Tuesday, May 24, 2011


Breaking News: Attorney Orly Taitz is reporting a subpoena was issued for Loretta Fuddy, the Director of Hawaii Health Department. The purported subpoena embedded below states Health Director Fuddy is to bring for inspection the original 1961 typewritten birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, II, on June 27th, 2011 at 10 am. *Please see comment section for updates...

This is related to the Taitz v. Astrue lawsuit in regards to Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants.

Subpoena for Loretta Fuddy, Director of Hawaii Health Department - 5/24/2011

Jerome Corsi: Criminal Fraud Committed By White House To Keep Obama In Office; Challenges Mainstream Media & Bill O'Reilly -Video here.

Corsi Smacks Down Radio Host Over The 14th Amendment And The Irrelevant, Non-Binding, Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana State Case -Video here.

Jerome Corsi To Release Details On Key Media Person Who Helped Create Obama's New Birth Certificate; Got AP's Mark Niesse!? -Video here.

Jerome Corsi: Obama Birth Certificate 100% Forged; Sources Say Hawaii Forged Obama's Certificate of Live Birth Placed It In DOH Book. -Video here.

Jerome Corsi's First Interview Post-Release of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President". -Video here.

News Release: Legal Proof That pResident Obama’s Certificate Of Live Birth Is A Forgery. -Details here.

Photoshop Expert & Author Mara Zebest Declares Obama's Latest Hawaiian Birth Certificate A Complete Phony -Details here.

Irrefutable Proof Obama's New Birth Certificate Forged Using Nordyke Birth Certificates -Details here.

Comparative Analysis By Pro Graphics & Special Effects: Trump Vs. Obama; Birth Certificate Fraud -Details here. 

Busted: White House Now Claims They Ordered Short-Form COLB From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008 Yet COLB Is Date Stamped 2007 -Details here. 

Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here. 

Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
News Realease: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Yes Virginia-There is a Usurper in the White House-Obama Long Form BC Forged! Wash Times NW 20110516 pg 5

84 comments:

  1. Retired Intelligence OfficerMay 24, 2011 at 11:29 AM

    Oh the White House isn't going to like this at all. Remember Fukino in a interview with MSNBC a week before Obama released the Abstract long form said his long form was half typed and half written and Albercrombies office said all they could find was something written, a notation. Fuddy needs to be monitered during this time as well as the Perkins Coie Lawyer who flew to allegedly pic up the documents.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's good news! Except for the fact that Hawaii has been in the bag for Obama all along.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where's the "Smiley Face" in Alvin T. Onaka's signature here -- LOL?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lies will be like land mines in this story...there are way too many to avoid getting blown sky high.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If this is true, now it can be authenticated, and compared to the phony one issued by the White House. Barry isn't going to like this much. Watch now for Eric Holder to sue to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Can someone explain what this means!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey! For us non lawyer types, i'd like to know more. Is this the real deal? Something that they have to comply with? Or just another thing that the courts tell us to shove the constitution up our butts and we never hear any more about it.

    Please! More explanation!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm trying to get more details...

    I don't think they can ignore a subpoena from a Federal Court...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Retired Intelligence OfficerMay 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM

    Hang on folks. A lawyer is saying this:

    1. Subpoenas in a civil matter are issued by a party. This is something she generated 100% on her own. The only signature on that subpoena is Taitz. Not a judge.

    2. Fuddy isn't "court ordered" to do anything. Again, it's Taitz issuing the subpoena, not the court.

    3. Taitz made the address of the deposition Fuddy's office. Someone cannot appear, or bring records, to the address at which they are served a subpoena. This makes the subpoena in essence a nullity.

    4. Fuddy and the DOH can ignore the subpoena. But, if they do file a motion to quash, it will absolutely most likely be granted.


    Can we have another lawyer chime in and verify this. I don't see a judges signature or a ADA. I hope this subpoena can be enforced and how did Taitz get her hands on a DC Subpoena?

    ReplyDelete
  10. This subpoena is being issued as the information to be derived from it is being used in a lawsuit against the Social Security Administration (Taitz v. Astrue) and its Director which refused under a FOIA request to turn over information to Taitz regarding the CT SSN that he allegedly has fraudulently obtained.

