Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Via Chris Strunk; The first time anywhere in the USA since 1824, that any Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is and concluding that BHO Jr. is not NBC.

This affidavit will be notarized tomorrow and duly served by two days mail upon Justice Schmidt and the State in regards to the appearance on a personal and confidential basis with the intent that Plaintiffs understanding of the record of the hearing be entered into the court record enabling further action by Plaintiff when the Order shown as Exhibit C is entered and forwarded by the State to Plaintiff. -snip-

From the Affidavit; 1. This is the AFFIDAVIT OF Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, Witness at the January 11, 2011 Hearing on the Notice of Motion for Amended Complaint in Strunk v Paterson et al. New York State Supreme Court of Kings County Index No.: 29642-08 before the Honorable Supreme Court Justice David I. Schmidt with the appearance of Joan Duffy, Esq. Supervising Assistant Attorney General for the New York Attorney General’s Office and Joel Graber, Esq. Special Assistant Attorney General representing the State of New York as a party-in-interest opposing the Motion to Amend the Complaint.

2. After the Court called those in attendance including several law clerks and the audience to order, the Honorable Justice Schmidt questioned Plaintiff as to the subject request for relief to amend the complaint and status of the underlying complaint without there being a recording or transcript of the proceeding.

3. As to the proposed amended complaint, the Court asked whether Plaintiff expects the Court to remove Barack Hussein Obama from office; to wit Plaintiff responded “NO” as that remains a Federal matter. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment as to breach of fiduciary duty by the Defendants failure to provide equal treatment and protection of Plaintiff along with those similarly situated in regards to the certification of the Presidential / Vice Presidential candidates ballot access at the 2008 Election cycle; and as well as plaintiff seeks further discovery as to the scheme to defraud and unjust enrichment.

4. That Plaintiff stated the NYS Board of Elections never responded to the request for documentation of the various certifications of ballot access for the various Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates; and as previously expressed to the Court Plaintiff had filed in Washington DC a FOIA case 08-cv-2234 for the travel records of Stanley Ann Dunham germane herein with a motion for summary judgment decision pending before Judge Richard J. Leon.

5. The Court asked if Plaintiff is seeking to obtain a copy of Barack Hussein Obama Jr.’s (BHO Jr.) Certified Birth record herein; to wit Plaintiff responded "NO". Plaintiff seeks a decision by the Court as to whether or not the Candidate(s) are eligible for Office of President of the United States (POTUS) as required with the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 as required as a regulation by the New York State Board of Elections including inter alias based upon the Certificate of Live Birth published August 21, 2008 by Annenberg Political Fact Check at FactCheck.org http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (see Exhibit A); and that as a prima facie matter Plaintiff seeks a Court decision herein as to whether or not Obama in fact has Dual Allegiance, is not a Natural Born Citizen per se but merely a Native-Born citizen if that; because BHO Jr.’s father, BHO Sr., is a British subject with a student visa at that time, and is shown to be the purported father of BHO Jr. by both the newspaper announcement and the COLB shown by Fact Check.org; and therefore, at best BHO Jr. is only a "Native" born citizen, if that, with only one U.S. Citizen parent mother as a minor at his birth, and that without two U.S. Citizen parents - BHO Jr. is NOT a "Natural" born citizen at best is “Native” born.

6. The Court asked to know Plaintiff's understanding of the difference between "Native" and "Natural" born citizen, to wit Plaintiff explained on a blood and soil basis as of the Law of Nations as related to the 1961, 1963 and 1969 Vienna Convention Treaty matters as to citizenship status as with the children of diplomats and tourists who were not certified admitted by the U.S. Customs Service; and

7. Plaintiff provided the Court with a copy of the SCOTUS decision in McCreery's Lessee v Somerville 22 US 354 (1824) (see Exhibit B), and

8. That the Court responded favorably to Plaintiff’s argument and contention expressing familiarity with the difference between the Natural and Native born, as there is within Jewish law similar precedent and commented that the Court agreed there is a difference and would read the SCOTUS decision Plaintiff provided....

Full affidavit embedded below. Previous reports on Christopher Strunk can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence and people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html]. 

