Friday, April 29, 2011


Video: In an exclusive April 29, 2011 interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington Times investigative radio, has stated after a clear on-camera demonstration that purported certificate of live birth released by U.S. President Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic forgery.

Mr. Stanley had earlier on April 29, 2011 reported this breaking news on Washington Times investigative radio while being interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a correspondent for CNN. -Text via 68Truthseeker. Hat tip to Commander Kerchner.



Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here. 

Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here. 

Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here. 

Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here. 

Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here. 

Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Whose CT SSN is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using? Wash Times Natl Wkly 25 Apr 2011 pg 5
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

32 comments:

  1. They're dreaming. We don't have a congress anymore, or an FBI, for that matter. All is lost.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hidden Part Of The Obama Birth Certificate Uncovered - OCR Debunked

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up62cFOtvQ4

    OCR Theory debunked for Obama Birth Certificate. The undeniable truth is in the "Linked" Files.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi85U0HtU68

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  3. The public has been so dumbed down that they actually believe there is no requirement for the president to have citizen parents. They mostly know nothing about the Constitutional requirement and/or they don't care.

    IF...the new birth certificate is real, the reason it was not released until now is the Obots overestimated the intelligence of the average America, and did not want to advertise the Kenyan birthplace of Obama's sleazebag father. During the 2008 election very few Americans even knew his father was not an American citizen, and they thought those who were saying he was were just making it up.

    Now, after 2.5 years of the media, especially Fox News, and Congress never mentioning "natural born" unless forced, and then interchangably using it with native born, the Bots under pressure from Trump and Corsi believed letting everyone know for certain that Obama's father was born in Kenya would be no problem. Yes, the COLB did say African, but it was given as a race and not a nationality.

    Unfortunately, they may be right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello!

    Incredible situation here - as the W.Times correspondent said in the vid - unknown territory..

    Is there any factual information or proof - that anyone know here - on that the layers are - or are not - forgery - in the latest COLB from the WHITE HOUSE...?
    The picture is really a little fuzzy for the moment on this...

    Yes, I saw the vid above - and I know - and agree with the assummption - why use OCR, at all...? - but I havent´t seen any factual proof of forgery - or not forgery - on this matter.

    Are there any in this moment in time...?

    Best Regards...


    A

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/
    Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate Is Legit

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292673
    ARTICLE FROM WND ABOUT THE LAYERS
    EXCERPTS:
    "Tests on other PDF images produce an effect similar to the multiple layers extracted from Obama's document."

    "Cartan said it appeared that compression operations known as Flate and DCT were used for various parts of the scanned image."

    "They appear as text but also contain glyphs, dots, lines, boxes, squiggles, and random garbage," Goulding said. "They're not combined or merged in any way. Quite simply, they look like they were created programmatically, not by a human."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Book 'em Dan-O.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Abercrombie upon his inauguration as the new governor of Hawaii was so intent on proving the birthers wrong by locating the Obama bc.

    Because one doesn't exist, one needed to be fabricated.

    Question: Is this the reason that Neal Palafox was forced to resign (didn't want to fabricate a forgery)?

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=267897

    ReplyDelete
  7. In this first Video Obama was Co sponsor of McCain's Eligibility Resolution 511 Senate Bill and Obama agreed that to be eligible you need 2 parents to be Citizens of the USA to be natural Born eligible , Obama only has 1 parent ?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VJgY86nmEHc
    Now if the above Senate finding with Obama as CO sponsor of McCain's Ratification to be president is Proof then we have this Round of Research 2 month later by an Obama Operative from the Arizona Law department in Tucson at U of A that says McCain was Ineligible to be POTUS and I would have to think that this is when the Conspiracy to Cover-up Both Obama and McCain was conceived .
    This Might be the Biggest Cover-up of the 21st Century !!!!

    http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-20/opinion/chin.natural.born_1_natural-law-united-states-and-subject-citizenship-clause?_s=PM:OPINION
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1157621

    ReplyDelete
  8. I grabbed screen shots of the blog post made on whitehouse.gov showing the post was made in the 8 o'clock hour and of the document properties showing the file at the link is after 12 noon.

    In other words, the post was made with one PDF and as stated by Stanley, the PDF was changed later in the day.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Congress to investigate? Are you serious? Don't make me laugh. If anything, they're probably wondering themselves how much longer can we continue this crime against the American people. It's possible a few might be concerned about lenthy prison terms, but don't count on it. They all understand it is all or nothing. No, the reality is we have been taken over, only now a few of us are realizing it and also realize there is only one way out.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Further evidence of fraud

    post 371 at

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2712636/posts?page=356

    ReplyDelete
  11. WND has an Adobe expert on their homepage who refutes that the layering proves the document is a forgery so we need another Adove expert to refute his claim - nothing seems black and white anymore

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's pretty obvious that, where the form itself bends and distorts toward the left hand side of the page as all photocopies from books do, the 'typed' entries do not. It's very clear, under sex, that the entry "Male" does not curve in the same manner as the lines of the box....