    The SSA and Astrue defaulted against Taitz, which is why she is proceeding with court action.


    The P&E has an article regarding the case.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/18/orly-taitz-default-judgment-due-in-obama-social-security-number-case/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not attempting to be over pessimistic,

    However, this is not the first time the DOH has been served to show cause of proof to claims, whereby they got out of it through the denial by a sitting Judge.

    Lt. Col. Lakins comes to mind.

    Lets only pray and hope, the judge in this case allows the supoena to be enforced.


    William Richardson

    ReplyDelete
  12. I may have misunderstood in my previous statement.

    Is this an order issued by the district court for subpoena, or an attempt to garnish and collect a subpoena from the Hawaii DOH by Dr. Orly Taitz through the current federal case?

    It appears to me, and again, I could be wrong, but wouldn't a Federal Subpoena issued by the court be signed by the Judge, not the attorney?

    I damm sure pray that the court has issued it, or at the least, allowed such issue to be granted by the requesting attorney.

    William Richardson

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here's a link to rule 45 on subpoenas.

    It looks like an explanation of what comes next starts in (C)(2)(b)

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm

    ReplyDelete
  14. If "Orly Taitz" had been in the headline, I would not even had clicked on the link.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Here's the last order by the court in Taitz v. Astrue lawsuit:

    [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ATTACHED EXHIBITS

    This court, having considered Defendants’(Astrue) Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Complaint, First Amended Complaint, and attached exhibits, It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s(Taitz) Complaint, First Amended Complaint, and all attached exhibit are stricken from the record. Plaintiff is directed to refile those documents under seal or with properly redacted social-security numbers.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/56179834/Taitz-v-Astrue-USDC-DC-Text-of-Proposed-Order-5-23-11

    ReplyDelete
  16. My train of thoughts,

    Considering a divorce case (civil) or a robbery (criminal) case, any Attorney can Subpoena for witnesses, for example. But unless that Subpoena is signed by the Judge to appear in court, its basically worthless and you as a citizen are not required to appear.

    But again, if signed by a Judge on that Subpoena to appear in court, you best do so, otherwise you are contempt of court. An Attorney cannot find you contempt of court of your don't respond to their subpoenas.

    That is my understanding. And of course, I could most likely be mistaken.

    William Richardson

    ReplyDelete
  17. I know if I received a subpoena and it didn't have a judges signature on it I would wipe my backside with it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If I'm not mistaken, the Lawyer is an officer of the court, with subpoena power, and the subpoena would be considered to be valid unless the Judge specifically denies it upon being contested.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Is Obama this crazy?
    D'oh! Forget '57 states,' Obama still thinks it's 2008
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=302953

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  20. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ATTACHED EXHIBITS..

    That says it all doesn't it?

    1) This court, having considered Defendants’(Astrue) Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Complaint,

    2) It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s(Taitz) Complaint, First Amended Complaint, and all attached exhibit are stricken from the record.

    3) Plaintiff is directed to refile those documents under seal or with properly redacted social-security numbers.


    It other words, the Social Security Administration does not want to be on public record discussing a damm thing about Obama's Connecticut issued SS number, instead, they want all filings, discussions and information provided to the court, under "Sealed Documents", outside the view of the public.....

    Go figure... and the court agrees.

    nothing to hide?

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anonymous

    No, wrong. Orly did not redact the Social Security numbers in her filings which is against the rules.

    She has two options according to the order.

    1: File the complaint under seal...

    OR

    2: Redact the Social Security numbers in her complaint(filing) and refile them with the court.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think Gary Kreep did this with Occidental College and their lawyers, connected with O's, threatened with guaranteed big time monetary sanctions if the subpoena was not withdrawn.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Isn't she by law able to refile using only the last 4 digits of the SS# in question?

    ReplyDelete
  24. ORYR,

    Then I would opt with number 2. Redact the SS number in her filings. Still I cannot help but wonder what the purpose of this is? Obama's SS number is all over the internet and is already public information. Why strike something from a court record that is public information and place it under a sealed document?

    That (to me) would be akin granting a motion to strike from the public, records showing I had a speeding ticket in 2003, and require the attorney to refile under a sealed motion (To hide from public - reason of a court seal) that I had a speeding ticket, in which the public has knowledge of currently. That makes no rational sense to me. I guess we can only see how this plays out.


