Monday, March 7, 2011


The Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court was denied without comment and again with no recusal from jUstice Sotomayor and jUstice Kagan. SCOTUS Order here and embedded below. Previous reports on Colonel Hollister can be viewed here, here, here, here, here, here and here. [image source]

PAGE 11: REHEARINGS DENIED; 10-678 HOLLISTER, GREGORY S. V. SOETORO, BARRY, ET AL. Take note of this. 

UPDATE: CNN; Supreme Court rejects appeal from 'birther' advocate -Source.



Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro - Supreme Court Order List Page 11 - Denied - 3/7/2011

Obama Ineligible! 21 Feb 2011 Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 5

22 comments:

  1. That was expected.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From page 9 of the order...

    10-762 LA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., ET AL. V. BAYER AG, ET AL.

    The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
    Sotomayor and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


    Not so for the Hollister case...

    ReplyDelete
  3. As Charlie would say,"Duh"

    ReplyDelete
  4. such a travesty of justice

    ReplyDelete
  5. COURTS ARE RUN BY OFFSHORE CORPORATE BANKS!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have seen documents that list Kagan as attorney for B.O. in birther cases many times before she was appointed. I would say that is a conflict of interests.

    ReplyDelete
  7. IMO< The bigger conflict of interest for Sotomayor and Kagan is of course: IF Obama is found to be ineligible - They stand to lose their cushy appointments. This is a DIRECT conflict and their participation in this decision is outrageous and very troubling to those of us who still believe in the "FairyTale" that the Nation is a Nation of LAW. I'm beginning to wonder - seems like the Constitution is invoked when it suits the "Rulers" and Disregarded when it doesn't.
    ELmo

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think it is time to find out how to go about IMPEACHING the United States Supreme Court Justices.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Anonymous
    I agree Anonymous. We should have been seeking investigators and attorneys to impeach several of the Supreme Court Justices. They need to dig back to at least the cases heard during the Bush 41 administration. They must investigate all the justices connections with government and government agencies.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Attention Birthers: Just because you don't like the President doesn't justify you wasting the time of people who do real work in America. The President was born in the USA...put on your big girl/boy pants and deal with it. Be an adult and get over it

    ReplyDelete
  11. California Birther/Dualer/DoubterMarch 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM

    ... and the mystery deepens.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anyone who believes this birther crap is a blithering idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ha ha. You people are stupid. Keep whining.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Here is an oldie but it shows the idiocy that was this man from day one. We are stupid, tak a look at the poser-in-chief

    http://logistory.blogspot.com/2010/10/he-was-never-up-for-job.html

    ReplyDelete
  15. CRoCk oF ShIt!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Anonymous
    Any other parts of the constitution you want to see ignored, you worthless tool?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Once again, the Supreme Court chooses to completely ignore an Obama eligibility case, thus refusing to issue a ruling on the meaning of the term “natural born citizen” as it appears in the U.S. Constitution. The term apparently now means anything anyone wants it to mean. If Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Kim Jong-Il want to run for president of the United States and claim they are natural born citizens, they will have legal precedent for doing so.

    Read The Obama Timeline for all the ammunition you need to stop Obama in 2012 and deport him to Indonesia.

    ReplyDelete
  18. WHAT HAS PRIORITY TO THE US SUPREME COURT DURING THE FIRST
    WEEK IN MARCH OF 2011

    http://twitter.com/ussupremecourt

    1. WALL, DIR., RI DOC v. KHOLI, KHALIL. Decided 03/07/2011 http://bit.ly/gKa1eq about 23 hours ago via twitterfeed


    Respondent was convicted in Rhode Island Superior Court on 10 counts of first-degree sexual assault and sentenced to consecutive life terms.
    His conviction became final on direct review on May 29, 1996.

    1. MILNER, GLEN S. v. DEPT. OF NAVY. Decided 03/07/2011 http://bit.ly/enEQT0 about 23 hours ago via twitterfeed

    The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires federal agencies to make Government records available to the public, subject to nine exemptions.
    This case concerns Exemption 2, which protects from disclosure material “related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.”

    1. SNYDER, ALBERT v. PHELPS, FRED W., ET AL.. Decided 03/02/2011 http://bit.ly/i5XRGA 8:33 AM Mar 2nd via twitterfeed

    For the past 20 years, the congregation of the Westboro Baptist Church has picketed military funerals to communicate its belief that God
    hates the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality, particularly in America’s military.

    1. PEPPER, JASON v. UNITED STATES. Decided 03/02/2011 http://bit.ly/fuDrTh 8:33 AM Mar 2nd via twitterfeed

    After pleading guilty to drug charges, petitioner Pepper was sentenced under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to 24 months’ imprisonment,
    a nearly 75 percent downward departure from the low end of the Guidelines range based in part on his substantial assistance, followed by
    five years of supervised release.

    1. HENDERSON, DAVID L. v. SHINSEKI, SEC. OF VA. Decided 03/01/2011 http://bit.ly/fQu9uy 11:03 AM Mar 1st via twitterfeed

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a two-step process for adjudicating veterans’ benefits claims for service-connected disabilities

    1. FCC, ET AL. v. AT&T INC., ET AL.. Decided 03/01/2011 http://bit.ly/eJiSAL 11:03 AM Mar 1st via twitterfeed

    The Freedom of Information Act requires federal agencies to make records and documents publicly available upon request, subject to several
    statutory exemptions. One of those exemptions, Exemption 7(C), covers law enforcement records the disclosure of which “could reasonably
    be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

    1. STAUB, VINCENT E. v. PROCTOR HOSPITAL. Decided 03/01/2011 http://bit.ly/ijgkNL 11:03 AM Mar 1st via twitterfeed


    While employed as an angiography technician by respondent Proctor Hospital,
    petitioner Staub was a member of the United States Army Reserve. Both his
    immediate supervisor (Mulally) and Mulally’s supervisor (Korenchuk) were
    hostile to his military obligations.

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    OUR CONSTITUTION DOES NOT HAVE ANY PRIORITY.

    The Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in the United States
    Supreme Court was denied without comment and again with no recusal from jUstice Sotomayor and jUstice Kagan.
    SCOTUS Order here
    and embedded below. Previous reports on Colonel Hollister can be viewed here, here, here, here, here, here and here. [image source]

    ReplyDelete
  19. SUPREME COURTS:
    WHY THEY DON'T DO THE JOB OF HEARING ANY CASES ON OBAMA, BECAUSE OBAMA PAYS THEM MORE THAN THE TAXPAYERS? REMEMBER THIS, IT WILL COME TO A HEAD SOON, AND THE LIST OF WHO WILL BE BOUGHT TO COURT WILL BE LONG, OBAMA,MICHELLE O, REID,PELOSI, JUDGES, ETC.
    JUST PRAY A LITTLE HARDER...

    ReplyDelete
  20. What are hollister taglines? And what should i wear to my hollister job interview?

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.