud, sadly never realizing how dumb and slave like they've become to their ideologies.

    They would do the world well to simply perish.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Anonymous

    "that combination was never issued??"

    How could it have never been issued, what about the person born in 1890? Shouldn't their name come up?

    ReplyDelete
  27. All I'm interested in is why there's no pending investigation, clearly there is plenty of reason for there to be one and yet its taken until the beginning of his campaign for re-election to even provide a copy of his birth certificate, not even the original, which should have been provided before he was even considered to be a candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  28. SSN where born?

    My mother born in Mass. Moved to AZ. Got SSN in AZ when she got a job. SSN is an AZ number.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Is this the calm before the storm or did this issue just die? What the hell is going on? Why isn't Farah, Corsi, Vogt and all the prominent birthers and bloggers holding a convention or a press conference with the evidence? COORDINATE DAMMIT! Nobody seems to give a shit anymore. Everything has gone quiet...What is ORYR going to find in Hawaii and Indonesia that Corsi hasn't already uncovered. These global bastards and Obot drones are winning and everyone else is on vacation...Fucking bullshit!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Snopes should have the Obama campaign symbol in the middle of their "O"

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Anonymous
    I was born in Oregon, got my SSN in Maryland about 1969 where I only lived a little over 2 years, and my SSN begins with "217".

    And your point is...?

    What about the theory that the clerks who processed Obama's app mistakenly entered a "0" instead of a "9" for the 1st digit of his zip code, resulting in a Connecticut zip code for his residence?

    Then wouldn't the CT zip cause the card to be undeliverable by the USPS?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Anonymous

    Huh? He didn't have to fly anywhere. I applied by mail in the 1970s.....

    =================================================
    Uh, what 15 year old do you know who is thinking about applying for a SS# at that age? The mind of a 15 year old is far from thinking about applying for a SS#, if you know what I mean.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Uh, me when I was 15. I applied for my Social Security number, also by mail and also in 1979, when I was 15 years old so that I could work my first job. The labor laws in Texas at that time permitted 15 year olds to work a very limited number of part time hours per week.

    Don't know what the Texas labor laws are for kids nowadays; for all I know, the Feds have taken that power from the states, too, and make those calls now. But that's irrelevant to this discussion, anyway, because nowadays, most, if not all, 15 year olds have been registered with Social Security for at least a decade already. In order for their parents to list their names as deductions on the income taxes, they had to register them with the Social Security Administration by the age of five (I think it's age five...could be younger).

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Hotlanta Mike
    And so the narrative begins by the LSM to allow Obama to walk away...

    The Increasingly Feeble Case for Obama's Reelection

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/06/21/here_come_the_extremists_110289.html
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    If Barky isn't reelected, that will be a good thing.

    Birthers need to understand and accept these two things:

    1) Just as a bank robber doesn't have to be caught red-handed during the bank robbery in order to be charged, tried, convicted and punished for robbing the bank, if Barky is ever held accountable for running for and taking control of the position of POTUS while knowing he's not eligible for the position, it doesn't have to be while he's still in office. Helping Barky's reelection efforts, even if it's just by not voting voting for his opposition, will be a very stupid, destructive thing to do, akin to cutting off one's nose to spite one's face except that it's the entire country's nose and face you'll be destroying.

    2) Barky may very well simply walk away and never face justice for this and the many other crimes he's committed. Frankly, every day that possibility appears more likely. That won't likely be changed by a second term because time, or the lack of it, hasn't been the obstacle. His being voted out of office will not mean a lost opportunity for justice. In fact, a second term with him and his band of criminals at the helm could mean the end of justice and all opportunity in America.

    IF BARKY ISN'T ELECTED TO A SECOND TERM, THAT WILL BE A GOOD THING.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @AuntieMadder

    The big problem with Obama and anomolies is that there are so damn many.

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Anonymous

    He's their man.

    It reminds me of a story on Stalin on History channel. People were actually writing Stalin begging him to save them. What they couldn't phathom was that Stalin was the one screwing them.

    These goofy Obots actually think Oscama cares about them. He would chuck them under the buss faster than Rev Wright or William Ayers.

    They are definitely tools.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @AuntieMadder

    No matter what he will alwyas be using a bogus SSN so he will always be committing a crime.
    Sooner or later he will get popped.

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Matt

    "People were actually writing Stalin begging him to save them. What they couldn't phathom was that Stalin was the one screwing them.

    These goofy Obots actually think Oscama cares about them. He would chuck them under the buss faster than Rev Wright or William Ayers.