    William Richardson

    ReplyDelete
  25. a Subpoena does not have to be signed by a judge. an attorney can do it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Does Orly ever get experienced professional guidance in proper procedure rather than just hoping personal zeal should overcome real world channels for getting things accomplished so they have future foundation to proceed?

    ReplyDelete
  27. California birther/dualer/doubterMay 24, 2011 at 1:27 PM

    Think Barry wrote "2008" on purpose so as to prove at his eventual criminal hearing that he is not of sound mind when asked to explain why he fabricated so much of his past?

    As for Orly's subpoena, here's hoping it has teeth to match the pearly whites of the squatter in the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  28. We can hope that the Motion to Strike will be denied because the SS#'s involved are already public knowledge, on the internet and not confidential. The "Oder Granting....." is just the "proposed text of the order" right now.

    ReplyDelete
  29. California birther/dualer/doubterMay 24, 2011 at 1:42 PM

    Speaking of fabrication, WND's Joseph Farah notes the irony in the Obots' "Made in the USA" campaign: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=302449

    Let's see if Hawaii DOH Director Loretta Fuddy Duddy plays along with the meme should she forced to produce the good.

    Someone should warn her to contemplate the stiff penalties that she faces should she try to do anything unseemly.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "We can hope that the Motion to Strike will be denied"

    I believe it was granted. I'm looking for the signed order...

    "Still I cannot help but wonder what the purpose of this is"

    Because it is the court rules...

    Only Obama can get away with not following the rules... ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Anonymous

    "Can someone explain what this means!!!"


    It means just what it says it means. That judge Lamberth gave the go ahead for Taitz to go after Obama's COLB that he showed to the world on the Internet so it can inspected in his court and entered into the record. This also means that Loretta Fuddy duddy has to show up in Federal court to be questioned by Taitz.

    I suspect that Taitz not only has been given the go ahead to subpoena the birf certificate, she also has the power given by the court to subpoena every and all records that Hawaii has that supports Obama's alleged COLB to include the "transactions logs." We could be seeing more subpeana orders to Hawaii.

    And this case is also about Obama's CT Social Security number where the government is stalling to release those records. They are likely to be forced to produce the SS application for 042-68-4425.


    I have no doubt that Obama and his lieywers will try to squash the subpoena(s), by trying to get Lamberth to change his mind, or get another federal judge to countermand the subpoena(s) by stepping on Lamberth's feet. I don't think that they will successful, but you never know with this corrupt Obama administration.

    RS

    ReplyDelete
  32. California birther/dualer/doubterMay 24, 2011 at 1:54 PM

    Even a computer is not too pleased about the chalaque who cleverly maneuvered his way into being a squatter in the White House: http://tinyurl.com/3ow7y3g

    At least it didn't call him a Punjabi word for snake in the grass.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @ObamaRelease YourRecords

    I've got a Pacer account and the courts decision on the motion or the signed order hasn't shown up yet.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Obama is the only president that was not eligible to hold the office because of his parents citizenship status. If he cant be removed from office after 2 years and 4 months for not being eligible then we are in a dictatorship and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous 1:26
    =====================
    But it can only be enforced by a judge.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @ 1:26 p.m.
    "a Subpoena does not have to be signed by a judge. an attorney can do it."

    Orly filed this case pro se. She doesn't have a lawyer, and can't sign a subpoena herself. Only a lawyer admitted to practice in the district can sign a subpoena. She has to get the clerk to issue it. And a subpoena issued in Washington D.C. is not valid in Hawaii. She should have gotten the court in Hawaii to issue the subpoena.

    It's Orly, kids. She never gets anything right. She's the worst lawyer in the history of the planet. Your dog is a better lawyer than Orly. The booger you just picked out of your nose is a better lawyer than Orly.

    That's why I love her so!

    ReplyDelete
  37. @Retired Intelligence Officer
    I predict a fire or flood or something that will prevent the document that doesn't exist from being copied or Fuddy will turn up dead very soon like the passport guy.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Whatever happened to Hollister and his discovery about the SSN? He had both the CT SSN from the Selective Service form as well as the "no match" reply from SSA between Obama name and that SSN he used.

