Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Video: Attorney Dr. Herbert Titus interview with theAmericanView.com: Dr. Herb Titus Says Most Important Question: Is Obama, Constitutionally Speaking, A “Natural Born” Citizen? Answer: No, He Is Not - The interview embedded below.

BIO: Herbert W. Titus is of counsel to the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Prior to his association with this firm, Mr. Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.

Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota. -Source. 

Audio Source: http://www.theamericanview.com/dictator/media/1766/TitusNaturalBornCitizen.mp3

PART ONE:



PART TWO:



Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Obama Committed Draft Registration Fraud! Whose SSN is He Using? Wash Times Natl Wkly 20110502 pg 5
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

27 comments:

  1. Nice to see someone gets it!

    Born a dual citizen is not NBC.

    Easy enough, BHO not NBC.

    How can BHO be born A British Subject and a US NBC at the same time? Impossible.

    Singular Loyalty !

    Singular Allegiance !

    How can a dual citizen "defend" the Constitution with a divided allegiance at birth?

    Thanks OBRYR

    ReplyDelete
  2. IMO, this guy has one small part of it right: it's more than just a matter of where Obama was physically born. But he's assuming the BC is legit (now proven thousands of times all over the US - indeed the world - that it isn't), that the SCOTUS has no say (what?!), that the only recourse is through the electoral process (huh?!), and basically sounds like a slow, dim-witted idiot. He has the perfect timber in his voice to be a constitutional expert - great casting - but needs a new brain to go with it. The content of his views as to recourse is patently ridiculous. An analogy to his view would that if a person breaks into your home and takes up residence against the law, the issue can only be resolved through the realtors. Moron.

    Next....

    ReplyDelete
  3. As a birther, I find that interview depressing even though Dr. Titus defines, "natural born Citizen", and says correctly that Obama isn't one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Barry tell the truth!
    If your mother married to Obama Sr. in Feb. 1961 why your father wasn't a permament resident (green card) in 1964? why he was here illegally and chasing women?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The prevailing view of an Art.II natural born citizen is that there is absolutely no doubt that if a citizen is born of two U.S. citizens is a natural born citizen. The debate before the Supreme Court, if, indeed it ever gets to the Supreme Court, is, are there other situations wherein a citizen born of only one U.S. Citizen can be a natural born citizen?

    I thinking here of a citizen born out of wedlock, or the father unknown.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    ReplyDelete
  6. Puppies: No one is going to touch Obama. They know they'll be sleeping with the fishes if they try.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As a commissioned officer in the US Army, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against enemies both foreign and domestic. The President ain't the only office that goes beyond "defend".

    Other than that nit, Dr. Titus is spot-on and much appreciated! His analysis of the 14th Amendment needs to be wide spread.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Podcast The Peter Boyles Show - May 10, 2011 7am

    WND.com publisher Joe Farah came on the show to talk about the latest birther issues.

    http://www.khow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_page.html?podcast=fullshow_boyles&selected_podcast=05102011PETE7A.mp3

    Several stories to come out later this week pointing to the fact that BHO Sr. is NOT The Pretender’s biological father.

    Farah said the information that Corsi was investigating last week in Hawaii is incredible.

    ReplyDelete
  9. he was wrong. if obama was not born in hawaii he is an illegal alien.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Retired Intelligence OfficerMay 10, 2011 at 1:13 PM

    Titus is being attacked on other forums for this video. Here is what Obots and other lawyers are saying:

    "His argument is BS. There are tons of precedents that say the 14th amendment says what it says about birth citizenship. This guy is a right wing, Christo-fascist crank from an unaccredited law school. He has no substance."

    "But his definition also does not exclude dual citizens... only children of non-citizens. After all, children born of two citizens can still be dual citizens."

    "He further acknowledges that the "prevailing view" has its origin in English common law... which as we all know was also the position of the US Supreme Court in the case of Wong Kim Ark."

    "He admits that "the prevailing view" is that anybody born on US soil is a natural born citizen."

    " He admits that this is not a justiciable issue for the courts, but instead a political issue that should be resolved by congress... thus agreeing with almost every court that ever threw out a Birther case."

    Another Obot says this;

    "The 14th Amendment's birth citizenship clause refers to anyone born on our soil, except where treaties override it, as in the case of children of diplomats. His logic is tortured."

