Wednesday, September 15, 2010

The State Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President that he was running for which was the normal procedure by the State Democratic Party of Hawaii in all the prior election cycles. See the State Democratic Party of Hawaii certification of nomination forms [embedded below] for the Presidential election years of 2008 for Obama, 2004 for Kerry, and 2000 for Gore.

See this summarizing quote from the Butterdezillion blog post of 10 Sep 2010:

"It’s been removed from the web, but shortly after CFP published their original article about the Certificates of Nomination, somebody claiming to represent the DNC stated on a discussion board that the DNC relies on the state parties to verify Constitutional eligibility for candidates, so the oath by Pelosi and Germond would just confirm that the state democratic parties had confirmed the Constitutional eligibility of the candidates.

But this is where the argument totally falls apart, because the Hawaii Democratic Party actually ignored their protocols in 2008 in order to specifically NOT certify Obama’s eligibility as they had done for candidates in the past. IOW, if Pelosi based her decision to certify on whether the state party would confirm eligibility, then she had a duty to NOT certify Obama’s eligibility, because the democratic party of the state supposedly holding Obama’s birth certificate REFUSED TO CERTIFY Obama’s eligibility." 
 Source: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09

What did the State Democratic Party officials in Hawaii know about Obama and his now hidden and sealed 1961 original typed long form birth registration documents in Hawaii, and subsequent amendments to same, which would cause them to change their normal certification of nomination procedures for presidential candidates?

Is this possibly more evidence in Hawaii and elsewhere of possible misprision of a felony?

The American people and electorate have good reason to be concerned!
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama/Congress/Pelosi
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####
2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nomination for Presidential Candidates -

2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate with constitutionally eligible provision - Hawaii

2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate without constitutionally eligible provision - Georgia

Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!

A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Bor...

Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-09-27 pg 5

27 comments:

  1. They definitely changed the wording in the certs. It is pretty clear they knew something was up or they would not have removed "legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" from the 2008 cert.

    Something stinks in Hawaii!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Arrest all of them!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the United States . End of story !

    Remove is butt !!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alot of somebody's need to be in JAIL for this sh*t! When will SOMEBODY stand up and demand his removal??

    ReplyDelete
  5. i been writing weekly to demand of my senators that they make him release his records. and now hillary is trying to take our guns by a treaty with the u.n. there must be another gathering in dc to demand obama be removed before he starts a war in this country by trying to take our guns. they know they must disarm us to get away with the crap they are pulling. hillary is comitting an act of treason and again the constitution is being shreaded by the democommies.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The democratic party of hawaii knew the score and refused to certify. They didn't want to face jail time. But, as somebody said, what about misprision of felony?

    Good luck in bringing this to legal light. It looks like it's going to take a miracle from God to get it done.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Since the 'Traitor in Charge' was elected as a result of fraud, which is a crime, he does not deserve to be impeached. Instead he, Pelosi et al should simply be charged with fraud and JAILED. In purely monetary terms, during less than two years of rule, they have defrauded the American public of trillions of tax dollars.

    Since President Bush, whose wrong doing is only what was misreported and unreported in the George Soros media, was never legally replaced, he is still legally President and should be named interim President to oversee an emergency election in which we can put someone outside the present regime in office.

    We are undergoing a peaceful REVOLUTION in this country and if we continue along the trail we are currently foollowing, it will not become the bloody revolution envisioned by Obama and his henchmen.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hope someone is suing Peloisi over this...or is there "no standing" to do that either?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pelosi is a named defendant in the Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit which now has a Writ of Certiorari for it being prepared to take the lawsuit to the U.S. Supreme. Pray to God that they take Certiorari and hear the case. If not, our Constitution and the rule of law is history.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/19914488/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-00-Table-of-Contents-2nd-Amended-Complaint

    Help the cause if you can. Visit this site and make a donation if you can. This is a critical time. We need your support.
    http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/donate.htm

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    Pennsylvania USA
    Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al
    http://www.protectourliberty.org
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com
    ####

    ReplyDelete
  10. Obama-Biden and the Missing Severability Clause
    If Obama is removed or resigns then Biden could be also be deemed ineligible because the fraudulent Hawaii’s and Democratic National Party’s certifications documents to place them on the ballot for President and Vice President do not have a severability clause! In other words if a legal document is fraudulent in one respect it is fraudulent in all respects for without a severability provision it is not permissible for an authority to selectively rewrite it by retaining sections that the authority prefers to remain in force, while redacting or dismissing those parts he or she does not like.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Obama-Biden and the Missing Severability Clause
    Part 2
    If Obama is removed or resigns then Biden could be also be deemed ineligible because the fraudulent Hawaii’s and Democratic National Party’s certifications documents to place them on the ballot for President and Vice President do not have a severability clause! The knowing purveyors or certifiers of fraud cannot have it both ways. If their favored candidate is found out to be fraudulently presented by the certifiers they cannot be allowed to prevail with their second choice. "Not to worry folks; if we are discovered on the Obama fraud we will still get our guy Biden in as President".