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Anonymous

    Yes, old news, the Kerchner v. Obama lawsuit covered all that and some...

    ReplyDelete
  14. I CAN SEE NOW THAT THE OCR AND DIFFERENT SOFTWARE-LAYER EXPLANATION IS - DEBUNKED!
    NICE!
    OF COURCE THERE WAS A LOT OF OTHER EVIDENCE AND PROOF - BUT IT´S NICE THAT WE GOT THIS ONE STRAIGHT!

    SOME MORE LINKS TO THIS THREAD ON THIS MATTER:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2712636/posts?q=1&;page=51
    INTERESTING THREAD IN FREEREPUBLIC

    http://www.youtube.com/user/random331#p/u/0/GSDxAOlPqec
    OPTIMIZED LAYER EXPLANATION DEBUNKED ------>(Obama Birth Certificate - Explanation + reproduction of so-called "Tampering". (Layers, PDF) )

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eOfYwYyS_c&feature=player_embedded
    Obama's Birth Certificate: The "copy" the White House released is not a copy. It is manufactured.
    This video goes through the proof, and it's much more than the Illustrator "breadcrumbs" that others have found and talked about.


    A

    ReplyDelete
  15. Maybe I am late to this, but who said the just released BC is a copy?

    The stamp at the bottom says it is a copy..or, an abstract.

    If you aren’t positive what the meaning of ”abstract” is, look it up.

    It basically means, “not real”…which is not good when trying to prove the eligibility of the president and CIC.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous,

    RE THE "ABSTRACT":

    That is entirely correct, except this "abstract" contains the signature of a dead doctor. So if it is not a copy of an original - and my own professional view is that it cannot possibly be a copy of an original paper document from 1961 - and the abstract contains a dead doctor's signature post mortem, then it is forensically in the common vernacular known today as a "photoshop", and is worthless as evidence.

    This is simply another version of taking Hawaii's word for it, and that word is not worth much at this point. Trump was probably right when he said Abercrombie is taking a bullet for the party. It appears that the Hawaiian officials are as well. It appears they will do *anything as long as it falls short of committing themselves legally to the same simple long form birth certificate that Trump put forth without hesitation*. Anyone can see all the earmarks of a coverup, now. This is becoming obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Has anyone seen this before from mar.2010 Aloha Reporter? Look at very bottom.
    http://alohareporter.com/2010/03/hawaii-considering-law-to-ignore-obama-birthers/

    ReplyDelete
  18. It is a fake... The law cited at the bottom wasn't established until 1982...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Shouldn't this have been done before he was elected???? Just saying that this seems to go VERY high up.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Quote:

    "Shouldn't this have been done before he was elected???? Just saying that this seems to go VERY high up.

    April 30, 2011 2:32 PM"

    Yes, but it wasn't. See Congressional Research Service Document by Jack Maskell sent to all Congressional Offices in April of 2009 for official verification that there was none, zero, nada, vetting of Barack Hussein Obama.

    Being fraudulently elected does not TRUMP the Constitution!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. OK, NOW WHAT HAPPENS, NOTHING...AS WE THE PEOPLE HAVE A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT..NO ONE LISTENS...NO ONE STEPS IN TO PROTECT THE ''PEOPLE'' NO JUDGES, NO CONGRESS, NO ONE!

    ReplyDelete
  22. With Eric Holder the DOJ will not investigate, and the courts have avoided this. So it is up to the House of Representatives to begin an investigation of Obama, Pelosi, and the number of states that specifically required the candidates meet the constitutional requirements according to their respective state election laws (e.g. Texas, Hawaii, etc.)

    ReplyDelete
  23. If it isn't fake, then why the hell did it take so long to get it?

    ReplyDelete
  24. After reading the quote by Lovejoy (which I LOVED) I googled him to read a little about the man. Come to find out, he was murdered by a pro-slavery mob. I find it amazing that the same leftists that acted out back then have respond in similar fashion today (i.e. bullying state police and politicians at the state capital in Wisconsin) and yet they call the Tea Partyers violent?
    For more on Lovejoy:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elijah_Parish_Lovejoy

    ReplyDelete
  25. No document before Obama's official and legal adoption by Lolo Soetoro of Indonesia matters or is relevant. Whether it is the truth or not, such as a fake fraudulent COLB or any other questionable document that may now appear, they mean nothing, nothing at all. For those old records and documents are sealed and meaningless, Trumped by Hawaii’s and International Adoption Laws, as in most states when Obama became Lolo Soetoro’s adopted son in Honolulu Hawaii and relocated to his father’s home country of Indonesia and there became a Muslum and an Indonesian citizen like his father.

    Wait, as Joe the plumber asked it’s the redistribution of Obama. Because no sane mother would or has any legal right to ever change their children’s names like Maya or Barry to a penniless deceased, divorced bigamist and polygamist X husband’s last name to Barack Hessian Obama Sr. of Kenya, ex post facto and is prohibited and never recorded.