    They are definitely tools."

    ******************************

    Isn't that just exactly the situation. Great post. Stalin had an appropriate term for them, too: "Useful Idiots."

    My own thinking is that their devotion to Obama springs from an immature inability to cope with the possibility of the pain of the emotion of disappointment, having invested so much energy and personal feeling into the left-wing ideology; they would rather live in a dream world than face an unpleasant reality that hurts them. This is nothing new, of course, but it might bear closer reflection in context. It will help us if we can better understand the opposition, because from a rational perspective, their current devotion to Obama makes not one iota of sense to anyone with an educated understanding of the situation and the world.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous said:
    Is this the calm before the storm or did this issue just die? What the hell is going on? Why isn't Farah, Corsi, Vogt and all the prominent birthers and bloggers holding a convention or a press conference with the evidence? COORDINATE DAMMIT! Nobody seems to give a shit anymore. Everything has gone quiet...What is ORYR going to find in Hawaii and Indonesia that Corsi hasn't already uncovered. These global bastards and Obot drones are winning and everyone else is on vacation...Fucking bullshit!!
    -------------------------------------
    AMEN & DITTO! I feel the exact same way!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. So why Did Barry have trouble getting a SS number in HI at age 15? Was he still and adopted indonesian or maybe he lacked proper birth documentation. Red flags a flying EVERYWHERE!

    ReplyDelete
  40. All, Please don't confuse all the left-wing nuts with "facts." Facts don't mean anything to someone who is "in love."

    ReplyDelete
  41. This is just another spectacle of 'kicking the can down the road.'

    Judge Surrick refused to analyze Obama's citizenship at birth, let alone the framer's intent of 'natural born citizenship,' because they knew they would embarass the first 'black' president/candidate.

    SCOTUS knows that there are conflicts between the framer's intent confirmed in Minor v Happersett, compared to the careless abuse of the term of art in other cases, e.g., Liakakos, Diaz-Salazar, Ankeny.

    One last word: Citizenship at Birth merely by being born on U.S. soil is a misreading of our naturalization law, and a hucksterish myth created by a judge in 1898 who violated his own stare decisis.

    Therefore, 'natural born citizenship' being determined by being born in Hawaii is a sham.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Anonymous

    "What about the theory that the clerks who processed Obama's app mistakenly entered a "0" instead of a "9" for the 1st digit of his zip code, resulting in a Connecticut zip code for his residence?"

    In that case the mailing envelope would have had the same typo and no doubt would have been returned to sender as undeliverable and the error would have been corrected.

    Even if I am wrong, the point is were this the only irregularity in Obama's past one might overlook it; but it would seem his whole life is nothing but one mysterious irregularity after another.

    He simply has too many fraudulent documents associated with him. And when you throw in the ridculously photoshopped/doctored family photos and the parliament of a foreign nation calling him their own native born son, well, it's a bit too much don't ya think?

    And then there's all the 'splaining over autobiography ghost writer terrorist Ayers who wrote Dreams From My Father; Tony Rezko and real estate fraud; cozy relations with Hamas operatives; Jeremiah Wright, etc., etc, etc.

    BTW, where are the girl friends from his past when he was quite a handsome stud back in the day? Ya know, back when he was snorting coke and passing joints in da hood or on campus? How about just one, just one girl friend from college or high school?

    Better yet, why did some low level criminal involved in a scheme to access Obama's passport records get blown away with a single bullet to the head shortly after being released on bail?

    And why . . .

    And why . . .

    And why . . .

    ReplyDelete
  43. FYI---Go to the SSA death index and search the Obama SS number first 5 digits- you will get a list of all deceased individuals from xxx-xxx-0001 to 9999.
    Look at the addresses and see where everyone lived who applied for a SS#- they all resided in CT, not Hawaii, not California, not Indiana- it's CT, people- a state that Obama never lived in. Federal agencies/courts are aiding and abetting this Obama fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Make that. "Phony birth certificates," plural.

    It's the short-form that got him elected and protected in office for three years. The sources of that forgery?

    The St. Petersburg Times D/B/A Politifact.com & Annenberg Public Policy Center D/B/A Factcheck.org.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @Anonymous

    Corsi has made regular apearances at the National Press Club and on FOXNEWS.

    The libtard bullshit media don't have the balls to invite him.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Snopes is a joke! The Mikklesons totally gravy-train off of Factcheck.org, Politifact.com, and the Obama Campaign's Fight The Smears.