UPDATE: New comment from Chris Strunk here.
Strunk v Paterson/Obama et al: Memorialization of NOM Hearing - New York State Supreme Court Kings County -...
Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro Passport Application File Strunk v Dept of State FOIA Release 7-29-10
Obama is Not a Natural Born Citizen - 17 Jan 2011 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-29 pg 5

38 comments:

  1. WOW! 9. The Court then asked Mr. Graber to respond; to wit Mr. Graber and Ms.
    Duffy were in appearance without representing any specific defendant herein, that
    the State contends that based upon the record filed to date Defendants were not
    served back in 2008, that Plaintiff has failed to file a default motion as to
    defendants within one year, and that the State opposes the Motion for Amended
    Complaint to add twenty-four defendants with CPLR 305 that Mr. Graber
    especially finds the proposed addition of Zbigniew Brzezinski frivolous.
    10.To wit Plaintiff responded first to the proposed addition of Zbigniew
    Brzezinski as a necessary party based upon the involvement of Zbigniew Brzezinski
    and his sons Ian and Mark early-on to run both the McCain and Obama campaigns
    and that Plaintiff contends such involvement is about Zbigniew Brzezinski’s
    fixation with Afghanistan going back to 1978; and that Zbigniew Brzezinski nor
    anyone is above the law;
    11.That Plaintiff explained that had he known that McCain like BHO Jr. was
    also not a Natural-born citizen he would not have voted for McCain / Palin and as
    there was already a question of eligibility with BHO Jr. as a result of the NYS SOS
    and NYS BOE breach of fiduciary duty that a pattern of malice is shown as
    to Defendant NYS BOE placing Roger Calero of the Socialist Worker’s Party onto
    the ballot, when in fact is a Nicaraguan born and to date is not even a naturalized
    citizen should have been kicked off the ballot as done in New Jersey and California;
    but to the contrary all were included by NYS BOE Defendants'
    malicious maladministration of the law and regulations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 12.Further, to wit Plaintiff responded in the matter of service of Defendants,
    assuring that Defendants were served in 2008 by a third party; however, Plaintiff
    would recheck and verify for the Court and update the record.
    13.That the Court asked why Plaintiff does not just go ahead and file a new case
    rather than try to amend the 2008 case; to wit, Plaintiff based upon information and
    belief expressed concern the statutory time that has passed since the 2008 Election
    requires Plaintiff standing depend upon amending the case rather than filing a new
    one.
    14.Further, the Court asked Plaintiff [in regards to the underlying complaint] if
    Plaintiff believes there is a civil action for sedition, treason and or conspiracy as
    alleged; to wit Plaintiff responded by saying he did not know if a Civil action for
    Sedition, Treason, and or conspiracy exists; but that under the New York State civil
    rights law there is a cause of action much like 42 USC §1983, and that Plaintiff
    emphasized that injuries were caused by Sedition, Treason, conspiracy as well as
    fraud as willful failure of the BOE and Secretary of State to provide equal
    treatment of ballot certification terms for BHO Jr., McCain and Calero injuring
    Plaintiff along with those similarly situated.
    15.To wit, the Court held there is no state civil action for sedition, treason and
    or conspiracy notwithstanding whether or not Plaintiff’s wording of injury were
    intended, is vague.
    16.That the Court found that there were so many procedural questions that
    would otherwise end up in Appellate Court anyway in that the best way to expedite
    the matter of importance requires Plaintiff to proceed as quickly as possible and
    therefore entered an order (see Exhibit C):

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The motion for leave having come on to be heard, and the Court having
    heard plaintiff in support thereof, and the Attorney General's Office in
    opposition thereto, NOW, it is hereby ORDERED, that the motion is denied
    in entirety."
    17.That the foregoing is Affirmant’s best recollection of the hearing as true and
    substantively complete, notwithstanding additional ancillary matters discussed,
    and absent a transcript of the hearing accordingly wishes by due service upon the
    Court and appearing parties without timely objection, that this affidavit be duly
    admitted by the Court as part of the permanent record for use after entry of the
    order shown as Exhibit C.
    ___________________________
    Christopher-Earl: Strunk
    Sworn to before me
    This ___ day of January 2011

    ReplyDelete
  4. BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT !!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The ball's starting to roll! not fast enough, but it is moving!

    ReplyDelete
  6. OMG! PRAY!! If this goes down the dem's will go Balliistic!..They will Burn down City's!, i hope it's handled Tactifully..Or all hell will break lose.. Just out the Back door with him and through him and his Czars in GITMO!! OOHHH PLEASE GOD..

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here We Go Again,False Hope.

    A Judge Not in on the fix.I'll count the days till i'm told spoiled again.Seeing is believing!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am awaiting the entered order from the NYS AG and with it I will file for reconsideration within ten days for Justice Schmidt to review cure to the procedural matters accordingly.