    ReplyDelete
  39. It's issued by the wrong court...and, lo and behold, Taitz is trying to circumvent to rules of subpoena and gerrymander the law AGAIN. This is useless and will be quashed very soon. Don't say I didn't tell you, but Taitz is an idiot, and if you believe anything she says you are a fool.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Anonymous
    Probably just another stall tactic to make it harder to get the info.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The courts are just making it more and more apparent that they are corrupt, and that they are aiding and abetting criminal forgery, identity theft, and false personation of a US President.

    ReplyDelete
  42. A problem with the subpoena could be FRCP 45 (3) (A) (iii):

    FRCP Rule 45 - Subpoena

    (3) - Quashing or Modifing a Subpoena

    (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that:

    (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or

    The DOH would argue that vital records are privileged.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Has anybody seen this?
    Page 12 of the PDF is particularly interesting.

    http://theobamahustle.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/addresses-for-barack-obama-in-a-50-state-search2.pdfa>

    ReplyDelete
  44. If I remember right, an exception does apply according to Hawaii regulations. If the document is requested by a legal proceeding or court.

    ReplyDelete
  45. The usurper needs to be jailed.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Oops, link didn't work.

    http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com

    PDf is the first link on the page.
    Page 12

    ReplyDelete
  47. Lord-a-mercy!

    Looks like Soros in drag!

    ReplyDelete
  48. For a legal proceeding according to Hawaii's statutes, all she would get is a verification of a vital event. Not the right to view or inspect the BC. Also since President Obama is not a party to the suit, it is doubtful she would even get that.

    ReplyDelete
  49. @ObamaRelease YourRecords

    IT - IS - THE - DOC - TOR! EX - TER - MI- NATE! EX - TERRRR - MINNNN - ATE!

    ReplyDelete
  50. http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/04/perkins-coie-judith-corley-got-obamas-birth-certificate.html

    ReplyDelete
  51. american patriotMay 24, 2011 at 6:02 PM

    its time for rope and pitch forks and a little visit to the white house and congress. if the courts wont do the right thing its time for us to. it is our right and duty to defend ourselves and our nation. and please you obots get in our way. ridding our nation of you will be next on our list. keep it up guys obamas out of town and itll be a nice surprise for his return to justice.

    ReplyDelete
  52. WE are definitely living under a dictatorship. That being said, nothing anyone does is going to matter, obviously. All is a waste of time, money, and effort. Dictators understand one thing. Us, ourselves, removing Soetoro is the only way. Congress is guilty along with the courts. Soetoro made his move. We must make ours by surrounding the capitol and demand Soetoro be arrested.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Fuck, I'm with AmericanPatriot now. I say lets go to Washington and have ourselves a little fun. Lets ask our congressmen, "You work for who now?" In other words, lets go kick some ass. It doesn't matter if the rest of you see this way. Its only a matter of time before everyone sees this is the only way.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Retired Intelligence OfficerMay 24, 2011 at 6:23 PM

    @AnonymousPlease state the Hawaiian statutes you speak of.

    ReplyDelete
  55. @Retired Intelligence Officer

    §338-18 (g) (4) - "A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings"

    Nothing else in §338-18 mentions legal proceedings. And this is the section that determines who gets a copy of a BC.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Excuse me for a minute while I educate all you Ungrateful Jolly Come Lately pieces of shit.

    NO ONE, and I mean absolutely NO ONE has personally sacrificed more to bust YOMAMA'S BALLS than ORLY. The fact is that without her we wouldn’t be shit! Anyone that has been following this from the beginning knows this.