    "Regent University isn't accredited.Its pat Robertson's creation"

    With all that, he has clearly gotton under the skin of Obama supporters which in their minds, a dual citizen or anchor baby can be born here and be considered qualified for Article 2 Section 1. It's very troubling. I think Trump needs to ramp up his pressure on Obama's father negating natural born citizen status because of his British Nationality to the media in interviews. It will put the focus back on him and force discussion about the Natural Born Citizen clause and what our founders intent was.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Any lawyer who calls himself "Dr." is pathetic. The "dual citizenship" theory is a desperate attempt by Obama haters to find something to disqualify him, when many of our presidents have been "dual citizens" under the laws of other nations. Fortunately, in the USA, only our laws determine eligibility.

    I, for one, prefer not to let England, or Israel or Afghanistan or Libya to tell me who is and who is not eligible to run for president when that person was born in the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Retired Intelligence OfficerMay 10, 2011 at 2:22 PM

    To Anonymous @ 1:51.


    What Presidents were dual citizens after the Grandfather Clause ran out besides Chester Arthur who was 'Not Eligible' along with currently Barack Obama?

    Do you actually think that the founders wanted their future presidents to be born with dual allegiances or loyalties to foreign nations as their president, especially since we just finished a war with England for our independence? I think not. The founders wanted a pure American natural born citizen born to 'two' U.S. citizens as their president as a national security precaution. Sole Allegiance is the key words here that should be used. A dual allegiance president is not what the founders wanted to run this country.

    ReplyDelete
  13. California birther/dualer/doubterMay 10, 2011 at 2:31 PM

    Likewise, I, for one, prefer not to let anyone from my own country lecture me on who is constitutionally eligible to serve as president when it goes against the historical definition of such.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Anonymous"...many of our presidents have been "dual citizens" under the laws of other nations."

    Put up or shut up, Obot. Name them.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Executive Summary Re NBC Defined in Constitution Plus 4 SCOTUS Cases

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/55105383/Executive-Summary-Re-NBC-Defined-in-Constitution-Plus-4-SCOTUS-Cases

    ReplyDelete
  16. "I, for one, prefer not to let England, or Israel or Afghanistan or Libya to tell me who is and who is not eligible to run for president when that person was born in the USA."

    Hey Retard maybe you should read some history before you make dumb comments. GTFOOH

    ReplyDelete
  17. Quotation from the Constitution. "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President..." The Constitution is silent on the issue of the citizenship of the parents. A consideration of original intent, however, leads to the conclusion that a British father does not make a person ineligible. This is because at the time of adoption of the constitution, nearly everyone had fathers who were born British citizens, who had undergone no naturalization process, and who had not legally renounced their British citizenship in a British court of law. During the War of 1812, the British impressed some 10,000 American sailors into their navy, on the grounds that they had not formally renounced their British citizenship. This state of affairs endured for decades after the founding of the United States. Were the constitution to be interpreted so as to disallow citizens born in the USA who had British fathers, it would have been nearly impossible to select a president for a very long time. This was clearly not the intent of the founding fathers. The Constitution forbids "naturalized" citizens (i.e. those who did not acquire it naturally by birth). The Constitution (unfortunately) does allow "anchor babies" to run for president. The law ought to be changed in this regard, as the founding fathers could not have foreseen this development. But the change would require no less than a constitutional amendment. I would support such an amendment, but it does not apply to Obama. No amount of legal argument can place words in the Constitution that are not there.

    ReplyDelete
  18. IMO, this guy has one small part of it right: it's more than just a matter of where Obama was physically born. But he's assuming the BC is legit (now proven thousands of times all over the US - indeed the world - that it isn't), that the SCOTUS has no say (what?!), that the only recourse is through the electoral process (huh?!), and basically sounds like a slow, dim-witted idiot. He has the perfect timber in his voice to be a constitutional expert - great casting - but needs a new brain to go with it. The content of his views as to recourse is patently ridiculous. An analogy to his view would that if a person breaks into your home and takes up residence against the law, the issue can only be resolved through the realtors. Moron.

    Next....

    -------------------------------------------------

    Maybe this subject is a little deep for you , we'll let you know when the next JPEG shows up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Anonymous

    You're ignorant! What the hell do you think the grandfather clause of Article II was for?

    "No person except a natural born Citizen, OR a Citizen of the United States, AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION, shall be eligible to the Office of President..."

    From the Obama AKA Soetoro AKA Soebarkah website via Factcheck.org...


    “When Barack Obama, Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

    Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.” - Factcheck.org


    Senate Resolution 511: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen...


    Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution;

    "Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

    Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;...

    ...Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States." - (April 30, 2008)


    On the House floor with no objections...


    “All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” - (1862)

    "Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen....” - (1866)

    Rep. John Bingham, Principal Framer of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution -Source.


    From the Supreme Court of the United States...