    So, the only logical and legal question left is! When did Barry Soetoro of Indonesia change his name to Barack Hessian Obama Jr., II or to whatever legally, in the United States of America?

    Whether Barry Soetoro did or did not legally change his advertising stage or stooge name and campaign slogans to the Africanized name change of Barack Hessian Obama for votes, there is no known record by the U. S. State Department to confirm it. Barry Soetoro aka Obama still remains an Indonesian citizen here illegally, unless Hillary Clinton as Security of State confirms, denies or approves that Obama is a citizen only.

    The Naturalization Act of the Constitution also includes a very important limitation and caveat:
    The THIRD CONGRESS in 1795 states, "...children of citizens [plural = both parents] of the United States...shall be considered citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." (THIRD CONGRESS Session II. Ch.21. 1795, Approved January 29, 1795, pp. 414-415. Document margin note: "How children shall obtain citizenship through their parents" Document margin note: "Former Act repealed 1790 ch.3.")
    Kenya has never been a U.S. possession or state; well maybe in one of the 51-57 states of confusion and delusion, Obama said and claimed exists publicly, periodically.

    Obama is a sad pathetic public spectacle and disgrace according to law, such as: Article II - The Executive Branch Section 1 – The President: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” No one can claim and maintain Barry Soetoro aka Obama has any right or is a legal U.S. citizen eligible to be a U.S. President by law and the facts as known!

    Admittedly and fundamentally Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro of Indonesia, when his mother and father changed his name to Barry Soetoro upon adoption, divorce and passport records, one step beyond a marriage license.

    Adoption Laws, as in most states when Obama became Lolo Soetoro’s adopted son in Honolulu Hawaii and relocated to his father’s home country of Indonesia and there became a Muslum and an Indonesian citizen like his father.

    This begs the repeat question! Why would Mrs. Ann Soetoro ever change her two children’s names to a divorced-penniless polygamist and bigamist name of deceased Barack Hessian Obama Sr. when she unwittingly married into a multiple marriage Muslum group’s name making Obama ‘s name and use of it null and void? Obama had to assume his mother’s maiden name as recorded and keep his adopted name of Barry Soetoro, unless he was readopted by a d ead Hawaiian COLBerist? LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  26. @ObamaRelease YourRecords

    The law in Hawaii was amended in 1982 not created...

    HRS 339-17.8

    ReplyDelete
  27. @Anonymous
    "So, the only logical and legal question left is! When did Barry Soetoro of Indonesia change his name to Barack Hessian Obama Jr., II or to whatever legally, in the United States of America?"

    That question is what's bugged me for months now. What is the name of the man currently living in the White House and is it the same name that he uses to sign legislation, to borrow money from foreign countries, to sign treaties, etc.?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Online 'birth certificate' document 'was changed' - Analysis raises possibility content of text was altered -

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=293421

    ReplyDelete
  29. Fox News document expert in tank for Obama? - Man claims birth certificate real, but look how he's championed president previously -

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=293685

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a recently retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve. He is a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He writes:

    Obama’s ineligibility: Were Americans set up by the press and then scammed by the Congress?
    On January 25, 2008, before the Super Tuesday Presidential primary vote on February 5, 2008, the New York Times endorsed Senator John McCain for President.

    Several days after the Super Tuesday vote, Republican candidate Mitt Romney withdrew from the race and John McCain was declared by the press as the presumptive Republican nominee for President.

    On February 28, 2008, about the time Barack Obama began to overtake Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Presidential primary, the New York Times published an article questioning McCain’s eligibility to be President according to the natural born citizen clause of Article II, Section I of the Constitution.

    Needless to say, the Times story was immediately followed by numerous other news items questioning McCain’s eligibility.

    After publication of the New York Times article in February, at least three lawsuits were filed challenging McCain’s eligibility e.g. California and New Hampshire.

    Strangely enough, on February 29, 2008, the day after the Times article appeared, Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign announced he would co-sponsor legislation already introduced on February 28, 2008 by his political ally Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) to ensure that John McCain could become president, even though he was born in the Panama Canal Zone. (Washington Post)
    Obama said:
    “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”

    The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specifies a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”
    (Salon)

    The initial McCaskill legislation was eventually superceded by Senate Resolution 511.
    SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by Senator McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

    It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
    On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
    “That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”
    Again, strangely enough, the legal basis for SR 511, also contained in the Congressional Record, was provided to the Senate by former Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson, a McCain adviser, and Harvard professor Laurence Tribe, an Obama supporter.

    As reported by the New York Times on April 18, 2008:
    “Many who have studied the issue say it can only be definitively resolved by a Constitutional amendment.”

    “Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”

    So, in April 2008, it appears that a political deal was struck between the Democrats and Republicans that would provide cover for both McCain and Obama on the issue of eligibility. That would also explain the continuing conspiracy of silence by our political elite.
    Because SR 511 has no force of law, Congress protected itself from legal consequences, but by political fiat they could do a “quick and dirty” amendment to the Constitution.


    My fellow Americans – we’ve been had.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/35283/Lawrence%20Sellin/

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.