    They are incompetent, lying news aggreators who parrot the exact same talking points as those other "nonpartisan fact-checkers."

    Want an example?

    In my book, I did a three-way comparison on their take regarding Obozo's "crotch salute" during the playing of the National Anthem while Clinton and Harkin had their hands on their hearts.

    Their articles were written in verbatim.

    They did the same for their stories (or should I say, "story") on Jeremiah Wright's Black Spearatist Chuch, TCC. Even used the same token white guy to say that the church is not anti-white.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I was born in Mississippi but we lived in CA when I applied at age 12 or so, and I got back a MS card with a 428 prefix. Soon after, "they" began to come for me at night, first just probing me but later taking me to the main ship, where I learned how many there were, the different types, and was taught of their ways.

    ReplyDelete
  48. At least they're not calling us crazy any more, for thinking Obama's not a citizen. They know he's not American, LOL, they've gotten kind of muted, haven't they? Makes me wonder what Obama's end game is, if he knows we're all going to figure out he was bald-faced lying to us. Very strange, I think the man is breaking down. He knows he's going to be found out as a complete phony, in every sense, intellectually and otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  49. You are right the SSA does screw up from time to time but this is not a screw up simply because it must occur in Connecticut and the arguments allude to other states. That said, I checked the deceased data base for my parents and great uncle. None of them appear on that list. In other words, even though they have been dead for a decade to three decades the numbers are still active.

    ReplyDelete
  50. @Anonymous

    I received my first SS card in 1963, and we had to go to our local "Post Office" to apply, back then---because it fulfilled the requirement to "apply in person" (we lived over 50 miles from the nearest SS Office).

    ReplyDelete
  51. I thank all the true American Patriots out there today!
    We will prevail! Keep up the fight, reject the New World Order!

    -Minuteman Vegas Sheepdog

    ReplyDelete
  52. It's the ObamaMafia that is well-funded, heavily embedded, completely oblivious to the consequences of their actions and will snuff out any outspoken, Patriot whom comes forward with damning evidence which could incriminate them. We have no other choice people but to, at the very least, vote for anyone other than the current POTUS, and contacting your senators and representatives demanding that they hold these criminals (including the elusive, current AG Mr. EH) accountable or they will not be re-elected. This has to be done in order to combat this Gestapo.

    ReplyDelete
  53. "042-68-4425" is not and never was Obama's Social Security number.

    ReplyDelete
  54. @Anonymous

    Yes it is. As confirmed by the Selective Service website and Obama's tax returns posted at the White House website.

    That is not even in dispute.

    ReplyDelete
  55. My husband and I are both born in NYC. We have 2 different prefixes to our SS#. 122 and 051. Can you explain?

    ReplyDelete
  56. @Anonymous

    Your SS# prefix is not based on the place of your birth. It is based on where you registered for a SS#.

    Both the 122 and 051 SS# prefix are NY prefixes.