    Procedural matters:

    In the NYS CPLR 3215 (c) as to the matter raised by the court in regards to failure to file a motion for default would be subject to "unless sufficient cause [is] shown why the complaint should not be dismissed."

    Crossing the "sufficient cause" hurdle along with the CPLR 306-b service ordered by the Court with the attached CPLR 307 service upon the state; and as for the referenced "vague" portions of the verified complaint and or the proposed FAC I have within ten days to cure the vagueness after the order of entry is had with a more definite statement with CPLR 3024.

    In regards to particularity, CPLR 3016 (b) and the vagueness referenced by the court in re the cause of action for "sediton treason and conspiracy" as not being a civil action, I regard each as part of the proximate cause of injury as part of a scheme to defraud that has a 6 year statutory limit with CPLR 213(8) "an action based upon fraud; the time within which the action must be commenced shall be the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued (from collusion in re NBC on or about December 2005) or two years from the time the plaintiff or the person under who plaintiff claims discovered the fraud (DOS FOIA release July 29 2010), or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it."

    The court question as to why a new complaint could not be filed is now under consideration.

    However, my motion for reconsideration will include a reworked Amended Complaint as welll as the Amended Summons.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And, in the end...it will all be for naught. Nothing will change.

    AS
    http://starkravingmanager.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. California birther/dualer/doubterJanuary 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM

    Nothing would make my day more than for Orly Taitz to use this as the straw that finally breaks the camel's back on this issue and to get the last laugh on the tyrants and their lackeys.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You people are really playing into the rhetoric. The "big government" you so greatly despise has you playing right into the ruse. As long as the "left vs right" flames are fanned you minions will continue to self-regulate. WAKE UP!!! Who controls your food, water, energy, and money??? Is it you? Go ahead and hate your neighbor...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nothing will happen. If this issue is to be resolved, citizens will have to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. lets do it then! im so sick of this cons commie shit! we can run his ass up a nearby light pole. then salute his rotting carcass. ie; the only good commies are dead ones, lets make them all good commies! LIVE FREE OR DIE!

    ReplyDelete
  14. sorry to ruin your speel but its not my neighbor who destroying my country. its that fraud in our white house thats doing it. its time to march on dc and call for heads. its time to go and stay till they are all in jail.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Oh, I see you are letting commenters threaten to kill the president .. You approve all the comments that get through so you are therefor an accessory to a felony. Good luck at your upcoming meeting with the secret service douchebag .

    ReplyDelete
  16. No different than the comments you leave here, OBOT.

    I don't see any threats directed at a president.

    We have no president at this time, OBOT. Just an impostor!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I await their visit. I have lots to talk about!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Go jump off a bridge you stupid Obamatard. I don't see any threats directed at that fraud 0bama.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "we can run his ass up a nearby light pole. then salute his rotting carcass"

    You don't call that a threat?

    Like I said, You are going to jail ORYR... It's a felony to threaten the president of the United States of America. You will be locked up for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  20. If the secret service doesn't arrest you I will track you down and shoot you myself. You don't threaten my president and get away with it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I haven't threatened TO KILL any person, dingbat. EVER!

    Go piss up a rope!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Shall we remind the folks about the many REAL death threats you and your fellow OBOTS leave here?

    ReplyDelete
  23. new district judge assigned today in one of strunk's other very important and related federal case (FOIA) USDC-DCD 08-cv-2234 Strunk v US-DOS/DHS

    ReplyDelete
  24. Go away instigator. It was probably you.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I am holding onto the faith i have in this country of ours that justice will prevail. In so prevailing, Obama will be discovered to be not only not a natural born citizen, but not even a citizen at all. I applaud the judge who entered this decree - all other such attempts have been negated through threats to those who would cross the usurper who occupies the White House. The News (Fox) has also been under threat. Once we can get his ineligible status established, then all laws, appointments (including his vice president and 2 Supreme Court judges), etc are null and void - ESPECIALLY this totally destructive abomination known as Obamacare. The sooner the better: this man is destroying our country and it is not by accident: he knows exactly what he is doing. Just ask yourself: if Obama was to state outright that his personal mission was to destroy America, what would he do differently??? Answer: nothing! The man is such a pathetic liar that now I do not trust a word he says - or reads from a teleprompter, for that matter. The sooner he is gone, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Do the math. OBAMA = LIAR.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Too bad the old loud mouthed lying sissy Robert Gibbs hasn't hung himself with one of his dozens of faggy pink neckties - yet. (I'll bet he wears panties to match!)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I agree, threats of harm to our POTUS by treasonous bastards will not stand. I am personally going to refer this web site to the attn. of the Secrete Service St. Louis Div. Good luck trying to convince them of your patriotism.