    Make no mistake if ANYTHING at all has been accomplished it is owed mainly to her. She ALONE has paved the way. While many cut her down NO ONE has yet to lend her a hand. Trump the Chump, Kreep the Creep, Berg the Turd all these clowns are all merely STANDING ON HER SHOULDERS! If this thing ever sees the light of day you can rest assured it will be mainly because of HER RELENTLESS efforts. Get it through your thick heads! ORLY IS THE ONE THAT HAS RIDDEN THE RUFF OUT OF THIS SHIT! And don’t think for a minute that you are going to take that away from her, you Discosiderate Bastards! The old saying "Every country has the government they deserve" Rings true in my ears when I hear you Fu%*ers on THIS site bashing Orly. This needs to STOP. EL PRONTO! What Orly needs is your HELP and COOPERATION not your criticism. Trust me she is far more capable than all of us PUT TOGETHER! After all Just what the F%ck have YOU done that can compare to her?! If you think you can do a better job, who's stopping you? You wanna proof read her shit? Offer your services. She'll be glad to have you. Did you know that she is a Russian immigrant? Did you know that English is a foreign language to her? Let's see the likes of you immigrate to Russia and become Doctors AND Lawyers proficient in Russian language..! And while we’re in the neighborhood, is there anyone out there that can provide her with some Personal Security? You know she only receives death threats almost daily! Bottom line, if you want to help, help. But don’t go out of your way to undermine and cut her down you Low Life! Its YOUR KIDS she's fighting for!

    Here's a couple of little Orly Fun Facts for the Sensitively Challenged:

    In her younger years she was a "Drop Dead Gorgeous" Bikini Model (as if you hadn’t noticed) She came to this country, like many of us, to get away from the same shit that YOMAMA is putting into place. Here she becomes a Doctor AND a Lawyer licensed to practice in the Supreme Court. And as if that wasn't enough, She also holds a Second Degree Black Belt in Tae Kuon Do. So she can kick your ass from here to the 7 eleven if the need should arise.

    Is she perfect? Of course not. Can she make a mistake? Of course. But the question we should be asking is not whether she's competent or not, but WHAT CAN WE DO TO HELP HER?..! Sincerely I say to you. If we can't trust Orly, Gentlemen... Good Luck with this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  57. California birther/dualer/doubterMay 24, 2011 at 11:19 PM

    Speaking of Orly, an update on her subpoena efforts was published on the Post & Email. This follows up on the one linked to my Hotlanta Mike earlier in this post: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/24/subpoena-issued-to-hawaii-department-of-health-for-obamas-real-birth-certificate/

    Sharon Rondeau makes a great point about why the Hawaiian officials would refuse to release the original birth certificate if it already is in the public domain. Indeed, the plot thickens.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Fuddy's face just screams, "It's all for you, Damien! It's all for you!"

    ReplyDelete
  59. Silence is Golden?

    Isn't it amazing how quiet it is in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Orly's May 2nd presentments.

    Could it be that this liberal court is actually AGONIZING over a decision?

    ReplyDelete
  60. "More interesting is 042-XX-XXXX has been reported as associated with another individual born in 1890"?! There was no such thing as a social security number until over 40 past this date. Way to botch your cause. How do you expect to convince anyone with screw-ups like that?!

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Anonymous

    But a court could note that such BC has already been made public. Therefore there is now nothing preventing the agency from having such original of same made available for examination unless they have something to hide.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I agree tenfold with the comment praising Orly. She put the hook in me when she confronted Judge Roberts in'09. She and Mario Apuzzo need to team up. Anon. at 1:11 AM is good.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I hear ya commie killah,Patriot that she is for staying on the issue. I have been following this for 3 years. Orly is not a gifted attorney, God bless her.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @Anonymous

    "There was no such thing as a social security number until over 40 past this date. Way to botch your cause."

    Please point out anywhere online where we claim the SS# was issued in 1890. You can't.

    Many people didn't file for Social Security or apply for a Social Security number until later in their life when it was needed.

    Get real!

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Anonymous

    "There was no such thing as a social security number until over 40 past this date. Way to botch your cause. How do you expect to convince anyone with screw-ups like that?!"

    The SS# system was created in 1936. Are you saying that anyone born before that year couldn't get a SS#?

    ReplyDelete
  66. @Commykiller

    Of course the Obots are going to attack Orly personally: they cannot remain silent and cannot respond to the merits of the debate. What else are they going to do?

    Mocking the threat is not only the only thing left, but that''s what they are calling for people to do with the mug and t-shirts, when they say, "The only thing to do is laugh at them, and make sure eveyone else is in on the joke." Lterally, no joke, that means: "we have no other way to defend ourselves except the attempted and deliberate personal belittlement of the opposition, so try to get everyone you know to do it, to." Pretty sick. The slimy, guilty bastards.