    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.” - MINOR v. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) U.S. Supreme Court - -Source. -NEW: More on "natural born Citizen" from the SCOTUS here...


    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/bloomberg-on-fox-news-sunday-obamas.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just the thought there is an illegal alien criminal in our White House and no one is doing anything tells me we better forget waiting for someone or something to fix this. We, ouselves, are it. When I read about more evidence, etc., I don't know what to think, other then what a waste of time that is. Point is, I want action now, by us, in Washington. Something tells me when push comes to shove, we might cower like Trump. I hope not. Just out of curiosity, what is the straw that finally breaks the camel's back?

    ReplyDelete
  21. And we saw just what dual loyalty means these days in the mass rallies where "citizens" or citizen wannabes carried their Mexican flags demanding more respect for their rights to beg for more handouts while doing so! And during the Haiti crisis when reporters went into the Haitian communities in the U.S. every person they interviewed stated that as soon as the U.S. straightened things out they were going back to their homes in Haiti ... and this after years of living in the U.S. Too much loyalty to filthy lucre and not enough to the country itself!

    ReplyDelete
  22. "No person except a natural born Citizen, OR a Citizen of the United States, AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION, shall be eligible to the Office of President..." Yes, the upper case letters help. Nearly all Americans born in the USA ONE DAY after the adoption of the constitution would have been ineligible to become president, because their fathers would have been born British and had not legally renounced their British citizenship. This cannot possibly have been the intent of framers of the constitution. The constitutional article that made people born on July 5, 1776 eligible to run for president has not been amended. What holds then must hold now; law can be changed by means of legislation, but cannot be interpreted capriciously according to the whims and dislikes of the day. Anti-democratic, socialist states such as the "Peoples" Republics of Korea and China "interpret" their laws at will to get rid of people they don't like. We Americans have higher standards than this. We get rid of people we don't like by defeating them fair and square in open, unrigged elections, not via military coups d'etat. I am reasonably sure that you will find that 99% of Americans agree with me on this point.

    And as an American, I disagree with many (not all) of the opinions voiced here, but strongly support the right of all of you to free speech.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Absolutely correct.
    An American born citizen should be the president.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Anonymous

    "Nearly all Americans born in the USA ONE DAY after the adoption of the constitution would have been ineligible to become president, because their fathers would have been born British and had not legally renounced their British citizenship."

    As an American you're either ignorant or playing word games.

    It doesn't matter where the mother or father were BORN. It just mattered what their "CITIZEN" status was at the time of the birth of the child.

    ----

    There have been 42 Americans that have served as President (not including Mr. Obama). 10 were born before 1787.

    ALL Presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur*(and Obama), met the NBC criteria.

    There have been 46 Americans that have served as Vice-President (not including Mr. Biden). 10 were born before 1787.

    ALL Vice-Presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur*, met the NBC criteria. 14 VPs have gone on to be President.

    The citizen and natural born Citizen status of every president and vice-president including their parents:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/07/irrefutable-proof-that-barack-obama-is.html

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ 9:37 PM

    "And as an American, I disagree with many (not all) of the opinions voiced here, but strongly support the right of all of you to free speech."

    ******************************************


    You have this condescenting voice in your phrasiology that suggests that there is something that you would otherwise be able to do about it, instead of being grateful that the site doesn't omit your obnoxious remarks out-of-hand - a courtesy rarely afforded honest conservatives on liberal message boards.

    Natural born is understood to mean of two american citizen parents. IT WAS THE PRIMARY ASPECT OF THE RESOLUTION THAT OBAMA SIGNED AS A SENATOR THAT ALLOWED MCCAIN TO SEEK THE OFFICE.

    Dunderhead. Go peddle your bullshit somewhere else.

    ReplyDelete
  26. That bogus birth certificate

    "It was about three weeks ago that Jerome Corsi, author of "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President," called me with some disturbing news.

    In response to the success of his book (No. 1 at Amazon in pre-release stage) and the elevation of the eligibility issue because of Donald Trump's big megaphone, his sources in Hawaii were telling him that Barack Obama was about to release a fraudulent birth certificate.

    Corsi urged that WND report the story. But because of the nature of the warnings, I didn't think it would be meaningful. What good would it do to report that unnamed sources investigating Obama's eligibility expected him to do something he had resisted doing for two-and-a-half years? Details were thin. Who would pay attention?"

    "Pardon the pun, but he's played his Trump card too late – and wholly unconvincingly."

    "I know it goes against all conventional wisdom today to say this, but we may be witnessing the final days of the Barack Obama regime."

    Read more: That bogus birth certificate http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=297573#ixzz1M7D8tV8U

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.