    051-XX-XXXX - New York

    http://socialsecuritynumerology.com/prefixes.php/051

    122-XX-XXXX - New York

    http://socialsecuritynumerology.com/prefixes.php/122

    All of New York -

    050-XX-XXXX - New York
    051-XX-XXXX - New York
    052-XX-XXXX - New York
    053-XX-XXXX - New York
    054-XX-XXXX - New York
    055-XX-XXXX - New York
    056-XX-XXXX - New York
    057-XX-XXXX - New York
    058-XX-XXXX - New York
    059-XX-XXXX - New York
    060-XX-XXXX - New York
    061-XX-XXXX - New York
    062-XX-XXXX - New York
    063-XX-XXXX - New York
    064-XX-XXXX - New York
    065-XX-XXXX - New York
    066-XX-XXXX - New York
    067-XX-XXXX - New York
    068-XX-XXXX - New York
    069-XX-XXXX - New York
    070-XX-XXXX - New York
    071-XX-XXXX - New York
    072-XX-XXXX - New York
    073-XX-XXXX - New York
    074-XX-XXXX - New York
    075-XX-XXXX - New York
    076-XX-XXXX - New York
    077-XX-XXXX - New York
    078-XX-XXXX - New York
    079-XX-XXXX - New York
    080-XX-XXXX - New York
    081-XX-XXXX - New York
    082-XX-XXXX - New York
    083-XX-XXXX - New York
    084-XX-XXXX - New York
    085-XX-XXXX - New York
    086-XX-XXXX - New York
    087-XX-XXXX - New York
    088-XX-XXXX - New York
    089-XX-XXXX - New York
    090-XX-XXXX - New York
    091-XX-XXXX - New York
    092-XX-XXXX - New York
    093-XX-XXXX - New York
    094-XX-XXXX - New York
    095-XX-XXXX - New York
    096-XX-XXXX - New York
    097-XX-XXXX - New York
    098-XX-XXXX - New York
    099-XX-XXXX - New York
    100-XX-XXXX - New York
    101-XX-XXXX - New York
    102-XX-XXXX - New York
    103-XX-XXXX - New York
    104-XX-XXXX - New York
    105-XX-XXXX - New York
    106-XX-XXXX - New York
    107-XX-XXXX - New York
    108-XX-XXXX - New York
    109-XX-XXXX - New York
    110-XX-XXXX - New York
    111-XX-XXXX - New York
    112-XX-XXXX - New York
    113-XX-XXXX - New York
    114-XX-XXXX - New York
    115-XX-XXXX - New York
    116-XX-XXXX - New York
    117-XX-XXXX - New York
    118-XX-XXXX - New York
    119-XX-XXXX - New York
    120-XX-XXXX - New York
    121-XX-XXXX - New York
    122-XX-XXXX - New York
    123-XX-XXXX - New York
    124-XX-XXXX - New York
    125-XX-XXXX - New York
    126-XX-XXXX - New York
    127-XX-XXXX - New York
    128-XX-XXXX - New York
    129-XX-XXXX - New York
    130-XX-XXXX - New York
    131-XX-XXXX - New York
    132-XX-XXXX - New York
    133-XX-XXXX - New York
    134-XX-XXXX - New York

    http://socialsecuritynumerology.com/prefixes.php

    ReplyDelete
  57. I was born in Japan but I applied at the SSA office in Pearl City, HI when I was 15 in 1964 to get a job. My # starts with the prefix 575 and my husband 576 and all my family and friends that filed in Hawai'i all have the same prefixes even if they weren't born there. So RAZZ! @anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Anonymous

    I got my SS# in 1963. There were NO "local offices" back then---you had to send it to the main SS Center, for your state.

    Back in the 1960s, ALL SS#s were identified by the state you resided in---NONE were "random."

    I'm from Kansas, so the first 3 digits of ALL SS#s back then began with 515 or 513.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @Anonymous

    No, SS#s were NOT decided by the state in which you were born. I was born in Virginia, but I lived in Kansas when I first applied, in 1963. I received the Kansas-designated number---either 515 or 513.

    ReplyDelete
  60. @AuntieMadder

    The SSN website only recently began stating this. It put this on its website the same week that they gave themselves the "authority" to destroy SS-5 records from previous years. Which puts us genealogists in a world of hurt, because SS-5 Forms allowed us to track migrations of our ancestors!!!

    ReplyDelete
  61. The SS# prefix is based on where you apply for the SS# not where you were born.

    ReplyDelete
  62. @Anonymous

    With all the comments it still looks like something is up. This is the number on his tax return, so it is his. If his first job was in Hawaii, then the number is wrong, whether he was born there or not. Meaning his number should still be a Hawaiian number.

    ReplyDelete
  63. My son was born in Louisiana but I applied for his SS card in Kentucky. His number is from Kentucky. He was born in 1975 but I applied in the 1980's..go figure.

    ReplyDelete
  64. "My son was born in Louisiana but I applied for his SS card in Kentucky. His number is from Kentucky. He was born in 1975 but I applied in the 1980's..go figure."

    Correct. It is where the social security number is applied from not where the person may be born.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Hotlanta Mike 'Mike' you stated that the OP said her mother applied for her SS# while living in ZA, clearly that is NOT what she wrote, as copied and pasted below. She was clear: her mother did NOT apply for a SS# until they moved to Texas, and she was born in AZ, receiving an AZ prefix SS# of 601

    "I was born in Arizona in 1973. My mother did not apply for my SS# until 1986. I lived in Texas at the time she applied. My SS# has a prefix of 601 which is an AZ SS#, where I was born, even though the application was made in Texas."

    ReplyDelete
  66. So he was born in Connecticut?

    ReplyDelete
  67. "So he was born in Connecticut?"

    +++++

    Who knows where he was born. But, he's using a social security number reserved for Connecticut applicants.

    Keep in mind the social security number prefix doesn't represent place of birth but the state the social security number was applied for in.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous

    Even if you don't apply for a SS# in your birth state, don't you have to be a resident of the
    state in which you make your application for a
    a SS#?

    October 11, 2012

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.