    That's okay, though. We're getting to the end now, and we're winning and we will win. The longer they lie and deny, the harder they'll fall. There is no getting away from it, now. The elections of 2012 are too far away. The fraud has been put out. No escape for them, now.

    ReplyDelete
  67. @Commykiller
    Great defense of Orly!

    ReplyDelete
  68. check these links out on the way we are being taken down the tubes .......
    Media Silence on this cause benefit indirectly from OBAMA BAILOUTS & Health care wavers to BIG Advertisers right?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOwvwiIlOkI
    Parts 1-3:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyJVgISDZ94
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEUNVrHHGmc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIuzu2VZuJk
    http://www.trunews.com/index.htm
    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/jerome-corsi-criminal-fraud-committed.html
    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/obama-birth-certificate-made-in-media.html
    This is a Big Deal on Hawaii's involvement in the cover-up of obamas forgery of the Birth certificate
    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/subpoena-issued-for-loretta-fuddy.html


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6tvti9um6k , who is this guy really ???
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/55642721/News-Release-Legal-proof-that-President-Obama%E2%80%99s-Certificate-of-Live-Birth-is-a-forgery


    The Condensed Obama Timeline 1959–1995 , the most Informative research on Obama ever !!!!!

    http://www.colony14.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/condensedtimeline30apr2011v19.pdf

    I found this site , http://shariah4america.com/Washington/The-White-Masjid , off the NEWS feed from Rideside News , its Not propaganda . Is this the Fundamental Transformation OBAMA was talking about he was Bringing ??
    after researching the Muslim Brotherhood Link , it is questionable to know without ant audit of the Federal Reserve if , the operations funded by the Federal For International relations is not actually funding the Hate propaganda thats Publicized across the Middle east through these organizations , and so we need to Know and auditing the Federal Reserve is Our duty to our Country to cut off funding of these forms if Peace and Liberty can be resolved

    http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011030312967/world/terrorism/sharia4america-muslims-call-for-un-to-be-turned-into-massive-sharia-court.html
    The Muslim Brotherhood – Globalists’ Secret Weapon & Obama’s Treason
    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/01/31/the-treason-of-obama-fomenting-the-hatred-between-islam-the-united-states-the-muslim-brotherhood-%E2%80%93-the-globalists-secret-weapon/

    ReplyDelete
  69. http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/01/30/southern-poverty-law-center-sic-muslim-brotherhoods-terror-training-camps-inside-the-usa/

    http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Articles/Obama_Muslim_Brotherhood.htm



    here is a information site by a Retired Commander thats all over this subject ;

    http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com


    Its all about Collapsing the Capital system of our Economy , see it in this reading ;

    http://shariah4america.com/Washington/The-White-Masjid

    , the Backbone of Independence is our FREE Enterprise system of capitalism and they are targeting it just like they did with targeting the twin towers on 911 . They think its what will save the earth from OVERPOPULATION .

    Obama's Agenda: Overwhelm the System
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/overwhelm.asp

    http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/12/31/obama-handing-u-s-sovereignty-to-united-nations-the-un-and-interpol-how-the-un-will-gain-power/

    ReplyDelete
  70. @Commykiller

    I have been in this for more than a year before Orly. Orly is a liar like she is doing here. She has no subpoena.

    Also she is a shill for Obama ruining our movement. Orly should go away. all she cares about is using headlines to get donations from rich people. She is a loser.

    Mario Apuzzo is a real lawyer. Orly refuses to listen to any real lawyers. She plays the victim role of always losing. she is lost here as well. Her case is being throw out because she did not file her basic case correctly once again. Claiming she has a valid subpoena is a bold faced lie.

    You must be an Obot supporting Orly. She is used by Obama to mock all us true patriots. I say Orly is a shill for Obama. Let her prove other wise by filing a lawsuit correctly. by serving correctly. by getting a real lawyer on her staff and listening to him or her.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Ohh GOD this is so easy.....

    Nothing wrong with Apuzzo. I consider him a patriot.
    Orly however, has done, personally committed and sacrificed far more. Who secured Yommo's S.S.# verification? Selective Service registration? College attendance records? Did we already forget about Stephan Cook? Who got fined $20,000 by some SPINELESS FAGGOT Judge in Georgia, trying to help Connie Rhodes? Who stood with Lakin at his trial?.. Hint: It wan,t Apuzzo.