    ReplyDelete
  12. Get all those traitors out of Government and into prison cells where they belong. That includes, both the Obamas, the Bidens, the democratic ruled congress, Pelosi, and everyone else who knew or should have known that the annointed one was a total fraud and helped him and his wife to defraud the People of the United States of America. Since Obama is a fraud and his entire admin and congress are guilty of Fraud, Bush is still President and must take over until a new President can be elected. Also, every bill, law, treaty, and agreement signed by Obama is illegal. Get these criminals into prison.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Soros probably spent a few bucks in Waikiki too. It is so BLATANTLY obvious that reference to the Constitution is missing as to be almost comical. I have a feeling that if he in fact runs in 2012, there will be a lot of states who will NOT certify him unless he produces the documents. Which truly leads me to believe he WILL NOT run again. He will go down as one of the worst presidents ever, but if he steps down, it is unlikely anyone will proceed with any real investigations. And he'll just leave.... bye bye. Don't let the door hit your skinny ass on the way out...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Many of the elites that should be taking the lead in fixing the big mess they caused should force Obama to resign and go into exile are afraid that there would be hellacious riots on the “black street”. This is very easy to avoid. There are many avenues available to get Biden to join him.

    The constitution does not require that the Speaker of the House, the next in line of succession, be an elected representative. They could hire a manager to run the operations if they wanted to. Usually I am opposed to taking a person’s race into any kind of consideration. But these are very dangerous times for America, thus making this a very urgent, super critical and special case that requires very creative and extraordinary solutions.

    After the Republican’s likely elevation to majority status the House could as a stepping stone appoint to the Speakership a black person who is well respected and who has excellent leadership capabilities; and who can take the very forceful actions needed to fix the economy and the other things Obama and his associates damaged. It does not need to be a Republican. Preferably this person would declare that he or she will not run in the 2012 election; except if there is overwhelming public support for that. This should calm down the hundred or so presidential want-a-be’s currently in the House and Senate.

    There are probably a goodly number of black men and women that could do an excellent job. My most favorite is Thomas Sowell. Obviously he is much much blacker than Obama, but more importantly he is by far the smartest and best common sense oriented person in the world that I am aware of. He is super intelligent and the best practical economist we have. He understands how the government and country needs to work; and the policies needed to restore a great national economy. He will know the best people to bring in to help him. He is also extremely knowledgeable regarding national defense and international relations. National defense is now dangerously in decline.

    Another wonderful outstanding person that I am sure can do a great job is no-nonsense retired General Honore of Katrina fame. He was sen to take charge of the in turmoil relief operations in New Orleans. As most will recall, by the time he was ordered in to take over there was massive confusion and extremely inept management. I love his famous order to reporters – “DON’T GET STUCK ON STUPID””. We could use that hundreds of times a day as most everyone in the administration is super glued onto STUPID! “He describes himself as an African-American Creole American mixture that includes French, African, American, Indian and Spanish”. You cannot get any better than that!

    A Sowell as President and Honore as V.P. team, or vice versa, could do wonders for America. With Soule handling the economy and Honore kicking out the legions of incompetent screw-ups and screw offs, and riding herd on the administration departments they will lead our Country in a speedy rebuilding. Regardless of their race these men are both eminently qualified to be President of our United States of America and we all could be very proud to have them as our leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hawaii Dems button-lipped on Obama eligibility status - Doc missing statement candidate 'qualified' under U.S. Constitution -

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=207197

    ReplyDelete
  16. The fact that two different Certifications of Nomination were signed by Nancy Pelosi in 2008 by the DNC with Hawaii being the only state that got the different one is part of the Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit filed on 20 Jan 2009 at 2:50 a.m. prior to Obama being sworn in. If we can get to trial depositions will be in order from Nancy Pelosi and DNC officials and the 2008 Chairman of the Hawaii Democratic Party and officials ... under oath. So this difference in the two Cert forms issued by the DNC has been known about for almost two years and was made a part of my lawsuit. But we are now learning more as to the reason why Nancy Pelosi and the DNC had to issue a special form for Hawaii. Hawaii's Democratic Party refused to certify the constitutional eligibility at the state level which they had done so in the prior presidential elections in 200 and 2004. Thus the Hawaii Democratic Party officials clearly must have known something was not totally kosher with them certifying Obama as being Constitutionally eligible.

