Thursday, September 2, 2010

[updates]LTC Terry Lakin denied discovery to defend himself in his court-martial for refusing to obey orders until Obama AKA Soebarkah AKA Soetoro proves his Constitutional eligibility to be Commander-in-Chief. This post will be updated as soon as more details are available. Via CBS/AP news; Md. Judge Denies Request For Obama School Records - continued here. LTC Lakin will be on the Barry Farber radio show on Friday, Sept. 3, more details here. [Update: research needed; August 31, 2010, Obama Signed Executive Order Amending the Manual for Courts-Martial, Got Answers!? More here]

Update-2(9/4): Obama Executive Order 13552 - 2010 Amendments and Annex to the Manual for Courts-Martial -

(9/4): Courts Martial Defense of LTC Terrance Lakin - Researched and Reviewed By The United States Bar Association - 


Update-4(9/6): Lt Col Lakin Interview: Youtube; Lt Col Terry Lakin and Paul Jensen on the Barry Farber Show, September 3, 2010.-

Update-5(9/8): United States v LTC Terry Lakin - Ruling on Motions(Discovery) – Col. Denise R. Lind, Chief Judge, 1st Judicial Circuit. -


Update via WND; - Judge to Lakin: Find another defense - Rules that officer challenging Obama's eligibility can't see evidence - By Thom Redmond

FT. MEADE, MD. - A career officer in the U.S. Army acting as a judge in the court-martial process for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama's eligibility to be president to be evaluated.

Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence that will be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial for Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama's records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to those records.

With her decision, Lind plunged into lockstep with a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama's eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs' any access to any requested documentation regarding the president's eligibility.

Lind ruled that it was "not relevant" for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.

Paul Rolf Jensen, Lakin's civilian attorney, said the case would continue. But he said the courts now have denied his client the opportunity to present his defense.

Jensen had argued that under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant being put on court martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his or her defense.

Lind, who took 40 minutes to read her decision to the courtroom, disagreed.

She said opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president. ...continued here;

Previous reports on LTC Terry Lakin can be found here.  Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of people questioning Obama's eligibility; [].
Three-star General Files Sworn Affidavit Supporting Ltc Lakin's Case - 8-31-2010
Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney's Affidavit Supporting Lt. Col. Terry Lakin - 8/19/2010

Army Refers Charges Against LTC Terry Lakin To Court Martial, Arraignment Hearing on August 6, 2010 - Aug. ...

Press Release: LTC Terry Lakin Makes Formal Request of Hawaii Deposition - July 29th, 2010 -
Press Release: LTC Terry Lakin Appeals Army's Disparaging Fitness Report - July 16, 2010

LTC Lakin Waives Preliminary Hearing, Case To Proceed Directly To General Court Martial - 6/9/10

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Letter to Barack Obama                                                              
- Lt. Col. Lakin - Press Release April 13 2010: You Have the Right to Remain Silent  -                                                              
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Charge Sheet
Army Sets Court-Martial Hearing in Criminal Case Against Decorated Army Physician, LTC Terry Lakin -                                                              
Ruling on Defense Request for Witnesses and Evidence in LTC Lakin's court-martial - 6/1/2010                                                            

LTC. Terry Lakin on the G. Gordon Liddy show, recorded on 4/20/10, and some...



  2. If the putative pres. Obama gets off scot-free, someone needs to fund an institution such as a museum to house all of the documents and artifacts associated with his usurpation of the office he will have held but was not eligible for. There is now a mountain of evidence (lack of standing not withstanding :-) including affidavits from 3 star generals! You know by GOD they will not end up in his presidential library. But the truth has to get out and be told, well...truthfully.

    Pixel Patriot

  3. The people need to rise up and put an end to this.

  4. This may not comfort anyone and I might get some flack for it but there would be no way that "they" would grant discovery or "they" would have a mutiny on their hands. "They" will control this situation and that means remove the usurper in chief. I had a friend that worked for a big company. He witmessed his boss fixing the data and he blew the whistle on him. He got no satisfaction, they gave him the run around, and eventually he got layed off. He thought it was because he ratted on this guy and they were sticking it to him. Turns out that a few months later they carried the guy out practically in cuffs. "They" will never respond to a whistle blower but "they" do respond to the crime. Lakin may take the heat for now and maybe forever but the situation will be fixed. I have been really frustrated and many a collegue has told me dont worry, "they"'ll fix it. I have to believe them or I will lose all hope. So many have suffered already in a country where we supposedly have free speech. Very sad.

    Note: Not sure who "they" are?

  5. found this comment at Free Republic website.

    To: PA-RIVER
    After this case is resolved, and he receives punishment after a trial where the Collective Congressional emotion of embarrassment was a deciding factor of allowing evidence of his innocence or guilt, he will have standing in a Supreme court.

    "Standing" is a concept applicable to a plaintiff in a civil case; it has nothing to do with a defendant in a criminal case.

    Lakin will probably never get to SCOTUS, but for a different reason: If he is convicted, he can appeal to the Army Court of Military Appeals. That court must hear his case. If that court affirms his conviction, Lakin can ask the Armed Forces Court of Military Appeals to hear his case, but they don't have to hear it; their review is purely discretionary. If they refuse to hear his case, that's the end of the line; he cannot petition SCOTUS for certiorari. Only if the Armed Forces Court of Military Appeals decides to hear his case, and then affirms his conviction, can he petition SCOTUS for certiorari, but even then, it is purely discretionary with SCOTUS whether they will hear the case or not.
    145 posted on Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:43:51 PM by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)

  6. So, in other words, Lakin is screwed.

  7. Lakin may be screwed for now, but he WILL be vindicated in the end, and it will instead embarrass the judge and the American people who allowed the undocumented president to get away with this scam for the ages. I'll bet some of his peeps are checking this out. If so, shame on you for being accessories to a lawbreaker.

  8. Birther/Dualer/Doubter from CASeptember 2, 2010 at 5:15 PM

    Furthermore, if the honorable Lakin ultimately ends up in prison and it turns out that we've been had all along, I can't tell you how livid that'd make me.

  9. "She said opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president"

    This judge is a class A "O-hole". First of all, Lakin isn't calling for his impeachment. Second, how does she know opening evidence could be an embarrassment for the president. Does she know what is in them ? If so, how did she know ? Has she been having ex parte communications with the administration ? Isn't that improper for a judge ?

  10. Second, how does she know opening evidence could be an embarrassment for the president. Does she know what is in them ? If so, how did she know ? Has she been having ex parte communications with the administration ? Isn't that improper for a judge ?

    Exactly, apparently we're the last to know. They've already decided this case based on something. Well hard cheese, his father is who he claimed him to be and now he has to live with it or come clean. The emperor has no clothes.

  11. Terry Lakin for President.

  12. If there is evidence that'd prove embarrassing to the undocumented president, well, then just proves Lakin was right to challenge him. And he SHOULD be embarrassed if it turns out that our suspicions about him were right all along.

  13. Better to embarrass a traitor than to incarcerate a patriot.

  14. Yep....A NEW ORDER has been drawn in the sand. On private land we also plan a roast the Muslin book, that will get some action. Call in Pastor Terry Jones for back up.. 1st amendment rights. Hear our true blue patriot
    TERRY LANKIN...NOW..... and STOP the games. While were at it ask for Obummmers BC,medical papers etc. and then we may not torch the ....


“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.