    And there is MORE. A LOT MORE, But frankly anyone that BASHES ORLY isn't worth the time.

    Now let me get this straight. I am an Obot because I defend Orly. And you are the Patriot that bashes her!.. HMMM.... Tell me the truth Friend. You got YOMAMA Plates in your kitchen don’t you?... I just bet you do... Hey, you know he's selling mugs and shirts now! You're gonna look really cool at your next Gov. Union Protest!

    The day the Killer turns OBOT, I assure you, All is lost.

    About the Subpoena;
    Just what do you call that piece of paper on her sight... You know the one that says “SUBPOENA” right across the top... I'm not a lawyer. And so I'll leave the worthiness of said document to those more versed in the matter. BUT I KNOW ORLY! AND IF ORLY SAYS THERE”S A SUBPOENA, YOU CAN BET YOUR LEFT BALL THERE'S FU%*ING SUBPOENA SOMEWHERE YOU MAGGOT!

    ORLY DOES NOT LIE..! She might F*CK UP... But she DOESNT LIE..! and you are a PIECE OF SHIT for saying so.

    Carefull from now on when you Bash Orly on this site. The Commyliller is on the prowl!

    ReplyDelete
  72. It seems that the wheels of that famous "Obama Bus" that he loves to throw people under, are coming off completely, rather rapidly.

    ReplyDelete
  73. it's a shame the document expert did not have access to the first all white LFBC handed out at the press conference and still avail here: http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/ap_obama_certificate_dm_110427.pdf . If you review this document, you can see a lot more character and form detail. This is still a copy however. I thought HI DOH only issued these on green, so where did this white one come from?

    ReplyDelete
  74. A judge NEED NOT sign a subpoena in a federal civil case. Attorneys are sworn officers of the court and the signature of Ms. Taitz is, in and of itself, sufficient to cause the subpoena to be meet, proper, and legally binding. If Fuddy fails to appear, she CAN be arrested, tried, and if found guilty, severe civil and criminal penalties shall imposed upon her.

    ReplyDelete
  75. For those of you who ramble on and on and on about "Snopes says...", let me clue you in. "Snopes" consists of nothing more than a husband and wife team who work out of the basement of their home - they possess "0" credibility! - David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the web site about 13 years ago - and they have ABSOLUTELY NO formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of Snopes claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues, when in fact, time after time they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues. LOOK UP IMAGES of DAVID and BARBARA MIKKELSON and TELL ME HOW "CREDIBLE" THOSE TWO CLOWNS LOOK!

    ReplyDelete
  76. "Attorneys are sworn officers of the court and the signature of Ms. Taitz is, in and of itself, sufficient to cause the subpoena to be meet, proper, and legally binding."

    The attorney must also be authorized to practice law in that state/district. Orly is not. She filed the Taitz v. Astrue case Pro Se.

    ReplyDelete
  77. dlpa - It's really good for me to see you and your hard work. Every piece of your work looks amazing. Look forward to learning more from you.

    ReplyDelete
  78. If necessary Barry Soetoro will declare martial law to prevent any investigation into his fraudulent documents. They will never let anything happen.

    The Rothschild Banking Mafia own this puppet 100% and are going to use him to do whatever it takes to destroy the United States and establish a world dictatorship police state run by the Rothschild Banking Mafia.

    Just the facts mam.....

    ReplyDelete
  79. It seems that the wheels of that famous "Obama Bus" that he loves to throw people under, are coming off completely, rather rapidly.

    ReplyDelete
  80. What we need to do is to educate the masses in the Three Magic Questions. What is the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYBODY has the right to commit? What is the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYBODY has an actual obligation to endure? What is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of in the instant case?
    Apply those questions to your life all day long and see where they get you. They will take you further down the rabbit hole than you'd ever imagine anything could. Ask them of EVERY situation that you may find yourself or others in until it is resolved. Some things may take longer to do than others, but if they are honest and worthwhile goals, don't let that dissuade you.

    Your ever humble logician servant,
    Randy Gaumond

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.