    Pelosi is a named defendant in the Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit which now has a Writ of Certiorari for it being prepared to take the lawsuit to the U.S. Supreme. Pray to God that they take Certiorari and hear the case. If not, our Constitution and the rule of law is history.

    See page 19 of the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit which addresses the lack of proper vetting by the DNC and Pelosi and their issuing two different Cert of Nomination forms in 2008.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/19914488/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-00-Table-of-Contents-2nd-Amended-Complaint

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  17. I should say that a Petition for Writ of Certiorari is being prepared and that I hope that the U.S. Supreme Court grants and issues the Writ of Certiorari for the Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit.

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yawn... So, DPH stated that he was "legally qualified to serve as president." I would what laws made Obama legally qualified. Could it have been the constitution? It seems so.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I dont know what chance we have of getting obama out of office.Read the book by Daniel Estulin The true story of the Bilderberg Group if u want to know who really runs this country. Also watch the 2 Hour youtube video End Game

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bob66 posted this in another thread. But this observation is worth being repeated here in this thread.

    posted by Bob66
    ----------------------------------
    Here is another major "coincidence" in the Obama ineligibilty cover-up. The same lawyer that has worked for the Hawaii Democrat Party for years was also Stanley Soetoro's divorce lawyer in her 1980 divorce from Lolo Soetoro. Who, more than this lawyer, would known Obama's real citizenship, and would have seen his real long-form birth certificate?...check this out:

    http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/obamas-parents-divorce-decree-stanley-ann-soetoro-lolo-soetoro-child-custody-obama-indonesian-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-obama-born-in-kenya/

    Could this be related to why the Hawaii Democrat Party in 2008 refused to certify Obama/Biden, "per the Constitution" on their 2008 certification form?
    --------------------------------

    This attorney knows a lot about Obama's early life and he is one person who should surely be deposed when a case finally gets to the merits of the charges against Obama and Pelosi.

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  21. To the anonymous yawner. The eligibility requirements are constitutional. Despite the misstatement and disinformation posted by the anonymous yawner and Obot, the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) refused to certify that Obama was constitutionally eligible and qualified for the office of the President as they had done with no problem previously for Gore and Perry when they ran for President. The DPH's attorney handled Obama's divorce and obviously knew things were not kosher regarding the registration of Obama's birth and subsequent amendments thereto as to Obama's constitutional eligibility under Article II, Section 1, ... and refused to certify Obama was eligible thus forcing the national DNC to do it in Hawaii to get him on the ballot there. Imo, there is obvious indications and the fingerprints of a "misprision of a felony" by Hawaiian and the national Democratic Party all over this.

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    http://www.protectourliberty.org

    ReplyDelete
  22. ------------So, how do we get rid of the dirtbag? The speaker should go to jail

    ReplyDelete
  23. I am wondering how the Supreme Court of Hawaii would rule on the weight of the wording differences between the one the Pelosi signed and the other two documents. My guess is that both Schatz and Mahlislow could find themselves in som really deep ....DOO DOO.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It would seem that since Pelosi signed a legally invalid COON she became a CO PERPETRATOR of Federal ELection Fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  25. With all this proof popping up, we all know that it is a matter of time for Obama`s doomsday.BUT, I see another cover up by the Scotus. There is something wrong with this that know one in government wants to address this. What could be the reason? FEAR? I think not.More like bribery. Or maybe they all knew it was true and they found out to late and that it would be a disgrace to the world ,especially after 911 and we allowed an alien to sneak into our country with a name whichis the same as A MAN we just HUNG IN IRAQ.Or just maybe our government just wants to change our capitalism to socialist and they are all involved. Its seems to me that if 1/3 of all the stories are true,the government would investigate this stuff immediately and would stop this man before he goes to far.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The first certification of live birth put on line said for father, BLACK. Mother, causason.
    People started writing that they were not called black back in 1961. It was taken down and another one put up that said African. I remember that well as I saw it but did not save that copy.

    ReplyDelete

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.