    ReplyDelete
  29. It would be true that Barry was not a natural born citizen at birth if Obama the alien Luo were his birth father. But he's not. He's an adoptive father. His name was taken from the amended birth certificate reflecting an adoption.

    The original birth certificate is needed, which almost certainly shows two U.S. citizen birth parents.

    This does not resolve eligibility. Exhaustive investigations are required. After subpoenaing the original birth certificate from state files to confirm Barry was natural born at birth, investigators need to press on to ascertain whether he lost U.S. citizenship in the course of gaining Indonesian citizenship. Can't be both Indonesian and American.

    ReplyDelete
  30. As if they don't already monitor this site....

    Just so you know, the comment regarding the flag pole was left by an Obot trying to instigate trouble...

    Report this site all you want!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Obama mother was suppossedly raped by frank marshall? A known commie, go to www.patdollard.com, and go to Oct. 08, his mommy is naked as a jaybird, she was into porn or just an ole whore, the info says she was raped by the black man and it seems he is their bastard son. He also confirmed in his book that he raped a young white girl! That is why he will not release his BC, why has no doctor or hospital come forward to claim his birth ? Something is very weird!

    ReplyDelete
  32. I still am confused about all teh joy over having "won" something. The quote following seems to say that Plaintiff's motion was DENIED in entirety, right???
    ""The motion for leave having come on to be heard, and the Court having
    heard plaintiff in support thereof, and the Attorney General's Office in
    opposition thereto, NOW, it is hereby ORDERED, that the motion is denied
    in entirety.""

    ReplyDelete
  33. This is pretty thin gruel.

    Obama the alien Luo was not Barry's birth father. The Certification of Live Birth has the Luo's name because it was taken from the amended birth certificate created when the alien Luo and Stanley Ann Dunham adopted the little bastard, probably at the time of his birth.

    The original birth certificate and genetic analysis will most likely show a Caucasian father and a predominantly Polynesian mother, both U.S. citizens. Barry has refused to release the original birth certificate primarily because it will show his political manifesto "Dreams from my Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance" was a colossal hoax.

    The birth fantasy also serves Barry's tactic of diverting attention from the real issue, his loss of U.S. citizenship altogether, probably by becoming an Indonesian citizen.

    Exhaustive investigations are urgently needed to confirm Barry's eligibility at birth and move on to determine whether he lost U.S. citizenship altogether, which would negate his natural born status.

    The term "natural born Citizen" in U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1 subsumes "Citizen". You can't be a natural born citizen if you're not a citizen at all.

    ReplyDelete
  34. One step to get that c#@k sucker out of office and i hope its in shackles..

    ReplyDelete
  35. The vast majority of Americans are very eager to see "Lying Barry" on TV doing the perp walk in silver chains and a bright "urnge" jumpsuit. Everyone knows "Lying Barry" has perpetrated the biggest "in your face" fraud ever committed and he must and shall be indicted and tried for TREASON, which is a death penalty offense! BTW, "Lying Barry" is the one who encouraged the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Muslim groups to start the current riots in Egypt, Tunisia, and other areas. The Middle East is boiling because of him, but Israel SHALL prevail! REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE CLAIMS, THE COPIOUS AMOUNT of EVIDENCE THAT IS READILY AVAILABLE PROVES THAT "LYING BARRY" IS UNDOUBTEDLY A MUSLIM - HIS HALF SISTER, MAYA SOETORO NG, EVEN PUBLICLY STATED "OUR WHOLE FAMILY WAS MUSLIM". THAT MEANS MOM, DAD, "LYING BARRY", and MAYA, NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT WE KNOW BRITISH/KENYAN OBAMA SENIOR WAS ADMITTEDLY A PRACTICING MUSLIM! OPEN YOUR EYES, AMERICA, U-BIN-HAD FROM EVERY ANGLE BY "LYING BARRY" THE CONSTITUTIONALLY ILLEGAL MUSLIM USURPER! DOWN WITH ALL TYRANTS, LONG LIVE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!

    ReplyDelete
  36. All that exists is an affidavit from Strunk claiming that "the judge responded favorably." There is no ruling. There is no court paper. There is no confirmation from anyone that the judge responded favorably.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.